Jump to content

Twin Towers Nuked


Haunted Universe
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Haunted Universe said:

 

In videos you see them turn to dust as they fall, including the last standing column tip over and simply blow away in the wind. What else apart from a nuke would make metal turn to dust.

 Made up. None of the metal turns to dust. Nuclear bombs would send the building blasting apart many miles away. You'd hear it as well, just a tad. There would be nuclear fallout absolutely everywhere and all those caked in dust would have radiation poisoning. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Comedy Time said:

 Made up. None of the metal turns to dust. Nuclear bombs would send the building blasting apart many miles away. You'd hear it as well, just a tad. There would be nuclear fallout absolutely everywhere and all those caked in dust would have radiation poisoning. 

 

Made up? Its in videos clear as day. 

 

Once again, stop shilling you hypocrite. You state the planes in every video are real but the steel columns blowing away in the wind are made up.

 

Very selective aren't you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

17 minutes ago, Haunted Universe said:

Comedy Time's objective is to stonewall you in any way possible. 

 

Clear video evidence of metal columns evaporating into thin air-"made up".

 

If the collapse videos are fake then so are the planes. 

In all honesty mate it doesn't matter. What is agreed upon is that 911 is fucking shady, why don't you argue for hours about who's responsible instead of going on about sexy details like nukes metal columns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, FVCK BILLY G4TES said:

 

In all honesty mate it doesn't matter. What is agreed upon is that 911 is fucking shady, why don't you argue for hours about who's responsible instead of going on about sexy details like nukes metal columns.

 

Proper sexy. 

 

No point detailing the perps as Comedy Time will insist numbskulls with box cutters outwitted a billion dollar defence system, flew planes like winged gods in the sky hitting targets with pure precision and on and on.

 

I will stop replying to him/her/it now as Its only entertaining a shill/troll. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Haunted Universe said:

 

Made up? Its in videos clear as day. 

 

Once again, stop shilling you hypocrite. You state the planes in every video are real but the steel columns blowing away in the wind are made up.

 

Very selective aren't you. 

 

Stop calling me names. The steel fell downwards and out. The dust obviously confuses you🙄

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Haunted Universe said:

 

Proper sexy. 

 

No point detailing the perps as Comedy Time will insist numbskulls with box cutters outwitted a billion dollar defence system, flew planes like winged gods in the sky hitting targets with pure precision and on and on.

 

I will stop replying to him/her/it now as Its only entertaining a shill/troll. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

To be fair to him hijackers isn't the best case for planes. Boeing has backdoors by Israeli government and uninterruptible autopilot was made just before 911. There's more on it but honestly I don't care really. As I always say it's minutia, if you wanna know go here https://911pilots.org/

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Comedy Time said:

 

China bought 50,000 tons of steel from the wreckage. 

China is best buddies with the Israelis. Man who ordered wreckage to be given to china in an 'unprecedented' move, Michael Chertoff. He is a dual Israeli citizen US-Israel and ex deputy attorney general. He allowed the wreckage to be taken without any examination from the FBI.

 

Laugh all you want mate but there's evidence contrary to your nuke scenario @Haunted Universe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Haunted Universe said:

 

I couldnt give a shit anymore, beleive what you like. 

Michael Chertoff was born on November 28, 1953 in Elizabeth, New Jersey. His father was Rabbi Gershon Baruch Chertoff (1915–96), a Talmud scholar and the former leader of the Congregation B'nai Israel in Elizabeth. His mother is Livia Chertoff (née Eisen), an Israeli citizen and the first flight attendant for El Al.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm just trying to add to the conversation with actual evidence mate. Don't get upset when you make a thread about a subject with multiple viewpoints and someone questions your narrative. It's childish.

 

I don't go looking for affirmation off other people, shows mental immaturity when you only speak to people with the same perspective as you and no one else. I like learning things and being proven wrong, it challenges the mind instead of just being in an echochamber of the same opinion. No one learns anything, people remain stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, FVCK BILLY G4TES said:

I'm just trying to add to the conversation with actual evidence mate. Don't get upset when you make a thread about a subject with multiple viewpoints and someone questions your narrative. It's childish.

 

I don't go looking for affirmation off other people, shows mental immaturity when you only speak to people with the same perspective as you and no one else. I like learning things and being proven wrong, it challenges the mind instead of just being in an echochamber of the same opinion. No one learns anything, people remain stupid.

 

I don't necessarily agree with you but this is the perfect attitude. If I see stuff that questions my own beliefs it always adds fuel to the fire. No planes, nuclear weapons and a cast of impossible extras, not so much.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Can you explain PROPERLY how the explosion at the plane impact point went inwards and bent the outer columns in that direction?
  • Since you claim an astonishing amount of work was done to fake this whole thing, why didn't they just fake some black boxes? Fairly simple to do.
  • On the posted picture of an impact test where a jet hits a wall and breaks into tiny bits, why shouldn't the 911 plane do the same?
  • How many people to plant it all, how were they paid, paper trail etc.
  • You stated that the impact was "perfectly straight square and rectangle hole" - how did the two pictures posted not disprove that?
  • Please provide images where the outer columns bend outwards.
  • Can you please, give me a follow up question to "yeah it was an explosion" bearing in mind the reporter knows it was a plane? 
  • Do you have evidence for planted wreckage, any dodgy pictures, witness accounts etc.?
  • Do the multiple images provided show severe fire damage and lots of the plane now gone after it has landed at low speed and not impacted anything

 

@singhz312 This crap has been covered before for about 15 years. just so you know.

Edited by Comedy Time
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Comedy Time said:
  • Can you explain PROPERLY how the explosion at the plane impact point ......

 You like hard evidence , logic and scientific proof ?

 

Have a look at the first few minutes of Richard Hall video from singhz above .He covers the speed of the supposed planes impacting the towers ... The manufacturers of the plane say they cannot fly at that speed at that altitude .... not maybe .... but 100% sure they can't! ....

 

So that has dealt with the plane issue , and we don't need any other evidence on this  ... 

 

On that evidence alone we know with certainty the planes did not hit the towers ... that is irrefutable and we can move on to the next part of the puzzle 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Comedy Time said:
  • Can you explain PROPERLY how the explosion at the plane impact point went inwards and bent the outer columns in that direction?
  • Since you claim an astonishing amount of work was done to fake this whole thing, why didn't they just fake some black boxes? Fairly simple to do.
  • On the posted picture of an impact test where a jet hits a wall and breaks into tiny bits, why shouldn't the 911 plane do the same?
  • How many people to plant it all, how were they paid, paper trail etc.
  • You stated that the impact was "perfectly straight square and rectangle hole" - how did the two pictures posted not disprove that?
  • Please provide images where the outer columns bend outwards.
  • Can you please, give me a follow up question to "yeah it was an explosion" bearing in mind the reporter knows it was a plane? 
  • Do you have evidence for planted wreckage, any dodgy pictures, witness accounts etc.?
  • Do the multiple images provided show severe fire damage and lots of the plane now gone after it has landed at low speed and not impacted anything

 

@singhz312 This crap has been covered before for about 15 years. just so you know.

Who are those bullet points referring to? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, oz93666 said:

 You like hard evidence , logic and scientific proof ?

 

It certainly helps.

 

1 hour ago, oz93666 said:

Have a look at the first few minutes of Richard Hall video from singhz above .He covers the speed of the supposed planes impacting the towers ...

 

I watched. It was Richard Hall and his dipshittery circus. A man who gives not a crap about the truth, merely the number of people he can get to watch and contribute to his living expenses. I saw him reading from a sheet of paper. I missed where he verified any of it. I am used to his brand of utter bewilderment with truth and it never changes.

 

1 hour ago, oz93666 said:

The manufacturers of the plane say they cannot fly at that speed at that altitude .... not maybe .... but 100% sure they can't! ....

 

Nope. 

 

The Boeing 767-20 has a cruising speed of 540 mph. It has a "top speed" of 558 mph. These are manufacturers recommendations.

 

https://aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/15407/can-a-boeing-767-200-fly-at-510-knots-at-a-height-of-400-metres

 

"In short, flying a Boeing 767 in 400 m at 510 kts is not recommended, but is entirely possible and most likely even safe when done in calm air and by a calm pilot. It only won't last long, because the engines will not produce enough thrust to maintain that speed. Flying this dive requires guts, but no special skills."

 

1 hour ago, oz93666 said:

 So that has dealt with the plane issue , and we don't need any other evidence on this  ... 

 

It hasn't dealt with it and you haven't provided any evidence. Dickie Hall doesn't count.

 

1 hour ago, oz93666 said:

On that evidence alone we know with certainty the planes did not hit the towers ... that is irrefutable and we can move on to the next part of the puzzle 

 

What evidence. You didn't offer any to refute. 

 

As for it falling to bits at REAL maximum speed....

 

https://www.metabunk.org/threads/debunked-the-role-of-aeroelastic-flutter-in-the-events-of-9-11.3359/

 

Tons of refuting content there.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...