Comedy Time Posted October 2, 2020 Share Posted October 2, 2020 Just now, Haunted Universe said: Yet we see FUCK ALL upon the fake impact. Your landing gear etc, where is it in the explosion? I dont see a single shred of debris from a plane being blown out. Hmmmm well dude, that would be because it all went in to the building. Just now, Haunted Universe said: You still havnt explained how full strips of columns are being blown out, impossible if a plane has smashed through it. I don't need to. You need to show why it is impossible. Just now, Haunted Universe said: Pull another pathetic explanation out of your ass why don't you. It didn't come from my ass, it wasn't pathetic and there were planes. Try not to lose your rag again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reet Hard Posted October 2, 2020 Share Posted October 2, 2020 (edited) @ comedy time Actually crashing a plane into a specific target is rather difficult. Have you ever seen the video where they crash big flow into the desert and miss the target by a long way? Edited October 2, 2020 by Reet Hard Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comedy Time Posted October 2, 2020 Share Posted October 2, 2020 1 minute ago, JacksonsGhost said: It does not matter. Sure it does. you were wrong, the holes WERE plane shaped and the explosions went INwards. Explain that without using comedy explosives. 1 minute ago, JacksonsGhost said: The building was pulled, same difference. FYI: Pulled has been in use well before the farce of 9/11. No it wasn't. A plane hit them both and weakened the flooring. Pulled is a term for something entirely different. 1 minute ago, JacksonsGhost said: I do hope you're not a lemming. You don't even know what one is do you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reet Hard Posted October 2, 2020 Share Posted October 2, 2020 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Comedy Time said: Hmmmm well dude, that would be because it all went in to the building. Does that include the engine from the wrong plane that they found on the ground? Edited October 2, 2020 by Reet Hard Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comedy Time Posted October 2, 2020 Share Posted October 2, 2020 2 minutes ago, Reet Hard said: Actually crashing a plane into a specific target is rather difficult. Not if it's a big enough target. All 3 were. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comedy Time Posted October 2, 2020 Share Posted October 2, 2020 1 minute ago, Reet Hard said: Does that include the engine form the wrong plane that they found on the ground? No, some parts that were not blocked were ejected. Who told you it was the wrong engine? A truther site? https://www.metabunk.org/threads/explaining-the-9-11-murray-st-engine-from-flight-175-n612ua-that-hit-wtc2.9022/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haunted Universe Posted October 2, 2020 Share Posted October 2, 2020 1 minute ago, Comedy Time said: No, some parts that were not blocked were ejected. Who told you it was the wrong engine? A truther site? https://www.metabunk.org/threads/explaining-the-9-11-murray-st-engine-from-flight-175-n612ua-that-hit-wtc2.9022/ Hey don't forget Popular Mechanics hehehe. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JacksonsGhost Posted October 2, 2020 Share Posted October 2, 2020 (edited) Mr. Comedy, please elucidate exactly how 1/4 mile high buildings, designed to take a Boeing 707 impact, fall into their own footprint after being struck by a vastly smaller aircraft. Do you have an excuse for WTC7, yet? Your gaslighting skills need some work. Edited October 2, 2020 by JacksonsGhost Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comedy Time Posted October 2, 2020 Share Posted October 2, 2020 Just now, Haunted Universe said: Hey don't forget Popular Mechanics hehehe. Hey don't forget to ignore it all because you can't answer any of it hehehe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haunted Universe Posted October 2, 2020 Share Posted October 2, 2020 8 minutes ago, Comedy Time said: I don't need to. You need to show why it is impossible. Great come back, its because you're stumped on that one. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comedy Time Posted October 2, 2020 Share Posted October 2, 2020 Just now, JacksonsGhost said: Mr. Comedy, please elucidate exactly how 1/4 mile high buildings, designed to take a Boeing 707 impact, fell into it's own footprint after being struck by a vastly smaller aircraft. I asked you to explain the inwards explosion dude. You first. Oh and building designers always get everything spot on don't they. Just now, JacksonsGhost said: Do you have an excuse for WTC7, yet? No, do I need one? Just now, JacksonsGhost said: Your gaslighting skills need some work. You are the one asking if I am a lemming dude. Check your own skills. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comedy Time Posted October 2, 2020 Share Posted October 2, 2020 4 minutes ago, Haunted Universe said: Great come back, its because you're stumped on that one. Back at you dude. You have the burden of proof. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reet Hard Posted October 2, 2020 Share Posted October 2, 2020 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Comedy Time said: Oh and building designers always get everything spot on don't they. I agree they don't and I would like to add that buildings were designed to survive a strike from a Boeing 707. what do you think was the fatal flaw in the design/construction of the building that meant they didn't survive a strike from a 767? You see the problem isn't that truthers don't provide empirical evidence that illustrates holes in the official narrative it's that many people never look into the validity of what they are being told. If you don't mind me asking Comedy, why are you so sure that the official version of events is true. Edited October 2, 2020 by Reet Hard 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haunted Universe Posted October 2, 2020 Share Posted October 2, 2020 11 minutes ago, Comedy Time said: Hey don't forget to ignore it all because you can't answer any of it hehehe. The outstanding photo i posted of the moment of impact shows no plane and collumn strips being blown out in full with zero plane parts visible what so ever. You insist on there being a plane in that photo so you show me the evidence. So far your 'evidence' has been a joke. Arent you getting bored of being a total bullshitter? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reet Hard Posted October 2, 2020 Share Posted October 2, 2020 14 minutes ago, Comedy Time said: Back at you dude. You have the burden of proof. Why might Haunted Universe be right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haunted Universe Posted October 2, 2020 Share Posted October 2, 2020 24 minutes ago, Comedy Time said: Hey don't forget to ignore it all because you can't answer any of it hehehe. Answer the question then. Where in the photo is any evidence of a plane? Thats IN the photo, not after or before, IN the photo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red pill taken Posted October 2, 2020 Share Posted October 2, 2020 I'd like to butt in hereof I may, comedy time do you believe the official narrative about 911? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red pill taken Posted October 2, 2020 Share Posted October 2, 2020 Explosion proof passports, gotta love um 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comedy Time Posted October 2, 2020 Share Posted October 2, 2020 50 minutes ago, Reet Hard said: I agree they don't and I would like to add that buildings were designed to survive a strike from a Boeing 707. what do you think was the fatal flaw in the design/construction of the building that meant they didn't survive a strike from a 767? You see the problem isn't that truthers don't provide empirical evidence that illustrates holes in the official narrative it's that many people never look into the validity of what they are being told. If you don't mind me asking Comedy, why are you so sure that the official version of events is true. I looked into the validity of the conspiracy theories. It leaves not many alternatives. I find the potential list of peoplevin the need to know list fairly excessive. http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=196440&highlight=vesey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comedy Time Posted October 2, 2020 Share Posted October 2, 2020 32 minutes ago, Red pill taken said: Explosion proof passports, gotta love um Didn't buy that one. But it is possible I suppose. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reet Hard Posted October 2, 2020 Share Posted October 2, 2020 That's interesting in reality very few people need to know or be involved. It's called compartmentalisation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comedy Time Posted October 2, 2020 Share Posted October 2, 2020 38 minutes ago, Red pill taken said: I'd like to butt in hereof I may, comedy time do you believe the official narrative about 911? Most of it. I'm a "probably they let it happen". Not sure they realised quite how devastating it was going to be. It isn't anything I would put my house on though. The problem is that the conspiracy claims are just so improbable and I see very compelling counter explanations. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reet Hard Posted October 2, 2020 Share Posted October 2, 2020 (edited) Why do you think they let it happen? Edited October 2, 2020 by Reet Hard Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comedy Time Posted October 2, 2020 Share Posted October 2, 2020 1 minute ago, Reet Hard said: That's interesting in reality very few people need to know or be involved. It's called compartmentalisation. Yeah right. That's called generalised bollocks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comedy Time Posted October 2, 2020 Share Posted October 2, 2020 Just now, Reet Hard said: Why do you think they let it happen? Middle East leverage. Why do you think they did it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.jpg.8081a54a3b74a5d1823dfac966666137.jpg)
.jpg.594f0ef23288ec5ab04539b2f8a8dbd4.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.