Jump to content

The Facts of WTC PLANNED & CONTROLLED DEMOLITION


pirate
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Haunted Universe said:

Yet we see FUCK ALL upon the fake impact. Your landing gear etc, where is it in the explosion? I dont see a single shred of debris from a plane being blown out.

 

Hmmmm well dude, that would be because it all went in to the building.

 

Just now, Haunted Universe said:

You still havnt explained how full strips of columns are being blown out, impossible if a plane has smashed through it.

 

I don't need to. You need to show why it is impossible. 

 

Just now, Haunted Universe said:

Pull another pathetic explanation out of your ass why don't you. 

 

It didn't come from my ass, it wasn't pathetic and there were planes. Try not to lose your rag again.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JacksonsGhost said:

It does not matter.  

 

Sure it does. you were wrong, the holes WERE plane shaped and the explosions went INwards. Explain that without using comedy explosives.

 

1 minute ago, JacksonsGhost said:

The building was pulled, same difference.  FYI: Pulled has been in use well before the farce of 9/11.

 

No it wasn't. A plane hit them both and weakened the flooring. Pulled is a term for something entirely different.

 

1 minute ago, JacksonsGhost said:

I do hope you're not a lemming.

 

You don't even know what one is do you?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mr. Comedy, please elucidate exactly how 1/4 mile high buildings, designed to take a Boeing 707 impact, fall into their own footprint after being struck by a vastly smaller aircraft.

Do you have an excuse for WTC7, yet?

Your gaslighting skills need some work.

Edited by JacksonsGhost
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, JacksonsGhost said:

Mr. Comedy, please elucidate exactly how 1/4 mile high buildings, designed to take a Boeing 707 impact, fell into it's own footprint after being struck by a vastly smaller aircraft.

 

 

I asked you to explain the inwards explosion dude. You first. 

 

Oh and building designers always get everything spot on don't they.

 

Just now, JacksonsGhost said:

Do you have an excuse for WTC7, yet?

 

No, do I need one?

 

Just now, JacksonsGhost said:

Your gaslighting skills need some work.

 

You are the one asking if I am a lemming dude. Check your own skills.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Comedy Time said:

Oh and building designers always get everything spot on don't they.

I agree they don't and I would like to add that buildings were designed to survive a strike from a Boeing 707.

 

what do you think was the fatal flaw in the design/construction of the building that meant they didn't survive a strike from a  767?

 

You see the problem isn't that truthers don't provide empirical evidence that illustrates holes in the official narrative it's that many people never look into the validity of what they are being told.

 

If you don't mind me asking Comedy, why are you so sure that the official version of events is true.

Edited by Reet Hard
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Comedy Time said:

Hey don't forget to ignore it all because you can't answer any of it hehehe.

 

The outstanding photo i posted of the moment of impact shows no plane and collumn strips being blown out in full with zero plane parts visible what so ever.

 

You insist on there being a plane in that photo so you show me the evidence.

 

So far your 'evidence' has been a joke.

 

Arent you getting bored of being a total bullshitter? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Reet Hard said:

I agree they don't and I would like to add that buildings were designed to survive a strike from a Boeing 707.

 

what do you think was the fatal flaw in the design/construction of the building that meant they didn't survive a strike from a  767?

 

You see the problem isn't that truthers don't provide empirical evidence that illustrates holes in the official narrative it's that many people never look into the validity of what they are being told.

 

If you don't mind me asking Comedy, why are you so sure that the official version of events is true.

 

I looked into the validity of the conspiracy theories. It leaves not many alternatives. I find the potential list of peoplevin the need to know list fairly excessive. 

 

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=196440&highlight=vesey

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Red pill taken said:

I'd like to butt in hereof I may, comedy time do you believe the official narrative about 911? 

 

Most of it. I'm a "probably they let it happen". Not sure they realised quite how devastating it was going to be. It isn't anything I would put my house on though.

 

The problem is that the conspiracy claims are just so improbable and I see very compelling counter explanations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...