Jump to content

The Facts of WTC PLANNED & CONTROLLED DEMOLITION


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, ManxCat3 said:

I think what actually hit was a cruise missile, as it sounds like a cruise missile engine, also some eyewitnesses describe a "small plane" -  could have mistook the missile for a small plane.

 

 

I thought that for a long while as well, but when you look at the imapct hole it has obviously been curated. No way in a million years would any projectile create straight lines squares and rectangles.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 440
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

911 was a huge scam. Regardless of the precise details. We all agree it was an orchestrated scam... Don't trust your Government. That we can agree on. Full stop.   

WTC Building 7 Primed for Demolition Prior to the day of September 11th 2001.   There is a video of "Lucky Larry" Silverstein, the owner of the WTC Complex, where he says he had a conversati

By elephant in the room I mean exactly what you're saying in regards to people like Silverstein and his pals. Most normies don't talk about that stuff, they just post jet fuel can't melt steel beam me

Posted Images

8 minutes ago, Haunted Universe said:

 

I think 9/11 is a prime example of criminals over estimating their abilities. 

 

Well to be fair, they have pretty much got away with it as I can't see the media reporting exactly how it went down if they themselves were involved. Add that the lack of any real 911 truth movement these days. Have a search, there's not much at all happening. Did the families give up? How many kids lost a parent that day? They would all be in their 20's or 30's now. Where's the push for truth? 3000 people, that's a lot of relatives. There were only 96 victims at Hillsborough and their families never gave up.

Edited by mishy
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, mishy said:

Well to be fair, they have pretty much got away with it as I can't see the media reporting exactly how it went down if they themselves were involved. Add that the lack of any real 911 truth movement these days. Have a search, there's not much at all happening. Did the families give up? How many kids lost a parent that day? They would all be in their 20's or 30's now. Where's the push for truth? 3000 people, that's a lot of relatives. There were only 96 victims at Hillsborough and their families never gave up.

 

So true. What i meant was the 20% (us) notice the flaws in their work but they dont give a shit as they know the 80% bought it hook line and sinker.

 

I'm starting to think now that the plane holes were a deliberate piss take, like "haha look how shit we made these look and you still believe a plane hit".

 

Yes, its amazing inst it how we hear nothing from the families of the 'victims'.  Dead silence. 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Haunted Universe said:

 

 

 

All his questions suggest that clandestine/black op operations totally dont go on behind the scenes (remember Bin Laden being dropped in the sea in a box),staged and the assassination of JFK (in my opinion), and the moon landing which is a total fake as well.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Could you elaborate on the bolded section or maybe start a thread on the assassination of JFK?

Edited by wideawake
Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Haunted Universe said:

 

I didnt say all were crisis actors. Crisis actors are interviewed by the media to set the scene, and people who didn't see anything except for the towers exploding will be swayed into beleiving they just missed a giant airliner crash into the towers. Mandella effect will also have them beleive they think they saw a plane.

 

This is then drilled into everyones head with the phoney planes crashing into the towers repeatedly from different angles on every news channel. 

 

i dont think you realise the massive scale of planning by the perps years in advance. 

 

 


That you evaluate and question things is brilliant but I'm going with Jets on this one mate. Thanks all the same.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 4 weeks later...
On 9/7/2020 at 11:02 PM, Haunted Universe said:

 

 

I thought that for a long while as well, but when you look at the imapct hole it has obviously been curated. No way in a million years would any projectile create straight lines squares and rectangles.

 

Wow, you repeat your same claim here when you already had that explained. These are rectangular panels that have been blasted off. The actual entry hole is not nice and neat. Explain to all who read this, exactly how the blast went inwards and created a plane shaped hole. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, - TZC - said:

I wonder what you say to this. Looks to me as if the plane shaped hole is created a little late. Can you explain that.

 

https://youtu.be/h3shmfKOZ9g

 

 

I cannot explain why you think it looked a little late.

 

It wasn't. late - it's a video camera at the limit of its capabilities and that is a digital copy that has had unknown uploads, compression changes, frame rate changes and was originally created from a video tape that wasn't great to begin with.

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, - TZC - said:

I wonder what you say to this. Looks to me as if the plane shaped hole is created a little late. Can you explain that.

 

 

 

 

 

Here's a better analysis of the first strike. No plane shaped hole until few seconds after impact.

 

https://videopress.com/v/tyb4tbsm

 

It has nothing to do with the capabilities of the video recorder, and anyone saying so is just being dishonest.

 

tower.JPG.50fee115e5cc05eb59abdd93d4f103af.JPG

 

 

 

Edited by mishy
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, mishy said:

Here's a better analysis of the first strike. No plane shaped hole until few seconds after impact.

https://videopress.com/v/tyb4tbsm

 

Uhuh...bit blurred don't you think?

 

24 minutes ago, mishy said:

It has nothing to do with the capabilities of the video recorder, and anyone saying so is just being dishonest.

 

It is totally an issue with a blurred video recorder and anyone claiming otherwise is telling very large pork pies. I cite as my evidence the very blurred image you just posted, the very blurred left hand wall on the original claim and the blurry plane approaching it. Blurred - the capabilities of the video, plus of course all the numerous conversion/compression/multiple uploading.

 

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Comedy Time said:

 

Uhuh...bit blurred don't you think?

 

 

It is totally an issue with a blurred video recorder and anyone claiming otherwise is telling very large pork pies. I cite as my evidence the very blurred image you just posted, the very blurred left hand wall on the original claim and the blurry plane approaching it. Blurred - the capabilities of the video, plus of course all the numerous conversion/compression/multiple uploading.

 

 

There's no plane shaped hole in the buliding, blurred or otherwise, immediately after the impact. And it has nothing to do with video compression and the amount of times it's been uploaded, it's simply because a plane didn't crash into it.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I'm new here so I hope no one minds me asking a question.

 

There seems to be much ongoing debate about how the hole in the building looks too regular and Comedy Time believes it is because square panels were forced off during the impact.

 

I wonder if schematics of the construction/construction methods of the building may solve this conundrum.


To my knowledge the floors were steel covered in concrete, and there was an inner and outer core of steel beams.

 

Presumably there must have been facade panels attached to the outer beams that were blown off?

 

If not then how can Comedy Time be correct?

Edited by Reet Hard
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, JacksonsGhost said:

There was not a plane shaped hole. 

 

Yes there was.

 

51 minutes ago, JacksonsGhost said:

Aluminium/Composite does not fare well against steel I beams. 

 

It does if it is equipped with people, trolleys, food, equipment, luggage, cross beams, landing gear, engines, fuel, seats, carpets, lights, toilets, sinks and various other bits and bobs, plus it is travelling at 500 + mph and carrying gargantuan kinetic energy.

51 minutes ago, JacksonsGhost said:

These buildings were all pulled.  

 

 

No, really they weren't and the term is demolished. That term is the "truther" term used to implicate Silverstein.

 

51 minutes ago, JacksonsGhost said:

The planes were only for the lemmings.

 

No, they were for the travellers and the people who took control of them and crashed them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

@Comedy Time

Some of the best pilots in the world are on record saying they could not have flown those planes at 500mph plus through the skyscrapers and hit the towers.

 

By the way did you find an schematics of the construction of the towers?

 

Your theory about square panels is interesting.

Edited by Reet Hard
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Comedy Time said:

No, they were for the travellers and the people who took control of them and crashed them.

 

Yet we see FUCK ALL upon the fake impact. Your landing gear etc, where is it in the explosion? I dont see a single shred of debris from a plane being blown out.

 

You still havnt explained how full strips of columns are being blown out, impossible if a plane has smashed through it.

 

Pull another pathetic explanation out of your ass why don't you. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Reet Hard said:

 

@Comedy Time

Some of the best pilots in the world are on record saying they could not have flown those planes at 500mph plus through the skyscrapers and hit the towers.

 

By the way did you find an schematics of the construction of the towers?

 

Your theory about square panels is interesting

 

Yeah, some of the ones in ae911. Others say it's rather easy to crash a plane. The hardest one was the Pentagon and people do it all the time on plane simulators. There are a couple of youtube vids.

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Comedy Time said:

 

 

Comedy panto time. Oh yes there was.....

 

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRIBKtxhVOC4L4J6vsFIMs

 

It does not matter.  The building was pulled, same difference.  FYI: Pulled has been in use well before the farce of 9/11.

I do hope you're not a lemming.  Please do not tell me WTC7 was  brought down by burning furniture.

Edited by JacksonsGhost
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...