Jump to content

The Facts of WTC PLANNED & CONTROLLED DEMOLITION


Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Enforcement said:

So you admit that NIST are lying and something else had to have caused the collapse because burning jet fuel is never hot enough to fuse molten steel and concrete.

 

No. I admit that your claim is giant balls.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 440
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

911 was a huge scam. Regardless of the precise details. We all agree it was an orchestrated scam... Don't trust your Government. That we can agree on. Full stop.   

WTC Building 7 Primed for Demolition Prior to the day of September 11th 2001.   There is a video of "Lucky Larry" Silverstein, the owner of the WTC Complex, where he says he had a conversati

By elephant in the room I mean exactly what you're saying in regards to people like Silverstein and his pals. Most normies don't talk about that stuff, they just post jet fuel can't melt steel beam me

Posted Images

3 minutes ago, Enforcement said:

So again you indicate that you agree with the official version of events even though in an earlier post you claim you don't.

 

Dude, have we "met" on the internet before you were Reet Hard? You seem to think you know a lot about me, but are failing to actually supply evidence of any of your claims. I don't BELIEVE the official version of events so much as a general feeling that most of it fits with logic, critical thinking and observable data. As I said, if there is a conspiracy version that better fits all that, I am happy to entertain the idea. My position on this has never changed. There are issues that raise suspicion, but that's all they do. Without something tangible, suspicion is not evidence. 

 

How about you lay off the personal shit observations and I lay off the report button? Maybe address the actual debatable content huh?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Enforcement said:

Which particular issues do you believe raise suspicion?

 

If I wanted to debate them, I would raise them. I certainly have no need for any input you wish to make on the matter. Just one ....United Airlines stock.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Enforcement said:

Why don't you want to debate them? If you want to get to the truth then anything that raises suspicion needs to be analysed & debated.

 

I am ok with their explanation and suspect that insider trading knew in advance. There IS no way to debate this. You either believe it or don't. It doesn't interest me. I like puzzles and things that require thought, not some dumb yes or no issue.

 

Just now, Enforcement said:

Please elaborate, thank you.

 

No. Google it!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, Comedy Time said:

Volcanic activity quite some time ago.

 

NBC said that it was due to the action of glaciers, which is ridiculous for the depth you see in the photos.

 

https://web.archive.org/web/20160516065831/http://www.nbcnews.com/id/26844329/ns/technology_and_science-science/t/ice-age-geology-revealed-ground-zero/

 

Edited by theo102
Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Comedy Time said:

 

I am ok with their explanation and suspect that insider trading knew in advance. There IS no way to debate this. You either believe it or don't. It doesn't interest me. I like puzzles and things that require thought, not some dumb yes or no issue.

 

 

No. Google it!

 

An unusually high number of put options could suggest some people new something was going to happen resulting in a fall in value.

 

We have seen something similar pre the "scamdemic" along with a masse exodus of CEOs.

Edited by Enforcement
Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, theo102 said:

NBC said that it was due to the action of glaciers, which is ridiculous for the depth you see in the photos.

 

 

Sounds like a good explanation and it is most certainly not ridiculous concerning depth.

https://www.livescience.com/32641-whats-the-worlds-biggest-glacier.html#:~:text=The world's largest glacier is,meters) deep at its center.

 

And say what.....? You think a legitimate depth for a glacier is "ridiculous" but a bloody nuclear bomb going off isn't muttleypoos.gif

Edited by Comedy Time
Link to post
Share on other sites

In this video, Bush trips up in his speech and lets slip that explosives were used, later in video you will see the explosive charges detonated that caused the collapse of building 7 via controlled demolition....

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9t1p9Kqw4EM

 

Silvenstein stated "we made" the decision to "pull". Pull refers to controlled demolition.

 

My conclusion...

 

As for the other twin towers, they were bought down by thermite. You can even see the stuff pooring out the building just like liquid metal in many videos. Scientists have came to the conclusion that jet fuel would never burn hot enough to turn steel into molten metal. Only thermite could do that. Their was traces of thermite found in the rubble. The place was a crime scene, and they were prompt at clearing away the remaining steel after collapse as quick as possable to conceal evidence. Despite this, remnants of thermite was found at the site. As for the scrap steel it was quickly loaded onto boats and shipped to china where it was to be sold as scrap metal. Then they conveinently find one of the highjackers passports in the rubble. It is laughable that a passport would of survived. The place, its passengers and the building would of been vapourized on contact.

 

Prior to the collapse of the twin towers, Israeli students were on one of the floors conducting an art project which saw a walking platform erected out of one the the windows.  In photos you will see the Israeli students have stacks of boxes. Written on the boxes is BB18 - these boxes of fuse holders. Fuses are also used in controlled demolitions. Security in the building was lapse; parts of the building had no electricity which would of meant this was easily to pull off. This included non working security cameras in parts of the building.

 

hqdefault.jpg

Edited by kestrel
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, there were two military planes controlled remotely.

 

The planes hitting the tower created the drama needed to make the idiot sheeple demand the solution which surprise surprise was more surveillance and removal of freedoms and more tax payer funded war.

Edited by Enforcement
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Enforcement said:

Yes, there were two military planes controlled remotely.

 

The planes hitting the tower created the drama needed to make the idiot sheeple demand the solution which surprise surprise was more surveillance and removal of freedoms and more tax payer funded war.

 

Why did you just repeat your claim?

 

Now we need:

  • A team to dispose of the planes and the bodies
  • A team to burn and mangle the bodies to sprinkle DNA all over the area, or a team to fake the analyses.
  • We still need a team to place tiny body parts everywhere.
  • A team to drive around dropping bits of plane around the area, including a massive plane engine in full view of spectators!
  • A team to do this at the Pentagon with cameras on helicopters and emergency services arriving any time soon.
  • A team to control the military aircraft. Paper trails to be destroyed accounting for the aircraft.
  • ALL paper trails paying any personnel to be deleted and financial reimbursements hidden.

 

That makes zero sense.

 

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6719039&postcount=1

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=9725182&postcount=11

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Enforcement said:

Don't be silly please - compartmentalisation.

 

Don't be incredibly daft....explain fully how any single person in that post are not just a tad suspicious about what they have done  .....ya know ....given that 4 planes just splattered all over the general vicinity.

 

Your base claim requires all of that and more.

 

Here, example.....you lot can you dispose of that UA plane over There and get me some bits.  Burn them and mangle them. Oh and do the same with the passengers.

 

What crazy "compart-totally-mental" world would fail to notice!

Edited by Comedy Time
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...