Comedy Time Posted October 5, 2020 Share Posted October 5, 2020 6 hours ago, wideawake said: Can you explain to me how a commercial plane can enter the WTC through steel columns and not lose ANY parts of the plane on the impact side? i.e wings and/or wing tips for example. It goes right through the skyscraper like there was no obstacle encountered. Nah... It has colossal kinetic energy. What you should be asking yourself is does the edge of the building have enough resistant force to combat that kinetic energy? It does not by a long way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comedy Time Posted October 5, 2020 Share Posted October 5, 2020 10 hours ago, zArk said: are there sensible experienced people who still believe in the crock of ++++ plane story? Yes, it's an exclusive club for the sensible. It involves logic, reasoning and proper analysis of all evidence. It involves understanding physics properly. 10 hours ago, zArk said: even after the well publicised Norman Mineta story about Cheyney http://www.911myths.com/index.php?title=Norman_Mineta 10 hours ago, zArk said: even after the infamous Bush in the school watching the plane crash before the video was on TV How does that prove the dumb no planes claim!? 10 hours ago, zArk said: even after September Clues fairly well highlighted all the videos September Clues has had the living crap kicked out of it. That's where the sensible people come in with logic, critical thinking and physics. 10 hours ago, zArk said: even after only 2 of the 4 named flights existing You said that before and ignored my response. All 4 flights existed. In one traffic log, two of them were not noted because it was a log of LANDED planes! 10 hours ago, zArk said: even after Flight 93 was seen landing Cleveland Hopkins Airport ....Sigh.....seek the truth and ye shall find it. Stick with no-plane crap and you never will..... http://www.911myths.com/html/93_landed_in_cleveland.html 10 hours ago, zArk said: The videos are fake, No they aren't. I see we are in to the bare assertion bullshit section. 10 hours ago, zArk said: the people interviewed are agents for the narrative No they aren't. 10 hours ago, zArk said: the people interviewed on the streets (like harley davidson man) are intel agents No they aren't. 10 hours ago, zArk said: which would place all photographic and video evidence as suspect. Circular logic - that evidence is fine. 10 hours ago, zArk said: Sitting analysing fake doctored footage and pictures has those repsonsible laughing their heads off. It's not fake or doctored and I can't imagine anyone laughing if a gang of such "astute" internet detectives are on their case 10 hours ago, zArk said: Its a great wheeze for them and they love to argue the toss over the images because ... they made them deliberately If you say so. It was planes, four of them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wideawake Posted October 5, 2020 Share Posted October 5, 2020 16 hours ago, Comedy Time said: It has colossal kinetic energy. What you should be asking yourself is does the edge of the building have enough resistant force to combat that kinetic energy? It does not by a long way. So the aluminum wings on the planes were stronger then the steel columns? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comedy Time Posted October 5, 2020 Share Posted October 5, 2020 5 minutes ago, wideawake said: So the aluminum wings on the planes were stronger then the steel columns? Not relevant. They carried sufficient kinetic energy to break them. The quantity of fuel in them aided in making them more solid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wideawake Posted October 5, 2020 Share Posted October 5, 2020 @Comedy Time WOW, that is a good one mate... Now think of it this way... if you could throw the WTC at the plane with the same kinetic energy, would the wings collapse or the steal columns? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wideawake Posted October 5, 2020 Share Posted October 5, 2020 Crickets................ Out googling for an answer? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oz93666 Posted October 6, 2020 Share Posted October 6, 2020 10 hours ago, Haunted Universe said: Look at those you suspect of being shills as an opportunity ... If they ask idiotic questions , then the general public could also be asking these , I always address the unseen lurkers , not the suspected shill when replying .... If they ask nothing valid or try to wind you up , just ignore .... I guess by 'Shill' you mean paid government agent .... not to be confused with Troll , who is just an idiot tying annoy people.... Indications of a shill might be someone who believes most official stories , 9/11 etc , and is feeding FE and no space threads , on either side of the argument. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haunted Universe Posted October 6, 2020 Share Posted October 6, 2020 1 minute ago, oz93666 said: Look at those you suspect of being shills as an opportunity ... If they ask idiotic questions , then the general public could also be asking these , I always address the unseen lurkers , not the suspected shill when replying .... If they ask nothing valid or try to wind you up , just ignore .... I guess by 'Shill' you mean paid government agent .... not to be confused with Troll , who is just an idiot tying annoy people.... Indications of a shill might be someone who believes most official stories , 9/11 etc , and is feeding FE and no space threads , on either side of the argument. Nothing makes sense anymore in this bullshit world, and you can't trust anyone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oz93666 Posted October 6, 2020 Share Posted October 6, 2020 (edited) Just now, Haunted Universe said: Nothing makes sense anymore in this bullshit world, and you can't trust anyone. How can you still be posting if you are banned??? The controllers will target DI family and forum administrators with mind influence to get them to make wrong decisions ...this forum (and the 2 predecessors ) have a long history of strange goings on , from the outside it often appears management are trying to sabotage things .... In reality they are trying their best. Edited October 6, 2020 by oz93666 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haunted Universe Posted October 6, 2020 Share Posted October 6, 2020 2 minutes ago, oz93666 said: How can you still be posting if you are banned??? I was temporarily banned from posting for 2-3 days for calling out a piss obvious shill and antagonizer, and the ban is over. 3 minutes ago, oz93666 said: from the outside it often appears management are trying to sabotage things .... In reality they are trying their best. I'm far from convinced. Lionizing them doesn't make it so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theo102 Posted October 6, 2020 Share Posted October 6, 2020 6 hours ago, FrankVitali said: ComedyTime's a shill No, he's a skeptic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theo102 Posted October 6, 2020 Share Posted October 6, 2020 6 hours ago, wideawake said: Now think of it this way... if you could throw the WTC at the plane with the same kinetic energy, would the wings collapse or the steal columns? It wouldn't make any difference, relative speed is what matters. There's a cutoff point where there isn't enough kinetic energy to break the steel columns: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comedy Time Posted October 6, 2020 Share Posted October 6, 2020 8 hours ago, wideawake said: Crickets................ Out googling for an answer? Went to bed actually. This was asked before the forum hack and the answer is the same result. Listen, do you have any actual mathematical analysis to support any of this? Because at the moment it's just you doing Ralph from the Simpsons. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comedy Time Posted October 6, 2020 Share Posted October 6, 2020 5 hours ago, Haunted Universe said: Just been banned from posting for 2/3 days for "abusive behavior" - I smell controlled opposition, double standards, hypocrisy and mala fide. I suggest you do what I do, behave myself and just get on with debating. Now, explain to the forum how the "No-plane-perps" designed an explosion to coincide with their fake planes that managed to blow very strong support columns inwards. The kinetic energy from the plane explains it. Your turn. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comedy Time Posted October 6, 2020 Share Posted October 6, 2020 8 hours ago, FrankVitali said: ComedyTime's a shill Nope, but if such a job exists, can you tell me where to apply? Why do people with no answers always complain at the people asking the questions? See post above - I await your non-shill answer....because of course the idea there were no planes is not completely insane at all and doesn't make a mockery of the entire thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reet Hard Posted October 6, 2020 Share Posted October 6, 2020 2 hours ago, Comedy Time said: I suggest you do what I do, behave myself and just get on with debating. Now, explain to the forum how the "No-plane-perps" designed an explosion to coincide with their fake planes that managed to blow very strong support columns inwards. The kinetic energy from the plane explains it. Your turn. Does it depend how and where the explosive are packed in? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reet Hard Posted October 6, 2020 Share Posted October 6, 2020 2 hours ago, Comedy Time said: See post above - I await your non-shill answer....because of course the idea there were no planes is not completely insane at all and doesn't make a mockery of the entire thing. I think there were planes but the concept that there were not is not insane, they just have a different opinion to you. Please define thing, thank you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wideawake Posted October 6, 2020 Share Posted October 6, 2020 12 hours ago, wideawake said: @Comedy Time Now think of it this way... if you could throw the WTC at the plane with the same kinetic energy, would the wings collapse or the steal columns? 4 hours ago, Comedy Time said: This was asked before the forum hack and the answer is the same result. Listen, do you have any actual mathematical analysis to support any of this? Because at the moment it's just you doing Ralph from the Simpsons. So that is your answer? I was expecting more from you... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comedy Time Posted October 6, 2020 Share Posted October 6, 2020 (edited) 2 hours ago, Reet Hard said: GCHQ careers section on their website. I was being flippant, but since you are playing the smart arse, post a link please. 2 hours ago, Reet Hard said: Please define thing, thank you. No. 2 hours ago, Reet Hard said: Does it depend how and where the explosive are packed in? You tell me! How exactly do you "pack" explosives in to SUCK a bloody support column inwards! No planers make all sorts of hoooohaaaa about how strong the columns are but are shit scared to explain how they went inwards! Edited October 6, 2020 by Comedy Time Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comedy Time Posted October 6, 2020 Share Posted October 6, 2020 (edited) 36 minutes ago, wideawake said: So that is your answer? I was expecting more from you... The forces involved are identical....BUT....you cannot sum the kinetic engine of the building in the same way and use it to determine damage. It is a much more complicated sum. I wasn't actually expecting you to post an answer to my request for quantifiable mathematical analysis, so there you go. Edited October 6, 2020 by Comedy Time Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wideawake Posted October 6, 2020 Share Posted October 6, 2020 13 hours ago, wideawake said: @Comedy Time Now think of it this way... if you could throw the WTC at the plane with the same kinetic energy, would the wings collapse or the steal columns? 12 minutes ago, Comedy Time said: The forces involved are identical....BUT....you cannot sum the kinetic engine of the building in the same way and use it to determine damage. It is a much more complicated sum. So... still no answer. I'll tell you what the difference is before you google all day for an answer... none and the wings will collapse, period. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comedy Time Posted October 6, 2020 Share Posted October 6, 2020 (edited) 13 minutes ago, wideawake said: So... still no answer. I'll tell you what the difference is before you google all day for an answer... none Wtf? I gave you an answer! The forces are identical....you just bloody quoted it. And don't talk to me about "googling an answer", you just plagiarised that claim and lifted it from a no planer site. 13 minutes ago, wideawake said: and the wings will collapse, period. And your stunning conclusion for this was reached because? You were doing so well, you got the identical bit, then you seemed to mess up slightly. Show your mathematics for any of it. Because it is a problem of mechanical force and engineering. I await an answer to a whole host of things from any single no-planer...must I list them again? Edited October 6, 2020 by Comedy Time Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gone Fishing... Posted October 6, 2020 Share Posted October 6, 2020 3 hours ago, Reet Hard said: Possibly but I'm not convinced that's the story with the moderators Haunted Science is complaining about. 2 hours ago, Reet Hard said: If you don't mind me asking What was your previous name Theo? Comedy Time's was Rupert. MOD NOTE. Stop discussing moderation and members. Keep on the topic. Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gone Fishing... Posted October 6, 2020 Share Posted October 6, 2020 10 hours ago, Haunted Universe said: MOD NOTE. DO NOT DISCUSS MODERATORS OR MODERATION. BC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wideawake Posted October 6, 2020 Share Posted October 6, 2020 1 minute ago, Comedy Time said: Wtf? I gave you an answer! The forces are identical....you just bloody quoted it. And your stunning conclusion for this was reached because? You were doing so well, you got the identical bit, then you seemed to mess up slightly. Show your mathematics for any of it. Because it is a problem of mechanical force and engineering. I await an answer to a whole host of things from any single no-planer...must I list them again? So your answer is a question and you criticize everybody else for doing the same. Hmm My conclusion was by logic. Every time on 9/11 discussions ( towers fell on their own footprints, arabs as highjackers, fake planes, Silverstein's insurance racket, the pentagon attack video, unusual crash debris in Shanksville, etc, etc) for some reason, there is no logic anymore but always a long technical, mathematical, scientific answer. Why? Because NIST said so? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.jpg.8081a54a3b74a5d1823dfac966666137.jpg)
.jpg.594f0ef23288ec5ab04539b2f8a8dbd4.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.