Jump to content

The BBC Tells Us "The Universe Has A Speed Limit. We Can't Go Faster Than The Speed Of Light". The BBC is always right on matters of NWO Science of course...


HistoryIsComplex

Recommended Posts

The Corporation-that-never-lies (cough... Iraq WMDs... cough...) tells us in an ANIMATION that "The Universe Has A Hard Speed Limit", so other civilizations COULD NOT POSSIBLY REACH US IN ANY NORMAL TIMEFRAME.

 

https://www.bbc.com/reel/video/p04v97r0/this-video-explains-why-we-cannot-go-faster-than-light

 

 

 

Of course, people a few decades ago were told "NOTHING CAN GO FASTER THAN THE SPEED OF SOUND. IT IS A HARD LIMIT THAT NO PLANE CAN BREAK."

 

 

 

 

 

 

BBC.png

Edited by HistoryIsComplex
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Time for some shameless self promotion:

 

https://www.truthspoon.com/2015/08/quantum-physics-telling-us-what-jesus.html

 
Quote

 

Light is timeless light is spaceless, there is no separation between events as they are recorded by light. The speed of light is the speed limit of the universe and the universe ceases to exist in its present form at the speed of light. Therefore since photons travel at the speed of light they must exist in a state which is outside or apart from our present universe. The speed of light is the escape velocity of the universe. The  Lorentz contraction means that the closer an object were able to travel to the speed of light, the more it’s length would contract, namely it would get smaller and smaller. This effect is only noticeable from velocities of around 30 million mph, and then only at infinitesimal degrees, but the closer the object were to move at the speed of light of 670 million miles per hour the more the object appears to get smaller and smaller until at the speed of light the length goes down to zero and the object disappears, at least to an observer. Anyone who could somehow record or perceive reality from the point of view of the object travelling at the speed of light would find that it wasn’t the object which became infinitely compact, but the universe itself.
 
Lorentz.png
The corollary of the object disappearing from the point of view of an observer would be that the object no longer existed in space and indeed that space itself no longer exists. We also know from Einstein’s theory of special relativity that time slows to zero at the speed of light, therefore we would no longer be in time and no longer ‘in space’. But let’s get this clear, this doesn’t mean the object no longer exists in some real way. Merely because it is no longer ‘in space’ doesn’t mean it has gone anywhere. Instead it is everywhere at once. Being ‘in space’ literally means to be contained within a boundary and to be located at some point within those boundaries. At the speed of light there is no longer any containment within space. The light IS the space. All of it. And a thing cannot be contained within itself. 
 
When  the Lorentz contraction effect on the speed of light reduces the object to a zero point in space it has effectively ‘tunnelled’ out of real space and is now free to be anywhere it likes and at any time.  This is perhaps a similar effect to that of quantum tunnelling which is a mathematically impossible process by which stars release photons from the fusion collisions at the heart of the sun. It is not actually hot enough in the centre of the sun, at a mere 15 million degrees Kelvin to power nuclear fusion, Earth based experiments to create nuclear fusion require temperatures 10 times this which are produced in a plasma Torus, however because of the quantum probability that a protons ‘field of action’ can interfere with another protons field of action, then despite there not being enough energy for this to take place, it takes place all the same. Physicists are far from certain of the mechanics behind this process but in all likelihood it probably involves the ability of a proton travelling at the speed of light to transcend time and space and to merge with the energy of another proton and therefore prompt nuclear fusion.     

 

Edited by Truthspoon
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fundamental problem with these reports is that they are based on the assumption that the human sense perception reality, is the ultimate reality.

 

Rather than, seeing human sense perception (mind) as a limitation with which we see reality.

 

To use a famous example. It's a bit like (mind) us putting on yellow glasses, looking at the snow and claiming that snow is yellow!

 

Within our world of yellow glasses at this current time, it maybe true that speed of light is the ultimate speed, but what about if the glasses were removed?

 

Our minds cannot go there, but it is something to be aware of, especially when people make claims that x is definitely like this.........

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mr H said:

The fundamental problem with these reports is that they are based on the assumption that the human sense perception reality, is the ultimate reality.

 

Rather than, seeing human sense perception (mind) as a limitation with which we see reality.

 

Yes. And by our ability to create and build measurement devices. We are limited by our perception and technological achievments and current understanding of the universe. We are still at an infant stage with regards to the last point.

 

I'll give an example courtesy of Stan Deyo - trying to measure gravity is like trying to measure the weight of a cup full of water with scales while your under the sea.

 

Great thread and I'll say again - can we please have a Surpressed Technology / Free Energy sub forum please for threads like this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, well scientists are unlikely to ever find out much about the reality of the universe because they start off with a false premise, that there is such a thing called matter, independent of the existence of consciousness. Which no one has ever found and could ever find. They believe that matter was here first, then consciousness miraculously came out of matter although they don't say how, because they can't, because it most likely didn't if we go with our experience. Which is consciousness is and was here first. Matter derives it's existence from consciousness. Until this is seen clearly everything they ever find out about the universe will be extremely limited.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/11/2020 at 12:14 PM, Mr H said:

The fundamental problem with these reports is that they are based on the assumption that the human sense perception reality, is the ultimate reality.

 

Rather than, seeing human sense perception (mind) as a limitation with which we see reality.

 

To use a famous example. It's a bit like (mind) us putting on yellow glasses, looking at the snow and claiming that snow is yellow!

 

Within our world of yellow glasses at this current time, it maybe true that speed of light is the ultimate speed, but what about if the glasses were removed?

 

Our minds cannot go there, but it is something to be aware of, especially when people make claims that x is definitely like this.........

 

 

The 5 sense reality is the only reality they can imagine because they have closed minds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/11/2020 at 12:14 PM, Mr H said:

The fundamental problem with these reports is that they are based on the assumption that the human sense perception reality, is the ultimate reality.

 

Rather than, seeing human sense perception (mind) as a limitation with which we see reality.

 

To use a famous example. It's a bit like (mind) us putting on yellow glasses, looking at the snow and claiming that snow is yellow!

 

Within our world of yellow glasses at this current time, it maybe true that speed of light is the ultimate speed, but what about if the glasses were removed?

 

Our minds cannot go there, but it is something to be aware of, especially when people make claims that x is definitely like this.........


Indeed. Humans don’t even perceive the precise moment they are in, there is a delay (latency) in sensing an event through the eyes before the signal reaches the brain and then further delay as we decide what to do and then return a signal to our nerves making our muscles work. We do well catching/batting balls because they move slowly enough for us to apply a form of predictive model, but the latency does reduce what we can handle. Film was always at 25 Frames/s or more as that was the limit of our perception. Slower and you see the jumps, 25-35 FPS might cause some a headache, whilst 60Fps plus would be indistinguishable from reality except for screen size/colour/ Dimensions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Mikhail Liebestein said:


Indeed. Humans don’t even perceive the precise moment they are in, there is a delay (latency) in sensing an event through the eyes before the signal reaches the brain and then further delay as we decide what to do and then return a signal to our nerves making our muscles work. We do well catching/batting balls because they move slowly enough for us to apply a form of predictive model, but the latency does reduce what we can handle. Film was always at 25 Frames/s or more as that was the limit of our perception. Slower and you see the jumps, 25-35 FPS might cause some a headache, whilst 60Fps plus would be indistinguishable from reality except for screen size/colour/ Dimensions.

 

Yes, I guess from a bodymind perspective this is true. Same with conscious choice. It's been proven to reach the conscious mind something like several seconds later than when it originated. But apologies I'm switching between absolute and relative perspectives here, which could be confusing, well for me anyways.....

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/10/2020 at 5:27 PM, HistoryIsComplex said:

But the BEE-BEE-CEE SAYS YOU ARE W-R-O-N-G... You must TRUST THE BBC. IT NEVER EVER LIES ABOUT ANYTHING EVER. :classic_biggrin::classic_biggrin::classic_biggrin:

 

Don't tell the mythical BBC TV licence detector van is a lie, with a man twiddling some knobs on a console of advanced BBC electronics, that can track down someone watching an episode of Columbo illegally in a block of flats with pin point accuracy. 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Firstly, the speed of light limit is based on the equations that show that at the speed of light you would have to have the same mass as the entire universe ... but that is only if you approach that speed linearly without making a jump.  If you jump over that limit there is no upper limit.  Because of various subatom discrete jumps that have been observed that gives credence to the ability to jump over it.  Due the extreme stupidity of scientists nobody even bothered to consider that possibility for decades.  They did not consider what happened beyond the right hand side of the graph.

 

t1.png.23f1aa0dd0406d0cd785091bf41aeee4.png

 

Secondly, there have been some torpedos developed recently that are really really fast because they travel through air, at the front tip of the torpedo air is emitted and it forms a skin of air around the torpedo, within the water, and so the torpedo travels at the limits set by the friction with air, rather than friction with water.  Possibly some other ingenious technology could be used to cross the speed of light.

 

sc.jpg.d9751aa098b0f127d490ad15d9fcb0b2.jpg

 

As for intelligence : human intelligence is formed from the simultaneous processing of 3 areas : the mind - the body -the emotions.  In other words to know reality you can't just sit in your head, you must think and come up with something then use the body and spirit to explore.  And learn from your successes and mistakes in real life.  Humans have become very mind heavy which has damaged the way they process data to reach intelligent conclusions.  Watching the internet dreaming that you are learning something therefore is not going to work, in fact it makes you worse.

And from this we can also tell that the human being is a precious instrument that can function to comprehend the universe and what lies beyond the universe ... but only if it is kept in good condition, and if it has been taught to function correctly to comprehend reality.

Humans are not the same as each other then, because most do not keep themselves well.

 

But, human mortality and intelligence are intimately related.  An immortal being is simply one who lives in a part of existence that does not rely on coarse physical matter.  He has during his mortal life he has sensed tasted and merged with the "higher world" which is non-material.  In the material world or the material state of consciousness ... everything dies.   It takes quietness sensitivity intelligence love to sense the higher world, and to make it part of you, so that you live in that higher identity even whilst still carrying the old body.  Then when this body dies you are placed into a new body that matches your intelligence and is non-material or ... of a higher material. 
These things should be the priority for human beings. 

This world is not a place to stay or make a home, it is inherently violent.  This world meaning this state of consciousness.  The human 3 sided consciousness (mind-spirit-body) needs to be maintained, as does the higher 'spiritual' consciousness.

 

 

 

Edited by rideforever
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Back to the OP ... many assholes on the BBC and the internet in general set themselves up as expert authorities and almost all of them do that because they know absolutely zero and are cynical and evil people who don't feel any shame.  There is an expert industry where people are taught to act like experts ... if you see the joke.

This is so wrong and destructive and degenerative that only extremely fucked up people who act this way, and seriously speaking you are far far better off living with much less in the countryside and working the land where you will avoid most of these fuckwits.  Working physically does cut the shit, and makes you more real.  Although you will have less, maybe much less, you will live a better life learn more and die happier.  Perhaps also in the trades.

There is no future for assholes of the expert industry, it is precisely because they have no souls that they are happy living like that.

The world wasn't always like that, but ... people don't stop it because they are used to the easy gravy train of money, as usual.   They don't have the sense that they need to give value for money, or that they need to get off their arse not be a parasite, even a middle class parasite with a big conservatory and a wine subsription in a box with little gold ribbons on it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...