peter Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 On 9/20/2020 at 3:38 AM, alexa said: I'm not, it just that you afraid to face the truth. Everyone is entitled to their own truth ,alexa ,it's just that yours makes no sense to most people, including me ,you quote the ancient Hebrew conception of the universe as fact yet you follow the King James bible, to me the modern term for that is cherry picking Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexa Posted September 25, 2020 Author Share Posted September 25, 2020 On 9/18/2020 at 1:57 PM, Comedy Time said: What is this? Some sort of joke???? No but this is: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comedy Time Posted September 26, 2020 Share Posted September 26, 2020 9 hours ago, alexa said: No but this is: Prove it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexa Posted September 26, 2020 Author Share Posted September 26, 2020 9 hours ago, Comedy Time said: Prove it. You prove it isn't ..............a joke that is ?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bamboozooka Posted September 26, 2020 Share Posted September 26, 2020 why does bezos' blue origin rocket look like a penis? is it because he is a dick? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comedy Time Posted September 26, 2020 Share Posted September 26, 2020 4 hours ago, alexa said: You prove it isn't ..............a joke that is ?? Ahhh bless you don't quote understand the burden of proof do you? When somebody makes a brainless and ill thought out claim - as you have - THEY have the burden to prove it. You quote a piece of mathematics that has been fully explained. Now YOU must prove your useless claim. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amy G Posted September 26, 2020 Share Posted September 26, 2020 4 hours ago, bamboozooka said: why does bezos' blue origin rocket look like a penis? is it because he is a dick? Freemasons love dick like their obelisks where they believe their sun god Ra resides. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexa Posted September 26, 2020 Author Share Posted September 26, 2020 43 minutes ago, Comedy Time said: Ahhh bless you don't quote understand the burden of proof do you? When somebody makes a brainless and ill thought out claim - as you have - THEY have the burden to prove it. You quote a piece of mathematics that has been fully explained. Now YOU must prove your useless claim. Well Frank Drake uses a probabilistic formula that uses random guesses and wild speculation as inputs b/c he didn't really know a lot about the universe, what a joke, his equation is meaningless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comedy Time Posted September 27, 2020 Share Posted September 27, 2020 8 hours ago, alexa said: Well Frank Drake uses a probabilistic formula that uses random guesses and wild speculation as inputs b/c he didn't really know a lot about the universe, what a joke, his equation is meaningless. His equation is a road map to determine the factors needed to work out if there is life out there. It is irrelevant what unknowns he plugged in to the formula, it was what NEEDED to be known to determine accuracy! 8 hours ago, alexa said: LMAO at you and your limited understanding of Tesla! https://www.teslasociety.com/cosmos.htm Nikola Tesla built a laboratory in Colorado Springs, Colorado, in 1899, to experiment with high frequency electricity and other phenomena. In that laboratory he received and recorded on his sensitive instruments, cosmic radio waves. He announced that he received extraterrestrial radio signals. The scientific community in 1899 did not believe him, because knowledge of cosmic radio signals did not exist at that time. Nikola Tesla had a vision of radio communications with planets of the solar system. His Wardenclyffe magnifying transmitter had sufficient energy, voltage and frequency of oscillations to reach that goal. Tesla’s vision was the exploration of cosmos. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexa Posted September 27, 2020 Author Share Posted September 27, 2020 3 minutes ago, Comedy Time said: His equation is a road map to determine the factors needed to work out if there is life out there. It is irrelevant what unknowns he plugged in to the formula, it was what NEEDED to be known to determine accuracy! LMAO at you and your limited understanding of Tesla! https://www.teslasociety.com/cosmos.htm Nikola Tesla built a laboratory in Colorado Springs, Colorado, in 1899, to experiment with high frequency electricity and other phenomena. In that laboratory he received and recorded on his sensitive instruments, cosmic radio waves. He announced that he received extraterrestrial radio signals. The scientific community in 1899 did not believe him, because knowledge of cosmic radio signals did not exist at that time. Nikola Tesla had a vision of radio communications with planets of the solar system. His Wardenclyffe magnifying transmitter had sufficient energy, voltage and frequency of oscillations to reach that goal. Tesla’s vision was the exploration of cosmos. I know all this, but you can't deny he was one clever guy. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comedy Time Posted September 27, 2020 Share Posted September 27, 2020 1 hour ago, alexa said: I know all this, but you can't deny he was one clever guy. He was clever enough to know space wasn't faked! Is this some kind of trolling exercise for you? Do you not see the big problem here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexa Posted September 27, 2020 Author Share Posted September 27, 2020 12 hours ago, Comedy Time said: He was clever enough to know space wasn't faked! Is this some kind of trolling exercise for you? Do you not see the big problem here? Are you sure about that ? what do you mean some trolling exercise ? what problem is there ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexa Posted September 27, 2020 Author Share Posted September 27, 2020 16 hours ago, Comedy Time said: Nikola Tesla had a vision of radio communications with planets of the solar system. His Wardenclyffe magnifying transmitter had sufficient energy, voltage and frequency of oscillations to reach that goal. Tesla’s vision was the exploration of cosmos. Well Tesla didn't have much luck at all did he. We can all visualize. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comedy Time Posted September 28, 2020 Share Posted September 28, 2020 9 hours ago, alexa said: Are you sure about that ? what do you mean some trolling exercise ? what problem is there ? The man you quoted says that space most definitely existed and here you are quoting him to support irrelevant and incorrect side issues! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexa Posted September 28, 2020 Author Share Posted September 28, 2020 Nicola Tesla Quote "I hold that space cannot be curved, for the simple reason that it can have no properties. It might as well be said that God has properties. He has not, but only attributes and these are of our own making. Of properties we can only speak when dealing with matter filling the space. To say that in the presence of large bodies space becomes curved is equivalent to stating that something can act upon nothing. I, for one, refuse to subscribe to such a view. " Tesla was one of the few people granted access to the Vatican archives, so he should know the truth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comedy Time Posted September 28, 2020 Share Posted September 28, 2020 1 hour ago, alexa said: Nicola Tesla Tesla was one of the few people granted access to the Vatican archives, so he should know the truth. OK, so he is talking about someething you deny. Space. Your continued inability to see this is quite baffling. Space exists. Planets rotate. Astronomers see this clearly. I've had the privilege of looking though a big telescope and seeing Jupiter and some of its moons. Here are a few pictures at various times: It is rotating - it is a real planet and you are just totally and provably wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexa Posted September 28, 2020 Author Share Posted September 28, 2020 6 hours ago, Comedy Time said: OK, so he is talking about someething you deny. Space. Your continued inability to see this is quite baffling. Tesla also claims that space is full of either/plasma which would ring true in my book. space is not what you have been led to believe, it is fake just like the ball you think you live on. All the pictures of planets in the world are not going to get me to change face. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexa Posted September 28, 2020 Author Share Posted September 28, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grumpy Owl Posted September 28, 2020 Share Posted September 28, 2020 3 hours ago, alexa said: Tesla also claims that space is full of either/plasma which would ring true in my book. space is not what you have been led to believe, it is fake just like the ball you think you live on. All the pictures of planets in the world are not going to get me to change face. I can partially agree with that, we live in a 'plasma universe' which isn't always immediately visible to our own eyes, but it is there, and goes some way towards why scientists can't find the pesky 'dark matter' that eludes them. But space and planets and stars are 'out there'. So you're basically admitting that you are not going to change your mind, no matter what evidence or material to the contrary is put before you? 3 hours ago, alexa said: There's a big difference between looking at a very distant planet through a proper magnifying telescope, than with a camera with a 'really good' zoom lens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexa Posted September 28, 2020 Author Share Posted September 28, 2020 1 hour ago, Grumpy Owl said: But space and planets and stars are 'out there'. The stars, the moon and the sun are out there and they are within the firmament but as for the planets, no way are they what you think they are. 1 hour ago, Grumpy Owl said: So you're basically admitting that you are not going to change your mind, no matter what evidence or material to the contrary is put before you? Yes, all these so called planets are even named after Greek and Roman gods and godesses. This should tell folks something, wouldn't you agree ? Especially when it comes to the scripts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comedy Time Posted September 29, 2020 Share Posted September 29, 2020 15 hours ago, alexa said: Tesla also claims that space is full of either/plasma which would ring true in my book. space is not what you have been led to believe, it is fake just like the ball you think you live on. All the pictures of planets in the world are not going to get me to change face. Tesla says SPACE is xxxxxxxxxx, and you say it doesn't exist. You have to be colossally confused not to see how that is a problem with you referencing him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comedy Time Posted September 29, 2020 Share Posted September 29, 2020 14 hours ago, alexa said: These are not REAL pictures of Venus, they are taken through a device not fit for purpose!! https://www.bing.com/images/search?view=detailV2&ccid=%2fuDiF5wk&id=352B705DC1B24453AA86C76CCD873C89B37471F9&thid=OIP._uDiF5wkhub0H9w8nVxILgHaFO&mediaurl=https%3a%2f%2fc2.staticflickr.com%2f2%2f1142%2f618108540_c4ea04b0e8_z.jpg%3fzz%3d1&exph=452&expw=640&q=telescope+pictures+of+venus&simid=608052697975555613&ck=50CBC777EC7A44D946309D26EFA5D5A1&selectedIndex=123&FORM=IRPRST&ajaxhist=0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comedy Time Posted September 29, 2020 Share Posted September 29, 2020 (edited) @alexa Six full minutes of continuous weightlessness on board the ISS: If you can't tell the difference between that and the edited Hollywood stuff then you really cannot be reached. Fence sitters - ISS, in space. Edited September 29, 2020 by Comedy Time 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oddsnsods Posted September 29, 2020 Share Posted September 29, 2020 @Comedy Time Quote The Skylab section is massive, there isn't a plane in the world that big and if you dive one of the massive planes like that you would really struggle. This proves weightlessness in space before CGI and obviously not hollywood fx. Space means orbits. Orbits mean planet. https://www.americaspace.com/2012/04/11/photo-feature-tour-nasas-747-shuttle-carrier-aircraft-inside-and-out/graham-sca-184/ Remove the floor? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comedy Time Posted September 29, 2020 Share Posted September 29, 2020 36 minutes ago, oddsnsods said: @Comedy Time https://www.americaspace.com/2012/04/11/photo-feature-tour-nasas-747-shuttle-carrier-aircraft-inside-and-out/graham-sca-184/ Remove the floor? That is what gives it rigidity, plus all those top sections too. And widen it to put all that stuff on the edges as well. Then find somebody daft enough to dive it like that over and over with all the vital cross members missing and the momentum it would generate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.jpg.8081a54a3b74a5d1823dfac966666137.jpg)
.jpg.594f0ef23288ec5ab04539b2f8a8dbd4.jpg)
Recommended Posts