oddsnsods Posted August 20, 2020 Share Posted August 20, 2020 34 minutes ago, zArk said: jeeze, all of em??, i cant argue that you will probably find one or two circular stone houses with doors and pad stones for roofs yet the 99.999% of these 'circles' are not settlements yeah settlements @oddsnsods lol The examples you gave were settlements, 1000% I know this as ive watched video of people exploring them. Now you give a totally different phenomena of fairy circles. Prove they are from plasma storms, plus they are nothing like a crater. 34 minutes ago, zArk said: once more regurjitating the orthodoxy. It is not fact that Moldevite was created through a meteor impact. its green glass. the narrowmindedness of the religious zealots of heliocentrism cannot be exaggerated Yet fragments, weighing upto 120tons are found in & around craters. Please explain the difference between Telluric iron found in the ground & meteoric Iron Professor & how this is created by electricity? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chelyabinsk_meteorite 34 minutes ago, zArk said: once more Electric Universe can be used to explain adequately the supposed meteor relics Im sure Thornill & Talbott would be in total agreement LMAO.. "worlds in collision." How can you be talking about electric universe on a space is fake thread, posted by someone who thinks we are in a cosmic goldfish bowl?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlos Posted August 21, 2020 Share Posted August 21, 2020 20 hours ago, alexa said: Well at least I don't believe that a big lump of rock just fell to earth, how ridiculous peoples assumptions are. Tell me.......... if this is the case why hasn't this happened since ? Large meteors and on collision courses are extremely rare. To be honest your beliefs are of no interest to me, you clearly have no grasp on reality and prefer to think you are one of the "in crowd" who are smart enough to see things. Sadly the complete opposite is true. Tell me about the craters on the Moon. Tell me about all animated gifs of the planets spinning - absolutely anyone can do this and verify it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexa Posted August 21, 2020 Author Share Posted August 21, 2020 @Carlos Totally misguided & deceived............. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zArk Posted August 21, 2020 Share Posted August 21, 2020 (edited) You know they came up with that side impact crater theory because their own moon earth position theory fecked itself How could a meteor impact at 90 degrees on the moon when the earth is right there, in the way of the supposed meteor trajectory So while facing an uncomfortable fact with incredible mental gymnastics, a lot of math and a blackboard they describe how meteors can impact from the side, leave no trench or skid and create a level rim with the deepest part of the crater being dead centre Clap clap clap for the moronic orthodox sphere science Edited August 21, 2020 by zArk 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diesel Posted August 21, 2020 Share Posted August 21, 2020 On 8/20/2020 at 2:34 PM, zArk said: if anyone is interested in an alternative scientific explanation than a rock falling did this , check out electric universe and with regard to the moon craters ... golly .. the orthodoxy is really struggling with equations, blackboards and absolutely no demonstrable lab experiences , however electric universe is showing how these craters were formed and explaining how it all fits together. The orthodoxy is massively reliant upon computer simulations which they program to produce a set of results. also check out Michael Tellingers african circles Thanks for the electric universe link A truly fascinating subject. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oddsnsods Posted August 21, 2020 Share Posted August 21, 2020 Interesting to watch disinfo spread on this forum. @alexa tell us a story Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oddsnsods Posted August 21, 2020 Share Posted August 21, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexa Posted August 21, 2020 Author Share Posted August 21, 2020 9 minutes ago, oddsnsods said: tell us a story Well....... Once upon a time...... John 3:12 “If I have told you earthly things, and ye believe not, how shall ye believe, if I tell you of heavenly things? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Messenger Posted August 21, 2020 Share Posted August 21, 2020 On 8/19/2020 at 6:39 AM, Carlos said: You ignored the picture above - did "God" make you afraid to debate honestly? Seriously dude, have you ever bought a telescope and looked at the planets? Or watched the ISS move across the sky? NASA are not the only space agency btw, you do know that don't you? You're wasting your time Carlos. Many of us have presented the same points as you have yet they also weasel their way out of it or ignore it. They always want to point to NASA as if nasa are the only people exploring space. Of course nasa are going to lie to people. If you sat on amazing tech and hardware that could get you and others to other planets, would you share it with people who were not as smart? I wouldn't. I would not share my findings with people who throw their fast "food" bag of litter out their vehicle window, or those who toss their cigarette butt down on the ground so that the filter full of toxins can then find its way into the soil and water system. No way in hell would I share space exploration with those people. A large percentage of humanity do not deserve to live on this beautiful planet as they have no respect for it, so why would I help them get to another planet, so they can trash that one too? How many times has the bible been re-written by man? And who originally wrote it? And is everything in it literal? Or is some of the content metaphoric? Does the bible teach physics? No. Does the bible teach alkalinity vs acid? No. What does the bible say about Ayahuasca? This is why it is difficult to discuss topics requiring deep thought with college "educated", and with religious people, because they have been indoctrinated and they cannot see past the conditioning. A good friend of mine is very religious and when we get into deeper issues such as UFO's and visitors from other planets and galaxies she always calls them demons. Even though some of them have proven to be benevolent. They are far more advanced than us in many regards but since the NWO who control the media and "education" and energy industry have conditioned humanity and suppressed information, it is why humanity know so little about aliens and life form from other parts of the universe. It's also why we are still using oil and coal and the gasoline combustion engine which after a century the average automobile still only gets about 28-32 miles per gallon. One would think that at this point we would have cars that could get 100 miles per gallon, but nope. Why is that? It's also why the NWO keep from humanity the importance of frequency. Everything the NWO apparatus does is to keep humanity enslaved, to keep people sick, misinformed, addicted, confused, trapped inside the political ping pong paradigm of left vs right blue vs red and never independent. Flat Earth is one of their newest forms of mental enslavement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexa Posted August 22, 2020 Author Share Posted August 22, 2020 7 hours ago, Messenger said: A good friend of mine is very religious and when we get into deeper issues such as UFO's and visitors from other planets and galaxies she always calls them demons. Your friend is right. 7 hours ago, Messenger said: It's also why we are still using oil and coal and the gasoline combustion engine which after a century the average automobile still only gets about 28-32 miles per gallon. One would think that at this point we would have cars that could get 100 miles per gallon, but nope. Why is that? This is b/c most men who tried to patent a car that would run on water which would go and go for miles either got bumped off or paid off. As I've said before Space is for the movie goers, the deluded and the deceived as they are also with the shape of the earth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Messenger Posted August 22, 2020 Share Posted August 22, 2020 38 minutes ago, alexa said: A. Your friend is right. B. This is b/c most men who tried to patent a car that would run on water which would go and go for miles either got bumped off or paid off. C. As I've said before Space is for the movie goers, the deluded and the deceived as they are also with the shape of the earth. A. Actually she is not, she is simply afraid, like many people. It makes the brain hurt to think about such deep issues. But I still love her anyway. B. Mankind has already manufactured devices that can generate energy using many sources, water, fossil fuel, coal, hydrogen/water, algae, corn, soy, cannabis/hemp. None of them have come to fruition because it threatens big oil and would lead to humanity taking their power back from the NWO cabal. BUT, it could also lead to certain death for the entire planet if people experiment with things they do not understand. Space is for people who have a very deep and ambitious mind, that which you lack, hence why you cannot comprehend it. It's ok, you're not alone, but to pass it off as fact is to do your fellow human a disservice. You may as well join the cabal one way or another and become an assassin for one of their many rackets as it's not far removed from trying to keep people in the dark about space exploration which "they" have been conducting for decades. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlos Posted August 22, 2020 Share Posted August 22, 2020 19 hours ago, alexa said: @Carlos Totally misguided & deceived............. Please note, I am not the least bit interested in your evasive opinions. You are simply too scared to address the evidence. Do not address me unless you have something tangible to say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlos Posted August 22, 2020 Share Posted August 22, 2020 18 hours ago, zArk said: You know they came up with that side impact crater theory because their own moon earth position theory fecked itself No, I don't know this made up nonsense. They have verifiable experiments that visually demonstrate it. 18 hours ago, zArk said: How could a meteor impact at 90 degrees on the moon when the earth is right there, in the way of the supposed meteor trajectory Wait what??? The Earth is in the way? Dude, that is one of the dumbest things I've ever seen. The Earth occupies around 2 degrees of the Lunar sky and thanks to the way the Moon librates and changes distance elliptically, there is never any exclusive area of sky where the Earth always blocks. Even if it stood completely still, the damn thing is a quarter of a million miles away! 18 hours ago, zArk said: So while facing an uncomfortable fact with incredible mental gymnastics, a lot of math and a blackboard they describe how meteors can impact from the side, leave no trench or skid and create a level rim with the deepest part of the crater being dead centre It isn't an uncomfortable fact, no incredible mental gymnastics and the variable incident angle approach is a ludicrously inevitable consequence. What mad universe sees object only impacting at 90 degrees!? Yet all the craters are round. 18 hours ago, zArk said: Clap clap clap for the moronic orthodox sphere science Go and educate yourself, your posts demonstrate such dire understanding of even the basics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexa Posted August 22, 2020 Author Share Posted August 22, 2020 3 hours ago, Carlos said: Please note, I am not the least bit interested in your evasive opinions. You are simply too scared to address the evidence. Do not address me unless you have something tangible to say. OK no prob Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlos Posted August 22, 2020 Share Posted August 22, 2020 30 minutes ago, alexa said: OK no prob That it? Not going to address any evidence, afraid to be wrong? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexa Posted August 22, 2020 Author Share Posted August 22, 2020 11 minutes ago, Carlos said: That it? Not going to address any evidence, afraid to be wrong? No.. not at all, if I'm wrong I'd be the first to admit it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlos Posted August 22, 2020 Share Posted August 22, 2020 4 hours ago, alexa said: No.. not at all, if I'm wrong I'd be the first to admit it. I deplore dishonest people. That is what you epitomise. You preach your ludicrous nonsensical claims and steadfastly ignore copious amounts of data, demonstrations, explanations and an untold number of posts that refute your claims. All you do is the equivalent of this: Prove me wrong. Explain in your own words how the Sun, a huge distance above any Earth observer can fall below eyeline and disappear over the horizon. How the hell can it show identical angular velocity anywhere on Earth regardless of the supposed distance variations on a "flat earth"? How in any sane world can it disappear with no size change!? Here is a flat earther shooting himself in the foot with a chieftain tank: Barely half way to his horizon and the Sun is a quarter the size. Go on then, explain or admit you are wrong! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexa Posted August 23, 2020 Author Share Posted August 23, 2020 8 hours ago, Carlos said: An upgraded model now offers responsive digital projections. Hmm! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter Posted August 23, 2020 Share Posted August 23, 2020 1 hour ago, alexa said: An upgraded model now offers responsive digital projections. Hmm! Gee whiz they have two strings now instead of one,and he has moved from the kitchen to the lounge room. Well I'm sold Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter Posted August 23, 2020 Share Posted August 23, 2020 (edited) NASA Lies ..... There Is No Such Thing As Space I absolutely disagree with this statement of course there is space ,and I know this to be true, how do I know this for a fact you ask ?, simple really because occasionally you find an ear each side of it Edited August 23, 2020 by peter 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexa Posted August 23, 2020 Author Share Posted August 23, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexa Posted August 23, 2020 Author Share Posted August 23, 2020 Simple Flat Earth Dome Experiment Coinciding Exactly with Biblical Scripture (2) https://153news.net/watch_video.php?v=813K67U1RNMA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexa Posted August 23, 2020 Author Share Posted August 23, 2020 10 hours ago, Carlos said: Prove me wrong. Explain in your own words how the Sun, a huge distance above any Earth observer can fall below eyeline and disappear over the horizon. The sun can only be systematized by incremental time-phases. Also by Location such as N W E S Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter Posted August 23, 2020 Share Posted August 23, 2020 20 minutes ago, alexa said: The sun can only be systematized by incremental time-phases. Also by Location such as N W E S I'm obviously a bit of a dummy , would you mind explaining the meaning of your statement in simple terms Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zArk Posted August 23, 2020 Share Posted August 23, 2020 29 minutes ago, peter said: I'm obviously a bit of a dummy , would you mind explaining the meaning of your statement in simple terms tricky deceivous energy waster Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.jpg.8081a54a3b74a5d1823dfac966666137.jpg)
.jpg.594f0ef23288ec5ab04539b2f8a8dbd4.jpg)
Recommended Posts