Jump to content

NASA Lies ..... There Is No Such Thing As Space


alexa

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, alexa said:

 

 

So it couldn't possibly have anything to do with the Firmament/Dome holding it in then ?

 

No, such magic domes are figments of weird imagination. 

 

MeteorCrater.jpg

 

Is there a big hole in "the dome" or did somebody dig that out with a JCB?

 

Explain gravity. P.s. when you start going on about density being the cause you can explain why you can't jump proportionally higher at altitude, such as Mexico City.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, alexa said:

 

How come God put one there ? And nothing can pass through it ?

 

You ignored the picture above - did "God" make you afraid to debate honestly?

 

Seriously dude, have you ever bought a telescope and looked at the planets? Or watched the ISS move across the sky?

 

NASA are not the only space agency btw, you do know that don't you?

Edited by Carlos
typo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Carlos said:

 

No, such magic domes are figments of weird imagination. 

 

MeteorCrater.jpg

 

Is there a big hole in "the dome" or did somebody dig that out with a JCB?

 

Explain gravity. P.s. when you start going on about density being the cause you can explain why you can't jump proportionally higher at altitude, such as Mexico City.

 

Electric Universe has superb explanations for these 'craters'

but anyway

 a rock would have to hit the land from 90 degrees to create that shape

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, zArk said:

 

Electric Universe has superb explanations for these 'craters'

but anyway

 a rock would have to hit the land from 90 degrees to create that shape

 

 

No on both accounts. 

 

Let me point something out to you - listen very carefully.

 

YOU CANNOT USE A THEORY ABOUT AN ALTERNATIVE TO SPACE, THE UNIVERSE ETC. AS A MEANS TO DISPROVE THAT SPACE EXISTS.

 

That is astonishingly stupid.

 

https://www.scienceabc.com/nature/universe/why-are-impact-craters-on-the-moon-round-and-not-some-other-shape.html

 

"When a meteor hits the lunar surface, a shockwave spreads out in all directions and the impact creates a dent in the surface that is much bigger than the size of the impacting object itself. Since the impact sprays ejecta in all directions in equal proportions (just like the shockwave of an explosion), the direction and incident angle of the impact become irrelevant in determining the shape of the crater."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, zArk said:

 

 

 

 Dude, you are a complete failure. You just got owned on both points and your response is some stupid emoji. How about you respond like an honest poster and admit you were wrong, that would  make you feel all good knowing your integrity is intact. Try it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/18/2020 at 2:26 PM, Carlos said:

MeteorCrater.jpg

 

Maybe this is some sort of Quarry made by the Giants who once roamed the earth.

........And maybe they used the stones from these quarry's to build  Pyramids. 😎

 

Just a thought!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Carlos said:

 

 Dude, you are a complete failure. You just got owned on both points and your response is some stupid emoji. How about you respond like an honest poster and admit you were wrong, that would  make you feel all good knowing your integrity is intact. Try it.

🙄

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, alexa said:

 

Maybe this is some sort of Quarry made by the Giants who once roamed the earth.

........And maybe they used the stones from these quarry's to build  Pyramids. 😎

 

Just a thought!

 

Maybe they used a fleet of fairies to transport them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Carlos said:

 

Afraid much.

Evveryone can see that if a rock caused it then it must of come from a 90degree angle

 

Its obvious . No trench no one side bigger than the other. Its not even debatable

 

But it wasnt a rock it was electrical  bolts zapping the land. 

 

N.b didnt check photo info...its not a nuke test site is it?

Edited by zArk
Didnt check photo blurb
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, zArk said:

Evveryone can see that if a rock caused it then it must of come from a 90degree angle

 

Well no, "everyone" can look at the science behind high velocity impacts and see that quite clearly and provable, from visible lunar craters that are all mainly round, that the angle of approach doesn't make much difference! But shit, you ignore that why don't you!

 

 

1 hour ago, zArk said:

Its obvious . No trench no one side bigger than the other. Its not even debatable

 

It is not debateable because people with brains have already studied it. Your "it's obvious" crap doesn't wash - the appeal to ignorance.

1 hour ago, zArk said:

But it wasnt a rock it was electrical  bolts zapping the land. 

 

Dude, you really need to get your head out of your backside.

 

1 hour ago, zArk said:

 n.b didnt check photo info...its not a nuke test site is it?

 

A plethora of facepalms at you. Nukes weren't around 2 billion years ago!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

The electric universe has proposed for many decades that laboratory experiments with high energy electrical discharge provide the clearest analog for craters seen on rocky bodies throughout the solar system.

 

if anyone is interested in an alternative scientific explanation than a rock falling did this , check out electric universe

 

MeteorCrater.jpg

 

and with regard to the moon craters ... golly .. the orthodoxy is really struggling with equations, blackboards and absolutely no demonstrable lab experiences , however electric universe is showing how these craters were formed and explaining how it all fits together. The orthodoxy is massively reliant upon computer simulations which they program to produce a set of results.

 

also check out Michael Tellingers african circles

africancircles.gif.7ff0469bf63b26460fec96f531e7922d.gif

 

africancircles2.jpg.866d72869e5e5ed3195d792e45315ddc.jpg

 

 

 

Edited by zArk
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, zArk said:

 

if anyone is interested in an alternative scientific explanation than a rock falling did this , check out electric universe

 

MeteorCrater.jpg

 

and with regard to the moon craters ... golly .. the orthodoxy is really struggling with equations, blackboards and absolutely no demonstrable lab experiences , however electric universe is showing how these craters were formed and explaining how it all fits together. The orthodoxy is massively reliant upon computer simulations which they program to produce a set of results.

 

also check out Michael Tellingers african circles

africancircles.gif.7ff0469bf63b26460fec96f531e7922d.gif

 

africancircles2.jpg.866d72869e5e5ed3195d792e45315ddc.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

Dude, you are in a thread that denies space and joining in with the crazies who believe it - now how the hell do you resolve this with the electric universe. These are impact craters from objects arriving from outer space. They are pretty much always round regardless of the incident angle of approach.

 

How can truthers be so dishonest?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Carlos said:

Dude, you are in a thread that denies space and joining in with the crazies who believe it - now how the hell do you resolve this with the electric universe. These are impact craters from objects arriving from outer space. They are pretty much always round regardless of the incident angle of approach.

🤦‍♂️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, zArk said:

🤦‍♂️

 

Irony. The person who appears to deny space, seeks to explain a crater in a space denial thread, uses a claim that doesn't deny space. They then put up an infantile facepalm for some weird reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, oddsnsods said:

Ancient settlements.

 

 

jeeze, all of em??, i cant argue that you will probably find one or two circular stone houses with doors and pad stones for roofs yet the 99.999% of these 'circles' are not settlements

 

Quote

Himba people who live in the region, however, there is nothing to explain. That’s just how it is, they tell anthropologists; the circles were made by their “original ancestor, Mukuru,” or more poetically, they are “footprints of the gods.”

 

219191279_MysteriousAfricanFairyCircles.jpg.5b32aa35e8f6b70e5b088af4dc9ce419.jpg

 

yeah settlements @oddsnsods lol

 

35 minutes ago, oddsnsods said:

Craters have tons of debris found of rock that is not from this planet. Moldevite for example.

 

once more regurjitating the orthodoxy. It is not fact that Moldevite was created through a meteor impact.

its green glass. the narrowmindedness of the religious zealots of heliocentrism cannot be exaggerated

 

once more Electric Universe can be used to explain adequately the supposed meteor relics

Edited by zArk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Carlos said:

 

Maybe they used a fleet of fairies to transport them. 

 

Well at least I don't believe that a big lump of rock just fell to earth, how ridiculous peoples assumptions are. Tell me.......... if this is the case why hasn't this happened since ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Guest locked this topic
  • screamingeagle unlocked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...