NASA Lies ..... There Is No Such Thing As Space

[Eldnah 136]

Cant edit

 

A quick google shows 

 

1) Decca stayed in service 10 yrs longer than i recalled although i suspect thats the differrence between commercial aviation and things like uk gov / life boats using it and so im correct it was gone from aitcraft.

 

2) Deccas coverage was more extensive at one time 

In my defence we only dealt with existing transmitters and coverage - so we may not even have been told about stations in other parts of empire equally its been 30yrs and ive forgot

[amy G 57]

Why must they fake everything if it is real?

 

 

I mean... seriously?

Edited December 8, 2020 by amy G

[Eldnah 136]

8 minutes ago, amy G said:

Why must they fake everything if it is real?

 

 

I mean... seriously?

Exactly seriously

 

Think about it  We all agree  Going to the wrong  link happens - 

 

Now ask yourself this why would you be filming yourselves making the hoax and even if you did why would you not be commiting it to tape - but transmitting it as well.

 

Its a completely preposteros claim and its embarrasing how the some of the so called awake critical thinkers - will leap on stuff like this without giving it the most cursory thought.

[amy G 57]

12 hours ago, Eldnah said:

Exactly seriously

 

Think about it  We all agree  Going to the wrong  link happens - 

 

Now ask yourself this why would you be filming yourselves making the hoax and even if you did why would you not be commiting it to tape - but transmitting it as well.

 

Its a completely preposteros claim and its embarrasing how the some of the so called awake critical thinkers - will leap on stuff like this without giving it the most cursory thought.

The explanations offered by freemasons mean nothing to even moderately critical thinkers. Space is a stage and your beloved astronots are actors. What is preposterous is that anyone still believes. And the hoops they force themselves through to maintain such insane beliefs.

 

[Doctor What 17]

6 minutes ago, amy G said:

The explanations offered by freemasons mean nothing to even moderately critical thinkers. Space is a stage and your beloved astronots are actors. What is preposterous is that anyone still believes. And the hoops they force themselves through to maintain such insane beliefs.

 

 

 

Gravity.

 

You have had it explained for you with complex science, easier science and idiot-proof science. You ignore all examples shown to you of weightlessness on space vessels. You are ignorant troll. 

 

 

[Eldnah 136]

2 hours ago, amy G said:

The explanations offered by freemasons mean nothing to even moderately critical thinkers. Space is a stage and your beloved astronots are actors. What is preposterous is that anyone still believes. And the hoops they force themselves through to maintain such insane beliefs.

 

 

Even if you believe moon landings / space walks are faked - Or that they happenned but footage was faked 

 

it doesnt excuse the embarrassing level of gullability required to believe that they would have accidently linked to the people filming the hoax - rather than the hoax.

 

There is no credible reason they would be live feeding the filming of the hoax - by even giveing that moronic video credibility you are embarrasing yourself - undermining your arguments (since you clearly dont think you simply parrot whatever  you hear if its contrary to the official story. Worse you really help promote the idea that were all conspiraloons.

 

Aqs to this meme it fails because it takes a fact in isolation and applies it to differrent circumstances - 

So its true if you opened the doors on a space shuttle all the air would bugger off fast as pressure attempted to equalise Its also true that if you took a something like the space station in Elysium with high enough walls* then it could be open as the centripital effect (which provides gravity**) means the wall is higher than the air will climb and so the atmosphere wont escape - of course if you make a hole in the wall it would.

 

The irony here is that you claim gravity doesnt exist and so we stay at the bottom / fal because of density

 

So youre own rational of what gravity really is means that something with zero density will be above  something with density and so air must be under vacuum

 

 

 

 

*I think its 10 Miles 

**Yes I know it isnt really but for the sake of simplicity

[amy G 57]

They just lie and fake everything. You believe as many do and as I, myself used to, but no longer do.

 

Watch this and tell me how WE KNOW FOR CERTAIN THAT THIS IS FAKE:

 

 

Sound stages, actornots and a comedy routine that never ends.

[Steph 169]

16 minutes ago, amy G said:

Watch this and tell me how WE KNOW FOR CERTAIN THAT THIS IS FAKE:

Obviously, if that was the moon, the hammer wouldn't bounce but it would embed itself in the cream cheese.

 

The Wallace and Gromit mission made a finding that our understanding of the moon may not be what we are told. Laboratory studies on samples taken from the moon suggest it may be as tasty as Wensleydale.

 

https://youtu.be/T0qagA4_eVQ

[peter 686]

On 12/9/2020 at 5:47 PM, amy G said:

The explanations offered by freemasons mean nothing to even moderately critical thinkers. Space is a stage and your beloved astronots are actors. What is preposterous is that anyone still believes. And the hoops they force themselves through to maintain such insane beliefs.

 

I think we have just seen the second law of abject stupidity , 100% NON - Cognitive, now where have I seen this dumb picture before, oh the monotony

Edited January 8 by peter

[serpentine 300]

A certain amount of space is needed to keep the really weird stuff apart.

 

 

Edited January 9 by serpentine

[alexa 665]

[MarpatV2 19]

On 12/9/2020 at 7:47 AM, amy G said:

The explanations offered by freemasons mean nothing to even moderately critical thinkers. Space is a stage and your beloved astronots are actors. What is preposterous is that anyone still believes. And the hoops they force themselves through to maintain such insane beliefs.

 

But your whole view is based entirely on your belief that only the bible is true, therefore everything else must be false.

[AnarchicBreeze 21]

On 12/9/2020 at 7:47 AM, amy G said:

The explanations offered by freemasons mean nothing to even moderately critical thinkers. Space is a stage and your beloved astronots are actors. What is preposterous is that anyone still believes. And the hoops they force themselves through to maintain such insane beliefs.

 

It may be that the core of the Earth has so much mass that it has curved spacetime around the Earth in towards itself; that our atmosphere and everything on the surface of the Earth IS attempting to escape into the vaccum of space but can only travel through a spacetime so curved that the only direction it can travel is towards the centre of the Earth. 

 

All possible futures for matter within the radius of the curvature are downwards to the surface of the Earth unless massive amounts of energy, such as rocket boosters, are used to overpower that curvature.

 

That there is curvature can be seen in the Earth and other planets traveling in a straight line through a spacetime that has been curved by the mass of the sun and that our own moon is traveling in a perfectly straight line through space that the mass of the Earth has curved around itself.

 

I've always wondered why only one side of the moon faces the Earth and why the moon has zero spin. There is attraction between the moon and the water that is on Earth. It causes tides (and our weather systems) as that attraction pulls on the water. But what is it on or in the moon and specifically on only one side of the moon that is attracted to the water on the Earth?

 

 

Edited Wednesday at 10:19 AM by AnarchicBreeze

[AnarchicBreeze 21]

One possibly explanation is the salt content of the Earth's oceans. 

2 hours ago, AnarchicBreeze said:

It may be that the core of the Earth has so much mass that it has curved spacetime around the Earth in towards itself; that our atmosphere and everything on the surface of the Earth IS attempting to escape into the vaccum of space but can only travel through a spacetime so curved that the only direction it can travel is towards the centre of the Earth. 

 

All possible futures for matter within the radius of the curvature are downwards to the surface of the Earth unless massive amounts of energy, such as rocket boosters, are used to overpower that curvature.

 

That there is curvature can be seen in the Earth and other planets traveling in a straight line through a spacetime that has been curved by the mass of the sun and that our own moon is traveling in a perfectly straight line through space that the mass of the Earth has curved around itself.

 

I've always wondered why only one side of the moon faces the Earth and why the moon has zero spin. There is attraction between the moon and the water that is on Earth. It causes tides (and our weather systems) as that attraction pulls on the water. But what is it on or in the moon and specifically on only one side of the moon that is attracted to the water on the Earth?

 

 

One possible explanation is that our oceans are saltwater and saltwater is a good conductor of electricity. If the Earth has a metallic core and there are currents of electricity flowing around the Earth's surface through the saltwater it becomes a coil that can generate a magnetic field.

 

It is widely believed that the moon is a remnant of a planet sized object that collided with the Earth billions of years ago. There is widespread evidence of that collision but oddly, less extraterrestrial debris than would be expected. Unless of course the planet sized thing that hit Earth was big chunk of frozen saltwater.

 

One of the interesting properties of  water ice is that it has the ability to magnetise certain metals. If the moon is a ball of water ice with a metallic core, that core could become magnetised and, due to the attraction and repulsion effects of adjacent magnetic fields, become orientated in one position in relation to the Earth's magnetic field. 

 

That the moon is traveling in a straight line past the Earth permanently following a curved spacetime path around the Earth could explain why the Earth rotates.

 

If the moon's continuous journey past the Earth causes the magnetised core of the Earth to spin to keep one attracted pole of its magnetic field pointing at the moon, then the outer layers of planet Earth would be in a continual state of trying to catch up with the core spinning within it. The friction from this would cause enough heat to make rocks and stuff molten...

 

Another lazy lockdown dystopia morning with nothing better to do than drink coffee and think about space

[screamingeagle 877]

6 hours ago, AnarchicBreeze said:

Another lazy lockdown dystopia morning with nothing better to do than drink coffee and think about space

that should be a priority....see how goverment is looking up for you

[TheDoctor 1]

Space is real, the government would not give nasa billions of dollars, if there was no space

 

[AnarchicBreeze 21]

On 1/13/2021 at 6:34 PM, screamingeagle said:

that should be a priority....see how goverment is looking up for you

Lol maybe I should be using that time more usefully and be thinking up ways of subverting the spiralling police state we are in.

[AnarchicBreeze 21]

1 hour ago, TheDoctor said:

Space is real, the government would not give nasa billions of dollars, if there was no space

 

Something else I've often pondered is does space exist if there is nothing to exist within it? More specifically, does space exist only when there is something to exist within it?

 

The notion of space as infinite and without end does beg the question of what is space(?). Is space devoid of matter or energy a tangible infinite thing that exists in and of itself? Or is it simply non-existance?

 

It seems, to me at least, that if space is non-existance that it could then be infinitely non-existing, rather than be infinitely existing.

 

Theories of a curved universe creating its own circular infinity and of multiple universes coexisting still don't answer the question of what is the space within which these curved or multiple universes exist.

 

There are of course many more questions this line of thought raises not least of which is what if space is non-existance would that mean we don't exist either?

 

May have to try a different brand of coffee

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited Friday at 06:34 AM by AnarchicBreeze