Jump to content

NASA Lies ..... There Is No Such Thing As Space


alexa

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Comedy Time said:

It explains what YOU  are about. You don't care about honesty...just deceptive crap

 

So the earth is a ball, NASA never told a lie, 911 is down to box cutters, all science is true and everything concerning covid stated by governments and media is correct!

Would that be about right?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If there is no such thing as space, as some of you contend, how do you account for satellites, satellite dishes (pointing up - have you noticed?), orbiting manned spacecraft from the 1960s, the ISS, independent scientific analysis of distant stars and planets, and accounts and testimonies of the astronauts who have been in earth orbit?

 

And given that for hundreds of years the earth is believed to be and proven to be a sphere, if you are claiming otherwise, i.e. a flat earth, then to support your theory the onus is on you to demonstrate proof. A few YouTube videos won't do as they've all - to my knowledge - been successfully debunked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, lake said:

So the earth is a ball, NASA never told a lie, 911 is down to box cutters, all science is true and everything concerning covid stated by governments and media is correct!

Would that be about right?

 

That is called an excessive non-sequitur argument.

 

9 hours ago, lake said:

So the earth is a ball,

 

Yes. Proven with so many things it is laughable that people dispute it.

 

9 hours ago, lake said:

NASA never told a lie

 

They hid the truth about Challenger, but that is an internal departmental thing. To all intents and purposes the claim is that they lie about the stuff they present....so no. They haven't lied. Just useless conspiracy crap.

 

9 hours ago, lake said:

911 is down to box cutters

 

If it wasn't, why not give them hi-tech plastic guns or hidden explosive vests? The absence of a coherent alternative leaves the conclusion. I don't know for sure whether it is true, but I know the conspiracy claims make no sense.

 

9 hours ago, lake said:

all science is true

 

A really daft comment. Science gets many, many things spot on. The tough things to verify are surrounding universe creation, reality and life. There's work to be done.

 

9 hours ago, lake said:

and everything concerning covid stated by governments and media is correct!

 

Doubtful. They can't even agree amongst themselves. The disease is real.....anyone who knows NHS staff will get that. The cause being 5G is ludicrous. I certainly don't want to delve into the colossal thread and argue the toss. 

 

9 hours ago, lake said:

Would that be about right?

 

Now I could say, so the world is flat, loads of NASA conspiracies are true, 911 was no planes, all science is wrong, covid  is caused by mobile phone masts, a cast of millions and millions. Would that be about right?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, alexa said:

 

Well watch the vid & you might find out!

 

I watched it all - NASA occupied about 5% of it. Oooh the Nazis and operation Paperclip and all the usual bullshit about Full Earth composites, conveniently ignored about a hundred Apollo pictures....all the ISS (not NASA - four other agencies too!) images and video.

 

Speaking of watching videos to "find out" things, why don't you ever watch the ones posted as rebuttal? twatty.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Comedy Time said:

Speaking of watching videos to "find out" things, why don't you ever watch the ones posted as rebuttal? twatty.png

 I used to know of somone else who posted pictures of this kind Ha!

 

As for the vid's that support space, I've seen most of them and they are mostly full of scientific crap and lies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, alexa said:

 I used to know of somone else who posted pictures of this kind Ha!

 

Hmmm, very interesting.:classic_rolleyes:

 

10 minutes ago, alexa said:

As for the vid's that support space, I've seen most of them and they are mostly full of scientific crap and lies.

 

How would you know? You and science are not best friends. And you've seen "most of them"?

 

Hell's bells you've not seen 1% of them....and your capacity to assess "lies" seems fatally flawed given that you just bigged up one littered with them.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, alexa said:

 How could you possibly know what I've seen and what I haven't ??

 

How could you possibly know what is lies when you have no knowledge at all of basic mathematics or any science. 

 

https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=iss+videos&FORM=HDRSC3

 

......keep scrolling down for about an hour until you find one you have actually watched!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, alexa said:

 

What is one mans truth is another mans lie!

 

 

 

image_2020-10-14_103142.png

 

Right there is what you are doing. Nothing can reach you.

 

You claim verifiable and repeatable science is a lie, but espouse the daftest claims on the planet. Have you ever looked through a powerful telescope? 

 

Explain this picture......

ibr-1608172.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Diesel said:

As a satellite orbits the earth I have never understood how dishes tune into to a static position. please explain

 

Very good question.

 

The higher up the satellite orbits the slower it moves....that is just orbital mechanics. For example the Moon has a speed of 2,300 mph, whilst the ISS moves around at 17,500 mph.

 

There is a point where this orbital period matches Earth's rotation. Geosynchronous orbits. BUT, these appear to move too because they simply come back to the same point daily , so a specialist type of geosynchronous orbit is needed.

 

Geostationary. A geosynchronous orbit parked on the equator, It appear in the same spot all the time.

 

https://www.n2yo.com/satellites/?c=34

 

05-Geostationary%20Sat-Ani.gif

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, alexa said:

 

At what point does this happen ?

 

Half past seven on a Wednesday. Google it, learn something.

 

Clue: Close up ISS takes 93 minutes. Far away Moon takes 27.32 days. Somewhere in between.

 

Explain the bloody picture of the satellite dishes.

Edited by Comedy Time
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Comedy Time said:

Half past seven on a Wednesday. Google it, learn something.

 Why ?  when I can just ask you.

 

3 minutes ago, Comedy Time said:

Somewhere in between.

 

What kind of an answer is this ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, alexa said:

 Why ?  when I can just ask you.

 

Because in going to look for the words "geosynchronous orbit" you might actually learn something instead of blundering through life with a complete absence of knowledge.

 

13 minutes ago, alexa said:

What kind of an answer is this ?

 

One that somebody with poor understanding should get. Pick two points. One is below the target speed - ISS 93 minutes. One is above it - the Moon 27.32 days.

 

The target is one day, it lies between the two distances. Duhhhhhhh.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Comedy Time said:

 

Right there is what you are doing. Nothing can reach you.

 

You claim verifiable and repeatable science is a lie, but espouse the daftest claims on the planet. Have you ever looked through a powerful telescope? 

 

Explain this picture......

ibr-1608172.jpg

 

@alexa And the dishonest evasion continues. When can we expect you to "cover" this or tell us why it doesn't count?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Comedy Time said:

 

Very good question.

 

The higher up the satellite orbits the slower it moves....that is just orbital mechanics. For example the Moon has a speed of 2,300 mph, whilst the ISS moves around at 17,500 mph.

 

There is a point where this orbital period matches Earth's rotation. Geosynchronous orbits. BUT, these appear to move too because they simply come back to the same point daily , so a specialist type of geosynchronous orbit is needed.

 

Geostationary. A geosynchronous orbit parked on the equator, It appear in the same spot all the time.

 

https://www.n2yo.com/satellites/?c=34

 

05-Geostationary%20Sat-Ani.gif

 

Thanks for the explanation that makes perfect sense

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Maybe some of us are living on a round Earth and some of us on a flat one, which may or may not have a space surrounding it, maybe others on other kids of Earth but if everything is a simulation/dimension/hologram or something, perhaps we are all on different programmes, we think and act we are all living in the same place, but we aren't.

Edited by rhydra
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

I just knew these so called Aliens were working from underground.

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9015711/Leaked-photo-Pentagon-UFO-task-force-shows-sliver-cube-hovering-Atlantic.html

 

Leaked photo from Pentagon UFO task force shows 'silver cube' hovering over the Atlantic at 35,000ft - as classified reports reveal concerns 'aliens' could be operating beneath the world's seas

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/3/2020 at 9:35 PM, lake said:

 

166 in this link but it seems to hold no outside link!

 

https://flatearthfacts.com/flat-earth-model/proof-the-earth-is-flat/satelliets-dont-exist/

  Quote

The “geostationary communications satellite” was first created by Freemason science-fiction writer Arthur C. Clarke and supposedly became science-fact just a decade later. Before this, radio, television, and navigation systems like LORAN and DECCA were already well-established and worked fine using only ground-based technologies. Nowadays huge fibre-optics cables connect the internet across oceans, gigantic cell towers triangulate GPS signals, and ionospheric propagation allows radio waves to be bounced all without the aid of the science-fiction best-seller known as “satellites.”

 

So just a copy paste.

 

Decca was a UK system that was quite short ranged in its coverage ( UK North sea and some Atlantic) - although very accurate by the standards of the day.

But you did have to know roughly where you where to use it -

(Bear in mind its been out of service 30 years - in fact befor i trained so we learnt it as a requirement because the sylibus hadnt caught up to reality. so its possible ive confused how it works a little)

 

You had 4xmitters different frequencies that fired in a given sequence  Purple Master Red Green** the phase differrence indicated where you were - of course the cycle repeated  which meant you had to know which lane ie which  block of sky or sea ( it was kept around really for the R boats) you were in.

 

Loran was longer ranged but i think had lanes as well - it and omega were dying like Decca when I learnt them. one of them basically a case of if a station fails it wont be repaired. 

 

Omega was a truly global Radio Nav System - it was also absolutely massive - each of the 8 (iirc) Stations was the size of a small town and either a massive tower or strung across a valley a small valley. 

 

As such they were vulnerable to attack -expensive to maintain  but also the whims and vageries of the country they were based in - that as much as anything saw its demise .

 

Notwithstanding that you can carry a GPS reciever in your pocket - The antenna for an Omega system is more dustbin lid sized - not really man portable. 

 

 

 

**Princess Marys rose garden - in case you were wondering how i remembered that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Guest locked this topic
  • screamingeagle unlocked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...