911 events from an air stewardess point of view

[- TZC -]

Wasn't it impossible for planes to fly that fast at that altitude? Let alone just fly through such heavy dense and thick steel wings and all. They didn't try so hard when it came to masking the other missiles away from the twin towers

 

I have forgotten maybe more than half I knew about 911 but I remember the video of the silver orb coming 'down' toward the tower without the plane 'on' which could have been the pods you mention, sticking out of the composite laid over for TV. The background sky was deleted wasn't it, on certain shared shots

 

But I don't have a solid opinion, other than it was a very complicated scam that despite being meticulously planned could not be completely masked live and ultimately the shock value, fear for what may be next and repetitive explanations that should make you think ( buildings undamaged under the impact site turning to dust as the upper somehow gained mass allowing perfect vertical demolition- TWICE! ) worked for the majority to bypass thought and just go along, again that bigger lie angle.

 

Then there was the building that didn't even get hit that did the same thing. crumbled perfectly so as not to damage anything else

 

That's about 911 not the focus of the thread so I'll not push it further

 

 

Edited August 21, 2020 by - TZC -

[- TZC -]

After consideration, I can tie my thoughts to the thread better

 

I suppose that they knew it would be impossible to fly an airliner into the tower and get the desired effect that it caused crippling damage. There would be another synchronisation sensetive realtime problem to overcome tying detonations to the impact of the plane, and also it couldn't fly fast enough to paint the picure desired

 

All of a sudden it makes perfect sense to divert the plane and replace it, and again it explains the phonecalls.. just that in my opinion it wasn't another plane but something dressed up as one.

 

She might be right!

Edited August 21, 2020 by - TZC -

[mishy]

Why bother of going to all the trouble of changing planes? The footage is all you need to show 9/11 for what it is....a shit Hollywood movie.

[- TZC -]

58 minutes ago, mishy said:

Why bother of going to all the trouble of changing planes? The footage is all you need to show 9/11 for what it is....a shit Hollywood movie.

Well that was what I couldn't see before remembering/realising the point in my post right above, the shit Hollywood movie wouldn't have been able to convince anybody had a real televised plane reacted realistically on the surface of the tower, on the day.

 

So, put plane down, replace with some kind of missile (that never was meant to bring the towers down only setup the story), set up the shit Hollywood movie for the masses, confiscate most all independent photography or video of the event just like at the pentagon and the surprising lack of evidence there of any plane and saturate the news with 'eyewitnesses' selling the chosen nightmare.

 

The thing that stuck so much to me was all those people that were there and managed to get on tv saying so many things that were never repeated or given any time the next day onward. It's what fully woke me up actually.

 

The trouble of diverting the plane would be to more strongly convince people that a plane could actually do what they said it did by taking it out of the equation

[Hedders]

I am another one with no answers but lots of questions..

 

One of the things that made me wonder about the planes and passengers was the lack of concerned/grieving friends and family at LAX wondering what happened to their loved ones.

Destination airports are always swamped when planes go missing/crash but i don't remember seeing any of the usual news footage from any airports. It was a long time ago though and maybe i missed it.

I am new to the forum, this has been covered?

 

 

 

[wideawake]

First of all, Welcome to the forum.

You are right, I have never heard of families grieving at airports, doesn't mean it didn't happen though. Waiting to see what others have found because I couldn't find any videos about it. 

Edited September 3, 2020 by wideawake

[mishy]

1 hour ago, Hedders said:

I am another one with no answers but lots of questions..

 

One of the things that made me wonder about the planes and passengers was the lack of concerned/grieving friends and family at LAX wondering what happened to their loved ones.

Destination airports are always swamped when planes go missing/crash but i don't remember seeing any of the usual news footage from any airports. It was a long time ago though and maybe i missed it.

I am new to the forum, this has been covered?

 

 

 

 

Right near the end of Sptember Clues they show the TV footage from LAX on 9/11. Nobody turned up and they evacuated the airport.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cF0-nslm3j0

[Carlos]

5 minutes ago, mishy said:

 

Right near the end of Sptember Clues they show the TV footage from LAX on 9/11. Nobody turned up and they evacuated the airport.

 

If you saw on the news that the flight had crashed why would you go to the airport? The question is more about how many would have failed to have noticed the events on the news. 

[peter]

On 8/21/2020 at 9:05 AM, Basket Case said:

'sparked' milliseconds before impact.

You noticed that on the video as well, just before impact , I wondered if it was some sort of laser guidance system and the pods were certainly unusual

[wideawake]

23 hours ago, Carlos said:

 

If you saw on the news that the flight had crashed why would you go to the airport? The question is more about how many would have failed to have noticed the events on the news. 

True and they would've had plenty of time to see/hear the news considering the flight duration.

[Guest Gone Fishing...]

 

[wideawake]

10 hours ago, Basket Case said:

 

 

Thank you for the video,

I think they took over the planes by remote control like they wanted to do during the Cuban crisis, switching the planes in the air with modified drones or missiles and the sims set up by NORAD were to camouflage the switch and confuse the air traffic control crew. Many have reported seeing a smaller "plane" then a standard commercial airliner hitting the towers and that would explain why the planes never fell apart at the speed and altitude reported. 

There are too many coincidences and hidden facts about 9/11 to believe the official story. 

 

[legion]

On 7/24/2020 at 2:06 PM, Guest Gone Fishing... said:

 

 

This ^^^^^

[screamingeagle]

37 minutes ago, legion said:

This ^^^^^

what "this"?

[Kelli]

On 12/31/2022 at 8:41 AM, Campion said:

One thing I've noticed is that my thoughts sometimes appear automatically as a result of other emotional and biological functions which I don't have control over. Eg when I feel hungry I get thoughts appearing about obtaining food, as if it's part of the survival strategy. Also the fight/flight/freeze/fawn mechanism creates a cascade of responses which include thoughts of fear, anxiety and anger which aren't consciously chosen. I only have a basic understanding of psychology but I understand there is a primitive part of the brain, sometimes called the 'reptile brain' around the brain stem which controls these type of subconscious functions separate from the executive function (which is what we normally associate with our conscious self and will power). 

Hey - the brain stem actually controls very basic functions like breathing, blood pressure, cycling between sleep and wakefulness, and level of alertness. I believe you are referring to the CONTENT of consciousness, which involves different areas of the brain, such as the pre-frontal cortex, or the visual centers when you are thinking about something in front of your eyes. The so-called Reptile brain refers to the limbic system, a bunch of structures that are very primitive & play a role in emotions, memory, & learning. I'm sorry if that's not helpful. Interestingly, even though I have a graduate degree in psychology and have worked in the field for many years I've never heard of the limbic system described as the reptile complex before David Icke!