Jump to content

Do Nuclear Bombs Exist And Can An Atom Be Split?


Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, bflat said:

Anyone here for the truth?

 

Summary

1. This article explains the good news that atomic bombs are just propaganda and do not work.

2. Any info of the opposite is US lies and propaganda since 1945.

3. The 73 years old hoax from 6 August 1945 about military explosive fission is of course still working kept going strong by several governments, crazy armed forces and plenty physicists incl. Nobel prize winners that cannot get any better jobs than lying for their governments - the only real job many physicists can get apart from being low paid school teachers - and by mainstream media that are experts in publishing fake info.

4. 10 000's of atomic bombs have since 1946 been built, transported around, mishandled, dropped by mistake but none has ever exploded.

5. Reason is that an atomic bomb cannot explode. It is physically impossible. Military explosive fission is pseudoscience!

Much more here: http://heiwaco.tripod.com/bomb.htm

 

There has been this thing over the last 30 years of 100 or so Soviet-era nuclear suitcases being missing, so one can ask how come there has not been a thermonuclear incident?

 

This from 1978, BBC's Connections TV series by the science historian, James Burke and it is stated that all that is needed for a suitcase with an atomic bomb is stolen nuclear material and any physics graduate to do the rest.  So, if it is that easy why has it not happened?   Watch from the start to 3 minutes.

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 147
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

yes,2 or 3 days of bombing,about 2000 planes were used  and in Japan just one plane    the alies never had that kind of air fleet near the japan to pull out "dresden like bombing"

Tokyo and others were firebombed in said manner and believe it or not it just like in Germany this involved a large number of aircraft dropping crap everywhere.   How do you explain then tha

After stumbling across a great written piece by John Pilger, l can't help but share this here;   ANOTHER HIROSHIMA IS COMING… UNLESS WE STOP IT NOW 3 August 2020   In a major e

Posted Images

13 hours ago, bflat said:

Anyone here for the truth?

 

Summary

1. This article explains the good news that atomic bombs are just propaganda and do not work.

2. Any info of the opposite is US lies and propaganda since 1945.

3. The 73 years old hoax from 6 August 1945 about military explosive fission is of course still working kept going strong by several governments, crazy armed forces and plenty physicists incl. Nobel prize winners that cannot get any better jobs than lying for their governments - the only real job many physicists can get apart from being low paid school teachers - and by mainstream media that are experts in publishing fake info.

4. 10 000's of atomic bombs have since 1946 been built, transported around, mishandled, dropped by mistake but none has ever exploded.

5. Reason is that an atomic bomb cannot explode. It is physically impossible. Military explosive fission is pseudoscience!

Much more here: http://heiwaco.tripod.com/bomb.htm

 

Excellent post.

Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, Defbalt said:

Utter claptrap. Of course they exist, as everyone will possibly find out in the next few years. File this with flat earth nuttery.

I have still yet to see any evidence at all that an atom has ever been split. You got something?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why don't you simply ask the poor people of Hiroshima, Japan, whether Nuclear bombs exist?

And you might like to check out the Mururoa atholl in the South Seas too, where the French carried out huge numbers of nuclear bomb experiments and detonations while for example Jacques Chirac was President of France! That was finally stopped because of worldwide protests. Here is just one sample text on this subject.

https://www.france24.com/en/20181010-france-faces-hague-complaint-french-polynesia-nuclear-tests-international-criminal-court

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Defbalt said:

Utter claptrap. Of course they exist, as everyone will possibly find out in the next few years. File this with flat earth nuttery.

 

Do you believe you live on a spinning water ball  in a vacuum then?

lol

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/4/2020 at 9:54 AM, bflat said:

I have yet to see any evidence at all that an atom has ever been split.

 

Anyone?

And I have yet to see any evidence that it hasn't,

How's my questions going by the way?

Edited by peter
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/5/2020 at 9:55 AM, Dagmar Gross said:

Why don't you simply ask the poor people of Hiroshima, Japan, whether Nuclear bombs exist?

And what will that accomplish? You think they have been brainwashed less than the rest of us?

As stated on page one of this very thread:

Hiroshima and Nagasaki were firebombed like Dresden and all the other heavily populated German cities. These were disgusting, egregious war crimes, but a nuclear weapon has never been detonated.

 

Now, since no proof has been presnted that an atom has ver been split, why don't you post proof gfpr us that a nuclear weapon has ever been detonated, fair?

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, bflat said:

Hiroshima and Nagasaki were firebombed like Dresden and all the other heavily populated German cities. These were disgusting, egregious war crimes, but a nuclear weapon has never been detonated.

 

 

Tokyo and others were firebombed in said manner and believe it or not it just like in Germany this involved a large number of aircraft dropping crap everywhere.

 

How do you explain then that witnesses to both Hiroshima and nagasaki, military radar operators etc only report a single aircraft and none report a sustained a raid.

Edited by Eldnah
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, Eldnah said:

 

Tokyo and others were firebombed in said manner and believe it or not it just like in Germany this involved a large number of aircraft dropping crap everywhere.

 

How do you explain then that witnesses to both Hiroshima and nagasaki, military radar operators etc only report a single aircraft and none report a sustained a raid.

yes,2 or 3 days of bombing,about 2000 planes were used 

and in Japan just one plane 

 

the alies never had that kind of air fleet near the japan to pull out "dresden like bombing"

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, screamingeagle said:

yes,2 or 3 days of bombing,about 2000 planes were used 

and in Japan just one plane 

 

the alies never had that kind of air fleet near the japan to pull out "dresden like bombing"

 

 

4 days and 1500 aircraft IIRC

 

Japan Tokyo was hit by about 250 aircraft in a single night ( so potentially you could have a 1000 over 4 days) but also wasn't the only target that night.

However 1) the B29 was larger than the Lanc

2) Building construction was less robust  hence the destruction of Tokyo outweighed anything in Europe.

 

There seems to be a misconception about the size of the US strategic bomber force in the Pacific.

People seem to think because it was an Island bombing wasn't feasible - whereas the fact it was quite an isolated Island meant it was the only way to strike at it -  Proportionally a much bomber effort was directed to the Pacific as the ETO

 

Which returns us to the point

Every Japanese city was levelled with bomber fleets - except the 2 - which only record a single aircraft.

Whatever that bomber dropped it was not the usual firebomb explosive mix.

 

The US says Nuke - others here are saying it wasn't - but as yet nobody has produced a valid alternative explanation of how one aircraft caused such destruction using conventional weapons.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

How else can submarines stay under water for four to seven months if they weren't nuclear powered? Anyone who thinks that there is no nuclear weapons is a fool or a shill.

 

 

sub.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎6‎/‎25‎/‎2020 at 4:41 AM, Avoiceinthecrowd said:

Both the NAZI and the USA chose to detonate at high altitude instead of optimizing the destruction with a ground level precursor shockwave 

 

The reason given is that there's more destruction from the developed fireball and pressure wave than from impact and ground shockwave - If that's correct then 2000ft (which isn't high altitude) may well be optimal for destruction

 

 

Modern idea is airburst as well,  theres also less dust pulled up which reduces fall out ( ie radioactive bomb bits attaching to dust and drifting everywhere)

 

As for the German weapon- they were so far off in their physics its suggested that those working on it were anti Nazis deliberately sabotaging the project (others think that's a convenient post fact excuse for being so wrong)

Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎6‎/‎25‎/‎2020 at 4:01 AM, Avoiceinthecrowd said:

 

Cinema special effects came online same time as staged nuclear blasts.

 

No need for special effects, a large conventional explosion looks like a nuclear blast - Muchroom cloud etc.

 

Take footage of that adjust film speed and dont provide scale and you've faked it

Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, bflat said:

Hiroshima and Nagasaki were firebombed like Dresden and all the other heavily populated German cities. These were disgusting, egregious war crimes, but a nuclear weapon has never been detonated.


How would a single plane cause a fire storm ?
In Dresden it took wave after wave of hundreds and hundreds of English and American heavy bombers to get the storm going..

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, Eldnah said:

Playing devils advocate -

 

The existence of a functioning nuclear power source does not have to equal the existence of functional nuclear weapons

True but think about the psychopaths in power who are currently forcing masks and lock down on the entire planet.

 

They have wrecked so many small businesses and caused many suicides by doing this. If you think for one second that they do not have nuclear weapons then you are very naive.

 

How about Cern, is that fake now too?

 

When I lived in Phoenix Arizona there was talk after 9-11 about how "terrorists" could easily bomb the Palo Verde nuclear plant in Tonopah. So, nuclear weapons or not, a nuclear plant could become a weapon at any time, much like Fukushima did.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A nuclear weapon has been detonated by humans, and according to those in the know it is the point at which one or several alien species showed up here because they felt it out there where they reside, where ever that may be. I believe this to be true. If I can find the person who talks about it I will definitely post it in this thread.

 

As for the nuclear war head topic, I was continuing reading William Cooper's, Behold a Pale Horse, today and came upon the following information in chapter two in which he writes about secret societies.

 

I will upload a page prior for preface.

 

Page 83, talks about the "JASON Group" which included members of the Manhattan project who were brought together during WWII to build an atomic bomb.

 

 

Behold a Pale Horse Page 82.jpg

Behold a Pale Horse Page 82-b.jpg

Behold a Pale Horse Page 83.jpg

Behold a Pale Horse Page 83-b.jpg

Behold a Pale Horse Page 84.jpg

Behold a Pale Horse Page 84-b.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...