Jump to content

US ELECTION 2020: Trump vs Biden


Message added by Grumpy Owl,

Please keep all discussion of the US Presidential Election 2020 Race and its subsequent fallout in this topic, thank you.

Recommended Posts

23 minutes ago, Fluke said:

She is dead already.

 

Energetically reptilian hierarchy, so yes, in the spiritual battle, dead figuratively speaking. 

 

Thats why they never do anything about her, even though overall she pulls the whole crowd down. 

 

Lucifer himself is/was Zeta Reticuli or grey alien, and Area 51/Roswell spiraled into the creation of the CIA THEN connecting the dots back to Hollywood and the occult. Black ops programs, MK ultra programs, secret space programs, the DEATH of JFK/MLK Jr, etc. JFK just used his noggin and figured out the eggs the greys were promised would be used to create an army of hybrids. He was right.

 

Do you think black culture would be like it is now, if MLK Jr would speak out against rap when Lucifer had plans to harden their hearts??? In the way, dead. 

 

Who needs a crisis actor on tap?? Anyone??

 

They started using cocaine and other elements early on in the CIA to control people to the dark side of things. Thats why most NASA crew sniff it, and its them that are constantly editing photos and video of ET life, trying to keep us in the dark ages. 

Edited by MatchaLove
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For a lot of staunch Biden supporters regarding the evidence of fraud 

 

There  could literally be a video of someone cheating and changing 1000s of votes from trump Biden from 100 different camera angles and they’d still say there’s no evidence unless it’s peer reviewed by a scientist (who they like) and published in a journal 

 

Even then they’d Move the goalposts

 

I still belive trump has a chance albeit a slim one 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Liam3880 said:

For a lot of staunch Biden supporters regarding the evidence of fraud 

 

There  could literally be a video of someone cheating and changing 1000s of votes from trump Biden from 100 different camera angles and they’d still say there’s no evidence unless it’s peer reviewed by a scientist (who they like) and published in a journal 

 

Even then they’d Move the goalposts

 

I still belive trump has a chance albeit a slim one 

 

Trump is sore loser. There was no fraud and no evidence is found for this.

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/3/2020 at 7:23 PM, Liam3880 said:

For a lot of staunch Biden supporters regarding the evidence of fraud 

 

There  could literally be a video of someone cheating and changing 1000s of votes from trump Biden from 100 different camera angles and they’d still say there’s no evidence unless it’s peer reviewed by a scientist (who they like) and published in a journal 

 

Even then they’d Move the goalposts

 

I still belive trump has a chance albeit a slim one 

 

Like this??

 

There is no evidence, right?'

 

Children that were supposed to be dead are standing right there they just used pictures of when they were 4 and 5 years younger and crafted fake identities based off from old photos.

 

But there is no evidence they say.

 

Forensics is so advanced now that they can age an infant to adulthood, but a lot of these kids just look the same. 

 

Jennifer Hudson is rumored to have gotten rid of a HUGE chunk of her family for fame. Not just one or two or three, and there she stands with a bunch of kids that are supposed to be dead to gun violence. 

 

Call me crazy, but at least I didn't flush democracy, reason, and science down the toilet. lol 

 

The most obvious being Curly Who, Semite Of No Chosen People Here Inc., Clef Lip, Runt, and Goldie Locks from a special bred breeding program. *Front Row* 

 

Speaking of the "front row", this picture symbolizes George Carlin's statement if you are born American you get "the front row seat" to the freak show. A psychopath who is rumored to have killed a portion of her family standing with the boasting survivors of what they thought would be the end of gun rights. ***BOWS*** The front row seat to the freak show1!!

 

Not survivors, edit, more like some pyramid scheme plot to grab your guns that didnt work in the first place b/c people were already watching and paying attention to their constitutional rights. Concerned citizens. 

 

Born and raised in CT myself and for the few that have listened at least know that CT is full of crisis actors and hybrids. Good and real people here are harder to come by. Yet, even here there are concerned citizens. "Asking them questions" that's all I am saying. 

 

This is not like 9/11, you have the video and photos of this event everywhere. About 20-30 alive children they reported as dead b/c it was nothing but a faked drill. 

 

Now, the truthing community investigation of this event happened BEFORE this Super Bowl event happened. There was already holes and widespread speculation coming from different angles. This just confirmed everything. 

 

I am no forensics expert, but that whole front row looks the same, and the top row aged normally which even in itself is sufficient evidence of a scandal and Obama's administration wanting guns and Biden is putting his admin back into power as we speak. 

 

 

 

article-2272983-1754595C000005DC-792_634x394.jpg

Edited by MatchaLove
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Liam3880 said:

 

Theres lots of evidence.

 

You may dislike or disagree with the evidence, it might not even be very good, but there’s lots of evidence 

Ah but this is the exact point, there is nothing!

 

Time after time, Agent Orange's legal people ($1m-an-hour) have swung into courts across the land and presented.....nothing! Not a shred......

 

Even yesterday, four more courts across the Republic decide against Agent Orange.

 

Now if you were the plaintiff (that's the soon to be ex-president Orange), you might have decided by now, I think I would have, that one of two things is happening; Either (A) my er....top-gun lawyers are taking me for a ride here, or (B) my case is shite. Trouble is for Orange, both are true, and in the case of Rudy G, probably on the way to a courthouse near you soon, but this time in the dock.

 

Not looking good for Agent Orange. If I were him, I would take this to the only judge and court that is suitable to hear this sort of case;

 

 

 

 

     

download.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Liam3880 said:

 

Theres lots of evidence.

 

You may dislike or disagree with the evidence, it might not even be very good, but there’s lots of evidence 

 

Hillary was caught red handed 4 years ago tampering with votes. Why Trump backed off Hillary and didnt throw her in jail is beyond me, but she has sh!t files on everyone. 

 

Now, the tampering that went on is the constant slander on Trump and fake news on Russia, I dont condone corrupt politicians but they are humans there to, just like China where they are good honest people and many that live in poverty. 

The constant slander is what shifted the votes that made it a close call the most. I mean Biden paid felons just to vote for him, its sickening and the whole USA cheered. 

 

Now, they can start by telling us why this kids from a fake mass shooting are standing alive and well at this event, b/c it was a botched plan for a gun grab back in the day. As we speak, BIden is bringing back Obama's cabinet, and you know what, we dont stop until we get answers on this FAKE NEWS STORY FOR A GUN GRAB that they did.

 

JFK didnt survive 48 hours and he was going to make fake news punishable by jail time in his last speech. The average modern day journalist has committed a life sentence of fake news. HE was on to big pharma as well and labeling laws, he was shutting down black ops programs, going after the bad and wicked in the military. Since they killed him suspiciously before any new laws could come into effect.

 

For the heck of it, check what foods are banned in the EU but America sells.

 

article-2272983-1754595C000005DC-792_634x394.jpg

Edited by MatchaLove
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Strummer101 said:

Even yesterday, four more courts across the Republic decide against Agent Orange.


l've seen it said that this is just a delaying tactic, as the case is then pushed up higher through the legal system by appeals. lt will eventually end up in the highest court..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Basket Case said:


l've seen it said that this is just a delaying tactic, as the case is then pushed up higher through the legal system by appeals. lt will eventually end up in the highest court..

 

Which lends weight to the idea that this is all a big distraction, so the vaxxines can be rolled out..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Strummer101 said:

Ah but this is the exact point, there is nothing!

 

Time after time, Agent Orange's legal people ($1m-an-hour) have swung into courts across the land and presented.....nothing! Not a shred......

 

Even yesterday, four more courts across the Republic decide against Agent Orange.

 

Now if you were the plaintiff (that's the soon to be ex-president Orange), you might have decided by now, I think I would have, that one of two things is happening; Either (A) my er....top-gun lawyers are taking me for a ride here, or (B) my case is shite. Trouble is for Orange, both are true, and in the case of Rudy G, probably on the way to a courthouse near you soon, but this time in the dock.

 

Not looking good for Agent Orange. If I were him, I would take this to the only judge and court that is suitable to hear this sort of case;

 

 

 

 

     

download.jpg

OK, so we've got you opinion on the matter, do you have anything to substantiate your claim? As Basket Case said below, just running through the lower end courts to get to SCOTUS and then this is where we may see the actual evidence. By the way, there is plenty of evidence,  but evidence is not proof, so we'll see if there is anything or not. But to suggest there is none is wide of the mark. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am sure many of you have heard already. 

 

Pentagon blocks visits to military spy agencies by Biden transition team

 

Pentagon blocks visits to military spy agencies by Biden transition team (msn.com)

 

Your not even there yet, sheesh. You dont have the authority. lol Talk about a smooth transition, so wait until its your turn. 

 

 

Edited by MatchaLove
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Morpheus said:

Nah, there's no evidence:

 

 

Only fricking video evidence of someone with a suitcase full of thousands of illegal ballots. But no, I digress, nothing to see here, move along now. 🙄

Rudy must have missed this, quick send it through on the Orange twitter! 

 

Seriously, an army of Trump's overpaid big suits roll into court time after time.....with zip, nada, not a bean! But bloke on internet has a video..... 

 

Who mentioned Supreme Court? Non-starter, I will explain why; you cannot just turn up there and demand an audience, they have to choose your case! They are petitioned thousands of times each year, and choose just a handful of cases to hear. Do you think they will want to go within a million light-years of this? They will be off into the sunset quicker than you can say Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

 

But hey, let's imagine for a second, that the Justices find themselves face-to-face with Rudy G......as far as I am aware, no new evidence is permitted to be introduced. Given that so far, in court after court, in state after state, Sid James and her team have presented...er...no evidence, well, you can see the problem.     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Strummer101 said:

Rudy must have missed this, quick send it through on the Orange twitter! 

 

Seriously, an army of Trump's overpaid big suits roll into court time after time.....with zip, nada, not a bean! But bloke on internet has a video..... 

 

Who mentioned Supreme Court? Non-starter, I will explain why; you cannot just turn up there and demand an audience, they have to choose your case! They are petitioned thousands of times each year, and choose just a handful of cases to hear. Do you think they will want to go within a million light-years of this? They will be off into the sunset quicker than you can say Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

 

But hey, let's imagine for a second, that the Justices find themselves face-to-face with Rudy G......as far as I am aware, no new evidence is permitted to be introduced. Given that so far, in court after court, in state after state, Sid James and her team have presented...er...no evidence, well, you can see the problem.     

Hmm, me thinks you've been watching the MSM too much. Again, I did ask for some substantiation to your position, but I guess you forgot. 

 

Tell me, what do you think about this latest development? 

 

 

What do you think about Sidney Powell's case or Sean Parnell who is suing pennsylvania (i think) on the basis that mail in ballots are unconstitutional? Remember, there are other cases other than Trump's at play here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People are turning away from the GOP and who can blame them? Since the days of Reagan, they have done sweet FA to help out middle America. Trump is the first president to really get behind the middle class and maybe it's this as much as anything else that has earned him the enmity of the establishment party. As the Democrats arrogantly assume they own the black vote, Republicans think likewise about the middle class. I wonder if a third party might emerge from this; one that attracts old-school democrats and patriotic republicans alike.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Morpheus said:

Well, looks like pennyslvania is going to drop. 

 

 

Alito could make a ruling to throw out the vote for Biden. See how this pans out, to be heard on Wednesday.  

Er......no.

 

'In other words, the U.S. Supreme Court lacks the jurisdiction to issue an injunction.'

 

https://lawandcrime.com/politics/experts-it-doesnt-matter-that-alito-moved-up-deadline-for-pennsylvania-election-lawsuit/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Morpheus said:

Hmm, me thinks you've been watching the MSM too much. Again, I did ask for some substantiation to your position, but I guess you forgot. 

 

Tell me, what do you think about this latest development? 

 

 

What do you think about Sidney Powell's case or Sean Parnell who is suing pennsylvania (i think) on the basis that mail in ballots are unconstitutional? Remember, there are other cases other than Trump's at play here. 

No need to prove a negative - nothing has happened as far as I can tell.

 

Like I say, extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence, and so far we have seen.....no evidence!  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...