Jump to content

Censorship / Digital Book Burning


Recommended Posts

Twitter has made new rules regarding more "inclusive language" to better reflect its values. Gendered pronouns and terms such as "blacklist" and "whitelist" will be replaced with their preferred "inclusive versions" such as those on the list below. ?

 

https://davidicke.com/2020/07/05/twitter-ditches-offensive-non-inclusive-terms-such-as-whitelist-man-hours-and-he-him-his/

 

image.png.785ec908e8b1ed62926d1f9a0b5df2aa.png

  • Haha 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mitochondrial Eve said:

Twitter has made new rules regarding more "inclusive language" to better reflect its values. Gendered pronouns and terms such as "blacklist" and "whitelist" will be replaced with their preferred "inclusive versions" such as those on the list below. ?

 

https://davidicke.com/2020/07/05/twitter-ditches-offensive-non-inclusive-terms-such-as-whitelist-man-hours-and-he-him-his/

 

image.png.785ec908e8b1ed62926d1f9a0b5df2aa.png

 

Twitter is definitely an alternative reality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Guest changed the title to Censorship / Digital Book Burning
  • Guest pinned this topic
Guest Gone Fishing...

Rewinding quite a few years ago, this is the first person l noticed being hounded and censored.
David Irving.
All his research and writings were based on actual historical documents which he traveled extensively to examine, held by European governments after WW2.
At first he was an award winning writer, then as he unearthed increasingly embarrassing information he became reviled.
He's been imprisoned (maybe twice ?), had his life ruined by being dragged through the Courts by plaintiffs with huge resources, had a Hollywood (misinformation) film made about the court case etc, etc...
ln his own words, " The path of Free Speech and Real History has often been a difficult one." 

Most of his books are available for free in PDF format on his website.

http://www.fpp.co.uk/ 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the football world I see many pundits and commentators always calling for harshness and toughness ... any player who might have opinions should shut up and be disciplined by the club or authorities ... and any young player who always talks humbly (aka kneels a lot) is praised.

Why do these pundits talk this way ?

It because this ... is what they do in their own lives.

The pundits live by kneeling to authorities, they sacrifice having any opinion whatsoever and whip themselves into submission.

They are in otherwords soulless lifeless traitors of themselves.

And so, have so destroyed their own lives ... they demand that others do the same.

They hide the shame of having betrayed their souls ... by demanding others do the same.

 

Society is full of people who are destroying themselves, and silencing themselves, trying to kill everything alive inside.

So that they can conform to the insanity.

And anyone or anything alive offends them and must be censored.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Gone Fishing...

l'm hot and cold with Jonathan Pie, but l love his take on censorship of jokes and comedy..
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Gone Fishing...
3 hours ago, rideforever said:

In the football world I see many pundits and commentators always calling for harshness and toughness ... any player who might have opinions should shut up and be disciplined by the club or authorities ... and any young player who always talks humbly (aka kneels a lot) is praised.

Why do these pundits talk this way ?

It because this ... is what they do in their own lives.

The pundits live by kneeling to authorities, they sacrifice having any opinion whatsoever and whip themselves into submission.

They are in otherwords soulless lifeless traitors of themselves.

And so, have so destroyed their own lives ... they demand that others do the same.

They hide the shame of having betrayed their souls ... by demanding others do the same.

 

Society is full of people who are destroying themselves, and silencing themselves, trying to kill everything alive inside.

So that they can conform to the insanity.

And anyone or anything alive offends them and must be censored.

 


We could give this condition a name - 'The Normie Virus'.

The only cure is this forum :classic_wink: 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 'Campaign Against Anti-Semitism' has written to Waterstones complaining about David Icke's "anti-semitism". Their response has been to remove all his material from sale immediately.

 

https://davidicke.com/2020/07/08/more-david-icke-libel/

 

I don’t know what adjectives I have used that could be in any way original. I’ve said: “ridiculous!”, “defamatory!”, “stupid!” so many times on this subject before. What this is about is that once more there has been a libellous attack against David Icke. It includes a deliberate attempt to sabotage his livelihood, done in the usual cowardly manner, eschewing direct confrontation while calling in air-strikes from the authorities. The self-styled Campaign Against Antisemitism has “written to” the mainstream bookseller Waterstones about David Icke and the company have immediately taken all David’s titles off stock.



I doubt if they even questioned or lifted a finger in protest. “You don’t want to be a racist do you!?” are the words that make almost everybody kneel… in some cases literally these days. The triumphant article uses a lot of rhetoric like “hate preacher”, “incite hatred”, “crank”, “Jew-hater”. The supposed justification for what the CAA has done is that David’s views are classified as antisemitic according to the International Definition of Antisemitism.

This is totally false. David states unequivocally that Jews are neither the instigators nor the culprits of the New World Order. He explains why in great detail. In the background links below I provide more information. I don’t know if David intends to inform his solicitor about this article, but I shall be advising him strongly to do so.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/29/2020 at 10:38 PM, EnigmaticWorld said:

Democrats want speech controls through private companies while the Administration wants speech controls through government agencies.  The choice is between Little Brother and Big Brother.


Great point. It is the one percent (that issues all money out of nothing) that controls and censors whole human society, either via the state or without - it does not matter.

The State = elected officials  would have any meaning at all if they would act in favour of their electorate and accordingly would control private companies, but since the opposite is the case, ie private global companies control the State, we the people have lost democratic control and experience the meltdown of our societies all over the West.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...