Jump to content

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, dollazNdiamond said:

you can't see through rock

Define "rock". I can see through quartz.

 

The moon is a satellite.

 

It's amazing how small the mind is of people these days, it's no wonder people are being conquered by a fake virus.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 181
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

fs of course it was faked. photos, footage, the fecking lander was made of aluminium foil.  playing golf, riding around in sand buggies, reflections, shadows, stars,       

That guy sounds like he's just making it up as he goes

Had to try to see if I could get the same results for curiosity.   Normal levels:     Adjusted levels:     LMAO   Source of image: http

Posted Images

2 hours ago, alexa said:

 

Your right I would.

 

So C/T, you actually believe we went to the moon & Landed on it ? Lol'zzz

 

So if I showed you rock solid proof this Bart Sibrel was a lying SOB you wouldn't believe it? Seriously sad.

 

I don't "believe " we went to the Moon. This is MY subject and I KNOW we went. Not one thing you have to present will be new, it will be a whackamole fest. I will destroy every single inept argument you can present. You have ignored every single thing showing how your world view is based on piffle. No space, flat earth. So I don't anticipate any progress in educating you on one of mankind's greatest achievements.

 

I guarantee two things. I will debunk every SINGLE thing presented. Every piece of proof I present will be ignored.

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Comedy Time said:

 

I guarantee two things. I will debunk every SINGLE thing presented

 

Yes I believe you will.

 

8 hours ago, Comedy Time said:

Every piece of proof I present will be ignored.

 

Yes it will.

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, alexa said:

Yes I believe you will. Yes it will.

 

Girl, that is seriously pathetic. Seriously.

 

Explain why you ignore things even when they have child proof explanations. It can only be to wind people up. The whole point of discussion is to arrive at a common agreement or disagreement by analysing evidence. If it is an objective discussion like the existence of the sky fairy / God it is easy to see such disagreement, but when it's flat earth/space or the Moon landings when there is visual and verifiable proof you are wrong - it is a ludicrous person who refuses to engage in the actual evidence for fear of being wrong. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, dollazNdiamond said:

because of irrelevancy

 

you believe stars can be seen through something that spaceships have landed on hahahaha

 

You people are all the same. Not one of you has the integrity to respond properly. You're just making noise!

 

I posted numerous rebuttals to your daft claims and you come back with gibberish about seeing stars through the Moon. Comedy time.

 

I posted some simple maths putting the setting sun 85000 miles away. And you are afraid to answer. Flat earthers are the joke of the planet.

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, Comedy Time said:

 

You people are all the same. Not one of you has the integrity to respond properly. You're just making noise!

 

I posted numerous rebuttals to your daft claims and you come back with gibberish about seeing stars through the Moon. Comedy time.

 

I posted some simple maths putting the setting sun 85000 miles away. And you are afraid to answer. Flat earthers are the joke of the planet.

 

 

 

 

your denial of stars seen through the moon is comedy time

 

your maths are based on false assumptions

 

funny too how you constantly whine about ad homs

 

Edited by dollazNdiamond
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Comedy Time said:

The whole point of discussion is to arrive at a common agreement or disagreement by analysing evidence.

 

I know what you are saying, and also used to read MAD a lot !

But it's good to relate to people where they are ... and where you are.  Okay so people disagree, so disagree ... but it's also good to sort of try to get something useful from the conversation.  Rather than useless fighting and frustration.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, dollazNdiamond said:

your denial of stars seen through the moon is comedy time

 

Provide evidence for this ridiculous claim!

 

1 hour ago, dollazNdiamond said:

your maths are based on false assumptions

 

Name the false assumptions and correct them.

 

The flat earth society and the people who make all the online noise tell us the Sun is 30 miles across(guffaw) and 3000 miles away(ludicrous). If that is wrong what should it be!?

 

Sunrises and sunsets are logged online and verifiable by the people who actually live in the damn paces they reference! If you claim they are wrong prove it and tell me why.

 

I am anticipating further evasion from you since you are afraid to be proven wrong. You have invested so much energy on this it would be too much for your ego to contemplate.

 

1 hour ago, dollazNdiamond said:

funny too how you constantly whine about ad homs

 

I don't "constantly" whine about anything. You don't know what an ad hom is do you? It isn't an insult it is where the content of a post is avoided and the target is the poster.

 

I do not do that. I ALWAYS address the content with an occasional whinge about people evading the posts. Since these are part of the available emoticons on this website I determine they are available to be used:

 

🐓🐓🐓🐓🐓🐓

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Comedy Time said:

Name the false assumptions and correct them.

 

The flat earth society and the people who make all the online noise tell us the Sun is 30 miles across(guffaw) and 3000 miles away(ludicrous). If that is wrong what should it be!?

the fes are handled by the same people who do you

you are arguing with yourself

 

stop baiting me to answer your posts from other threads

this thread is fake moon landing

 

are you a boomer? did you watch on your tv nixon call the astronots on the moon?

 

again you only bring irrelevance

 

https://scontent-lax3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/119884520_10219461956719899_8513080571687567634_n.jpg?_nc_cat=108&_nc_sid=825194&_nc_ohc=UPqgGSKE1W4AX-H6llk&_nc_ht=scontent-lax3-1.xx&oh=a270de9066118518afe9e2d2d02277be&oe=5F8C0C2A

 

 

 

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, dollazNdiamond said:

the fes are handled by the same people who do you

you are arguing with yourself

 

stop baiting me to answer your posts from other threads

this thread is fake moon landing

 

are you a boomer? did you watch on your tv nixon call the astronots on the moon?

 

again you only bring irrelevance

 

https://scontent-lax3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/119884520_10219461956719899_8513080571687567634_n.jpg?_nc_cat=108&_nc_sid=825194&_nc_ohc=UPqgGSKE1W4AX-H6llk&_nc_ht=scontent-lax3-1.xx&oh=a270de9066118518afe9e2d2d02277be&oe=5F8C0C2A

 

 

 

Your a one trick pony mate ,again no evidence just more dumb ass memes

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another gibberish post with a stupid meme.

 

Just now, dollazNdiamond said:

the fes are handled by the same people who do you

 

 

Uhuh, personal implication noted. I am not handled by anyone. Sometimes the wife but that's another story.

 

Evasion noted. You're afraid dude. You armwave it away and fail to offer corrections.

 

Just now, dollazNdiamond said:

you are arguing with yourself

 

Kind of true since you are running away from any debate. But fence sitters won't get influenced by this brand of lunacy.

 

Just now, dollazNdiamond said:

stop baiting me to answer your posts from other threads

 

OK. Answer the posts from other threads. 

 

@Basket Case Please open the flat earth thread. If it causes moderation work then so be it. This person needs to be shown they are wrong or at least others see that they are afraid to debate.

 

Just now, dollazNdiamond said:

this thread is fake moon landing are you a boomer? did you watch on your tv nixon call the astronots on the moon?

 

again you only bring irrelevance

 

And? Nixon connected via a telephone network to an s-band radio transmitter that sent a signal to the Moon. What daft youtube video have you watched that says that can't happen?

 

Irrelevance? Dude you are just posting horseshit. When you get around to posting the same old same old that has the arse kicked out of it, you'll ignore all the replies. It is impossible to reason anyone out of a position they didn't reason themselves in to. 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, Messenger said:

Define "rock". I can see through quartz.

 

The moon is a satellite.

 

It's amazing how small the mind is of people these days, it's no wonder people are being conquered by a fake virus.

That's because they keep them in their smart  phone, they have to be miniaturized to make them fit

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

NASA has announced they are going back to the moon with a landing in 2024.

They are sending a man and a woman.

Can we all please lobby NASA to send Alexa!

It will be fun Alexa, you get to practice in a spacesuit in a big swimming pool and then they stick you on top of a big rocket and off you go!

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, gregory-peccary said:

NASA has announced they are going back to the moon with a landing in 2024.

They are sending a man and a woman.

Can we all please lobby NASA to send Alexa!

It will be fun Alexa, you get to practice in a spacesuit in a big swimming pool and then they stick you on top of a big rocket and off you go!

 

 

Ha ha very funny greg lol'z. Well thats one way to get closer to the Heavens! :classic_biggrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The landing on the Moon was the first big victory of the Americans, who were far behind the Soviet Union in the space race: Soviet scientists and engineers had time to put the first man first into Earth's orbit (Yuri Gagarin), and then into open space (Alexei Leonov). Since then, a total of 12 American astronauts have been on Earth's natural satellite, not Russian cosmonauts. This fact gave rise to one of the most famous theory: supposedly, in fact, Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin never landed on the Moon, and all the photos and videos of their landing were directed by the US government with the support of NASA and Hollywood to announce the victory in space war. An important argument for the supporters of this theory was the death in 1967 of three astronauts who were preparing for the first manned flight to the Moon - but burned to death during ground tests a month before the scheduled start. They allegedly intended to tell the world the truth about the impending falsification, for which they were killed by the American authorities. There are a lot of circumstances prove that they never landed on the Moon and the same amount proves that the landing is true and it is up to you whether believe it or not. No one actually will blame you for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

6 hours ago, Eva Braun said:

The landing on the Moon was the first big victory of the Americans, who were far behind the Soviet Union in the space race: Soviet scientists and engineers had time to put the first man first into Earth's orbit (Yuri Gagarin), and then into open space (Alexei Leonov). 

 

That is completely wrong and often spouted without any understanding or research.

 

Some USA firsts:

 

First piloted flight Alan Shepard 1961

First active telecomms satellite 1962

First planetary flyby 1962

First Geosynchronous satellite 1963

First Geostationary satellite 1964

First piloted orbital change 1965

First Orbital rendezvous 1965!!

First Orbital rendezvous and docking 1966!!

First extended spacewalk 5.5 hrs  1966

First direct-ascent rendezvous on first orbit 1966!!

First crewed flight to the Moon Apollo 8 1968!!

 

From 1965 America started moving ahead and all the records they set were the ones that enabled the Moon landing. In addition to all those significant firsts they established a whole series of repeat flights to improve the process and identify issues for each successive one. Meanwhile Russia couldn't get their heavy launch vehicle N1 off the ground. THAT is why they didn't get to the Moon first. I have no doubt that they would have "cut a few corners" to do that.

 

6 hours ago, Eva Braun said:

Since then, a total of 12 American astronauts have been on Earth's natural satellite, not Russian cosmonauts. 

 

 

"Each of the four attempts to launch an N1 failed; during the second launch attempt the N1 rocket crashed back onto its launch pad shortly after liftoff and exploded, resulting in one of the largest artificial non-nuclear explosions in human history. The N1 program was suspended in 1974, and in 1976 was officially canceled. Along with the rest of the Soviet manned lunar programs, the N1 was kept secret almost until the collapse of the Soviet Union in December 1991; information about the N1 was first published in 1989."

 

6 hours ago, Eva Braun said:

An important argument for the supporters of this theory was the death in 1967 of three astronauts who were preparing for the first manned flight to the Moon - but burned to death during ground tests a month before the scheduled start. They allegedly intended to tell the world the truth about the impending falsification, for which they were killed by the American authorities.

 

Yeah great theory - not one single piece of proof for it. Let's potentially sabotage the whole program for a few years! The Command Module wasn't built by NASA. If they were planning falsification at that period why make them the prime crew before they had agreed to do it?

 

6 hours ago, Eva Braun said:

 There are a lot of circumstances prove that they never landed on the Moon

 

No there aren't. There is not a single piece of undebunked nonsense surrounding any mission. What there is, is a steady stream of people blundering upon youtube videos and gossip, having zero idea of what was involved, mainly with no intention of ever being reasoned with or open to the possibility they are wrong.

 

6 hours ago, Eva Braun said:

...and the same amount proves that the landing is true and it is up to you whether believe it or not. No one actually will blame you for that.

 

Everything about the evidence proves the missions landed on the Moon.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Apollo samples prove beyond any doubt that Man has been to the Moon. Over six missions, 842lbs of samples, including 3m cores were retrieved. Lunar samples that have been peer reviewed by thousands of the world's finest geologists and petrologists. The samples have substantial solar isotope impregnation, many contain large volumes of micro-meteorite impact craters. They collectively are devoid of any contamination from oxygen, water or nitrogen found on Earth, have no evidence of fragmentation or fusion crusts from entry through atmosphere. They show evidence of formation in a lower gravity environment. They are entirely dry as a bone, with the only hydroxyl/water type substances existing within low gravity formed volcanic beads or apatite crystals. They cannot by any possibility be meteorites. They cannot be from Earth. This leaves the only explanation as retrieval off world.


meteorites.wustl.edu/lunar/moon_meteorites.htm

"Any geoscientist (and there have been thousands from all over the world) who has studied lunar samples knows that anyone who thinks the Apollo lunar samples were created on Earth as part of government conspiracy doesn't know much about rocks. The Apollo samples are just too good. They tell a self-consistent story with a complexly interwoven plot that's better than any story any conspirator could have conceived. I've studied lunar rocks and soils for 45+ years and I couldn't make even a poor imitation of a lunar breccia, lunar soil, or a mare basalt in the lab. And with all due respect to my clever colleagues in government labs, no one in “the Government “ could do it either, even now that we know what lunar rocks are like. Lunar samples show evidence of formation in an extremely dry environment with essentially no free oxygen and little gravity. Some have impact craters on the surface and many display evidence for a suite of unanticipated and complicated effects associated with large and small meteorite impacts. Lunar rocks and soil contain gases (hydrogen, helium, nitrogen, neon, argon, krypton, and xenon) derived from the solar wind with isotope ratios different than Earth forms of the same gases. They contain crystal damage from cosmic rays. Lunar igneous rocks have crystallization ages, determined by techniques involving radioisotopes, that are older than any known Earth rocks. (Anyone who figures out how to fake that is worthy of a Nobel Prize.) It was easier and cheaper to go to the Moon and bring back some rocks than it would have been to create all these fascinating features on Earth. "

Summary:

1. Geologists have been examining Apollo samples for 50 years, there is complete agreement that they are authentic and from the Moon.

2. The samples are impregnated with billions of years of solar exposure causing isotopes impossible to produce on Earth.

3. It is impossible for a rock to reside on Earth without it interacting with the gasses or liquids it comes into contact with.

4. It is impossible for a rock to enter the Earth's atmosphere and still retain its outer layers. Apollo rocks have strong Helium 3 on their outer layers.

5. Lunar samples have in some cases been older than any known Earth rock.

6. The Apollo samples contain only water encased within volcanic beads showing formation in lower gravity.

7. The Apollo rocks contain tiny craters far smaller than any man made gun could produce! They also show redistribution effects called "gardening".

8. The Apollo samples have no terrestrial weathering they simply cannot be from Earth.

9. Apollo samples show evidence for a whole variety of meteorite impact damage.

10. They are bone dry with water-type material encased within volcanic beads formed in low gravity and apatite crystals.

11. It's been suggested that zap pits were created by guns that have limitations of 0.1mm projectiles when the zap pits are in the region of 50 microns (2/1000 inch) in diameter!

12. It's also been suggested that micrometeorites hitting the Earth could have done this. Yes really:classic_rolleyes:

13. Apollo samples show evidence of formation with essentially no free oxygen.

14. Isotope ratios on Apollo rocks are different to anything found on Earth.



They cannot be meteorites for the reasons given and they cannot be from Earth. They had to have arrived within a sealed environment from off world.

 

62 pages of references for those who have looked at the Apollo Moon rocks and soil:

https://www.lpi.usra.edu/publications/books/lunar_sourcebook/pdf/References.pdf

Edited by Comedy Time
Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, Comedy Time said:

 

 

That is completely wrong and often spouted without any understanding or research.

 

Some USA firsts:

 

First piloted flight Alan Shepard 1961

First active telecomms satellite 1962

First planetary flyby 1962

First Geosynchronous satellite 1963

First Geostationary satellite 1964

First piloted orbital change 1965

First Orbital rendezvous 1965!!

First Orbital rendezvous and docking 1966!!

First extended spacewalk 5.5 hrs  1966

First direct-ascent rendezvous on first orbit 1966!!

First crewed flight to the Moon Apollo 8 1968!!

 

From 1965 America started moving ahead and all the records they set were the ones that enabled the Moon landing. In addition to all those significant firsts they established a whole series of repeat flights to improve the process and identify issues for each successive one. Meanwhile Russia couldn't get their heavy launch vehicle N1 off the ground. THAT is why they didn't get to the Moon first. I have no doubt that they would have "cut a few corners" to do that.

 

 

 

"Each of the four attempts to launch an N1 failed; during the second launch attempt the N1 rocket crashed back onto its launch pad shortly after liftoff and exploded, resulting in one of the largest artificial non-nuclear explosions in human history. The N1 program was suspended in 1974, and in 1976 was officially canceled. Along with the rest of the Soviet manned lunar programs, the N1 was kept secret almost until the collapse of the Soviet Union in December 1991; information about the N1 was first published in 1989."

 

 

Yeah great theory - not one single piece of proof for it. Let's potentially sabotage the whole program for a few years! The Command Module wasn't built by NASA. If they were planning falsification at that period why make them the prime crew before they had agreed to do it?

 

 

No there aren't. There is not a single piece of undebunked nonsense surrounding any mission. What there is, is a steady stream of people blundering upon youtube videos and gossip, having zero idea of what was involved, mainly with no intention of ever being reasoned with or open to the possibility they are wrong.

 

 

Everything about the evidence proves the missions landed on the Moon.

 

You've been going on for pages about how you don't have handlers or work off of a script and you just literally cut and pasted a page of nonsense that freemasons claim as truth.

 

None of those "firsts" happened.

 

And if you think this is real with all the little "space sounds" that were put in after during post production, then there is nothing left to discuss with you... ever.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, Comedy Time said:

Apollo samples prove beyond any doubt that Man has been to the Moon. Over six missions, 842lbs of samples, including 3m cores were retrieved. Lunar samples that have been peer reviewed by thousands of the world's finest geologists and petrologists. The samples have substantial solar isotope impregnation, many contain large volumes of micro-meteorite impact craters. They collectively are devoid of any contamination from oxygen, water or nitrogen found on Earth, have no evidence of fragmentation or fusion crusts from entry through atmosphere. They show evidence of formation in a lower gravity environment. They are entirely dry as a bone, with the only hydroxyl/water type substances existing within low gravity formed volcanic beads or apatite crystals. They cannot by any possibility be meteorites. They cannot be from Earth. This leaves the only explanation as retrieval off world.


meteorites.wustl.edu/lunar/moon_meteorites.htm

"Any geoscientist (and there have been thousands from all over the world) who has studied lunar samples knows that anyone who thinks the Apollo lunar samples were created on Earth as part of government conspiracy doesn't know much about rocks. The Apollo samples are just too good. They tell a self-consistent story with a complexly interwoven plot that's better than any story any conspirator could have conceived. I've studied lunar rocks and soils for 45+ years and I couldn't make even a poor imitation of a lunar breccia, lunar soil, or a mare basalt in the lab. And with all due respect to my clever colleagues in government labs, no one in “the Government “ could do it either, even now that we know what lunar rocks are like. Lunar samples show evidence of formation in an extremely dry environment with essentially no free oxygen and little gravity. Some have impact craters on the surface and many display evidence for a suite of unanticipated and complicated effects associated with large and small meteorite impacts. Lunar rocks and soil contain gases (hydrogen, helium, nitrogen, neon, argon, krypton, and xenon) derived from the solar wind with isotope ratios different than Earth forms of the same gases. They contain crystal damage from cosmic rays. Lunar igneous rocks have crystallization ages, determined by techniques involving radioisotopes, that are older than any known Earth rocks. (Anyone who figures out how to fake that is worthy of a Nobel Prize.) It was easier and cheaper to go to the Moon and bring back some rocks than it would have been to create all these fascinating features on Earth. "

Summary:

1. Geologists have been examining Apollo samples for 50 years, there is complete agreement that they are authentic and from the Moon.

2. The samples are impregnated with billions of years of solar exposure causing isotopes impossible to produce on Earth.

3. It is impossible for a rock to reside on Earth without it interacting with the gasses or liquids it comes into contact with.

4. It is impossible for a rock to enter the Earth's atmosphere and still retain its outer layers. Apollo rocks have strong Helium 3 on their outer layers.

5. Lunar samples have in some cases been older than any known Earth rock.

6. The Apollo samples contain only water encased within volcanic beads showing formation in lower gravity.

7. The Apollo rocks contain tiny craters far smaller than any man made gun could produce! They also show redistribution effects called "gardening".

8. The Apollo samples have no terrestrial weathering they simply cannot be from Earth.

9. Apollo samples show evidence for a whole variety of meteorite impact damage.

10. They are bone dry with water-type material encased within volcanic beads formed in low gravity and apatite crystals.

11. It's been suggested that zap pits were created by guns that have limitations of 0.1mm projectiles when the zap pits are in the region of 50 microns (2/1000 inch) in diameter!

12. It's also been suggested that micrometeorites hitting the Earth could have done this. Yes really:classic_rolleyes:

13. Apollo samples show evidence of formation with essentially no free oxygen.

14. Isotope ratios on Apollo rocks are different to anything found on Earth.



They cannot be meteorites for the reasons given and they cannot be from Earth. They had to have arrived within a sealed environment from off world.

 

62 pages of references for those who have looked at the Apollo Moon rocks and soil:

https://www.lpi.usra.edu/publications/books/lunar_sourcebook/pdf/References.pdf

62 pages of freemason lies and no outside researchers can examine any of it

 

The only 'moon' rocks that we have actually examined are fakes.

 

Curators at Amsterdam's Rijksmuseum, where the rock has attracted tens of thousands of visitors each year, discovered that the "lunar rock", valued at £308,000, was in fact petrified wood....

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/space/6105902/Moon-rock-given-to-Holland-by-Neil-Armstrong-and-Buzz-Aldrin-is-fake.html

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, amy G said:

You've been going on for pages about how you don't have handlers or work off of a script and you just literally cut and pasted a page of nonsense that freemasons claim as truth.

 

That was all  my own work. Prove it's nonsense. You just armwaved away close to a ton of samples analysed by 62 pages of personal references - geologists. It's FUCK ALL to do with da freemasons. 

 

1 minute ago, amy G said:

None of those "firsts" happened.

 

Yes they did. A cast of thousands were involved and you from suddenly being the curious "mathematician" are now the full blooded believer in faaaaake space and rockets.

 

1 minute ago, amy G said:

And if you think this is real with all the little "space sounds" that were put in after during post production, then there is nothing left to discuss with you... ever.

 

Wow, the noise generator has spoken. So there is nothing to discuss.....run along then.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, amy G said:

62 pages of freemason lies and no outside researchers can examine any of it

 

 

Wow, noise generation at full blast. Thousands all lying because the flat earther says so.

 

ANY accredited geologist can examine an Apollo sample. You are lying.

 

17 minutes ago, amy G said:

The only 'moon' rocks that we have actually examined are fakes.

 

Really, this is your claim to knowledge is it, the biggest whackamole crap ever. I answered this utter horseshit about a dozen times on the now disappeared old forum and about 3 times on the now hacked new one. It was ONLY discovered to be a piece of petrified wood when an actual geologist examined it.

 

17 minutes ago, amy G said:

Curators at Amsterdam's Rijksmuseum, where the rock has attracted tens of thousands of visitors each year, discovered that the "lunar rock", valued at £308,000, was in fact petrified wood....

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/space/6105902/Moon-rock-given-to-Holland-by-Neil-Armstrong-and-Buzz-Aldrin-is-fake.html

 

 

 

Piss poor reporting….but this time the conspiracy theorist has no problem believing the MSM account!!

The rock was given by the US Ambassador to a former Dutch prime minister. It was a gift that Drees had seen in the US inventory and liked the look of it. It was never given as a Moon rock. It is absolutely ludicrous to suggest that NASA would hand out such a massive rock to a complete nobody, weeks after they brought back such invaluable samples.

On the Goodwill Tour, astronauts handed tiny fragments encased in plastic on mounted wooden presentations with Gold inscriptions. They handed one such fragment to Queen Juliana.

Hawaii_Apollo_11-9in_display.jpg

 

Drees died in 1988, the rock was donated to the Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam and put on display: www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/space/6105902/Moon-rock-given-to-Holland-by-Neil-Armstrong-and-Buzz-Aldrin-is-fake.html


The whole thing was a balls up by the people who were given the gift. No way was it from NASA…all explained here:
 

 
 

 

 

After examining the facts, we've discovered that the Apollo 11 astronauts did not hand out any moon rocks on their Goodwill Tour. They did, however, present various heads-of-state with a number of gifts. Queen Juliana, the official head-of-state to The Netherlands, publically received three gifts from the astronauts. The astronauts were also the guests-of-honor at the opening of an exhibit on space technology at the RAI Congress Centre, the same venue that John William Middendorf II was supposed to have presented the "moon rock" to then-retired Prime Minister, Willem Drees. Strange they didn't run into each other while they were there. It wasn't until November 1969 that Richard Nixon requested 50 grams of moon dust to construct 250 Apollo 11 gift displays. Each display contained four grains of lunar regolith in a Lucite button and 135 of these displays were given to various heads-of-state of foreign governments, including Queen Juliana of The Netherlands. Strange she didn't feel slighted by Nixon for giving Drees an 89 gram moon rock and all she got was 0.2 grams of moon dust.

 

So...

 

1. NASA would not hand out valuable lunar samples to a complete nobody.

2. They handed out tiny fragments to Queens and prime ministers

3. They handed out gold embossed engraved plaques with each sample not some crusty comp slip.

4. It was a gift from the US Ambassador - he confirmed it.

5. Drees had seen it long before and commented on it, that was why it was given to him.

Edited by Comedy Time
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Comedy Time said:

 

Wow, noise generation at full blast. Thousands all lying because the flat earther says so.

 

ANY accredited geologist can examine an Apollo sample. You are lying.

 

 

Really, this is your claim to knowledge is it, the biggest whackamole crap ever. I answered this utter horseshit about a dozen times on the now disappeared old forum and about 3 times on the now hacked new one. It was ONLY discovered to be a piece of petrified wood when an actual geologist examined it.

 

 

 

Piss poor reporting….but this time the conspiracy theorist has no problem believing the MSM account!!

The rock was given by the US Ambassador to a former Dutch prime minister. It was a gift that Drees had seen in the US inventory and liked the look of it. It was never given as a Moon rock. It is absolutely ludicrous to suggest that NASA would hand out such a massive rock to a complete nobody, weeks after they brought back such invaluable samples.

On the Goodwill Tour, astronauts handed tiny fragments encased in plastic on mounted wooden presentations with Gold inscriptions. They handed one such fragment to Queen Juliana.

Hawaii_Apollo_11-9in_display.jpg

 

Drees died in 1988, the rock was donated to the Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam and put on display: www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/space/6105902/Moon-rock-given-to-Holland-by-Neil-Armstrong-and-Buzz-Aldrin-is-fake.html


The whole thing was a balls up by the people who were given the gift. No way was it from NASA…all explained here:
 

hqdefault.jpg
 

 

hqdefault.jpg

 

So...

 

1. NASA would not hand out valuable lunar samples to a complete nobody.

2. They handed out tiny fragments to Queens and prime ministers

3. They handed out gold embossed engraved plaques with each sample not some crusty comp slip.

4. It was a gift from the US Ambassador - he confirmed it.

5. Drees had seen it long before and commented on it, that was why it was given to him.

And yet another obviously scripted response.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...