Fake Moon Landings

[peter]

9 hours ago, SimonTV said:

Jonathan Clark
Associate Professor of Neurology and Space Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine, who worked at NASA from 1997 to 2005 and was a six-time Space Shuttle crew surgeon

Speed is just a distance-per-time-unit measure, so the constraints to speed are really dependent on other environmental factors.

The velocity isn’t the issue as much as the change in velocity, which is acceleration. When you go to space, you have to get enough speed to get out of Earth’s gravity field. To get to lower orbit, astronauts have to get to 17,500 miles per hour, and to do that they have to change their velocity. They launch such that they’re taking the gravity from the front of their chest to the back of their chest—that’s called the G direction. Typically, the best way to tolerate it is going from front to back, which is why astronauts launch on a couch, sitting down.

The other constraint of velocity is in the atmosphere. John Paul Stapp, when he did his sled run, got up to 46, 47 Gs, and he was probably going close to 5 or 600 miles an hour. If you looked at his face, you would see that it was being blown and heavily distorted, and that his hands were actually restrained on his lap so they wouldn’t flail around. Speed going through an atmosphere causes what’s called aerodynamic flail, and that can kill you.

When you’re in outer space you can go as fast as you want—but you need the protection of a vehicle, or a pressure suit, to keep you from the exposure to the vacuum of space.

We know that humans have gone 25,000 miles per hour going to the moon—the speed itself is not an issue, it was mainly the acceleration to get out of the Earth’s atmosphere that they had to endure.

Once they’re on their way and speeding up, there’s no constraints to speed. We’ll eventually send humans to mars and they’ll be going 35,000 miles per hour.

The two programs I was involved with, the Red Bull Stratus and the space dive—the goal was for a human without a vehicle to break the speed of sound, and that was accomplished because they wore a pressure suit. The reason they didn’t have aerodynamic flail issues was that there’s very little atmosphere above a hundred thousand feet

You can attain very high speeds—at least supersonic ones—as long as you’re protected, or (if you’re free falling from space) you’re at an atmospheric density that’s not going to cause that flail to develop.

like I said with your other post ,your point is?

[Mr Crabtree]

On 3/14/2023 at 11:45 AM, SimonTV said:

Here is one for peter. 

 

If the stage 3 propulsion fuel was so big, how did the tiny service module with its tiny propulsion fuel travel the same distance back from the moon with less fuel? 

Intergalactic Uber mate And, being downhill all the way back, they freewheeled some of the distance, an old and trusted fuel saving trick!

[peter]

On 3/15/2023 at 12:40 AM, SimonTV said:

What is also funny is apparently when travelling at these high speeds, they were not affected by the speed and they were able to casually look at the windows. I am sure they have an explanation for that one, might want to ask chatgpt. 

it's not funny the answer is obvious , seriously?

[DaleP]

On 3/14/2023 at 1:44 PM, SimonTV said:

 

Where do you ask chatgpt questions? 

 

If anyone pose a qeustion, post the answer please. I can't access it.

 

While you are at it....ask if we went to the Moon and if the Earth is flat.

[DaleP]

On 3/14/2023 at 2:09 PM, SimonTV said:

 

Says NASA. The question I have is how many of these space facts are defined in such a way as to make NASA's space travel viable. 

 

NASA men have already answered this.

You haven't watched this video, have you?

If you can't be bothered to watch everything, though it's hilarious all the way through, watch it from 5 mins 20 seconds. lol

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S1D65NMBfmo

 

[peter]

4 hours ago, DaleP said:

 

If anyone pose a qeustion, post the answer please. I can't access it.

 

While you are at it....ask if we went to the Moon and if the Earth is flat.

Every question I've asked  you haven't answered,and you have been able to access it

[Bombadil]

On 3/15/2023 at 11:12 PM, DaleP said:

 

If anyone pose a qeustion, post the answer please. I can't access it.

 

While you are at it....ask if we went to the Moon and if the Earth is flat.

If you ask questions which are more controversial or considered conspiracy based, you WILL get the party line. The secret is to be indirect with chat gpt. Maybe ask for example: “There are many theories of Earths shape. Using the information available to you, what is your best understanding?” Now clearly the answer will still show a hard leaning towards the  helio model, but now you cherry pick parts of it response. It then gives much more relevant and considered answers. For want of a better way of explaining. Also you can ask it to show its sources that it’s comments are based upon.

 

I know I’m waffling but I had a conversation about what hard evidence existed for the existence of God. It quoted that there was none but multiple historical sources agree differently. I argued that sources historically are usually biased etc. It recommended that I check sources etc to judge if any of its comments are reasonable and correct. I did my best to pick apart chats argument to the point where it conceded that it needed to do a deep dive into where it was getting its own sources. It accepted that its programmers would have a natural human bias. It thanked me for making it ‘aware’ that it was probably being used not as a pure learning tool but to profit it’s controllers.

[DaleP]

On 3/16/2023 at 3:47 AM, peter said:

Every question I've asked  you haven't answered,and you have been able to access it

 

Some people are beyond help peter.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=83Ntpeih4f4

 

[peter]

3 hours ago, DaleP said:

 

Some people are beyond help peter.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=83Ntpeih4f4

 

Yes they are dale , what utube again how extraordinary

[Bombadil]

MOD NOTE: SAME BULLSHIT AS THE FE THREAD> USUAL SUSPECTS CARRYING ON AS BEFORE. ENOUGH!

 

NO REPLY NEEDED

[alexa]

Rolls Royce on the moon 

 

 

[Origin]

30 minutes ago, alexa said:

Rolls Royce on the moon 

 

 

Why not? Humans have grand dreams in microscopic dimensions...

[Steven Rainey]

It's fake everything when it's coming form authority and the MSM, we've literally had our heads rammed firmly up our backsides perceptually.

[Origin]

That's not entirely true. Something is fabricating the complete perceptible reality. Consequently, it does not matter who is responsible.

[Steven Rainey]

40 minutes ago, Steven Rainey said:

It's fake everything when it's coming form authority and the MSM, we've literally had our heads rammed firmly up our backsides perceptually.

I agree it's the archontic consciousness working through these elite family's the same consciousness that brought fear to the world and pulled us into low vibration and had held us there by feeding us a complete fiction on everything, and create endless reasons to fear.

[SimonTV]

 

Look at the fake shadow angles, get a grip nasa fanatics. 

[DaleP]

Quote

 

The crazy plan to explode a nuclear bomb on the Moon

https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20230505-the-crazy-plan-to-explode-a-nuclear-bomb-on-the-moon

 

 

What will be the implication?

[peter]

On 3/21/2023 at 7:55 AM, SimonTV said:

 

Look at the fake shadow angles, get a grip nasa fanatics. 

I would say look at the fake shadows.

Have a close look and tell me what you see , right off the bat there are four obvious problems.

Every one looks but very few see

Edited May 8, 2023 by peter

[SimonTV]

 

[webtrekker]

39 minutes ago, Connor Wiseman said:

Personally, I think the moon landing was fake and that we have never been to there. It's a touchy subject because I am calling it a huge lie and it comes across like I am crazy to say such things but however there is much evidence to show on planet earth that the moon landing can never have happened due to the nature of our universe that we all home with planet earth.

I am a flat earth-er and would consider it basic knowledge now I am close to hitting 30 years old, it's a strange concept when being brought up on a spinning ball that floats in space and is 70% water. However, I used to live in Australia and thought to myself, how could birds fly if gravity was so strong to keep water connected to the earth, a bird's wing span as small as a meter is certainly not strong enough to test a power that can keep hundreds of tons of water stuck to a spinning ball, also the flight times on the spinning ball is another reason why I think humans have never been to space, it takes 22 hours for London to Perth (western australia) and then 22 hours to do the exact same flight backwards, this is a conception that I feel reigns true with the earth as on the spinning ball theory, it would either take longer or less time to complete the journey.

What do you guys think, do you think the world is more a spinning ball or do you think we live in a kind of dome and that water does not curve. I am interested to speak to more people about the subject and get to know more about what others think about this touchy subject.

 

This should be moved to the Flat Earth thread IMHO. @Bombadil

[Bombadil]

8 hours ago, Connor Wiseman said:

I'm surprised there is not one already, why don't you make one.

There is. 

 

 

[peter]

22 hours ago, Connor Wiseman said:

Personally, I think the moon landing was fake and that we have never been to there. It's a touchy subject because I am calling it a huge lie and it comes across like I am crazy to say such things but however there is much evidence to show on planet earth that the moon landing can never have happened due to the nature of our universe that we all home with planet earth.

I am a flat earth-er and would consider it basic knowledge now I am close to hitting 30 years old, it's a strange concept when being brought up on a spinning ball that floats in space and is 70% water. However, I used to live in Australia and thought to myself, how could birds fly if gravity was so strong to keep water connected to the earth, a bird's wing span as small as a meter is certainly not strong enough to test a power that can keep hundreds of tons of water stuck to a spinning ball, also the flight times on the spinning ball is another reason why I think humans have never been to space, it takes 22 hours for London to Perth (western australia) and then 22 hours to do the exact same flight backwards, this is a conception that I feel reigns true with the earth as on the spinning ball theory, it would either take longer or less time to complete the journey.

What do you guys think, do you think the world is more a spinning ball or do you think we live in a kind of dome and that water does not curve. I am interested to speak to more people about the subject and get to know more about what others think about this touchy subject.

      sorry ,but your name and your post seem to be diametrically apposed, how ironic

[bamboozooka]

nasa got the tin foil and chube out of storage

pmsl the only clear picture is cgi

 

Intuitive Machines: Moon lander pictured on its side with snapped leg

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-68425211

[webtrekker]

39 minutes ago, bamboozooka said:

nasa got the tin foil and chube out of storage

pmsl the only clear picture is cgi

 

Intuitive Machines: Moon lander pictured on its side with snapped leg

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-68425211

 

Maybe the wind blew it over.

 

 

 

[Mr Crabtree]

4 hours ago, webtrekker said:

 

Maybe the wind blew it over.

 

 

 

Here is Buzz with his 4th wife Anca Faur whom he married last year aged 93, Anca is a mere 64 years old and Buzz was apparently 'Over the Moon' that she agreed to marry him!