Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

1) No person ever walked on the Moon.

 

2) It is likely that the Moon is not something that can be landed upon as it is both self-luminating and also shows qualities that appear translucent.

 

3) The very idea that Richard Nixon called the astrofreemasonfucks and spoke with them in real time is so ridiculous it defies further explanation.

 

Look, there is no way that a 10^-17 torr vacuum known as "deep space" exists next to our atmosphere, let alone inside of it, let alone with multiple gigantic suns existing inside of it. The whole thing is cartoon idiocy.

 

FFS, we can't even go 200 miles up let alone a quarter of  million!

 

 

With all you people know about freemasonry and its connection to the power structure of our world, I find it amazing how many still buy into their cgi, blue screen, swimming pool, cartoon fantasy.

 

They gave the astofucks snorkels ffs!

Edited by bflat
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 181
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

fs of course it was faked. photos, footage, the fecking lander was made of aluminium foil.  playing golf, riding around in sand buggies, reflections, shadows, stars,       

That guy sounds like he's just making it up as he goes

Had to try to see if I could get the same results for curiosity.   Normal levels:     Adjusted levels:     LMAO   Source of image: http

Posted Images

1 hour ago, bflat said:

2) It is likely that the Moon is not something that can be landed upon as it is both self-luminating and also shows qualities that appear translucent.

 

They gave the astofucks snorkels ffs!

 

 2) Like this guy suggested?

 

also, recently saw this which gave me a laugh :)

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just now seen an interview on Gaia TV,  to which I am subscribed, in an episode of one of Regina Meredith's series Open Minds. It was Episode 12 in Series 4 and it was with a British author Timothy Good and about a book he published in 2014 called "Earth - An Alien Enterprise". You should read that book! In the interview he tells among many other things about what the Apollo 11 crew really saw up on the moon and that there seem to have been two parallel films made at the time, one by Stanley Kubrick. That was part of your question, wasn't it.

 

I have also many years ago already now seen a video which is also freely available online (Youtube) about this moon landing and what the astronauts saw there. It was included in an episode of a series by the Spanish investigator Juan Jose Benitez. See below. As it is in Spanish, you may like to fast forward to where that sequence begins. Really amazing!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Scorn isn't a coherent argument.

 

These two things were launched possibly before some of us were born.

 

 

They are working still and will stop working in a few years time when someone else who has already noticed them will pick them up and pop them in a museum somewhere.

Edited by serpentine
Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, serpentine said:

These two things were launched

 

Well .... you have been told that they were launched and you believe that.

If they are as told is another 'story' ....

 

I remember, about 25-30 ish years ago, reading in the newspapers that one of them had slowed down and eventually come to a halt .... It was stated that it had 'bumped into a wall and couldn't go any further' .... that it was just 'slowly' bouncing against something!

But all that is gone and search as I may, I have never seen the reports again .... A bit like the two scientists who stated that they found 'Nemesis' .... all gone.

 

So sorry but just posting that this or that happened because you were told it did .... don't cut it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
19 hours ago, Silent Bob said:

Like this guy suggested?

 

also, recently saw this which gave me a laugh :)

Yes, the physicists we no longer speak of.

 

19 hours ago, Silent Bob said:

 

 

Astrofucks with snorkels and scuba gear and people still believe.

Edited by bflat
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, ink said:

 

Well .... you have been told that they were launched and you believe that.

If they are as told is another 'story' ....

 

I remember, about 25-30 ish years ago, reading in the newspapers that one of them had slowed down and eventually come to a halt .... It was stated that it had 'bumped into a wall and couldn't go any further' .... that it was just 'slowly' bouncing against something!

But all that is gone and search as I may, I have never seen the reports again .... A bit like the two scientists who stated that they found 'Nemesis' .... all gone.

 

So sorry but just posting that this or that happened because you were told it did .... don't cut it.

 

Well much has happened since this newspaper article from last year:-

 

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2019/nov/04/nasa-voyager-2-sends-back-first-signal-from-interstellar-space

 

and there were reports that Voyager 1 appeared to have been tampered with as it approached the heliopause six years ahead of it's sister craft.

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's already been done. They are using magnets, electricity, and elements we got from aliens. Plenty of interviews of people in the space program but it technically doesn't prove anything. There is a tight lid kept on information regarding space travel, and for good reason, most people don't need to know, even if they should be informed about it.

 

Personally, from what I have researched about alternative propulsion, there have been a small group of people from Germany, the US, and Russia who have been conducting interstellar travel for decades. Maybe other countries too. But most people aren't smart enough to understand the hardware and technology that makes it possible, so it's easy for them to say, it isn't possible.

 

Or shills and government clowns want to test people' on the internet to see how much they know so they know whether or not to attack the forum and erase all the information....

 

If people want to know about moon landings and space travel it makes sense to me to investigate the aerospace industry. Since the aerospace industry are the people building aircraft and advanced propulsion systems, for oh..... the past seventy five years.

 

I mean, is it that difficult to believe that we have the ability to travel to Mars very quickly if you consider taking the planet's smartest engineers and physicists and putting them in a warehouse and laboratory setting with billions of dollars worth of equipment and saying, build me a machine that can get us to the moon, or to Mars.

 

Al Bielek spoke about the Montauk project and Philadelphia experiment years ago, like in the 80's or 90's, and those two events actually happened back during WWII. Take a listen to his presentations, they can still be found on youtube.

 

You can also look into the Fluxliner or "Alien Reproduction Vehicle" ARV.

 

ARV-fluxliner.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it's one thing these topics prove, it's how small a mind most people have, or the amount of government shills signed up to Icke forums.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, Messenger said:

 

I mean, is it that difficult to believe that we have the ability to travel to Mars very quickly if you consider taking the planet's smartest engineers and physicists and putting them in a warehouse and laboratory setting with billions of dollars worth of equipment and saying, build me a machine that can get us to the moon, or to Mars.

 

 

Travelling quickly in outer space is not too difficult. It's the steering, the slowing down, the landing and return that's the hard bit.

 

That and actually staying alive and well for the duration of the mission.

 

Oh and I don't think a rivetted hull or a single door for extravehicular activity would work in practice either.

 

Edited by serpentine
Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, bflat said:

Astrofucks with snorkels and scuba gear and people still believe.

 

Im not sure where youre going with this

 

Its long been known they train in a pool - so pictures of a pool and astronauts isn't a suspicious reveal

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Eldnah said:

 

Im not sure where youre going with this

 

Its long been known they train in a pool - so pictures of a pool and astronauts isn't a suspicious reveal

Sure, whatever, but in "space?"

Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
20 hours ago, KillBill said:

Voyager's fake, as were ALL the Apollo missions, only mythology.

 

 

So rather than enter into a long winded metaphysical discussion of the nature of perceived reality let's play a version of the cheese shop game where I suggest a particular space mission, then you get to cry fake but you then have to give  a different excuse each time explaining as to why it's fake.:classic_smile:

 

 

Starting with the Cassini Orbiter

 

 

Edited by serpentine
Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem with that though, is the same reasons will keep coming up every time: stage-show productions - composite images/animations/cgi etc.

Except Challenger - most of the 7 'astronauts' who were supposed to have died, appear to actually be living.

(I did watch the video you linked by the way).

 

Here's an image from Cassini (In the Shadow of Saturn):

https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap110904.html

 

Unreal?

newrings_cassini.jpg.f4edf58dff1fc771b82eb1e02adb8daf.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, serpentine said:

 

Travelling quickly in outer space is not too difficult. It's the steering, the slowing down, the landing and return that's the hard bit.

 

That and actually staying alive and well for the duration of the mission.

 

Oh and I don't think a rivetted hull or a single door for extravehicular activity would work in practice either.

 

They have already solved that challenge.

 

It wouldn't matter if the door was held on by a paperclip if they figured out how to operate in between the dimension that is physical.

Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, KillBill said:

The problem with that though, is the same reasons will keep coming up every time: stage-show productions - composite images/animations/cgi etc.

Except Challenger - most of the 7 'astronauts' who were supposed to have died, appear to actually be living.

(I did watch the video you linked by the way).

 

Here's an image from Cassini (In the Shadow of Saturn):

https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap110904.html

 

Unreal?

newrings_cassini.jpg.f4edf58dff1fc771b82eb1e02adb8daf.jpg

 

Certainly some tinkering with the original data but to bring out the finer detail which is what scientists are interested in. Not really possible without digital technology. and the post process tinkering is documented in the links.

 

In reality if ever the naked human eye found itself in that same spot the glare of the light of the distant Sun off the Saturnian rings would dazzle just a few moments before blindness and death.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's Gaia (European Space Agency) which puts to practical use the phenomenon the Ancient Greeks knew about called parallax to systematically map the Stars in the galaxy and measure the distances to them amongst other things. The data gathering and processing from this one space scope employs 400 people and a vast computer system and will make or break several current Imainstream theories about the nature of space.

 

 

In more detail

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/5/2020 at 9:26 PM, bflat said:

1) No person ever walked on the Moon.

 

2) It is likely that the Moon is not something that can be landed upon as it is both self-luminating and also shows qualities that appear translucent.

 

 

 

people have been on the moon but 2) is correct imo.

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/10/2020 at 1:39 AM, Given To Fly said:

people have been on the moon...

Cool story, any evidence for this claim?

 

On 7/10/2020 at 1:39 AM, Given To Fly said:

...but 2) is correct imo.

Indeed!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

@bflat

i've seen the moon transparent/translucent/see through, but there IS also a dark side to the moon. (i'm not quoting pink floyd btw lol)
the beautiful thing exists.
but not how we are brainwashed how it is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...