Jump to content

Fake Moon Landings


SovereigntyOfMan

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, DaleP said:

You see, the key words are "half way to the Moon" and that's just a half story.

They didn't tell you the rest that they didn't actually go to the Moon for whatever reason in the end. 😆

 

It's really difficult to debate somebody who doesn't know the subject and doesn't provide any material to debate. You failed to acknowledge the point made in the video. Namely that the "hoax" film was made by a dishonest person who deliberately falsified his result and made a provably absurd claim.

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Mr. Nice said:

 

It's really difficult to debate somebody who doesn't know the subject and doesn't provide any material to debate. You failed to acknowledge the point made in the video. Namely that the "hoax" film was made by a dishonest person who deliberately falsified his result and made a provably absurd claim.

 

 

Someone has always started from the scratch. 😁

But I still think it was a fake, non-landing on the moon.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, DarianF said:

 

 

 

 

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6DpPQ8QdLg

 

Craters. No shit. 😆

 

Darian, NHK is like BBC of Japan. Most of the countries are bought. Look how they are going along with Covid, they are creating their own version of variants over there. 🤦‍♂️

So the last video you have posted shows Australia on top....how is that possible?

Most of the time Northern hemisphere is on top of the globe like this one.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/24/2022 at 9:52 PM, Mr. Nice said:

 

Nope. You need to substantiate the ramblings of your source.

 

It has craters. Meteors "land" on the Moon. The owner of this forum cites a seismic experiment on the Moon as proof that the Moon rang like a bell. 

 

 

I've heard about the Moon ringing like a bell but if the crater depth is anywhere between 2-4km....did they drop a JCB digger for it to penetrate the surface?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, DaleP said:

Someone has always started from the scratch. 😁

But I still think it was a fake, non-landing on the moon.

 

I'm not concerned about your opinion on the matter. If you care to present your evidence I will show you why it is bollocks.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, DaleP said:

I've heard about the Moon ringing like a bell but if the crater depth is anywhere between 2-4km....did they drop a JCB digger for it to penetrate the surface?

 

To what are you referring? A random crater or the Apollo seismology device recording the spent Apollo craft impacting the Moon?

 

Meteorites hit the Moon at crazy speeds. Some are tiny and make small craters, some are huge and ........

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DaleP said:

 

Not convinced with these. Look at the flag waving at 3 mins 10 second.

 

I am going to assume that you have zero physics knowledge. In a vacuum there is still the same inertia. He moves the pole, the flag moves. he stops moving the pole, the flag stops. If it was atmosphere making the flag move, it would carry on when he let go. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Nice said:

 

I am going to assume that you have zero physics knowledge. In a vacuum there is still the same inertia. He moves the pole, the flag moves. he stops moving the pole, the flag stops. If it was atmosphere making the flag move, it would carry on when he let go. 

If you look again, he's still and not moving the pole but flag is waving. 🤦‍♂️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DaleP said:

If you look again, he's still and not moving the pole but flag is waving. 🤦‍♂️

 

Dude, I've seen this clip a thousand times. YOU look again! Facepalm? Really? This crap has been debunked 20 years ago. You stumble upon it and like every other hoax believer fail to check a single thing. It stops when he lets go of it - it moves more because a) less gravity b) no atmosphere to slow it. At 47 mins:

 

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, DarianF said:

 

 

25 minutes ago, Mr. Nice said:

 

Dude, I've seen this clip a thousand times. YOU look again! Facepalm? Really? This crap has been debunked 20 years ago. You stumble upon it and like every other hoax believer fail to check a single thing. It stops when he lets go of it - it moves more because a) less gravity b) no atmosphere to slow it. At 47 mins:

 

 

 

Mr Nice, no, you look at the video Darian has posted which is from another angle. 🤨

Your video is in very poor quality. At 3 mins 3 second, you will see the flag waving when he is not moving the pole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, DaleP said:

Mr Nice, no, you look at the video Darian has posted which is from another angle. 🤨

 

No, really it isn't. There was only the one camera  - how can you not know this.

 

59 minutes ago, DaleP said:

Your video is in very poor quality. At 3 mins 3 second, you will see the flag waving when he is not moving the pole.

 

Your time stamp is wrong. I "will see", when he has let go of it, that the damn thing doesn't move in any way whatsoever. If you say it does, this is going to be one of those "debates" where things go nowhere because you need to visit Specsavers. All you need to do is go to 52 minutes, then drag the cursor along the time-line and watch the small screen showing the flag is the same for the entire time after he lets go. Don't make me fart around and make a gif just to prove this! 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Mr. Nice said:

 

No, really it isn't. There was only the one camera  - how can you not know this.

 

 

Your time stamp is wrong. I "will see", when he has let go of it, that the damn thing doesn't move in any way whatsoever. If you say it does, this is going to be one of those "debates" where things go nowhere because you need to visit Specsavers. All you need to do is go to 52 minutes, then drag the cursor along the time-line and watch the small screen showing the flag is the same for the entire time after he lets go. Don't make me fart around and make a gif just to prove this! 

 

 

OK @DarianF

According to Mr Nice, the video you have posted is fake. Hence cannot be used to debunk Fake Moon. 😌

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Mr. Nice said:

 

No, really it isn't. There was only the one camera  - how can you not know this.

 

 

Your time stamp is wrong. I "will see", when he has let go of it, that the damn thing doesn't move in any way whatsoever. If you say it does, this is going to be one of those "debates" where things go nowhere because you need to visit Specsavers. All you need to do is go to 52 minutes, then drag the cursor along the time-line and watch the small screen showing the flag is the same for the entire time after he lets go. Don't make me fart around and make a gif just to prove this! 

 

 

Your video is in such poor quality, you can't really see whether he is moving or not whereas Darian's video IS very clear. The difference is 1 (yours) to 100 (Darian's).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Nice said:

 

BULLSHIT! The video is authentic, you are the one who thinks it is different to the one I posted showing where that clip comes from!

The difference.

Your video shows astranot's back, you can't see his face.

 

Darian's video, the astranot can be seen from his profile angle. Different angle. You say, there was only one camera...... I doubt it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DaleP said:

The difference.

 

 

There is no difference.

 

2 minutes ago, DaleP said:

Your video shows astranot's back, you can't see his face.

 

It's astronaut. The clip on DarianF's video takes a clip from the full EVA I posted.

 

2 minutes ago, DaleP said:

Darian's video, the astranot can be seen from his profile angle. Different angle. You say, there was only one camera...... I doubt it.

 

I don't care what you "doubt". You need to go to the opticians. It's the same camera and the same EVA.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, DaleP said:

This is the danger of indoctrination.

 

They cannot even see a simple thing such as the difference of angle the image has been captured. 🤦‍♂️

 

No. This is the danger of not getting your eyes tested. We haven't even got out of the starting gate and already we have the kind of response I would expect from Stevie Wonder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...