Fake Moon Landings

[SimonTV]

  

On 3/10/2021 at 12:15 AM, Doctor What said:

 

You are very ignorant of the enormous amount of data from ALSEP experiments from the surface. 

 

Tell me then how much data? like it makes any difference. 

 

 

[Seconal]

That foil was propelled by the engines and flew with no air resistance and little gravity.

 

Very difficult special effects to create in the 60's.

 

I say its real. I mean so what if they did go to the Moon, why not, does believing in a such a major conspiracy one-up you on all of mankind.

 

Like the Flat Earthers, they think they know something everyone else doesn't and that makes them, what, special, it brings you what, money, happiness, enlightenment. No, it brings nothing but more questions and disbelief.

Edited April 9, 2021 by Seconal

[SimonTV]

17 hours ago, Seconal said:

Very difficult special effects to create in the 60's.

 

Clearly not because they did it. 

[Seconal]

I used to be closed minded. I thought I was objective but in truth I only looked to validate my preconceived beliefs.

 

Now I understand that instead of being rationally objective I was in fact being led by emotion that then formed my perceptions from the information I was understanding.

 

Unless you can step outside yourself and see, there is no way you will understand how blind you really are. I don't expect to change anyone's views for only a strong change to ones conscious experience will shift them out of their polarised state of judgement.

 

But here, ask yourself this question and ask it honestly 'Do you want the Moonlandings to be real or fake'?

Edited April 10, 2021 by Seconal

[SimonTV]

On 4/10/2021 at 5:01 PM, Seconal said:

I used to be closed minded. I thought I was objective but in truth I only looked to validate my preconceived beliefs.

 

Now I understand that instead of being rationally objective I was in fact being led by emotion that then formed my perceptions from the information I was understanding.

 

Unless you can step outside yourself and see, there is no way you will understand how blind you really are. I don't expect to change anyone's views for only a strong change to ones conscious experience will shift them out of their polarised state of judgement.

 

But here, ask yourself this question and ask it honestly 'Do you want the Moonlandings to be real or fake'?

 

I want them (and space travel) to be real but they are a fraud and it is very unfortunate. 

[Mkultra]

https://www.youtube.com/user/godgevlamste/playlists Please everyone watch. We will break the matrix.

[Xelador]

I think what was highly suspect was that there was hardly any delay on the Nixon call to the astronauts.
 

 

[peter]

11 hours ago, Xelador said:

I think what was highly suspect was that there was hardly any delay on the Nixon call to the astronauts.

I'm not saying weather they went to the moon or not , but when you consider that the moon at it's furthermost point is around 250 ,000 miles give or take and radio waves travel at the speed of light ,around 186,000 miles per second, the fact that there was bugger all delay would hardly be surprising. 

[peter]

On 4/10/2021 at 3:14 AM, SimonTV said:

These lift off videos were done with models. 

and you know this how?, I never saw anyone in a bikini

[Wakiza]

The 82-year-old had spent six decades trying to reach space. But she still sounded unimpressed by her maiden voyage:

We went right on up and I saw darkness. I thought I was going to see the world, but we weren’t quite high enough.

 

 

I posted this on another form but it makes me scratch my head if these people who are now getting to go to space through other means then NASA. Just a thought but couldn't they see earth as or maybe it's to fast or they didn't reach outer space far enough. Anyways Wally didn't sound like she was thrilled by the view......

[Gav]

2 hours ago, Wakiza said:

The 82-year-old had spent six decades trying to reach space. But she still sounded unimpressed by her maiden voyage:

 

It was sub-orbital from reading the mission brief, so you won't see the whole of the Earth.

 

"I love it. I love it!": Wally Funk makes history during Blue Origin's launch to space - CBS News

"For Funk, the countdown to this day lasted 60 years. She said Tuesday's trip to space was fantastic. "I love it. I love it!" she said as she floated in zero gravity."

[SimonTV]

 

[Origin]

That is the problem when everything is built on lies. And the lie started much earlier. The system offers many truths based on lies. In this truth, humans are persuaded that we will go to the stars. And what an effort is made to compulsively believe this. In this truth, Humans have control over this world. And everything Nasa sells is true. Videos of humans on the moon and pictures from Hubble are the truth. Right? 

 

As an Experiencer, I can only laugh about it. All the lies that humans tell themselves like worshipping gods and now it's aliens that are going to save humans. But we are not going anywhere. We find ourselves in a higher dimensional structure. And if normal Humans would be able to see it, I mean with their eyes, the whole illusory history of Humans will collapse into nothing. And not only that, but also what a ridiculous level of development we are at. I can indicate that it would be very wise to be more than suspicious of what humans think they know and what is sold as reality. 

 

 

[ConspiracyTruths.co.uk]

I wrote an article on the fake moon landings. I cover the 'evidence' that we have actually been to the moon, then cover who, where and why the moon landings were faked. This includes Stanley Kubricks involvement in the moon landings. Almost beyond doubt that they were filmed at Cinder Lakes in Arizona by Kubrick, giving him the a virtually unlimited budget to make 2001: A Space Odyssey, and he would be able to make any film he wanted, with no oversight from anyone, for the rest of his life. https://www.conspiracytruths.co.uk/apollo11.html

[alexa]

[DaleP]

OK, we can no longer comment on FE threads so let's talk about Moon for a change.

 

What is the common execuse offered by the elites that we are not migrating to the nearest planet....the Moon?

The focus seems to be aimed at Mars.... it would make sense to live on the nearest planet to the Earth? At least Greta will be happy for not wasting CO2.

[Alistair MacDonald]

On 6/25/2020 at 10:48 PM, SovereigntyOfMan said:

Hi All, 

 

So I'm trying to gather some specific information in regards to the original moon landing and also get some chatter started...

 

So iirc not to long ago I read on this board that their was a freemason flag planted before the U.S. flag? Is there video of this and assuming there isn't can anyone direct me to where this info came from? I'm also interested in the audio chatter between the astronauts and its double and esoteric meaning on any of their recorded audio and also the real meaning of the eagle has landed.

 

What about Kubricks connection? 

 

The first country to reach the moon was the Germans the Americans reached it no later than 1963 as for the NASA scam Kubrick made a film in 1968 in 1969 the apolo mission landed . hope that cleared things up for you , the reason Kubrick made the phoney film was in case the mission failed on reaching the moon accident or whatever then the accident would have to be coming home

[Grumpy Owl]

15 hours ago, Alistair MacDonald said:

The first country to reach the moon was the Germans the Americans reached it no later than 1963 as for the NASA scam Kubrick made a film in 1968 in 1969 the apolo mission landed . hope that cleared things up for you , the reason Kubrick made the phoney film was in case the mission failed on reaching the moon accident or whatever then the accident would have to be coming home

 

Sorry but that photo is clearly fake

 

(looks like a drive belt pulley off a car being held in front of the camera, hence why it appears out of focus)

[Guest]

Nice lol

 

 

 

 

[Mr. Nice]

1 hour ago, ink said:

Nice lol

 

 

 

 

 

The very definition of "Really? Not this shite again".

 

You would never in a million years get the whole earth in a window from orbit. The deceptive movie ignores the middle TV transmission that shows the camera zooming out and the Earth disappears off to the side of the window!

 

So many people suck up this crap without checking it. Here is a video I did oh just 10 years ago. Not one hoax believer has ever acknowledged the absurdity of this claim:

 

 

[Mr. Nice]

Apollo samples prove beyond any doubt that Man has been to the Moon. Over six missions, 842lbs of samples, including 3m cores were retrieved.

Lunar samples that have been peer reviewed by thousands of the world's finest geologists and petrologists. The samples have substantial solar isotope impregnation, many contain large volumes of micro-meteorite impact craters. They collectively are devoid of any contamination from oxygen, water or nitrogen found on Earth, have no evidence of fragmentation or fusion crusts from entry through atmosphere. They show evidence of formation in a lower gravity environment. They are entirely dry as a bone, with the only hydroxyl/water type substances existing within low gravity formed volcanic beads or apatite crystals. They cannot by any possibility be meteorites. They cannot be from Earth. This leaves the only explanation as retrieval off world.

meteorites.wustl.edu/lunar/moon_meteorites.htm

"Any geoscientist (and there have been thousands from all over the world) who has studied lunar samples knows that anyone who thinks the Apollo lunar samples were created on Earth as part of government conspiracy doesn't know much about rocks. The Apollo samples are just too good. They tell a self-consistent story with a complexly interwoven plot that's better than any story any conspirator could have conceived. I've studied lunar rocks and soils for 45+ years and I couldn't make even a poor imitation of a lunar breccia, lunar soil, or a mare basalt in the lab. And with all due respect to my clever colleagues in government labs, no one in “the Government “ could do it either, even now that we know what lunar rocks are like. Lunar samples show evidence of formation in an extremely dry environment with essentially no free oxygen and little gravity. Some have impact craters on the surface and many display evidence for a suite of unanticipated and complicated effects associated with large and small meteorite impacts. Lunar rocks and soil contain gases (hydrogen, helium, nitrogen, neon, argon, krypton, and xenon) derived from the solar wind with isotope ratios different than Earth forms of the same gases. They contain crystal damage from cosmic rays. Lunar igneous rocks have crystallization ages, determined by techniques involving radioisotopes, that are older than any known Earth rocks. (Anyone who figures out how to fake that is worthy of a Nobel Prize.) It was easier and cheaper to go to the Moon and bring back some rocks than it would have been to create all these fascinating features on Earth. "

Summary:

1. Geologists have been examining Apollo samples for 50 years, there is complete agreement that they are authentic and from the Moon.

2. The samples are impregnated with billions of years of solar exposure causing isotopes impossible to produce on Earth.

3. It is impossible for a rock to reside on Earth without it interacting with the gasses or liquids it comes into contact with.

4. It is impossible for a rock to enter the Earth's atmosphere and still retain its outer layers. Apollo rocks have strong Helium 3 on their outer layers.

5. Lunar samples have in some cases been older than any known Earth rock.

6. The Apollo samples contain only water encased within volcanic beads showing formation in lower gravity.

7. The Apollo rocks contain tiny craters far smaller than any man made gun could produce! They also show redistribution effects called "gardening".

8. The Apollo samples have no terrestrial weathering they simply cannot be from Earth.

9. Apollo samples show evidence for a whole variety of meteorite impact damage.

10. They are bone dry with water-type material encased within volcanic beads formed in low gravity and apatite crystals.

11. It's been suggested that zap pits were created by guns that have limitations of 0.1mm projectiles when the zap pits are in the region of 50 microns (2/1000 inch) in diameter!

12. Apollo samples show evidence of formation with essentially no free oxygen.

13. Isotope ratios on Apollo rocks are different to anything found on Earth.

 

[alexa]

On 3/10/2022 at 10:07 AM, Mr. Nice said:

Apollo samples prove beyond any doubt that Man has been to the Moon. Over six missions, 842lbs of samples, including 3m cores were retrieved.

 

 

Yeah yeah right 

[DarianF]

8 minutes ago, alexa said:

 

 

Yeah yeah right 

 

https://www.lpi.usra.edu/lunar/samples/

[Mr. Nice]

1 hour ago, alexa said:

Yeah yeah right 

 

Your informed rebuttal is something to behold. You are most certainly a valuable member of this forum and not at all a troll who has no clue whatsoever about anything. Well done.

[Ziggy Sawdust]

It's not green cheese, but it might as well be.

The Dutch national museum has said that one of its prized possessions, a rock supposedly brought back from the moon by U.S. astronauts, is just a piece of petrified wood.

Rijksmuseum spokeswoman Xandra van Gelder, who oversaw the investigation that proved the piece was a fake, said the museum will keep it anyway as a curiosity.

"It's a good story, with some questions that are still unanswered," she said. "We can laugh about it."