numnuts Posted June 21, 2020 Share Posted June 21, 2020 (edited) See below. Edited June 21, 2020 by numnuts Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
numnuts Posted June 21, 2020 Author Share Posted June 21, 2020 (edited) I have been speaking my mind since 2006 and I was on the old 2006 forum from 2009. I think that most folks who know of me will appreciate that I usually use quite considered language. For example, if am 10%, 30%, 50% or 70% etc. sure of something, then I will try to make that very clear. Now, on the late Anthony Lawson's (RIP) Youtube channel, there can be found his quite popular 'WTC7 - This is an Orange' video. I have viewed it numerous times, over the years, and also posted it both on the old forum and on this forum on a few occasions. My concern is that this video has now literally been 'added to' or 'segment switched', within the past fortnight or so, and I am 100% sure of it. God knows what Anthony would have said, if he had lived to see it. I am talking about the footage that I can now see between 1.03-1.07. It shows a more top to bottom view, from one angle of the building, and I believe it has been added to make the building look more susceptible to a total collapse. In reality it doesn't, as all of the separate steel columns will still have to have failed at exactly the same time, but I can see why someone would have done it. It was already quite farcical having a link to the official narrative on Wikipedia forced under this video, when this video in itself wholly disproved the official narrative, but whatever. Sigh. Edited June 21, 2020 by numnuts Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
numnuts Posted June 21, 2020 Author Share Posted June 21, 2020 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beachcomber Posted June 21, 2020 Share Posted June 21, 2020 We’re going to see a lot of history being rewritten I think. Funny enough I only watched loose change last week and wondered how they’d been able to keep that going. Might be worth buying the actual dvd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THESTRONG-THEVALIANT Posted June 21, 2020 Share Posted June 21, 2020 just started watching this - and thanks to this thread I noticed: @ 6: 32 time mark... 6:48 - 6:50 - strange lag... and a part of "proof" missing. 1984 youtube?? has the "proof" been tampered with, in the video? Anybody know? This is a Barrie Trower video btw. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motleyhoo Posted June 21, 2020 Share Posted June 21, 2020 WTC7, you can clearly see at all 4 corners at the same time a zipper effect from bottom to top. This is classic behavior of a controlled demolition. I knew it the first time I saw it. I'm not surprised videos are being altered. I hadn't thought of it, but it makes perfect sense. History is being rewritten as we speak, school curriculums changed, statues torn down, buildings and streets renamed, books and videos banned. It's just like 1984. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Armesis Posted June 21, 2020 Share Posted June 21, 2020 Simple, but a good video. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperstarNeilC Posted June 21, 2020 Share Posted June 21, 2020 It’s obvious WTC7 was controlled. But why would they demolish it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Efalump Posted July 27, 2020 Share Posted July 27, 2020 On 6/21/2020 at 8:55 PM, SuperstarNeilC said: It’s obvious WTC7 was controlled. But why would they demolish it? This is always my problem. I think this is a great video and really does make you think..... but why so many hours later? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pirate Posted August 11, 2020 Share Posted August 11, 2020 (edited) WTC Building 7 Primed for Demolition Prior to the day of September 11th 2001. There is a video of "Lucky Larry" Silverstein, the owner of the WTC Complex, where he says he had a conversation with The New York Fire Dept that went something like this..."The Fire Chief rang me and said that he thought Building 7 was so badly damaged that it would be safer to "Pull It", and I replied, because there had been such loss of life that day, to go ahead and "Pull It". There's 3 important points here... Point 1: To pull a building, is a term used in the Demolition Industry, referring to the Controlled Demolition of a building, so, whatever anyone says now regarding building 7 that says anything other than the fact building 7 was brought down deliberately, is arguing with what was said on the day, by the owner of the building. Point 2: To demolish a building in a controlled manner requires several weeks, even months in some cases, to plan and carefully weaken the structure of the building and strategically place explosives to safely and successfully bring the building down. It is impossible for this to have been carried out on the afternoon of 9/11 while the building was on fire, building 7 was already primed for demolition prior to that day. Point 3: When the hell did Fireman include demolition as part of their portfolio. Edited August 11, 2020 by pirate addition 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haunted Universe Posted August 13, 2020 Share Posted August 13, 2020 (edited) On 6/21/2020 at 8:55 PM, SuperstarNeilC said: It’s obvious WTC7 was controlled. But why would they demolish it? Building 7 was one of New York City's larger buildings. A sleek bronze-colored skyscraper with a trapezoidal footprint, it occupied an entire city block and rose over 600 feet above street level. Built in 1985, it was formerly the headquarters of the junk-bond firm Drexel Burnham Lambert, which contributed to the Savings and Loans collapse, prompting the $500-billion taxpayer-underwritten bailout of the latter 1980s. At the time of its destruction, it exclusively housed government agencies and financial institutions. It contained offices of the IRS, Secret Service, and SEC. One of the most interesting tenants was then-Mayor Giuliani's Office of Emergency Management, and its emergency command center on the 23rd floor. This floor received 15 million dollars worth of renovations, including independent and secure air and water supplies, and bullet and bomb resistant windows designed to withstand 200 MPH winds. The 1993 bombing must have been part of the rationale for the command center, which overlooked the Twin Towers, a prime terrorist target. How curious that on the day of the attack, Guiliani and his entourage set up shop in a different headquarters, abandoning the special bunker designed precisely for such an event Source-https://www.wtc7.net/background.html Edited August 13, 2020 by Haunted Universe 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alex67 Posted August 13, 2020 Share Posted August 13, 2020 (edited) On 6/21/2020 at 8:55 PM, SuperstarNeilC said: It’s obvious WTC7 was controlled. But why would they demolish it? Some logical suggestions are that flight 93 that was brought down in Pennsylvania, was destined for building 7, but when that event/collision didn't happen they decided to bring it down anyway, but consider even a plane alone hitting building 7 (just like the towers) isn't enough to bring down a whole building . Buildings like the twin towers and building 7 cannot completely destruct/collapse through themselves like they did without outside intervention - impossible. Building 7 contained very high tech military operations including ongoing investigations such as the Enron fraud, all of which were destroyed on that fateful day when the building eventually dropped. Some of the collapse (8 stories) were recorded and eventually admitted (9/11 commission) to have fallen at free fall speed, which as we all know is an absolute impossibility under normal gravitational collapse conditions. Edited August 13, 2020 by alex67 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
numnuts Posted January 13 Author Share Posted January 13 On 6/21/2020 at 12:21 PM, numnuts said: Ghost editing videos of free falling skyscrapers is now not sufficient for them. Just delete them instead! Ha ha ha. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.jpg.8081a54a3b74a5d1823dfac966666137.jpg)
.jpg.594f0ef23288ec5ab04539b2f8a8dbd4.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.