Why are we still paying £350 million per week to the E.U.?

[numnuts]

I honestly don't know why. Does anyone know why? 

 

P.S. I am sure Matt Hancock would no doubt say 'That's a fukking good question, that is!'.

Edited June 14, 2020 by numnuts

[oz93666]

Just looked into this .... apparently billions more to pay for many years to come ...

 

 

According to a BBC article .... "It was feared that if the government had not agreed to make such payments it would have soured relations with the EU "...

 

So the UK tax payers didn't have to do this .... British politicians simply agreed to give  away all this money ... https://www.bbc.com/news/51110096

 

It's because British leading politicians follow rothschild orders , transferring wealth from UK into the EU will make EU less likely to fail ...and the UK more likely to fail ..

 

And they know the public are out to lunch , and leave such things to the "experts" ...

[serpentine]

£350 million pounds a week would be enough to build and run purpose built luxury care home/hospitals with full facilities and fine gardens and sporting facilities and with extra accomodation for long distance travelling visiting relatives.

Edited June 14, 2020 by serpentine

[numnuts]

1 hour ago, oz93666 said:

It's because British leading politicians follow rothschild orders, transferring wealth from UK into the EU will make EU less likely to fail ...and the UK more likely to fail...

 

Well, yes, I think that pretty much sums it all up. I do know that the Remainiacs and the BBC 'Reality Check' fantasists always try to trumpet a net figure, which 'most' folks accept is around £220 million per week, but that doesn't wash with me at all. The notion of Joe Public benefiting from a £130 million per week rebate from the E.U. is totally laughable. The PTB no doubt advertise some 'poster boy' grand scheme where Joe Public is supposedly helped out, in a similar vein to a 'poster boy' private company helping out our NHS, but the amount of fraud going down must be mind-boggling.

 

Anyhow, back to my main point, I still don't understand the logic of us continuing to contribute 'as if' we were a member. I mean, even if I accepted the huge 'Divorce Bill' bullshit, which I don't, I still don't understand the logic of it. In the real world, we would now be paying the E.U. a 'different' amount of money each month. It wouldn't be like this.

 

Furthermore, the BBC 'Reality Check' fantasists don't seem to mention the fact that the 'Financial Settlement' allows for us to pay the E.U. £350 million per week right up until the end of March 2021. Could it be any more obvious that the PTB are ultimately expecting us not to go anywhere? Could it be any more obvious that the size of the 'Divorce Bill' was solely based on tallying up a few years of continuing membership fees, while they all conspired to stop Brexit? The key question to ask is 'Are we still going to be paying into the E.U. budget, 'as if' we were a member, on 1st April 2021?'. I know the answer and we will all look like fools too.

Edited June 14, 2020 by numnuts

[Armesis]

The government claims that the figure is 'over estimated', and that this is all a conspiracy theory. So it must mean the UK is still sending £349.9 million pounds instead of £350 million per week then. 

[jack121]

 

But how much of this does the uk government get to keep in backhanders. That is not stated.

Also the figures do not take into account Mr 10%.

Then there are the expenses claims, wages to be paid for all the hard working polititians who are overseeing this, all the commities they love setting up (their friends getting a cut of the action)

Everything the government does is 10X the usual cost because they will only employ certain people, use certain companies.

A little off topic, sorry,  so shocked at the multimillion dollar bills for roadworks, subsidies and grants given to the the post office, every tom dick or harry who knows a polititian is stepping forward with the begging bowl.

Edited June 14, 2020 by jack121

[zArk]

 

maybe the 350 a week is laundered drug money

 

i mean thats all these international financial systems are doing aint it... laundering money for rich criminals? 

 

 

[HistoryIsComplex]

Because the EU is the BEST Massively Multiplayer Online Game there is.

 

If you don't pay your 350M, you don't get the to use the Golden Armor and The Sword Of Balabukazia.

 

[numnuts]

6 hours ago, HistoryIsComplex said:

If you don't pay your 350M, you don't get the to use the Golden Armor and The Sword Of Balabukazia.

 

And whenever Portaloo hopped off a train, so as to go and visit a nearby NATO facility, then his iris scan would result in an 'Access Denied' message.

Edited June 14, 2020 by numnuts

[chocomel]

Portaloo.....

[Tinfoil Hat]

9 hours ago, zArk said:

 

maybe the 350 a week is laundered drug money

 

i mean thats all these international financial systems are doing aint it... laundering money for rich criminals? 

 

 

 

I know you might be kidding, but nothing would surprise me. Nothing at all.

[jack121]

18 hours ago, oz93666 said:

Just looked into this .... apparently billions more to pay for many years to come ...

 

 

According to a BBC article .... "It was feared that if the government had not agreed to make such payments it would have soured relations with the EU "...

 

So the UK tax payers didn't have to do this .... British politicians simply agreed to give  away all this money ... https://www.bbc.com/news/51110096

 

It's because British leading politicians follow rothschild orders , transferring wealth from UK into the EU will make EU less likely to fail ...and the UK more likely to fail ..

 

And they know the public are out to lunch , and leave such things to the "experts" ...

 

 

Why do they want the uk to collapse rather than europe, i thought the one world government they are starting is going to be in israel.

 

 

[numnuts]

33 minutes ago, jack121 said:

Why do they want the uk to collapse rather than europe, i thought the one world government they are starting is going to be in israel.

 

I am not sure that I understand what you are getting at. The E.U. project is a Zionist project. If the U.K. leaves, then it is in danger of collapsing. The PTB obviously don't want this to happen.

[oz93666]

14 minutes ago, jack121 said:

 

 

Why do they want the uk to collapse rather than europe, i thought the one world government they are starting is going to be in israel.

 

 

 

The fundamental NWO plan was to get the whole world under one administration ... all decisions made in one place , by one World  leader or group  ...

 

This was to be done in stages ... Europe in the EU ....Asian countries in The Asian Union (ASEAN) ... Canada , US  and Sth America in their group ( I forget it's name ) 

 

Then when people got use to this these three groups would be unified into The New World Order , NWO 

 

This plan goes back many decades ... EU and ASEAN has been fairly successful , the American group not so much 

 

But now the EU appears to be falling apart they are desperate to stop this  , if they can make UK fail they can blame it on Brexit and hopefully stop other countries leaving ....

 

All their plans fail ... They were hoping to get things all tidy and organised for the arrival of their Anti christ / messiah / ET's ( not clear which plan their going with )  so things were all set up and he could just assume this role of world leader , perhaps ruling from the new temple in Jerusalem ... But they haven't even built this yet !!!

 

The ET's who control things and make all these plans for the Cabal to carry out look like they will just plow ahead quickly  now anyway , despite things not being ready ...

 

I expect the open arrival of ET's very soon 

[jack121]

Thanks! 

Pretty sure the temple you are referring to is the temple of solomon, which is under the al aqsa mosque.

The jews are planning to collapse al aqsa and excavate temple of solomon, then use that as their base for world domination. Temple has already been built.

 

Getting to your point about the EU: Countries have left the EU and a whole load more are considering it. 

How is this happening, i thought these politicians were just puppets, so why are they leaving europe, isn't this openly defying their jewish masters.

 

Also, how does coronavirus play into all of this. Some are saying china started it, some say it was the US, some say it is a plan to reduce world population.

 

Also, what happened to WW3, thought they were going to nuke iran and a few other nearby countires they do not like.

 

Thanks!

Edited June 15, 2020 by jack121

[numnuts]

4 hours ago, jack121 said:

Countries have left the EU and a whole load more are considering it. How is this happening, i thought these politicians were just puppets, so why are they leaving europe, isn't this openly defying their jewish masters.

 

The E.U. was established in 1993 by the Maastricht Treaty. Prior to that it was the E.E.C., a purely economic arrangement, which was established in 1958 by the Rome Treaty. Algeria left the E.E.C. in 1962, by simply gaining independence from France. Greenland left the E.E.C. in 1985, due to a dispute over fishing rights. Furthermore, leaving the E.E.C., as opposed to leaving the E.U., wasn't that difficult. This is especially the case after the Lisbon Treaty of 2009.

 

The only E.U. territorial change to ever occur was when Saint Martin and Saint Barthelemy seceded from Guadeloupe, which is a department of France, in 2007. They did not sever ties with the E.U. though. Therefore, your hypothesis of 'countries leaving the E.U.', on which your question is based, is very wrong. This should be further proved to you, by all of the anti-Brexit antics that are about to unfold before your very eyes. We have not left the E.U. yet! As for your terminology of 'Jewish masters', I am not sure what you mean. Per chance, you have been brainwashed by the propaganda of Rachel Riley? 

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Withdrawal_from_the_European_Union#Withdrawals

 

4 hours ago, jack121 said:

Also, how does coronavirus play into all of this. Some are saying China started it, some say it was the US, some say it is a plan to reduce world population.

 

The Coronavirus was engineered by the Israeli mafia in a lab in the U.S. or Israel. China are being used as a scapegoat, which could quite easily 'contribute' towards an anti-China World War 3 plot. There are many aspects to the Coronavirus agenda, such as mass vaccination, population control and cashless society, but stopping Brexit is the main reason it was unleashed right now.  

 

4 hours ago, jack121 said:

Also, what happened to WW3, thought they were going to nuke iran and a few other nearby countires they do not like.

 

Can you please source where you are getting your info from? I have never heard anything like it. Efforts were made to lure Iran into a serious armed conflict at the end of last year and at the beginning of this year. Generally speaking, the PTB do want to displace the Iranian regime, but what recently occurred was specifically done with an anti-Brexit mindset. It would have been a 'distraction' from Brexit, but the plan failed. World War 3, if it happens, will be with Russia or China. Not Iran. If it is irrefutable evidence of great evil existing at a state level, which you are solely seeking, then you really need not look any further than this. Cheers.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zv7BImVvEyk

 

Edited June 15, 2020 by numnuts

[tooth]

Maybe its to cover the cost of the French Navy escorting the new arrivals into British waters 

[jack121]

Thanks!

 

 I thought it would be a nuclear war as i have heard quite a few times they want to reduce the world's population by 90% or so.

In most wars millions have died, so to kill ninty percent, which is billions, they would have to use something seriously destructive.

I assumed nukes to wipe out people on iran's side of the globe, probably will do afghanistan syria lebanon and other places they don't like

And virus to kill of people on this side of this planet, as nukes would cause a lot of fallout and make the place uninhabitable for them.

 

Keep hearing about greater israel as well, the expansion of israel into neighbouring countries. Do you know anything about this. Because all the jews are running to get to there, israel has built thousands of new homes to accomodate them.

Could they be wanting to get away from the nuclear fallout, viruses, economic collapses they have orchestrated, get back to greater israel and get ready to worship ttheir ET / messiah.

Edited June 15, 2020 by jack121

[mrbookrah]

10 hours ago, numnuts said:

 

I am not sure that I understand what you are getting at. The E.U. project is a Zionist project. If the U.K. leaves, then it is in danger of collapsing. The PTB obviously don't want this to happen.

France and Belgium to follow. 

[shadowmoon]

Why are we still paying NI contributions?  three of my family have had clinics cancelled until some further far off date.

Why pay for a service we can't even use.

[zarkov]

8 hours ago, mrbookrah said:

France and Belgium to follow. 

I think Italy might too if the protesters calls for a return to the lira is any indication.

 

 

Defiately agree that It indicates that brexit is a stake in the heart of the EU - It signals many things to other countries that are non virtuous re; the EU . If this first stage to centralisation fails then greater centralisation/UN takeover or whatever guise it is going to take is going to be much more troublesome.

Coronavirus clearly been a trojan horse from the start of lockdown - disruption fear panic and pliable populations.

Wondering what boris's next dead cat is going to be?

Edited June 15, 2020 by zarkov

[YHWHisgracious]

So what difference does a no deal brexit v a deal brexit make? 

 

Of course right now we are hearing all sorts of threats from the eu regarding fishing waters, trade deals right now....stoking the fire? Most peoples reaction to these msm articles seems to be along the lines of "go f***, no deal it is then!". But i do see boris looking more and more weary looking each day and i can almost see the fear oozing off him for how he is going to have to somehow do the u-turn of all u-turns  from his initial stance on the brexit stuff that got him the hot seat. We also have large companies speaking up about how harmful a no deal would be (nissan ect) and the wto chiming in with tariff talk.

 

But one thing id like to know.......if the plan was to keep us in the eu and all the political bods are 'chosen' then why did they initially voice boris so loudly on his calls to leave the eu? They pushed quite hard for it imo.

[Orange Alert]

32 minutes ago, YHWHisgracious said:

But one thing id like to know.......if the plan was to keep us in the eu and all the political bods are 'chosen' then why did they initially voice boris so loudly on his calls to leave the eu? They pushed quite hard for it imo.

 

To give the illusion that there is a real choice. Boris Johnson was chosen as the seemingly loose cannon, maverick for the Leave campaign, but is 100% establishment & controlled. Now Boris is on the scene to make the betrayal more convuluted and subtle than what could be achieved by Theresa May.

[zarkov]

@YHWHisgracious

No deal vs Deal Brexit would mean non-favourable or favourable trading arrangements with the EU. Its a Mexican standoff of sorts and will have economic impact on export and import markets.

For the most part it is theater and we are the participating audience in this facade.

Edited June 15, 2020 by zarkov

[numnuts]

13 hours ago, jack121 said:

I thought it would be a nuclear war as i have heard quite a few times they want to reduce the world's population by 90% or so. In most wars millions have died, so to kill ninty percent, which is billions, they would have to use something seriously destructive. I assumed nukes to wipe out people on iran's side of the globe, probably will do afghanistan syria lebanon and other places they don't like. And virus to kill of people on this side of this planet, as nukes would cause a lot of fallout and make the place uninhabitable for them.

 

I don't think that any nuclear war would be started with the goal of reducing the world's population. They will do that via vaccines, which will both cause sterilisation and reduce life expectancy. The current world population is estimated to be about 7.5 billion. I believe that they want to reduce the world population to about 2 billion, not 0.5 billion as some people think, which equates to a reduction of about 75%.      

 

1 hour ago, YHWHisgracious said:

But one thing id like to know.......if the plan was to keep us in the eu and all the political bods are 'chosen' then why did they initially voice boris so loudly on his calls to leave the eu? They pushed quite hard for it imo.

 

One can always debate just how 'in on it', controlled or compromised someone is and I think it is a fair debate to have. We shouldn't be thinking in binaries, as in 'he is PTB' or ' he isn't PTB'. Life is complicated. However, I think that Boris gave the game away, as to him being a darker shade, when he prorogued parliament last autumn. It was a completely pointless thing to do, which only played right into the Remainiac's hands. Plus, it was a big giveaway, when he started saying things like 'eminently feasible' in relation to us leaving by 31st October 2019. Ha ha ha.

Edited June 15, 2020 by numnuts