Jump to content
Message added by Grumpy Owl,

This topic is for discussing the "Great Reset" or "Fourth Industrial Revolution" being pushed and promoted by the World Economic Forum et al.

 

 

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, Staeld said:

You have to hand it to Sky News Australia for speaking out. This entire segment is warning about the great reset.

 

https://www.skynews.com.au/details/_6199544116001?fbclid=IwAR2VpvjBOH2EwG4yhLdNaO3hmRUK5El9DIutdt9yohJGEyDBgt7cNVvR478

I mean its good that they talk about it, but they also make it seem as if this is an idea that came up due to the fabricated crisis.

The Great Reset is basically another word for NWO (New World Order), which is a plan/agenda that is already in the making for at least a century.

The only difference now is  that they come out with it, because they need people get used to this idea, since the meassurments will be more and more extreme by the day.

 

What does the dude that lost his business say? He or she is of course angry and searches for answers. There will be a lot of these, because if your plan is to destroy each and every independent livelyhood, you will eventually face an ever growing angry mob. (which they pointed out and already know about)

 

Yes, it is good that an official news channel talks about it, but they are still not speaking the whole truth. If they would, youtube bans it in a matter of seconds (for a popular video that reaches a big audience).

 

Edit: I refered to youtube because Mitochondrial Eve already posted this video in this thread

Edited by Michael
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 766
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

That's tragic. Found that last line particularly sad, "keep doing the right thing... wearing face masks and hopefully I'll speak to you in the new year".   It boggles my mind that nearly a y

Posted Images

Increasing debt means someone or some future is being used to underwrite it

 

I see an amigo loan economy emerging

 

The old rich families want to be the creditor of nations and thus the populus.

These people were shoved to the side and debtor prisons disappeared when people were able to create their own money (based upon earnings and future earnings) being their own creditor and debtor

 

Now the old families wamt their position back. The huge national debt will be sold to the technocrasy groups

 

Stakeholder economy

Stakeholders are those guaranteeing the repaymemts. Billy boy will be a Stakeholder using his vaccine industry as capital.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some staggering information in this section from those who intend to change the world to a worse place to live and work. How can so much of the population in the U.K. be so ignorant and foolish to not realise this. Ironic that Microsoft man who wants reduction in population with the assistance from vaccines has three children. I tell people/friends/contacts to watch YouTube videos within 24HRS before deleted from the antisocial media. Time to start storing food/planting vegetables/free range Highland Cattle/having a safe remote place with some trustworthy friends.

Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.fastcompany.com/90553471/the-pitchforks-are-coming-if-we-dont-reform-capitalism-says-davos-founder

 

Its dressed up to appeal to the masses isn't it. . . They are going to be begging for it.

Now I'm waaayyyyy down the hierarchy ladder. I'm a stay at home mum (and student) my partner has a good job but we dont own our house or any assets we drive a shit banger of a car lol.... we sometimes feel the system is not in favour of couples like us - we live on a council estate, the schools are shit, the kids dont have the best of everything we have to watch our money closely and sometimes when surrounded by people who have the best (matetially) we cant help but compare. But we are sovereign, we work hard, we are greatful for our safety and nice home.... we realise one day we might get the pay off from working hard but we also realise we might not. We would love to get off the council estate and work towards that goal. We have no debt....

Even with all the hardship and worry and frustration, even when life seems unfair I wouldn't want to be controlled by socialist system. Even though it promises equality.... but the problem is I know soooooooooo many people who will literally be begging for this!

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/12/2020 at 1:31 AM, oz93666 said:

 

Oh yes Praying  ...

 

You will remember this whole reality is a free will experiment , with free will there is the possibility of departure from divine alignment , and that is what happened. Angels decided to rebel against Creator and went spiraling downward into depravity , delighting in the suffering of others . These non physical "Fallen Angels" cast their influence over physical ET races who also became depraved ... 3 of these races are working together to enslave and destroy humanity (Annunaki , Arcturians and Reptilians) ...

All humans alive incarnated with a specific goal to resolve this problem of evil ...we  all have a memory wipe at birth and are set upon by the dark forces ... we are all wrecks and have forgotten our mission ...

 

The depraved ET's who control the cabal (royalty and rothschilds) are extremely intelligent and have unbelievable technology , humans alone cannot hope to win ....

 

Only the Divine realm (Creator and highly evolved beings) can hope to fix things .... But energy dynamics dictates they cannot step in unless we invite them..

 

So we have to Pray for Help 

 

" I call on the Divine Realm to heal and forgive the dark entities oppressing humanity , may they move on and leave us in Peace "

 

We are informed if successful humanity will "ascend" and live in a paradise undreamed of. 

 

Praying is not gonna do shit. People have been praying for centuries. Didn't save them from centuries of epidemics like the Black Death, being slaves, serfs, children working 12 hour days in factories, being herded into workhouses etc etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/11/2020 at 11:39 AM, oz93666 said:

They do like to tell you the plan in advance. 

That phrase “The Great Reset ” is being used a lot recently , specifically relating to the economy , I think they are planning this for next year .

 

So what exactly does a reset mean?? I think it’s pretty clear … What happens when you reset your car milometer trip meter ? all the numbers go back to Zero … So an economic reset would be  all the numbers in your bank statement put to zero ….Good you say , my bank account was in the red ! Most people are in the red , mortgages credit card depts. Perhaps all these depts. will be gone too... Why would the bankers do this ...write off peoples depts? Because those in dept are already slaves , working 9 to 5 to pay their mortgage ,they will still be slaves in the new system ... But those in credit have freedom to jet off or do what they want , these people are the real target .... And no one will riot or come after the bankers because  most people  will be happy all their dept is gone ... those who were affluent , in credit,  don't  know how to riot  

 So then the new system will come in , cashless , numbers in a computer and you have a card or a chip in your hand to buy or sell ... you work to earn credits but the controllers can take you credits when ever they like ..carbon taxes to 'save the planet' , and you have no say.

 

The only way I can see them achieving this world wide is a global computer crash , all financial records will be gone.

 

So imagine if this happened tomorrow , you would have nothing , just the food in your fridge and the roof over your head ... you have to start from scratch working to earn credits for food ....

 

The only way to protect yourself is to buy food and anything else you need ...NOW 

 

This is just like Black Mirror. But there will eventually not be any jobs in the future for most people because A.I and the bots will be doing them, and many jobs will be obsolete due to technological developments and societal changes. So to "earn" the credits I see as being driven by being an obedient citizen. You can already see this in parts of China with digital cities- they are surveyed all the time.

 

Of course some people will fall for it when they'll be told there'll be no more crime ( impossible to commit a crime when you are surveyed all the time) and that they are now "safe."

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, itsnotallrightjack said:

 

Praying is not gonna do shit. People have been praying for centuries. Didn't save them from centuries of epidemics like the Black Death, being slaves, serfs, children working 12 hour days in factories, being herded into workhouses etc etc.

 

I fully agree with your opinion. It is not possible to reach a result just by praying. People have to show their reactions. It seems like an easier option for people to simply reassure their conscience by praying. The important thing is to show the reaction that will make the change.

Edited by Reid Li
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, itsnotallrightjack said:

 

This is just like Black Mirror. But there will eventually not be any jobs in the future for most people because A.I and the bots will be doing them, and many jobs will be obsolete due to technological developments and societal changes. So to "earn" the credits I see as being driven by being an obedient citizen. You can already see this in parts of China with digital cities- they are surveyed all the time.

 

Of course some people will fall for it when they'll be told there'll be no more crime ( impossible to commit a crime when you are surveyed all the time) and that they are now "safe."

 

 

 

I think they will mainly go after dissidents. The private security industry will no doubt grow though as society gets more hostile.

 

Stuff like this will become more common.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Reid Li said:

 

I fully agree with your opinion. It is not possible to reach a result just by praying. People have to show their reactions. It seems like an easier option for people to simply reassure their conscience by praying. The important thing is to show the reaction that will make the change.

 

Thanks. If people want to pray to a "deity" that's up to them, but I'm an atheist and so it's pointless to me. Better to try and oppose the cabal and try to build community cohesion and be united.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, itsnotallrightjack said:

 

Thanks. If people want to pray to a "deity" that's up to them, but I'm an atheist and so it's pointless to me. Better to try and oppose the cabal and try to build community cohesion and be united.  

 

Of course you don't sit the whole day praying .... just a few minutes ... the rest of the time you build your community or whatever ...

 

Believe me I was not easily sold on the idea of 'Creator" and Praying ... I've been a devil worshiper most of my life  (just joking , a new age atheist like you)....

 

It's a long story , but it's where I've ended up ... you do have to put in some time exploring it all to be convinced .... 

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCg18_LahHDHQZi7LYGbkS3Q/videos

 

I used the term 'new age atheist' to describe my previous outlook  ... I would describe DI in the same way , and most truthers .... God never is in their mind , the term has been too associated with corrupted religions like christianity and islam .... the word  'God' leaves a bad taste in the mouth . This is all by design of the dark forces .  

Edited by oz93666
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Former Australian Senator Cory Bernardi presented a piece for Sky News Australia in which he claimed that the agenda behind the COVID panic was for elite Davos billionaires to bring about a “great reset” that would see permanent social and economic changes.

Noting that there is “something unusual about the continuing pandemic panic,” Bernardi cited medical experts who “now acknowledge that lockdowns don’t work” and asked viewers to “consider if there is another agenda at work.”

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

Where did you find that? The kerning on that text looks amateur. I thought this was the official logo too:

 

Comes from a defunct Asian NGO ... slide notes for a 2010 meeting slide 3:

https://www.slideshare.net/kingmfai?utm_campaign=profiletracking&utm_medium=sssite&utm_source=ssslideview

 

 

An article on the Biden/Boris usage of bbb (666) mantra :

https://www.silverdoctors.com/headlines/world-news/why-are-both-biden-and-british-prime-minister-boris-johnson-using-the-phrase-build-back-better/

 

Possibly it comes from the UN.  The idea is that when there is a problem the globalists can swarm in and destroy real human life with their insect-machine-man agenda.

 

Some Singapore parties are using it:

https://theindependent.sg/reform-party-demands-that-paps-sim-ann-stop-using-its-campaign-slogan/

Edited by rideforever
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The term was used in the 30s and the 50s. It would be interesting to know the context.

 

bbbngv.jpg.c4f7ef509cd6700918edadfb7d7f6b3c.jpg

 

https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=build+back+better&year_start=1800&year_end=2019&corpus=26&smoothing=3&direct_url=t1%3B%2Cbuild back better%3B%2Cc0#t1%3B%2Cbuild back better%3B%2Cc1

Edited by EnigmaticWorld
Link to post
Share on other sites

Why The WHO Faked A Pandemic

Michael Fumento, 02.05.10, 04:35 PM EST

The agency needed to bounce back after the avian flu embarrassment.

The World Health Organization has suddenly gone from crying "The sky is falling!" like a cackling Chicken Little to squealing like a stuck pig. The reason: charges that the agency deliberately fomented swine flu hysteria. "The world is going through a real pandemic. The description of it as a fake is wrong and irresponsible," the agency claims on its Web site. A WHO spokesman declined to specify who or what gave this "description," but the primary accuser is hard to ignore.

The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE), a human rights watchdog, is publicly investigating the WHO's motives in declaring a pandemic. Indeed, the chairman of its influential health committee, epidemiologist Wolfgang Wodarg, has declared that the "false pandemic" is "one of the greatest medicine scandals of the century."

 

Even within the agency, the director of the WHO Collaborating Center for Epidemiology in Munster, Germany, Dr. Ulrich Kiel, has essentially labeled the pandemic a hoax. "We are witnessing a gigantic misallocation of resources [$18 billion so far] in terms of public health," he said.

They're right. This wasn't merely overcautiousness or simple misjudgment. The pandemic declaration and all the Klaxon-ringing since reflect sheer dishonesty motivated not by medical concerns but political ones.

Unquestionably, swine flu has proved to be vastly milder than ordinary seasonal flu. It kills at a third to a tenth the rate, according to U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates. Data from other countries like France and Japan indicate it's far tamer than that.

Indeed, judging by what we've seen in New Zealand and Australia (where the epidemics have ended), and by what we're seeing elsewhere in the world, we'll have considerably fewer flu deaths this season than normal. That's because swine flu muscles aside seasonal flu, acting as a sort of inoculation against the far deadlier strain.

 

Did the WHO have any indicators of this mildness when it declared the pandemic in June?

Absolutely, as I wrote at the time. We were then fully 11 weeks into the outbreak and swine flu had only killed 144 people worldwide--the same number who die of seasonal flu worldwide every few hours. (An estimated 250,000 to 500,000 per year by the WHO's own numbers.) The mildest pandemics of the 20th century killed at least a million people.

But how could the organization declare a pandemic when its own official definition required "simultaneous epidemics worldwide with enormous numbers of deaths and illness." Severity--that is, the number of deaths--is crucial, because every year flu causes "a global spread of disease."

Easy. In May, in what it admitted was a direct response to the outbreak of swine flu the month before, WHO promulgated a new definition matched to swine flu that simply eliminated severity as a factor. You could now have a pandemic with zero deaths.

Under fire, the organization is boldly lying about the change, to which anybody with an Internet connection can attest. In a mid-January virtual conference WHO swine flu chief Keiji Fukuda stated: "Did WHO change its definition of a pandemic? The answer is no: WHO did not change its definition." Two weeks later at a PACE conference he insisted: "Having severe deaths has never been part of the WHO definition."

They did it; but why?

In part, it was CYA for the WHO. The agency was losing credibility over the refusal of avian flu H5N1 to go pandemic and kill as many as 150 million people worldwide, as its "flu czar" had predicted in 2005.

Around the world nations heeded the warnings and spent vast sums developing vaccines and making other preparations. So when swine flu conveniently trotted in, the WHO essentially crossed out "avian," inserted "swine," and WHO Director-General Margaret Chan arrogantly boasted, "The world can now reap the benefits of investments over the last five years in pandemic preparedness."

But there's more than bureaucratic self-interest at work here. Bizarrely enough, the WHO has also exploited its phony pandemic to push a hard left political agenda.

In a September speech WHO Director-General Chan said "ministers of health" should take advantage of the "devastating impact" swine flu will have on poorer nations to get out the message that "changes in the functioning of the global economy" are needed to "distribute wealth on the basis of" values "like community, solidarity, equity and social justice." She further declared it should be used as a weapon against "international policies and systems that govern financial markets, economies, commerce, trade and foreign affairs."

Chan's dream now lies in tatters. All the WHO has done, says PACE's Wodart, is to destroy "much of the credibility that they should have, which is invaluable to us if there's a future scare that might turn out to be a killer on a large scale."

 

Removed from Forbes yesterday.

Highlighted by Computingforever.

 

https://web.archive.org/web/20100413120231/https://www.forbes.com/2010/02/05/world-health-organization-swine-flu-pandemic-opinions-contributors-michael-fumento.html

 

DrrxdikWoAEe4nI.jpg

 

 

 

Edited by oddsnsods
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...