Jump to content

New Forum Desires.


GarethIcke
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Given To Fly said:

 

it's you who is boxing yourself in. in all due respect.

 

are you denying a non-human interaction ?

 

 

Speaking of boxing .... 

 

Id like a Sport section because as much as I know its a bread and circus thing I still feel its important to try and keep somewhat fit and healthy and sports is a good inspiration for that 

 

 

Edited by MrA
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, MrA said:

I dont think I can stomach much more head burying tbh 

 

I feel like im almost at the end of some cycle or other and its someone elses turn on the hamster wheel 

 

Probably just a mild touch of forum burnout. Patience. This will soon become DIF -1 as opposed to the hacked DIF -2 and the prior very large DIF -3 . Some members say they can remember iterations prior to this and that in each case the forum end was preceeded by the ONE who calls himself Truegroup being banned. The matrix resumes but in the meantime consult your GP if the situation worsens. They will almost certainly have something for you or alternatively relax to this music.. :classic_smile:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VmtqZ3tZNAA

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, GarethIcke said:

Thanks for all the suggestions, folks. Have sent the thread to the web guy so he can implement as much as possible. 

 

I don't really care about any features listed in this thread. They're all meh, it would be nice to have, but who cares, in my opinion.

My only suggestion to your web guy would be to focus as much as possible on security aspect because the attacks are most likely going to increase and to have proper backups on your end. That's it. Don't spread your selves too thin.

 

btw there MUST be AMA (ask me anything) section where DI quickly answers few of our most voted questions! If Brian Rose can get him on his show why can't we? :classic_laugh:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/2/2020 at 9:11 PM, screamingeagle said:

@Finder you sound like troll,are you one?

 

I am not, SE. What made you think that way?

 

On 6/2/2020 at 9:23 PM, screamingeagle said:

just experience,i guess

 

What you really mean here is "you guess it is this way".

 

On 6/2/2020 at 9:40 PM, Finder said:

Why don't you examine the entire interaction of mine that bother you to make sure your experience confirms and not contradicts the facts?

 

On 6/2/2020 at 9:48 PM, screamingeagle said:

i did,hence my question....time will tell

 

If you really did, you would not be assuming I am a troll. You would know I am not.The reason you need time is because you DO NOT know and you don't bother investigating and finding any credible evidence for that.

 

Initially I thought we only had a hacked forum and site. Today I've discovered the forum moderator perception is hacked as well. Probably, like a forum,- in a very professional manner. So, for now, we have a half functional forum that randomly but regularly disallows posting and blocks users and a rather lazy "not to be disturbed unnecessarily" moderator who can't tell the difference between a troll and a genuine user! And who randomly blocks his own awareness and assumes the member can not be trusted, their reputation is wrong (see Golden R. comment) and perhaps they have covert evil intentions so they could be banned. See? Just like the current forum software malfunction that can not tell the difference between the hacker and a member who doesn't just copy and paste stuff but produces the original, independent and creative thought?  

 

You know, Screaming, how about you give me facts and evidence that support your assuption, if you really have read more than 10 of my posts? Or have a private discussion with me, which I would welcome as I began to question the credibility of all of your statements and assumptions. Let me guess, you would not bother. Right?

 

This blatant statement of yours: "Finder, you sound like troll,are you one?" without reference and evidence is nothing else but talking hot air. If this assuption is based on your experience, be exact and engaged, which one? Give me at least 3 different examples, will you? And then give me facts, i.e., concrete full, not abridged quotes of my replies and statements that confirm your experience.

 

I'll leave to @GarethIcke with this. And as a suggestion based on the last night interaction with SE, I'd like to offer that we have a special pinned section on the forum where all active members would evaluate the performance of all moderators on a monthly basis along the following parameters:

 

1. Fairness

2. Being Impartial

3. Moderator's level of engagement in forum activity

4. Moderator's level of awareness of current forum issues

5. Moderator's knowledge of the members posts content or their willingness to acquire such knowledge.

 

Each member votes only once, passive members/dormant accs are not invited to vote for obvious reasons.

Edited by Finder
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, jonesthepost said:

 

Lol, it’s not that, it’s about seventy per cent bickering by supposed adults; the shills and what have you will be absolutely delighted; shame. 

 

Couldn't agree more. The exact reason why I periodically, quite seriously consider leaving the forum. Not because of the bickering by supposed adults but because it's indeed, like you said, 70% of it. If not more in some threads. And frankly, DIF is the last place where I expected to find such percentage.

Edited by Finder
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Finder said:

 

Couldn't agree more. The exact reason why I periodically, quite seriously considering leaving the forum. Not because of the bickering by supposed adults but because it's indeed, like you said, 70% of it. If not more in some threads. And frankly, DIF is the last place where I expected to find such percentage.

Could be intentional part of an ongoing attack.

 

Break it and scare off a load of people.

Piss all over the remains and seed dissent and disagreement.

Ramp up the trolls.

 

I've been absent a lot recently and it's just not the same. Maybe we need a plan.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd like a button that basically says "I read your post - thanks for your contribution"  - I has nothing to do with if it needs liking or disliking, its just part of the thread and the ongoing conversation.

This also helps me to know where I'm up to in reading the thread when I return.

 

Edited by FigTree
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Nobby Noboddy said:

Could be intentional part of an ongoing attack.

 

Break it and scare off a load of people.

Piss all over the remains and seed dissent and disagreement.

Ramp up the trolls.

 

I've been absent a lot recently and it's just not the same. Maybe we need a plan.

 

I am with you on this one. Something is terribly off. Even some existing, used to be reasonable members, are acting out in the most bizarre way imaginable. I now visit some threads just to read, after 5 mins of reading, in total bemusement, I ask myself WTH is going on there?!?

Edited by Finder
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Finder said:

You know, Screaming, how about you give me facts

you brought argument in a fairly chearfull,positive thread along with GR(nothing new) 

and after all the BS this forum had/have 

so i have my suspicions,yes 

 

i have seen this tactic to many times,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, jonesthepost said:

I wish someone would terminate this thread ?

 

Ta Dah! Here I am. :classic_biggrin:

 

Gordon Bennet, been away like a day and it turns out the thread had turned into one of bickering....

I said before, do not complain.....(I know this is a difficult one when the world is so broken and you feel like complaining is the way to fix).

You are only throwing yourself into a cycle of downward spiral to hell <start_of_a_guitar_riff>????</start_of_a_guitar_riff>. Think of vibrations....complaint brings more of it.

Keep on bashing yourself.....

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, screamingeagle said:

i did,hence my question....time will tell

 

I did examine my interaction with the individual in question.

The first time I got the reply, I put him on ignore. Those that gets put on my ignore list gets banned sooner or later (not my doing but their own fault).

I scan strangers all the time. Anyway, my forum experience has been smooth and refreshing.

I know mods can't use the ignore feature....that's one of the unfortunate perks but we luv ya! :classic_tongue:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, chocomel said:

 

I did examine my interaction with the individual in question.

The first time I got the reply, I put him on ignore. Those that gets put on my ignore list gets banned sooner or later (not my doing but their own fault).

I scan strangers all the time. Anyway, my forum experience has been smooth and refreshing.

I know mods can't use the ignore feature....that's one of the unfortunate perks but we luv ya! :classic_tongue:

Sticky out tongue emoji!! Add that one Gareth..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, rideforever said:

 

What's your solution then ?  The hacker knocked out several of the icke systems ... so it seems it should be out of house somewhere or other.

Either that you simply backup the machine and practice restoring it regularly or something.

 

 

Agree on backups but not on G...you get me? lol

I'm surprised that they don't backup the database everyday.

Forum could be broken but as long as there is one day old databased store somewhere, it can be restored.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, screamingeagle said:

you brought argument in a fairly chearfull,positive thread along with GR(nothing new) 

and after all the BS this forum had/have 

so i have my suspicions,yes 

 

i have seen this tactic to many times,

 

I didn't bring the argument, let's be clear about it. Neither did GR. Me and GR brought our opinions and our standpoints on the matter. Are we not allowed to have and submit them? Esp when we also submit all the supporting points and not just blatant statements? The mentined argument was initiated by the first person who angrily and unreasonably replied to my and then GR observation and opinion on the matter, and that 1st angry reply generator was NOT me, nor was it GR, it was Tinfoil Hat. Go back and check. It's this very thread. Speaking of being attentive and impartial. I initially refrained from interacting with her. She went on with her LABELING OF MY PERSONALITY which I NEVER have done to anyone here, Tinfoil Hat including. She then preceded with exaggerated labeling of GR stand and pov on the matter (which everyone, GR including is entitled to have). Then, as if it wasn't enough already, she said she would not reply to that situation any more. Then she changed her mind and did. And finally after I replied to Tinfoil Hat emotional tantrum with just 2 lines, she issued me another set of labels that she attached to my personality and not to my opinions, AGAIN, and of course without any supporting points. And I am the troll???? If Muir was here, he would show up on time and say his famous "play the ball, not the person".

 

You should direct your questions and attention to Tinfoil and her replies. And it's high time you knew by now that it is my policy to focus on behaviour and not issue identity lables to anyone, sth that Tinfoil, unfortunately, doesn't practice. So, how is it again that I started the argument? If I say 1 thing to Tinfoil and she throws her multiple angry labels and remarks at me and GR, then who is really starting the argument?

 

And for the last time, I am NOT against fun and humour, I am against it being in the wrong place. Just like I was against Messenger's and a couple of others serious, heavy and unrelated content being posted in the thread which was designed to be light, joyful and humorous, remember (blue pill people)? For the very same reason! When things are in their appropriate places it offers better orientation and makes it easy to find what you need.

 

Edited by Finder
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/2/2020 at 2:07 PM, Finder said:

 

This is from my earlier post on this thread:

 

5. I would suggest to have 2 major sections of the forum in terms of info topics. 1) Consciousness, Perception, Awareness 2) Political & 3d Reality (On & Behind the Scene). Maybe we could vote or have a core management team to decide what's most appropriate, someone else on the now unavailable forum suggested sth similar to such branching. My branch name suggestion is slightly different, but I think it makes sense because different ppl gravitate more to one of these 2 topics and I think it would be more convenient for others to have these two topics separated, not mixed.

 

Yes I wish something like this would get implemented. If the forums had certain sections that catered more to people that prefer "hard evidence" and want info re current affairs & world issues  that make the mainstream press AND then those that are driven by metaphysics and the supernatural. I feel that the vast subject area that is aliens including the alleged involvement with US classified programmes would fall into the latter as its not something that the everyday person is informed out 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...