Jump to content

New Forum Desires.


GarethIcke

Recommended Posts

Golden Retriever, you and I were friends a long time ago on DIF. You must have missed it when I've said before.  ?

You may not remember me now anyways, but I assure you we were friends.

My user name then was Gilly, and I left when Sean was caught in my PM's, and there was a lot of poop on the go. I even had the same avatar.

 

Edited by Tinfoil Hat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Golden Retriever said:

 

YOU AND KJ35 sound like the THOUGHT POLICE on the forum.

 

Where did you both spring from?

 

 

Watch this about defamation from a rare honest Israeli Jew.

 

 

Off topic

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, oh, oh. Golden Retriever said something about numbering posts which reminded me of individual post links.  You know, where each post has its own individual link.  That would be nice to have when you want to link to a specific post or save the link to one for reference. 

 

Edit - I suppose that's what post numbering would do.  Usually post numbers contain the link to the post (I think ?).

Edited by yass
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Golden Retriever said:

 

50 per cent of this thread is off topic, but there was no problem earlier was there.

You brought my attention to how naughty I was being. 

 

I thank you for your wise counsel.

 

I too worry whether I worry too much about what I say and do. Whether I err too much on the cautious side. Is it even my concern? Could the Ickes clarify so we know they are protecting David's work. Which obviously they are. But I think it is wise to ..pause and consider implications for others.

 

As for thought policing. Please 're read your early posts here. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by kj35
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, kj35 said:

You brought my attention to how naughty I was being. 

 

I thank you for your wise counsel.

 

I too worry whether I worry too much about what I say and do. Whether I err too much on the cautious side. Is it even my concern? Could the Ickes clarify so we know they are protecting David's work. Which obviously they are. But I think it is wise to ..pause and consider implications for others.

 

As for thought policing. Please 're read your early posts here. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I meant to say - stop worrying.  ☺️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, ink said:

 

Cool .... Muir must have made a great impression on you for the less than 6 weeks you may have interacted with him. 

 

 

 

Triggered? The impression did not come from my interaction with him but from watching his interaction with other forumites.

That was informative enough for me. Many threads, different situations, different members. Certain actions and decisions of his on the forum were very informative as well.

 

Quote

 

Well .... when I was a mod .... both Muir and Screaming would tell you that I get really pissed off with thread diversion.

 

Glad we think alike in this regard.

 

Quote

As Gareth is the OP .... he could easy clean it if he wished.

He hasn't .... and he does like to laugh as well.

 

I too like to laugh, but in the appropriate place and time, like you know, when you go to a circus or attend a stand up comedy show. But when I go to a travel agency to book my trip or enquire about plane tickets, options and prices, if I visit or call a mobile store to get much needed info, I do not welcome a circus or a stand up comedy show there. Nothing personal, just common sense stuff.   

 

Quote

 

There is only one moderator currently.

Do you consider that they should be on the forum 24/7?

 

This second line, is this a question or a conclusion presented as a question?

If the question is " how much time do you think they should spend on the forum?" Then my answer is: 1-3 hours per day would be sufficient given the fact that it's just 1 person.

 

Quote

Also no new accounts can be made right now .... so there is trust in the members not to create havoc at this time.

 

Clearly it doesn't work the expected way.

 

Quote

You know .... Muir never wanted to be a mod and it took time to get him to agree. The problem is that ....

 

Those who want to be a moderator should never be allowed to become one .... and .... those who can make good mods, don't want to become one!

 

Wholeheartedly agree with it.

 

Quote

 

And .... some 'members' are utterly different in pm's with the mods from the 'face' they show on the forum.

 

That is interesting. And you said it in regards to what?

 

Quote

 

Anyway I have prattled on enough.

 

You have.

 

Edited by Finder
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Tinfoil Hat said:

 

(Yeah, I said I wouldn't comment further, but sometimes, I just want to after all).  

 

 

The first sign of madness is talking to yourself. The second sign is replying.

 

P.S. You know, I have been polite and balanced in my posts. If what I have said in them upsets or challenges you, just think of all the things I keep to myself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Finder said:

 

The first sign of madness is talking to yourself. The second sign is replying.

 

P.S. You know, I have been polite and balanced in my posts. If what I have said in them upsets or challenges you, just think of all the things I keep to myself.

 

Oh dear, it sounds like you're the one whose fragile ego is dented. 

 

But please don't concern yourself on my account - just go ahead and think whatever you please. 

 

Only it seems a shame that neither you or your side kick seem able to practice what you preach, given you're so fond of preaching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, screamingeagle said:

just experience,i guess

 

I am still uncertain as to what made you feel that way. Especially in the light of the fact that I am the one who is being repeatedly condemned these days. It bewilders me. I have not intentionally insulted anyone, I have not displayed any unreasonable or aggressive behaviour towards anyone, I do have my independent opinion based on my experience and observation and facts that I can refer to and I stand my ground and prove the accuracy of my statements. What's your point? Now I am curious. Ink barged into my thread where I was all alone, replying to the last (the 3d), not the first response of another member. Without orienting himself in the situation, Ink interrupted my replying, accused me of the things that were unrelated to my activity and then two other members came to the thread accusing me of fighting with ink! I didn't even plan to see him (and the 2 others) on that thread, let alone interact or fight with him. Why don't you examine the entire interaction of mine that bother you to make sure your experience confirms and not contradicts the facts? I am the one who needs to be questioning the attitudes and true intentions of some members here! If I challenge you in some unprecedented ways, fine, then go ahead and delete my entire content and my profile as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Finder said:

 

I am still uncertain as to what made you feel that way. Especially in the light of the fact that I am the one who is being repeatedly condemned these days. It bewilders me. I have not intentionally insulted anyone, I have not displayed any unreasonable or aggressive behaviour towards anyone, I do have my independent opinion based on my experience and observation and facts that I can refer to and I stand my ground and prove the accuracy of my statements. What's your point? Now I am curious. Ink barged into my thread where I was all alone, replying to the last (the 3d), not the first response of another member. Without orienting himself in the situation, Ink interrupted my replying, accused me of the things that were unrelated to my activity and then two other members came to the thread accusing me of fighting with ink! I didn't even plan to see him (and the 2 others) on that thread, let alone interact or fight with him. Why don't you examine the entire interaction of mine that bother you to make sure your experience confirms and not contradicts the facts? I am the one who needs to be questioning the attitudes and true intentions of some members here! If I challenge you in some unprecedented ways, fine, then go ahead and delete my entire content and my profile as well.

 

Don't take it personally!

 

Continued because I couldn't post the rest of my commet here. The usual you have been blocked response.

Edited by Golden Retriever
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, screamingeagle said:

that statement gets more evidence every day....

 

here

 

Bollocks ...I sent you PM's when Jump Rogue was creating havoc but you were silent. You didn't dispute the Sean X comment

about forthcoming changes to the forum either.

 

 

Edited by Golden Retriever
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, MrA said:

Oh God I really want to post a south park video ........

 

Must......resist........

 

Sean X posted a message to Screaming Eagle in favour about the changes to the forum last year when Jump Rogue was in full 

deletion mode and Screaming Eagle said nothing. Wake up Mr A.

 

I sent at least three PM's to Gareth, but he didn't understand the gravity of the situation. 

 

A few of us saved the forum last year including me, but the only moderator on this forum now thinks I'm the bad guy!

 

 

Edited by Golden Retriever
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...