Jump to content

New Forum Desires.


GarethIcke
 Share

Recommended Posts

Guest Gone Fishing...

l apologise if l joked around too much.
l did comment on others ideas and came up with a couple myself.
As the thread rapidly developed there was a certain 'light' mood being generated which was very enjoyable.
Again, sorry for off topic posts.

On another note; GR for a Mod role.
GR has a great memory (proven better than mine LOL )
GR would be firm (and hopefully fair).
We definitely need more Mods.
(And the vetted slow process of newbies signing up and posting)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, kj35 said:

gotcha. but that's not an emoji?? got to get this right for the webmaster

 

how about this it has a monkey and palmface. It's quite "chummy" though so may not set the right mood?:classic_wacko:

see-no-evil-monkey.png

Edited by kj35
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bookmarks - good for keeping track of favorite threads.

 

Shoutbox - can be useful aswell.

 

Different titles "members", depending on post count... this is a bit silly, but on some forums its nice especially if you got creativity with it. Might not suite here. IDK.

 

and if possible (my own idea I came up with right now) convert (download) thread into .pdf  - this would be useful.

Edited by THESTRONG-THEVALIANT
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Basket Case said:

l apologise if l joked around too much.
l did comment on others ideas and came up with a couple myself.
As the thread rapidly developed there was a certain 'light' mood being generated which was very enjoyable.
Again, sorry for off topic posts.

On another note; GR for a Mod role.
GR has a great memory (proven better than mine LOL )
GR would be firm (and hopefully fair).
We definitely need more Mods.
(And the vetted slow process of newbies signing up and posting)

 

Thanks Basket. I think you're good sort.

 

If it ever was suggested for me to become a moderator, then I would have to be true to myself, i.e, to disclose actively we are all controlled by a disproportionatley

Jewish and Zionist elite who are SATANIC in nature.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Gone Fishing...
8 minutes ago, Golden Retriever said:

If it ever was suggested for me to become a moderator, then I would have to be true to myself, i.e, to disclose actively we are all controlled by a disproportionatley

Jewish and Zionist elite who are SATANIC in nature.


The -The REAL "White Supremacy." video by ' Reality Engaged with Angelo John Gage'  from the 'George Floyd Pig state psy-op' thread nails it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, chocomel said:

Seriously

 

What's your solution then ?  The hacker knocked out several of the icke systems ... so it seems it should be out of house somewhere or other.

Either that you simply backup the machine and practice restoring it regularly or something.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Gone Fishing...
4 minutes ago, rideforever said:

backup the machine and practice restoring it regularly

Yep.
But not 'google'.
lt's a deep part of the beasts system.
Not to be trusted in any way , shape or form..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Gone Fishing...
1 minute ago, motleyhoo said:

When is the new site going to be up and running?

 


End of the week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/1/2020 at 6:05 PM, GarethIcke said:

The new forum is very nearly complete. The new davidicke.com will go live today and so all focus then moves to getting the new forum live. 

 

New webmaster has asked me if there are any functions that are important to you guys. 

 

If you have anything you really want the new forum to be able to do, drop it in here and I'll pass it on. He reckons it can all be implemented and live by the end of the week, so hopefully that will be a nice bit of news for everyone, after what has been a complete ball ache few weeks. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure after the ruling by the courts that media outlets can be held responsible for posts - we really do need a 'contentious 'does not necessarily reflect the views of david Icke ' area.  I'm sure the family have legal advice. We can and do descend into a free for all sometimes. As uncensored debate sort of should do.

 

It did feel at times during that the Ddos attack on David's work that we, the forum were inadvertently and potentially David's vulnerable area. Where they could use our posts against the family. 

 

That has been one of my concerns this last fortnight. 

 

That..And ink being all crabby and scary :-) .

 

And realising I'm a genius from the future.

 

And a facepalm emoji-  not letting that one go.

 

Make its use be a minus scoring on a members 'likes points'. They'll be the only ones I dish out :-)

Edited by kj35
Grammar pedantry
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, kj35 said:

I'm sure after the ruling by the courts that media outlets can be held responsible for posts - we really do need a 'contentious 'does not necessarily reflect the views of david Icke ' area.  I'm sure the family have legal advice. We can and do descend into a free for all sometimes. As uncensored debate sort of should do...

 

 

He can be sued, and it's been that way for a great many years. The new trend for, and encouragement of, censorship only strengthens the likelihood of that happening, and their being successful in court.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Tinfoil Hat said:

 

He can be sued, and it's been that way for a great many years. The new trend for, and encouragement of, censorship only strengthens the likelihood of that happening, and their being successful in court.

Exactly.  So whatever needs to be done to make sure David is protected. (Within reason to defend free speech)  That's the priority. Even if we might kick and scream at some of it . I don't mind being made to stand up for and defend my own views but I sure as death and taxes do not want someone to be made to do it on my behalf.

 

 

 

 

Edited by kj35
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Tinfoil Hat said:

Yep. Sensitive subjects could maybe get posted in a section that's not visible to guests, but anyone who registers can access, copy & distribute, so it's a bit of a knotty problem really.

Legal advice is the only answer I'm afraid. But if those areas were correctly disclaimered.  The ownership and legal status of the forum correctly separated from the main work. Use the cabal own red tape back at them.

 

I'm sure the family has got good media lawyers.  They'd have to. 

Edited by kj35
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

We used to have a board here, hidden from the public, with threads dedicated to other researchers. There was a disclaimer on that board.

 

As you might expect some of them were not very respected, and one of those (I don't remember his name) got wind of some of those comments and was threatening court action, and there was a bit  of a flap on over it. I don't know what the outcome of that was. 

 

That would have been for libel I think.

 

Racism / hate speech would be a bigger deal today, as it's the in thing for the purpose of control, and that's what we need to be especially careful of. The webmaster will probably be knowledgable in that regard.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Tinfoil Hat said:

 

We used to have a board here, hidden from the public, with threads dedicated to other researchers. There was a disclaimer on that board.

 

As you might expect some of them were not very respected, and one of those (I don't remember his name) got wind of some of those comments and was threatening court action, and there was a bit  of a flap on over it. I don't know what the outcome of that was. 

 

That would have been for libel I think.

 

Racism / hate speech would be a bigger deal today, as it's the in thing for the purpose of control, and that's what we need to be especially careful of. The webmaster will probably be knowledgable in that regard.

 

 

Defamation libel and slander. Defamation is more slippery the over view and easier to get applied. The 'hurt" felt is much more subjective than before. Used to need to show physical monetary or mental harm but the mental harm is very broad in application now. The other two are just variants of written, spoken etc 

 

When I used to work the last libel case I had on my books was where a man described another as a 'bewhiskered bag of slime' in a parish magazine :-)

 

whenever someone gets arsey with me I generally like to picture them thusly:-)

Edited by kj35
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kj35 said:

Defamation libel and slander. Defamation is more slippery and easier to get applied. 

 

I was thinking defamation was oral though (remember, no joking allowed  ?) but have just checked and it isn't, so it could well have been that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Tinfoil Hat said:

 

I was thinking defamation was oral though (remember, no joking allowed  ?) but have just checked and it isn't, so it could well have been that. 

Its just the heading. Libel written. Slander spoken. I'm sure there's more theyve added now. It's the mental harm area definition that's broadened. 

From memory anyway i've been retired for 5 years now (retired very very early ) and you get rusty

Edited by kj35
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, kj35 said:

Its just the heading. Libel written. Slander spoken. I'm sure there's more theyve added now. It's the mental harm area definition that's broadened. 

From memory I've been medically retired for 5 years and you get rusty

 

The chap doing staking the claim was worthy of the disrespect he was getting anyhow. i'll remember who he was in a bit.

 

But nowadays, it's more the dreaded hate speech and incitement to be a nob head accusations that is the big danger. Like how the press has already blamed David for the vandalism of 5G masts. Things could get really nasty if anyone decides to try pinning any thing race related on him when the world's in the throes of a race war, manufactured by you know who which most don't even realise.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Tinfoil Hat said:

Yep. Sensitive subjects could maybe get posted in a section that's not visible to guests, but anyone who registers can access, copy & distribute, so it's a bit of a knotty problem really.

 

YOU AND KJ35 sound like the THOUGHT POLICE on the forum.

 

Where did you both spring from?

 

8 minutes ago, Tinfoil Hat said:

 

I was thinking defamation was oral though (remember, no joking allowed  ?) but have just checked and it isn't, so it could well have been that. 

 

Watch this about defamation from a rare honest Israeli Jew.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...