Jump to content

Joseph Gregory Hallett


Dawn
 Share

Recommended Posts

At least one fact seems to be true so far:

https://www.catholicculture.org/news/headlines/index.cfm?storyid=45849

Catholic World News

Pope drops traditional titles, including ‘Vicar of Christ’

April 03, 2020

In the latest Vatican yearbook, the Annuario Pontificio, the title “Vicar of Christ” does not appear on the listing for Pope Francis.

In the 2020 edition of the Annuario, the page devoted to Pope Francis is headed simply by his name: Jorge Maria Bergoglio. Past editions have always been headed by the titles accorded to the Pope, beginning with “Vicar of Jesus Christ.” Other titles have been “Successor of the Prince of the Apostles, Supreme Pontiff of the Universal Church, Primate of Italy, Archbishop and Metropolitan of the Roman province, Sovereign of the Vatican City-State.” In the 2020 edition, these titles appear at the bottom of the page devoted to Pope Francis, identified only as “historical” titles.

Such a change would undoubtedly have required the approval of the Pontiff.

In 2006, Pope Benedict XVI dropped another traditional title: “Patriarch of the West.” The Vatican explained that the elimination of this title “could prove useful to ecumenical dialogue.” The statement also noted that the significance of that title “was never very clear, and over history has become obsolete and practically unusable.”

The title “Vicar of Jesus Christ,” on the other hand, has a clear and unmistakable theological significance. Cardinal Gerhard Müller, the former prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, said that downgrading the title was a “theological barbarism.”

Edited by Lore
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So there could be truth to it although it could also be a monumental deception. I can see a situation whereby we could be sold on a promise and led to the slaughterhouse. I am not very clued up on religion. What other reasons could there be for the pope to drop that particular title? They are all corrupted arent they so would they really just step aside and let the good guy step in and change the world against them? Or perhaps this is why the cabal are making there move for destruction NOW? With corona meaning crown perhaps its a battle taking place. Was it not said that satan would cause hell on earth for 3.5 years before the second coming? 

Who knows but i cling on to hope.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can think of no reason why the Pope would drop that title, it is the reason for his existence really, Pope’s have always claimed to be the representative of the Holy Trinity on Earth, so if he’s no longer the Vicar of Christ, what is he exactly and what will become of the Catholic Church? Yes there is a huge amount of financial corruption in the church and satanic abuse which could do with being exposed, but handing it all over to one guy who thinks he owns the world and everything in it, certainly doesn’t bode well for the future. Yes the antichrist thing occurred to me too, it does seem as if the world is being led blindly somewhere...

Edited by Lore
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, YHWHisgracious said:

So there could be truth to it although it could also be a monumental deception. I can see a situation whereby we could be sold on a promise and led to the slaughterhouse. I am not very clued up on religion. What other reasons could there be for the pope to drop that particular title? They are all corrupted arent they so would they really just step aside and let the good guy step in and change the world against them? Or perhaps this is why the cabal are making there move for destruction NOW? With corona meaning crown perhaps its a battle taking place. Was it not said that satan would cause hell on earth for 3.5 years before the second coming? 

Who knows but i cling on to hope.

I believe it also states there would be someone coming to save the world but he would be false but convince many. So there could be something in this.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars
Mr Hallett mentions this quite a bit in his vids, I have found a link to it:

https://b-ok.cc/s/Silent%20Weapons%20for%20Quiet%20Wars

 

Interesting reading, though some of the diagrams make me scratch my head in confusion..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing I've noticed is that the "Royal" section in the Daily Mail, which normally reached double figures in useless/pointless/feckless articles, has all but disappeared. This may lend credence to the theory that the Windsors have scarpered.

 

A few concerns though...

 

Why has has crest got 777 embedded in it?

 

crest.JPG.b26ed28f297e3a7cfbbfc027bda1b1a9.JPG

 

Seen better in relief here at the bottom of the poem "The Aramaic Christian Prayer for the New Age" on https://www.kingof.uk/

 

relief.JPG.23677f3cb6fba3565af3448cb8dd7422.JPG

 

Also, he regularly uses the phrase Nomen est Omen... The Name is the Omen... which presumably we all know is a movie about the anti Christ

 

The Omen - IMDb

 

Note also the movie stars Gregory Peck whom Joseph Gregory Hallett uses as an example predictive programming from the movie Roman Holiday.

 

A couple of other observation:

He speaks of Joseph Gregory Hallett (in the third person) getting locked in Rosslyn Chapel. But he doesn't (unless I missed it) expand on how he escaped. A possible hint to being replaced.

Then I capured this screenshot from one of his Caroline Stephens Chit Chat interviews on Youtube

 

1469730291_oneeye.JPG.c0892b119b2cb3657dc66402fa76c3c6.JPG

 

A subliminal one-eye gesture.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have watched and read comments on youtube the last couple of hours on our New King and here's a few things I have taken with a pinch of salt. 

 

The real Joseph Gregory Hallett is dead and this guy is not him. 

 

There are two video's disproving him including is family. 

 

Winston Churchill is Queen Elizabeth's father. 

 

Churchill poisoned Stalin. 

 

Bill Clinton is also a Churchill. 

 

There was few more, but can't remember. I'm 99% certain he is full of shit, but 1% of me wants to see how the bullshit story continues. He just looks like a guy that has obsessively researched the royal blood line. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr Chinnery said:

 

77th (7 = brigade)

I was just thinking that myself. Whilst i would love to believe his story is true, i think it is the rabbit hole, rather than the white rabbit. He is showing no full family tree to prove anything. 77 defo looks like 77th brigade to distract us from the truth and true cause. We need to work on a real peoples revolt and not waste our time hoping for someone else to do it for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
On 6/6/2020 at 12:07 AM, Alnitak said:

We need to work on a real peoples revolt and not waste our time hoping for someone else to do it for us.

 

Reckon you're right, so it's posting stickers around my local area, and walking around in my COVID1984 t-shirt and telling anyone this is all a load of bollocks.

 

"Do your bit where you are..."

 

There's NO WAY he's going to roll up, Trump is actually going to drain the swamp and we're going to live happily ever after. Nothing is changing if you ask me unless WE just stop complying in our own little ways.

 

Saying that though, this is quite interesting...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I’ve only just found all this, can’t believe I haven’t heard anything about it. But then it has been a mental year already with so much else happening. Surely though, this is just too big to actually be true? The Queen has until Thursday to reply/challenge this or passive acquiescence is assumed resulting in her abdication. Really? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

mc.jpg.1cc615e83f3e57569d9f0f2922c9f04f.jpg

 

Would be crazy if true. While I can understand that people don't like the monarchy, people also need to be careful what they wish for. The monarchy do suck, but one monarch/Antichrist ruling the world seems far worse. Look at Megan and Harry's matchmaker, the Epstein and Prince Andrew scandal and it looks like a push towards one monarch to rule them all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is interesting, he posted on a forum back in 2013. A lot of similar stuff that we were all talking about on Anders thread. The Rothschilds and connections to the Royals also Savile and pedo links to the family, absolutely incredulous but also very believable.

 


http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/20112-the-secret-history-of-the-british-royals/

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/29/2020 at 2:36 PM, Beachcomber said:

This is interesting, he posted on a forum back in 2013. A lot of similar stuff that we were all talking about on Anders thread. The Rothschilds and connections to the Royals also Savile and pedo links to the family, absolutely incredulous but also very believable.

 


http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/20112-the-secret-history-of-the-british-royals/

 

That's a very interesting link, thanks for that.

 

I agree, it does all sound very fantastic and incredulous, but then again, I was reminded of a chapter in John Hamer's "The Falsification Of History" book which I read last year, and contained a very eye-opening chapter on the 'truth' about the Jack The Ripper murders.

 

http://falsificationofhistory.co.uk/false-history/jack-the-ripper-prince-eddy-lord-randolph-spencer-churchill-and-the-queen-mother-2/

 

Add that to David Icke's research on 'our' Royal Family and their 'bloodline', as well as the assassination of Princess Diana, and well, it may not be that fantastic and incredulous after all.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One interesting thing Hallett has been claiming is that Will and Harry are not sons of Charles. This is in the document he submitted to the common law courts on the 9th July that William is the son of King Juan Carlos of Spain. Who incidentally has just gone into exile. (stating its to do with allegations from an ex). But it could be by order of another powerful woman dont you think 😉

 

There was a pic of Will and Harry on the Daily Mail today where William looked like a dead ringer for the younger King Juan. Its the nose that gives it away.

 

So thats a tick for Hallet in my book. I am also sure about the claims on Harry and James Hewitt. So if those two are not Royal line then likely the alleged claim of HM not being of the lineage seem more likely to be true. Im not saying Hallett should be King but if he can at least bring the truth out it would be good as it would change the system of control. It does seem odd to me that King Juan has gone into self exile at the time that Halletts document is due for a response from the Monarchy and Government.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...