Anti Icke Forum - See inside

[peter]

On 5/24/2020 at 11:58 PM, oz93666 said:

 

You've got the wrong idea ... this is a simple run of the mill forum with one thread which is titled "David icke" 

 

Of course there will be many silly posts taking the piss , these are just the general public , so there is an opportunity to reach new people . 

I had a look at the other web sight ,typical just taking the piss and thinking their smart , ask them to debate you with some facts and see what happens.

Personally I came up against the same thing with a local forum with regards chem trails and global warming,I'm not a member but I just couldn't help myself,I watched for days as they all made cheep one liners and patted them selves on the back about how clever they all were and that was the end of the discussion as no one would post for fear of ridicule,me I couldn't give a shit, then one asked sarcastically, what was my opinion on global warming. My reply was I'm not prepared to discuss this in front a bunch of brainless idiots that think their clever ,but if you would like to know I will meet you in town buy you a coffee and we can discuss it . To my surprise he took me up on it ,I gave him a lot of info to research and went back to see him a month later and said what do you recon,he said its very interesting but I still don't believe it, my reply was ,my work is done ,last month you thought I was a raving loony but now I have placed the seed of doubt in the back of your head so you may just want to look into it further 

[oz93666]

8 minutes ago, peter said:

I had a look at the other web sight ,typical just taking the piss and thinking their smart , ask them to debate you with some facts and see what happens.

 

When I'm posting there I just ignore the piss takers ... viewing figures on forums show there are around  11 times more non members viewing than members .... the smart alecks do not represent the average reader , so I just put the information out there .

That David Icke thread has 1,600 views , it is an effective way to reach people . 

[awake]

13 minutes ago, oz93666 said:

That David Icke thread has 1,600 views , it is an effective way to reach people .

 

That's really not that many BAAAH's 

 

In all support of freedom of speech, i think they should setup up to debate. There's enough intelligence on here to put them in their place 

[A_Grand_Tale_Of_Horror]

There is an in built-in mechanism in the human body, recognised by psychology, that makes someone "ridicule" "speak up" etc that triggers when someone has strayed too far from the social norm.

 

The social norm is an unspoken averaged mindset of society that everyone (well not everyone) abides by, i.e. how to act in the street, how you interact with people.

 

The ridicule is supposed to subconsciously and consciously bring the stray person back into the norm. It's designed to keep the group together.

 

Unfortunately in the modern age it's more of a hindrance than a boon.

 

Edited May 26, 2020 by A_Grand_Tale_Of_Horror
tidying up post

[Stride]

Keep up the good work guys feels good to set the record straight 

[greatdayforfreedom]

It will be like incessantly  banging your head against a brick wall. Those morons will ridicule everything you tell them. They think it's hilarious, I'd love to see their reactions if/when the truth comes out about 9/11 for the whole world to see.

[LondonFake]

On 5/24/2020 at 10:51 PM, jupiter12 said:

So ,,

 

If doods from anti Icke forums did try to express their views on Davids forum how would they do it?

 

Could anyone ever tell the difference?

 

Because freedom of speech is actually allowed ,, the favourite trump cards for all trolls ,,  

 

and ,,

 

do members of anti David forums ever wake up ,, or do they only exist to discredit David? ,,

 

Because ,, they know better ,, (allegedly) ,,

 

 

Good question....If someone was to criticize David Icke on this forum would they be allowed to do so?  Or would they be banned instantly for going against his word? 

 

It would be great to see a good debate where the Icke fans do not instantly jump on the block and ban button. 

 

If I was to provide video clips showing where he has lied would that be allowed on here? 

[Mitochondrial Eve]

22 minutes ago, LondonFake said:

 

Good question....If someone was to criticize David Icke on this forum would they be allowed to do so?  Or would they be banned instantly for going against his word? 

 

It would be great to see a good debate where the Icke fans do not instantly jump on the block and ban button. 

 

If I was to provide video clips showing where he has lied would that be allowed on here? 

 

When members sign up, they are asked to agree to terms and conditions which includes "rules and etiquette" - both of which can be found on the following links:

 

https://davidicke.com/terms-and-conditions/

 

https://web.archive.org/web/20151004091926/http://forum.davidicke.com/announcement.php?f=3&a=36

 

This includes the following:

 

Trolling
While David welcomes discussions on his research and doesn’t expect everyone will necessarily agree with every aspect of his work, anyone who joins this forum with the sole intention of flaming David Icke on his own forum will find their account suspended without warning.

Please do not flame others or deliberately disrupt users who wish to seriously discuss aspects of David’s work.

While it is perfectly fine to discuss aspects of David’s work you disagree with or do not understand, posters who habitually criticize David’s work while offering little or nothing constructive to other forum discussions will not be allowed to dominate this forum.

[LondonFake]

19 minutes ago, Mitochondrial Eve said:

 

When members sign up, they are asked to agree to terms and conditions which includes "rules and etiquette" - both of which can be found on the following links:

 

https://davidicke.com/terms-and-conditions/

 

https://web.archive.org/web/20151004091926/http://forum.davidicke.com/announcement.php?f=3&a=36

 

This includes the following:

 

Trolling
While David welcomes discussions on his research and doesn’t expect everyone will necessarily agree with every aspect of his work, anyone who joins this forum with the sole intention of flaming David Icke on his own forum will find their account suspended without warning.

Please do not flame others or deliberately disrupt users who wish to seriously discuss aspects of David’s work.

While it is perfectly fine to discuss aspects of David’s work you disagree with or do not understand, posters who habitually criticize David’s work while offering little or nothing constructive to other forum discussions will not be allowed to dominate this forum.

Ok, I can understand that.

 

IMO I would not be flaming, and I would be offering polite constructive criticism with timestamps and links to back up what I am saying, for discussion purposes. I am all for facts and logic and am happy to proven wrong and admit I am wrong if shown good evidence.

 

For example if I was to show that David icke did link 5G to this virus in various clips, but then I also showed he called the alternative media idiots for ever suggesting he linked 5G to the virus, would that be considered flaming? 

 

I know if the situation was reversed I would be happy for the chance to debate out some points in depth, it is normally people without any points that ban and block in my experience. 

 

[Mitochondrial Eve]

16 minutes ago, LondonFake said:

Ok, I can understand that.

 

IMO I would not be flaming, and I would be offering polite constructive criticism with timestamps and links to back up what I am saying, for discussion purposes. I am all for facts and logic and am happy to proven wrong and admit I am wrong if shown good evidence.

 

For example if I was to show that David icke did link 5G to this virus in various clips, but then I also showed he called the alternative media idiots for ever suggesting he linked 5G to the virus, would that be considered flaming? 

 

I know if the situation was reversed I would be happy for the chance to debate out some points in depth, it is normally people without any points that ban and block in my experience.

 

According to Wikipedia, flaming is "the online act of posting insults, often laced with profanity or other offensive language on social networking sites."

 

DI allows criticism of his work so, provided that it is offered constructively, backed up and remains free of insults, it should be permitted.

 

But moderators also have to have regard for "posters who habitually criticise David’s work while offering little or nothing constructive to other forum discussions."

[LondonFake]

Well I see your point but I can also see how that last rule can be used to shutdown anyone who actually has a point. I have a lot of criticism for Brian Rose, Andrew Kaufman, dr buttar, and mark steele too if that helps.. :) I hope I can provide my information in a respectful way that maybe makes people take a second look at some contradictions I have noticed. 

 

I can also post some funny stuff like this if that helps.

 

 

 

 

Edited July 26, 2020 by LondonFake

[screamingeagle]

2 hours ago, LondonFake said:

IMO I would not be flaming, and I would be offering polite

your username speaks completly the opposite,don't you think?

[Guest Gone Fishing...]

2 hours ago, LondonFake said:

I can also post some funny stuff like this if that helps.

London Flake
When you post something funny can you tag me ?
Ta  :O)

[LondonFake]

1 hour ago, screamingeagle said:

your username speaks completly the opposite,don't you think?

Calling London Real "London Fake" is flaming or impolite is it? Seems I am not the only one here who questions their motives.  

Edited July 26, 2020 by LondonFake

[Truthspoon]

I believe criticism is valid......but when it's your only tune it looks like you're doing this as a deliberate Brigade 77 trolling London Fake.

 

I've got to keep it real..... I agree that we should ask questions and there is a lot dodgy about Brian Rose's business practises...

 

But you're too well organised and too slick at this..... you've put too much time and investment into making those videos for it to be one of us normal people.

 

I'd say you're a Brigade 77 job.

 

Forgive me if I'm wrong... but I doubt it. 

 

I think Icke might be wrong about some of things he's saying.....but I hella like his videos with London Real and just the fact that he says Coronavirus is fake is a push-back that we all need against this medical tyranny that the whole world is facing over a jumped up flu.

 

 

 

Edited July 26, 2020 by Truthspoon

[LondonFake]

Not the first time I have been accused of being 77th brigade, CCP agent, paid shill etc, I take it as a compliment that anyone could think I am some kind of professionally paid agent. 

 

You can see by my first videos I did not have a clue how to edit video when I started this. You will also see that I started this just after Icke started pushing the 5g exosome theory.. I think it's dangerous TBH to be pushing terrain theory and 5g=covid19 stuff.. If you want to use the fact you suspect me of being a paid agent to get rid of me, work away.  

[Truthspoon]

I don't think you should be banned at all........

 

I just think we should all be honest with each other about who we are and what motivates us.

 

When this anti-Brian Rose and anti-Icke vendetta is ALL YOU DO.

 

The I wonder why you post here.

 

If you don't like Icke then just ignore him and get on with your life.

 

We can look after ourselves. 

Anyone who would come here and try to steer the forum against Icke probably isn't here as an honest broker.

 

 

 

 

 

Edited July 26, 2020 by Truthspoon

[oddsnsods]

London Fake, you dont care how Orwellian this worlds getting? The fact Icke was banned from Yewtube for mentioning 5g in relation to this virus that they've never really isolated & anyone who has a different perspective, even doctors gets censored & cancelled?

 

Andrew Kaufman seems to be pretty knowledgeable compared with some virus software eugenicist & the BBC paedo apologists.

 

Piers Corbyn has sent a letter to the government asking them to prove this virus exists, youde think would be an easy task considering they are so worried even tho it has a 99.98% recovery rate. Yet silence from the media that is putting out fake news 24/7 trauma based mind control.

 

Youde rather spend your time making some lame monotonous video...must really hate David Icke with a passion.

 

 

 

Edited July 26, 2020 by oddsnsods

[LondonFake]

My motivations, like I say... I see what Icke is doing as being similar to telling people in a burning building there is no fire..

 

Timeline for context:

• David went from talking like viruses exist on Rose/Icke 1 March 19th. bioweapon in Iran theory etc.. 
• March 27th podcast icke is still talking like its real
• 1st April article on here about Dr Kaufman..
• 3rd April its all fake in his podcast and citing kaufman as his expert backup
• 6th april icke is telling millions ion Rose Icke 2 that its all fake and EMF/5G /exosomes.
• 13th april i made London Fake YT channel and instantly on day 1 my first ever video was copyright struck by london real tv..this is all while he is claiming censorship

.

Do any of ye here really think that 4 days is enough time for icke to do the research between terrain theory and germ theory and make a complete flip and go on to tell millions it does not exist?

 

We could go further about how even now, Icke does not believe terrain theory fully as he will still say stuff like "they wouldnt release a real virus as they do not want to lose control"..  

 

P.S. I have never been a member here before, unlike what Basket Case likes to imply about me "spewing" "bile" "bitter" as i was banned from forum in the past etc etc..Even though I have only ever been polite to him.

 

 

[Truthspoon]

Fair enough, so we can assume you are not a supporter of Icke and his message.

 

So you are here to attack Icke.

 

I don't mind particularly..... I just think it's just a pretty poor way to spend your bandwidth.

[oddsnsods]

1 hour ago, LondonFake said:

Not the first time I have been accused of being 77th brigade, CCP agent, paid shill etc, I take it as a compliment that anyone could think I am some kind of professionally paid agent. 

 

Being Labelled Brigade 77 usually means you are a slimey sell out weasel.

 

Quote

 

You can see by my first videos I did not have a clue how to edit video when I started this. You will also see that I started this just after Icke started pushing the 5g exosome theory.. I think it's dangerous TBH to be pushing terrain theory and 5g=covid19 stuff.. If you want to use the fact you suspect me of being a paid agent to get rid of me, work away.  

 

You just troll anyone who questions your obvious bullshit covid1984 hoax.. 

 

 

[LondonFake]

1 hour ago, oddsnsods said:

Being Labelled Brigade 77 usually means you are a slimey sell out weasel.

 

You will find it normally the person being labelled 77th brigade just disagrees with you, and as you have no decent point the best thing you can come up with is that they must be getting paid. It's quite common.

 

1 hour ago, oddsnsods said:

You just troll anyone who questions your obvious bullshit covid1984 hoax.. 

Ok, good to know what type of language is acceptable to use here. Thank you.

[Guest Gone Fishing...]

10 minutes ago, LondonFake said:

P.S. I have never been a member here before, unlike what Basket Case likes to imply about me "spewing" "bile" "bitter" as i was banned from forum in the past etc etc..Even though I have only ever been polite to him.

Referring / quoting none DIF forum interactions on a public thread in this forum is not a good idea.
lt also shows you have come here with a clear agenda..
 

[oddsnsods]

Just now, LondonFake said:

You will find it normally the person being labelled 77th brigade just disagrees with you, and as you have no decent point the best thing you can come up with is that they must be getting paid. It's quite common.

 

Ok, good to know what type of language is acceptable to use here. Thank you.

 

 

[Guest Gone Fishing...]

9 minutes ago, Truthspoon said:

Fair enough, so we can assume you are not a supporter of Icke and his message.

 

So you are here to attack Icke.

Which is clearly against the guidelines everyone agrees to when signing up..