Pixar's 1st Gay Movie for Kids

[chocomel]

On 5/24/2020 at 11:34 PM, TrueSon said:

Playing acupuncture? By the way, I get no sexual satisfaction from acupuncture. I may get some from spanking a sexy woman's ass.

What's disgusting to me is severe physical torture masquerading as SM.

 

Graphic warning!! Not for the squeamish.

It's called needle play.

http://whisper.sh/whisper/0533f71094035635dbabac3f7933f958d81634/So-proud-of-myself-Did-needle-play-for-the-first-time-and-loved-it

[TrueSon]

5 hours ago, chocomel said:

Graphic warning!! Not for the squeamish.

It's called needle play.

http://whisper.sh/whisper/0533f71094035635dbabac3f7933f958d81634/So-proud-of-myself-Did-needle-play-for-the-first-time-and-loved-it

It looks like an edited picture.

[Tinfoil Hat]

1 hour ago, TrueSon said:

 

1 hour ago, TrueSon said:

I don't think children are inherently more valuable than adults. A person is a person regardless of gender, age, race, etc, ...

A woman is not more valuable than a man. A jew is not more valuable than a non-jew. A child is not more valuable than an old person or a young adult.

That's my view. Your view is children are more special. I'm not a fan of special privileges or special treatments in general.

 

I am humble enough to see that I am no more special than others and some kinds of people are not more special than other kinds of people.

 

You remind me of feminists who focus only on women raped by men while dismissing women raped by women or men raped by men as irrelevant facts.

 

.Children are vulnerable, and we have a duty to look after them, and to protect them both physically, and from sinister mind manipulation, as much as we possibly can. They are not able to protect themselves. Childhood innocence is precious. So yes, of course they require 'special privileges and special treatment in general' I actually thought that is such a basic and obvious fact that it would not need to be said, but evidently I was mistaken.

 

And in a thread which is very specifically about children, I am once again mystified as to why you want to make it about something it's not.

 

If you are expressing your views, rather than derailing, why are you, yet again, talking about women being raped v men  being raped - it's got nothing to do with this thread subject, and as previously encouraged, kindly sling your hook and post your own thread if that's the subject you are keen to debate. (Maybe I'll drop in with lots of irrelevant contributions but I suspect I'll have more pressing things to do  ).

 

I remind you of a feminist? You remind me of a simpleton.

 

 

 

[Silent Bob]

I find the comments made by TrueSon to be particularly disturbing, he is clearly supporting the pedophile agenda and we need to call him out on it. I bet he loves this TED talk. Just to be clear, when a pedophile has sex with a child it is ALWAYS RAPE. There is no such thing as a virtuous pedo, this suggestion is insane. This issue is crystal clear to me, anyone who makes any attempt whatsoever to defend or justify the sick urges of these evil perverts is just as bad as they are.

 

 

The OP mentioned how they are going to try and normalise pedophilia, they already are and have been trying to do so for quite some time as you can see from the video above.

 

We can't afford to pusyfoot around with this issue, we all know it's one of the most evil acts any human being can commit, there is absolutely no room to defend these sick, twisted fucks.

 

I have blocked the user TrueSon as I can't bear to read anymore of his vile defense of pedophiles and have no wish to engage this user in any form of debate on this, or indeed any other issue.

 

[Tinfoil Hat]

I couldn't agree less with your outlook, Trueson. A wishy-washy stance with no proper boundaries allows depravity to slope in & take advantage of the naive.

 

 

Cross this at your peril.

 

 

Full Stop.

Edited May 27, 2020 by Tinfoil Hat

[greatdayforfreedom]

 

I can't believe what I'm reading!!  Unbelievable! 

[Tinfoil Hat]

8 minutes ago, greatdayforfreedom said:

 

I can't believe what I'm reading!!  Unbelievable! 

 

Well that's a relief - I'm out of likes, but the numerous unexpected comments from a number of sources in this thread was starting to deepen my despair considerably!

[Tinfoil Hat]

18 minutes ago, TrueSon said:

So, you can't explain why children can't consent and why having sex with children always results in a rape.

 

I can (read my last but one post, in which I already did) but I won't waste my time further with you. 

 

 

[Guest]

I hadn't read this thread until now.

 

@TrueSon

 

Two questions I wish to ask you ....

 

1. Do you consider that pedophilia should be defined as a 'sexual orientation'?
2. Do you consider that adults having sex with children should be allowed?

These are yes/no questions .... so please 'define' yourself via those 2 words.

[Golden Retriever]

 

Your use of the word Luciferians is all over this thread.

 

Men or women who rape children whether they are "Luciferians" or not by your definition, are a danger to children and should be placed in a

secure environment where they can do no more harm.

[Tinfoil Hat]

Trueson, I said I wouldn't waste any more time on you, and nor do I wish to. But I'm not for letting you get the last word in on this thread. I can't, because it's a subject which, as a mother (and like many others here) I am fiercely passionate about.

 

There are laws in existence regarding sex with children, designed to protect their physical and mental well-being. Yet huge numbers of kids are still being horribly abused. The deviant overlords seek to diminish those protections, for 2 reasons - to make their own predatory actions easier to get away with without fear of reprisals, and to further degrade the accepted norm of humanity's conduct & drag everyone into the sewer with them. 

 

For people who believe that children should be defended and cherished, this is a frightening threat from the inherently evil. It's that simple.

 

That anyone would come along here, proudly proclaiming independence of thought by presenting any argument for relaxing those protections, is shocking to me.

 

And that the basis of your latest argument is a belief that immature school boys should be free to enjoy sexual conquests of older women (and no doubt bragging about it) displays a lack of comprehension that frankly makes me feel tremendous anger towards you.

 

You seem to think it's harmless if you're talking about school boys. That displays no concern for the possible repercussions of STD's, unwanted pregnancies etc that school aged children shouldn't even need to be considering yet.If they indulge with others of their own  (teen)age group, that's one thing with its own minefield. Suggesting it's OK for adults who seek sexual gratification above all else to take advantage is a different kettle of fish altogether.  It reveals zero care on your part about the moral development of youngsters. It would clear the way for presumed consent to be used as a defence where rape had taken place. It encourages an indecency which plays into the hands of the evil bastards who want us to hand over responsibility for those too young to defend themselves, to the children themselves.

 

So to recap, you've talked of 'virtuous paedophiles', women raping men (irrelevant), accused me of feminism for opposing your ideas, expressed that only Luciferian abuse is really paedophilia, how school-boys should be allowed to shag older women because it's fun, etc. etc. etc, and despite stating you don't want kids hurt, you've basically argued from many angles in favour of paedophilia. 

 

Know that your views are abhorrent to me. You're entitled to your opinion, but I SERIOUSLY DON'T WANT TO HEAR ANY MORE OF THEM.

 

I'll be requesting the thread gets closed - you've got the rest of the forum to taint with such views if others can tolerate it.

Edited May 30, 2020 by Tinfoil Hat

[kj35]

2 hours ago, Tinfoil Hat said:

 

 

For people who believe that children should be defended and cherished, this is a frightening threat from the inherently evil. It's that simple.

 

 

This. 

[Tinfoil Hat]

 

Again (I think for the 3rd time) adult women being raped is an entirely different topic, which you are free to discuss in a different thread if you want to start one - twisting my words by applying them to a topic that this is not about is not good enough. 

 

Who said the (hypothetical) bragging school boys were necessarily raped? Nobody, that's who. It's still wrong, and the person who is of age has broken a law that is there for a good reason.

 

Since you said in the same post that we should be discouraging children from activating sexuality, and basically applauded school boys getting their leg over, I'm going to accept that you are confused, rather than a downright troll. 

[Tinfoil Hat]

 

What you flaming well said is here in black and white on the thread. Kindly do not fucking repeat it, because I want no more paedo sympathising in my thread. I want it closed before things get any uglier.

 

 

[Tinfoil Hat]

Of course you don't respect the free will of children to indulge in whatever whim they think they fancy a dabble in. Do you respect a child's free will to shove its wet fingers in the plug socket you complete imbecile?

 

I've never put anyone on 'ignore' in my life, but I'm doing it with you now TrueSon, because if I relax my self-censor function, as I am very sorely tempted to do with you, the tirade of anger would scorch your eyebrows. 

[rideforever]

6 minutes ago, TrueSon said:

Freewill should be respected even if a person wants to commit suicide or inject oneself with vaccines although we can certainly discourage people.

Once you start using violation of freewill, you will later find that you shouldn't have violated freewill of others.

 

Without freewill and choice, you can't choose to be good. If you have no choice, you cannot grow up. Preservation of freewill is an important principle.

 

Well the problem is that once a person is reduced to a stimulus-response-unit ... that unit is no longer a human being nor does it represent the soul at any level.  It may "choose" ... but it is not choosing.  Like those young people who refuse to leave the computer ... they are actually totally miswired and what they need is to be thrown into manual labour for a good 6 months forcefully if necessary, and if not they are in a state that is worse than death and it is damaging to their souls.
Unfortunately no matter how it might seem, humans are part of a world that is quite low, and needs brutality and violence strength and courage.

And there is little need to talk about free will.

Mostly what is appropriate here, is manual labour and such type of work .. .that is actually what people need, because they all want to be free and flex their psychological powers and so on ... but they are only on the cusp of such things and if they reach up there they will fall like Icarus ... a wise steward sets them to work from the body and if they continue their higher powers will naturally grow but from the soil and so be unified strong and real.  Otherwise like many they will waste this life and fall from the sky onto devastation below, and the only thing to learn is never to do it again.
We are what we are.   Strength the bones, fill the bellies, empty the minds, return to the soil and the salt of the Earth - this is the way.

 

[rideforever]

@TrueSon

There have been some children who were left to their own freewill in the wild, some famous cases ... it didn't work out well for them, they were extremely retarded and in many cases unrecoverably.  Humans are not individual creatures they need a society, but society must function well according to the prime symbol.  However for whatever reason of their own or not of their own making ... humans are extremely corrupt - I would say it is simply their layer of evolution, they corrupt things as a way of understanding, first you corrupt many things like a child making a mess ... only after can you do it properly.
So in such a world of corruption it is sheer practical folly, easy to observe, that leaving people to their own devices is going to work out.  That is sheer folly.  But due to the extremely unpleasant situation here in society, most everyone wants to escape into a dream where we are all just great.  But ... the only real answer is engagement and making the road straight.  Through making the road and society straight that the way to learn, because this whole world is wonky.  Leave things for 5 minutes and it's already deviating, it is a continuous honing environment.
There is no perfect society and there is no magic utopia out of society ... our only choice is to engage and make the road straight, again and then again.  That is why we are here, it is all by design.
If we create world wars environment destruction, if we suffer and are ruled by evil ... it is not an accident, we are not here by accident ... it simply reflects our own personal level.
To be born here is a grave warning, a personal warning.
We are like crops if you grow wrong at the beginning it is very very difficult to correct later, but not impossible.
And so on ... 

 

[screamingeagle]

Mod note 

 

any member who promotes padeohilia will  be banned,instant 

 

the ever present inversion of truth used as tactic which is hidden behind free speach 

will not work on this forum

[Guest Gone Fishing...]

2 minutes ago, screamingeagle said:

i would like for the thread to stay,maybe a clean up, BUT that includes consent of the posters involved 

 

because about half of it needs to go and based on previos expiriences(if deleted) it will cause fight and i will be call out for all sorts of things  

A clean up would be good.
l can't see many contributors getting upset with removing TrueStains posts and any references to them ?
TrueStains comments were all off topic.

[screamingeagle]

Just now, Tinfoil Hat said:

She

ok

 

sorry 

[Tinfoil Hat]

No problem. 

[Guest Gone Fishing...]

3 minutes ago, Tinfoil Hat said:

She.

ls that for real, or is that how you 'identify' ?  

[Tinfoil Hat]

It's for real - I have the relevant paraphernalia.  

[screamingeagle]

Mod note

 

i cleaned up the thread(i think lol),some posts lost a bit of context but in general context i think it is ok 

[Tinfoil Hat]

Thank you for that Screamingeagle. It's appreciated.