QuodHumana Posted October 6, 2020 Author Share Posted October 6, 2020 (edited) I saw something this morning that opened my mind, in a certain way. Trump tweeted "Pro Life" "Vote". Then someone (presumably a lady) replied with: "No uterus, no opinion" Not very classy, but very relevant. This led me to the conclusion that men have absolutely no say regarding a woman's body, especially when it comes to making and enforcing laws. Women in power need to make pro or anti-abortion laws. Men should stay out of it. Also, for a long time i have been against men being gynecologists. Only women should be gynecologists. It just makes sense. Women understand women bodies. Men should stick to men's health. Common sense people. There should be more of it. Edited October 6, 2020 by QuodHumana 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EnigmaticWorld Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michi713 Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 On 10/6/2020 at 9:20 AM, QuodHumana said: This led me to the conclusion that men have absolutely no say regarding a woman's body, especially when it comes to making and enforcing laws. Women in power need to make pro or anti-abortion laws. Men should stay out of it. When I was pregnant I took a blood test that screens for Down Syndrome and other chromosomal abnormalities and common birth defects. (Used to be done by risky amniocentesis). I asked my husband what he would say if it came back positive. He said he would compel me to abort the baby. I was distraught because I didn’t want to kill it no matter what. I loved it even then. I was torn because he said he didn’t want to raise a child with problems. The test came back negative. Do you think the father should not have a say in matters like these? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lake Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 1 minute ago, Michi713 said: Do you think the father should not have a say in matters like these? The unique instance of a physical form, created via the joining of you and your partner, is a part and responsibility of both of you. As to the 'human' which you and your partner have created, you both have equal 'say' in the matter. Yes, the women takes the vastly greater risk as to gestation and birth, but the man is meant to act as a provider and protector not just within that time period but for ALL of the life of the child and mother. Such is the nature of this realm as it is for a human form. The inhabiting 'spirit' (which is not human) is another consideration? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EnigmaticWorld Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 (edited) 11 minutes ago, Michi713 said: When I was pregnant I took a blood test that screens for Down Syndrome and other chromosomal abnormalities and common birth defects. (Used to be done by risky amniocentesis). I asked my husband what he would say if it came back positive. He said he would compel me to abort the baby. I was distraught because I didn’t want to kill it no matter what. I loved it even then. I was torn because he said he didn’t want to raise a child with problems. The test came back negative. Do you think the father should not have a say in matters like these? I'm generally pro life, but not sure where I stand on babies born from rape and stuff. I understand decisions that women make are not easy. The ones that glorify abortion are evil though. There was a video I watched a while back where women were singing about abortion on some bus as they went to get abortions. I wanted to cry for humanity. Edited October 27, 2020 by EnigmaticWorld 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EnigmaticWorld Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Humungus Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 3 hours ago, EnigmaticWorld said: I'm generally pro life, but not sure where I stand on babies born from rape and stuff. I understand decisions that women make are not easy. The ones that glorify abortion are evil though. There was a video I watched a while back where women were singing about abortion on some bus as they went to get abortions. I wanted to cry for humanity. The women getting pregnant from rape is a false narrative. Women don't get pregnant from rape. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EnigmaticWorld Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 19 minutes ago, Lord Humungus said: The women getting pregnant from rape is a false narrative. Women don't get pregnant from rape. I'm confused. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Humungus Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 6 minutes ago, EnigmaticWorld said: I'm confused. The chance of pregnancy from rape is 5.0 percent. It's extremely rare. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EnigmaticWorld Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 Just now, Lord Humungus said: The chance of pregnancy from rape is 5.0 percent. It's extremely rare. Oh fair play, I thought you meant it doesn't happen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Humungus Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 (edited) 2 minutes ago, EnigmaticWorld said: Oh fair play, I thought you meant it doesn't happen. Pro-Choicers always use it as an argument. The right answer is "0.5%". Edited October 28, 2020 by Lord Humungus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Humungus Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 Abortions worldwide this year: 35,116,356 THE REAL HOLOCAUST https://www.worldometers.info/abortions/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Humungus Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steph Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 If they are into killing babies, who gives a shit about the law. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steph Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 2 hours ago, Lord Humungus said: He's a dick. The Torah forbids it. Exodus 1: 15 Then the king of Egypt said to the Hebrew midwives, one of whom was named Shiphrah and the other Puah, 16 “When you serve as midwife to the Hebrew women and see them on the birthstool, if it is a son, you shall kill him, but if it is a daughter, she shall live.” 17 But the midwives feared God and did not do as the king of Egypt commanded them, but let the male children live. 18 So the king of Egypt called the midwives and said to them, “Why have you done this, and let the male children live?” 19 The midwives said to Pharaoh, “Because the Hebrew women are not like the Egyptian women, for they are vigorous and give birth before the midwife comes to them.” 20 So God dealt well with the midwives. And the people multiplied and grew very strong. 21 And because the midwives feared God, he gave them families. Theres a certain kind of "religionity" in every religion which only has pretensions of being at one with God. They dont even believe in God or religious morality but just like their "science says", "the law says", and every other false flag they use to gain their misplaced power, they turn religion on its head and all the sons and daughters of the kingdom have is the sign of Jonah that Google is not their God. Babylon seeks that level of power, not for the sake of liberating the sons and daughters of the kingdom of heaven but to keep them prostrated before the enslavers, never knowing their heavenly treasure. You ough to see my website https://auranos.org/sub/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golden Retriever Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 How the Abortion Debate Displaced Economics on the G-7 Agenda "Much of the behind-the-scenes focus revolved around the push for abortion, which explains how economic discussions got relegated to the back seat. As awareness has grown regarding the intersection between women’s empowerment and the economy—a worthy recognition—so, too, unfortunately, has the push for radical agendas, unrelated to the economy. In 2018, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau created a new body, the Gender Equality Advisory Council, and gave it the power to present recommendations on gender issues to the G-7. That mechanism allows abortion activists to influence participating governments with a veneer of legitimacy, in a bid to build the case for an “international human right” to abortion. In a show of brazen disregard for governments, the Gender Equality Advisory Council published its recommendations in a 54-page document rife with controversial “reproductive rights” references—and emblazoned with the G-7 insignia, falsely giving the impression of official endorsement." More here https://www.dailysignal.com/2019/09/17/how-the-abortion-debate-displaced-economics-on-the-g-7-agenda/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steph Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 You know I wouldnt mind a public law to temporarly sterilise supporters of killing babies. I feel its other peoples babies they want to kill. Temporary sterilisation could be reviewed yearly for people promoting this kind of murder as some 'social good' during which time they are expected to attend courses demonstrating that their support for the killing of babies is a very serious wrongdoing whether the government permits it or not. If they take on board what they are taught then the temporary measures can be released as they will not be a risk to the lifes of these most vulnerable members of 'society' (an association of friends - who dont kill one another for a start). Let the murderers of babies die out in a cruel slow genocide against their ideology which is itself the greatest genocide of all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Humungus Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 2 hours ago, Steph said: He's a dick. The Torah forbids it. Exodus 1: 15 Then the king of Egypt said to the Hebrew midwives, one of whom was named Shiphrah and the other Puah, 16 “When you serve as midwife to the Hebrew women and see them on the birthstool, if it is a son, you shall kill him, but if it is a daughter, she shall live.” 17 But the midwives feared God and did not do as the king of Egypt commanded them, but let the male children live. 18 So the king of Egypt called the midwives and said to them, “Why have you done this, and let the male children live?” 19 The midwives said to Pharaoh, “Because the Hebrew women are not like the Egyptian women, for they are vigorous and give birth before the midwife comes to them.” 20 So God dealt well with the midwives. And the people multiplied and grew very strong. 21 And because the midwives feared God, he gave them families. Theres a certain kind of "religionity" in every religion which only has pretensions of being at one with God. They dont even believe in God or religious morality but just like their "science says", "the law says", and every other false flag they use to gain their misplaced power, they turn religion on its head and all the sons and daughters of the kingdom have is the sign of Jonah that Google is not their God. Babylon seeks that level of power, not for the sake of liberating the sons and daughters of the kingdom of heaven but to keep them prostrated before the enslavers, never knowing their heavenly treasure. You ough to see my website https://auranos.org/sub/ Jews run the abortion movement. This fact. I just tried 3 different search engines to look for sources but they've all been scrubbed from the search results so I need more time to dig them up. Research is getting hard with all the censorship going on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Humungus Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 (edited) (((Rebecca Gomperts))) (born 1966) is a doctor based in Amsterdam and is the founder of Women on Waves and Women on Web, which provides reproductive health services for women in countries where it is not provided. In 2013 and 2014, she was included in the BBC's 100 Women. In 2018, she founded Aid Access, which operates in the United States. A trained abortion specialist and activist, she is generally considered the first abortion rights activist to cross international borders. Edited October 28, 2020 by Lord Humungus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Humungus Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 (edited) (((Gloria Marie Steinem))) born March 25, 1934) is an American feminist, journalist, and social political activist who became nationally recognized as a leader and a spokeswoman for the American feminist movement in the late 1960s and early 1970s. Steinem was a columnist for New York magazine, and a co-founder of Ms. magazine. In 1969, Steinem published an article, "After Black Power, Women's Liberation", which brought her to national fame as a feminist leader. Edited October 28, 2020 by Lord Humungus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golden Retriever Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 (edited) 2 hours ago, Lord Humungus said: (((Gloria Marie Steinem))) born March 25, 1934) is an American feminist, journalist, and social political activist who became nationally recognized as a leader and a spokeswoman for the American feminist movement in the late 1960s and early 1970s. Steinem was a columnist for New York magazine, and a co-founder of Ms. magazine. In 1969, Steinem published an article, "After Black Power, Women's Liberation", which brought her to national fame as a feminist leader. The satanists in control like abortion because of killing and it helps the depopulation agenda. The morning after pill is available in most western nations. The morning after pill is better than a termination weeks or months down the line. People have to be more responsible about contraception, but they are not encouraged to do so by the State nor media. A friend of mine wrote the following words. He thinks Margaret Sangster was a male to female transender.
Recommended Posts