Jump to content

Recommended Posts

On 6/6/2020 at 7:55 AM, Messenger said:

Now consider, IF the Earth were flat, how thick would it have to be to hold the MILLIONS of gallons of water in the ocean? 

that's easy.....oceans do not exsist,they are fake as is universe.... ect.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 142
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

The tactics of psyOp shills.   1. Belittling valid points, that happen to be a soft spot for the subject they specialize in.    2. When they are losing an argument, they often reso

Arguing whilst clearly having been too idle to read links / watch videos of information provided.   Hopping around opening multiple threads with a single sentence.   Claiming direc

? says one.   Your cover is blown, you might as well upload your instruction manual PDF from 77.

4 minutes ago, screamingeagle said:

that's easy.....oceans do not exsist,they are fake as is universe.... ect.

:classic_laugh:

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...
On 5/23/2020 at 2:56 AM, jupiter12 said:

 

What's wrong with being a 40yr old virgin ,,?

 

 

Tis true. The spiritual realm doth expunge such nonsense. 40 year old virgin. Pft. Superficial bunch. I bet you all watch the movie for fun. Soooo great isn't it seeing a 40 year old man sad.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've not read the whole thread. But I've been thinking about why they do it. I've come to the conclusion that they must hate humanity. Been terribly hurt by others, and this is their revenge. I doubt they like themselves very much either. What a sad state of affairs. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...

There are blatant shills on this website who fail miserably. They also pretend to leave the website, come back with a different name yet become instantly recognisable by posting in the same exact manner and format using the same phrases and key wording.

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Haunted Universe said:

There are blatant shills on this website who fail miserably. They also pretend to leave the website, come back with a different name yet become instantly recognisable by posting in the same exact manner and format using the same phrases and key wording.

 

 

 

 


This has been discussed and decided upon behind the scenes.
Please leave it now..
Thanks
BC :O)

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Comedy Time said:

People who label others as shills do so as a means to avoid responding to their arguments. It is called an ad-hominem. The best way to close down an argument is to make a better one and refute the one being presented. 

 

I think we can add 'stalking' to the list. 

 

Go away.

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Comedy Time said:

The best way to close down an argument is to make a better one and refute the one being presented. 

or the best way to buri and to put discussion in a circle is to post mainstream matrial and call it facts and evidence.....

and hide your intentions behind free speach 

 

with a condesending and provocative style

a pattern behaviour......

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, screamingeagle said:

or the best way to buri and to put discussion in a circle is to post mainstream matrial and call it facts and evidence....

 

No, really? That's one way to analyse whether the alternative conspiracy theory stands up to scrutiny. It's where the acid test comes. Occam's razor, the more likely, the one with the most evidence. Or, Bic's razor, no evidence, endless and colossally varied speculation, ludicrously unfeasible.

 

I call that the pursuit of truth. I always receive evasion. If the conspiracy stands up to scrutiny there should never be a problem answering the difficult questions - sadly the difficult questions never get answered.

 

4 hours ago, screamingeagle said:

and hide your intentions behind free speach 

 

You are a moderator on this forum, your bias towards me is a disgrace!  You have the audacity to claim that I have some "intentions" hidden behind my free speech? YOU are hiding behind your moderating status and using it exactly the same way as TPTB that most on this forum wish to bring down.

 

4 hours ago, screamingeagle said:

with a condesending and provocative style

a pattern behaviour......

 

Not all the time. This "pattern behaviour" is INVARIABLY preceded by provocation and evasion from those I engage. You nearly always ignore that, because you appear to think it justified.

A perfect example straight above your comment.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, alexa said:

I hate it when ppl come on here and quote what members have supposed to have said, when in fact they didn't actually say it.

 

I hate it when people deliberately ignore clear and direct evidence and post silly pictures designed to inflame.

 

Hey look at this conversation. That is 3 people in a row(one a moderator) deliberately trying to provoke me. If your theories are correct, what are you afraid of?

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Comedy Time said:

I hate it when people deliberately ignore clear and direct evidence and post silly pictures designed to inflame.

 

Like your Nelson meme? Don't like a taste of your own medicine do you?

 

And here you are soiling someone else's thread with your baseless rhetoric. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, screamingeagle said:

or the best way to buri and to put discussion in a circle is to post mainstream matrial and call it facts and evidence.....

and hide your intentions behind free speach 

 

with a condesending and provocative style

a pattern behaviour......

 

Which in itself may not be totally  indicative of shilling behaviour by a group or individual but can be due to a phase that many people go through when growing up and maturing and quite often becoming set in their ways and viewpoints.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Comedy Time said:

Or, Bic's razor, no evidence, endless and colossally varied speculation, ludicrously unfeasible.

 

That's you in a nut shell. 

 

You've gone off the rails now, desperate to get the last word in every time with your one-upmanship. 

 

But you're falling, falling fast and swift into the canyon of  irrelevence. Weeeeee.

Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, Comedy Time said:

You are a moderator on this forum, your bias towards me is a disgrace!  You have the audacity to claim that I have some "intentions" hidden behind my free speech? YOU are hiding behind your moderating status and using it exactly the same way as TPTB that most on this forum wish to bring down.

my bias???? you say

 

you are a banned member who is allowed to post again.....calling me out(one more evidence of your intention)

 

Try again....

Link to post
Share on other sites

MOD NOTE;
This thread is about general shill tactics and not for 'outing' or 'attacking' other members.
Haunted House - You resurrected this thread after not being happy about exchanges behind the scenes.
Not the best of ideas IMO.
lt's opened a  can of worms, as can be seen.
Not needed or wanted here.
All of you, go back to your topics and threads.
Argue the points and not the person.
Thank you.
THREAD CLOSED

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...