DaleP Posted June 13, 2022 Share Posted June 13, 2022 The night of the bang, did not occur. If it did, they would have had to halt the concert and a complication of insurance situation to deal with. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaleP Posted June 13, 2022 Share Posted June 13, 2022 12 hours ago, Dagon44 said: Totally fake ah you've revived the thread yesterday and look what BBC have posted this morning. Do you work for the Beebs by any chance? lol https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-61782616 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whatthefoxhat Posted June 13, 2022 Share Posted June 13, 2022 59 minutes ago, DaleP said: ah you've revived the thread yesterday and look what BBC have posted this morning. Do you work for the Beebs by any chance? lol https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-61782616 How bizarre,I was watching a lot of the content on richplanet on Fri and Sat and watched the 'night of the bang' again,some incredibly compelling evidence that it was all fake and why is the BBC (spit) still doing its poodle impression for the security services ?...one and the same perhaps ? Are we due another 'event' shortly to ramp up the fear levels again? 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anti Facts Sir Posted June 13, 2022 Share Posted June 13, 2022 Just occurred to me. Concert was some female act called Arianna Grande. Now...grande is big...I know my Starbucks coffee sizes, haha...but just looked up possible meaning of the name Arianna. "Most Holy". Well there we go, eh. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spideysensei Posted June 13, 2022 Share Posted June 13, 2022 On 3/30/2022 at 5:25 PM, Pabloisawake said: Nobody died. Fact. Do i want an excuse to post this link? Yes. Anyway, yes more shady shit. Enjoying the thread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dagon44 Posted June 13, 2022 Share Posted June 13, 2022 10 hours ago, DaleP said: ah you've revived the thread yesterday and look what BBC have posted this morning. Do you work for the Beebs by any chance? lol https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-61782616 No but I got told a story by the mother of whose son girlfriend went. Sounded phoney as hell. Got covered in some fake goo after hearing a big bang in the disabled section. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dagon44 Posted June 13, 2022 Share Posted June 13, 2022 19 hours ago, DaleP said: The night of the bang, did not occur. If it did, they would have had to halt the concert and a complication of insurance situation to deal with. It happened at the end of the concert caused a lot of panic Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaleP Posted June 13, 2022 Share Posted June 13, 2022 (edited) 27 minutes ago, Dagon44 said: It happened at the end of the concert caused a lot of panic That's right. They had to pull the stunt at the end so that there won't be insurance claim, ticket refund issues etc. Probably Ariana was picked for humiliation ritual or something like that...you know how they do these things to up and coming artists. If you listen to 'Breathin' which was released AFTER the event and she knows. Yeah if you are new to all these tricks they pull, it feels like sky is falling. If you also listen to BreakFree she knows stuff.... as well as God is a woman, she centres herself in the Universe and see how she does Namaste hand mudra? That's how you create the zero-point. There was a video of Manchester which I've seen and while there was a confusion and people seems to be panicking, a guy announced that there is nothing going on and told everyone to calmly exit. Edited June 13, 2022 by DaleP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Athenry04 Posted June 14, 2022 Share Posted June 14, 2022 Whilst this was an establishment job, one of the alleged deceased was in the same class as my mates sister. The girl concerned was married, her husband is still around, but she isn't. Not sure if she was killed as part of a false flag or simply given a new life. But yeah the story of the whole thing is total shite and something you can't really discuss in Manchester. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexa Posted June 14, 2022 Share Posted June 14, 2022 9 hours ago, DaleP said: That's right. They had to pull the stunt at the end so that there won't be insurance claim, ticket refund issues etc. Probably Ariana was picked for humiliation ritual or something like that...you know how they do these things to up and coming artists. If you listen to 'Breathin' which was released AFTER the event and she knows. Yeah if you are new to all these tricks they pull, it feels like sky is falling. If you also listen to BreakFree she knows stuff.... as well as God is a woman, she centres herself in the Universe and see how she does Namaste hand mudra? That's how you create the zero-point. There was a video of Manchester which I've seen and while there was a confusion and people seems to be panicking, a guy announced that there is nothing going on and told everyone to calmly exit. I Remember the 2 min silence going on everywhere, I was in Asda shopping at the time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whatthefoxhat Posted June 14, 2022 Share Posted June 14, 2022 (edited) Link to the excellent 'Manchester the night of the bang' on Richplanet tv 40 mins long for each of the 3 episodes but very thorough https://www.richplanet.net/richp_genre.php?ref=283&part=1&gen=17 Just to compliment it heres the link to '7/7 The Ripple effect' https://www.bitchute.com/video/M5g4oSy8SDNn/ Edited June 14, 2022 by whatthefoxhat added a link 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nefaria Posted June 29, 2022 Share Posted June 29, 2022 (edited) On 6/14/2022 at 8:52 AM, whatthefoxhat said: Link to the excellent 'Manchester the night of the bang' on Richplanet tv 40 mins long for each of the 3 episodes but very thorough https://www.richplanet.net/richp_genre.php?ref=283&part=1&gen=17 Just to compliment it heres the link to '7/7 The Ripple effect' https://www.bitchute.com/video/M5g4oSy8SDNn/ The casualty/dead numbers he is using are wrong.... The first responders are estimating 30 casualties, he claims they should be saying 50. It was probably blatantly obvious the 20 dead people were dead at first sight considering a bomb had gone off - they were probably reduced to body parts scattered across the area, hence no photos would be published of them. They would only be indentifiable and their number confirmed after forensic examination. A dead person (or a still alive but fatally wounded one) wouldn't be counted as a casualty when first responders are reporting on an immediate situation and calling for help, as their priority is dealing with the injured who can be treated. Professionally trained people don't use the term casualty to describe a fatality anyway. Edited June 29, 2022 by Nefaria 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whatthefoxhat Posted July 1, 2022 Share Posted July 1, 2022 On 6/29/2022 at 8:22 AM, Nefaria said: The casualty/dead numbers he is using are wrong.... The first responders are estimating 30 casualties, he claims they should be saying 50. It was probably blatantly obvious the 20 dead people were dead at first sight considering a bomb had gone off - they were probably reduced to body parts scattered across the area, hence no photos would be published of them. They would only be indentifiable and their number confirmed after forensic examination. A dead person (or a still alive but fatally wounded one) wouldn't be counted as a casualty when first responders are reporting on an immediate situation and calling for help, as their priority is dealing with the injured who can be treated. Professionally trained people don't use the term casualty to describe a fatality anyway. Only a doctor can declare someone dead and as for body parts etc,thats the whole point there has been 1 photograph released of the aftermath..cameraphones wern't exactly rare at that point.Did you actually watch the 3 parts ? Perhaps get in touch with Richard D Hall and correct him ? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaleP Posted October 31, 2022 Share Posted October 31, 2022 Quote Conspiracy theorists, who claim UK terror attacks have been staged, are tracking down survivors to their homes and workplaces to see if they are lying about their injuries, a BBC investigation has found. bbc.co.uk/news/uk-63412651 By Marianna Spring BBC Disinformation and Social Media correspondent This name is somewhat familiar. I've heard of Richard Hall but never watched his video before so I wouldn't know. It seems they are going to go after one by one. It was David, then AJ....and now this guy. Who will be next? UK Column? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anti Facts Sir Posted October 31, 2022 Share Posted October 31, 2022 "Disaster trolls". ? Anyone ever heard of that phrase, let alone used it? Nah me either. Fuck off, BBC. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grumpy Owl Posted October 31, 2022 Author Share Posted October 31, 2022 2 hours ago, DaleP said: I've heard of Richard Hall but never watched his video before so I wouldn't know. The full video has now been removed from his own website, but is available to view on Odysee here: https://odysee.com/@richplanet:b/richplanet:7 It is well worth a watch, then make up your own mind what you think. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
numnuts Posted October 31, 2022 Share Posted October 31, 2022 2 hours ago, DaleP said: By Marianna Spring BBC Disinformation and Social Media correspondent. This name is somewhat familiar. I've heard of Richard Hall but never watched his video before so I wouldn't know. It seems they are going to go after one by one. It was David, then AJ....and now this guy. Who will be next? UK Column? I haven't really kept up with Richard Hall's stuff much over the years. I do know that this Marianna Spring character is a national laughing stock though. Don't panic Dale. If you ever see her lurking by your washing line, while sniffing your Y-Fronts, then just ring the BBC. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaleP Posted October 31, 2022 Share Posted October 31, 2022 It is fishy enough as it is someone like her writing the article on BBC.... All I know is that there are many shills. It's a big f-ing panto. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bamboozooka Posted November 1, 2022 Share Posted November 1, 2022 when the BBC Disinformation and Social Media correspondent comes a calling you leave this on the table 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted November 1, 2022 Share Posted November 1, 2022 Richard has responded here: https://www.richplanet.net/richp_genre.php?ref=301&part=1&gen=99 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mitochondrial Eve Posted December 22, 2024 Share Posted December 22, 2024 With the injunction now in place, RDH has had to take down much of his work on the Manchester attack. I had thought this had included his CCTV image viewer but thankfully it is still on his website here. The images, albeit redacted in many cases, are a matter of public record from the Manchester Arena Inquiry so should not be restricted. I am bumping this thread to highlight that, whilst RDH's work on this topic has unfortunately been blocked, others are still on the case including Iain Davis and Dr David Hughes. https://odysee.com/@InThisTogether:d/Manchester-Attack-No-Bomb-Evidence:3 https://dhughes.substack.com/p/the-law-vs-the-truth-getting-to-the I am also impressed by the work of Frances Culshaw aka Pighooey. She started following RDH's work in 2016 around the same time that I did - for me, it was the Jo Cox murder which brought me to his material. Manchester hadn't been one of the incidents which interested her the most but she is now, in light of the BBC's smear campaign against RDH, scrutinising the primary evidence for herself direct from the inquiry's archive material. Iain Davis and David Hughes are sharing her content which is how I have come across it. Frances Culshaw is on YouTube but anticipates her channel will soon be removed so is backing it up to Odysee. https://www.youtube.com/@pighooey4845 https://odysee.com/@Pighooey:7 She has uploaded four parts of her examination of the Manchester incident to date (embedded below). She expresses no opinion and only encourages people to make up their own minds. The latest part concerns marks on the wall next to the merchandise stand which cannot be seen in the original John Barr video from around 4 minutes after the bang (uploaded to Facebook on May 23rd 2017 at 00:01) but are present in photographs taken on May 23rd 2017. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lobster Posted December 22, 2024 Share Posted December 22, 2024 (edited) 1 hour ago, Mitochondrial Eve said: With the injunction now in place, RDH has had to take down much of his work on the Manchester attack. I had thought this had included his CCTV image viewer but thankfully it is still on his website here. The images, albeit redacted in many cases, are a matter of public record from the Manchester Arena Inquiry so should not be restricted. I am bumping this thread to highlight that, whilst RDH's work on this topic has unfortunately been blocked, others are still on the case including Iain Davis and Dr David Hughes. https://odysee.com/@InThisTogether:d/Manchester-Attack-No-Bomb-Evidence:3 https://dhughes.substack.com/p/the-law-vs-the-truth-getting-to-the I am also impressed by the work of Frances Culshaw aka Pighooey. She started following RDH's work in 2016 around the same time that I did - for me, it was the Jo Cox murder which brought me to his material. Manchester hadn't been one of the incidents which interested her the most but she is now, in light of the BBC's smear campaign against RDH, scrutinising the primary evidence for herself direct from the inquiry's archive material. Iain Davis and David Hughes are sharing her content which is how I have come across it. Frances Culshaw is on YouTube but anticipates her channel will soon be removed so is backing it up to Odysee. https://www.youtube.com/@pighooey4845 https://odysee.com/@Pighooey:7 She has uploaded four parts of her examination of the Manchester incident to date (embedded below). She expresses no opinion and only encourages people to make up their own minds. The latest part concerns marks on the wall next to the merchandise stand which cannot be seen in the original John Barr video from around 4 minutes after the bang (uploaded to Facebook on May 23rd 2017 at 00:01) but are present in photographs taken on May 23rd 2017. She is certainly a bit more considered than Richard, before jumping to the first conclusion that come into his head. Though god knows she drags it out. Just sat through the second one, were the bone of contention seems to be , disappearing casualties ?. As yet she hasnt considered that they may have put the casualties on a stretcher and moved them out of camera shot. There does appear to have been a sudden arrival of multiple stretchers on wheels and paramedics at around the time they " disapeared" Il see if she throws this possible in, in the next video ! Edited December 22, 2024 by lobster Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mitochondrial Eve Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 In the Richard D Hall thread, I mentioned that Nick Bickerstaff appeared on the Judge Rinder show and that this may indicate that he is an actor. Here is a clip of his appearance as the wronged plaintiff who was owed money by gambler Adrian. This was aired on 8th January 2015. According to the ABTC website, the Judge Rinder show has used TV extras and some of the cases are fake. Quote Do they use actors on Judge Rinder? Several cases on ITV Daytime’s Judge Rinder are fake and/or performed by people working as TV extras. In spite of the programme advertising for viewers to send in their cases with the possibility of appearing on TV, those people are not always the people who get to perform the case on the show. ITV did indeed advertise for applicants to the show. Whether the ABTC website is reliable, I don't know enough about it to be certain. It is owned by Wiggles Creative and "highlights compelling commentaries on happenings in Entertainment, Lifestyle, as well as stories around the world relevant to all Nigerians and Ghanaians, at home and abroad". However, I have also found an actor and performer profile on Cast Now for Jayne Brown who also appeared as a defendant on Judge Rinder in an episode aired on 3rd November 2015. She includes her Judge Rinder appearance as part of her acting resume and is a regular TV extra who does the rounds across various channels. I have found her Judge Rinder appearance too. Like Nick, her real first name of Jayne was used for the show's purposes. The fact that there is a verifiable performer who also appeared on Judge Rinder and credits this as part of her acting resume, supports the possibility that Nick Bickerstaff is an actor and could have been playing another part when he filmed himself at the Manchester Arena. The instinctual response of many to his Manchester Arena video is that it seemed unreal and a case of poor acting - that it also what my gut tells me and there is some evidence that also points to that conclusion. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.jpg.8081a54a3b74a5d1823dfac966666137.jpg)
.jpg.594f0ef23288ec5ab04539b2f8a8dbd4.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.