Parallel Universe (for / by Tinfoil Hat)

[Guest Gone Fishing...]

NASA Scientists Might Have Found a Parallel Universe 'Next to Ours' After an Antarctica Experiment.

 

One of the biggest debates is whether the theory of a parallel universe or multiverses is real with some people, including some experts, who believe it exists and the other group in disagreement.

 

Although it remains a mystery, it's a popular concept in films and TV series. Nevertheless, it may not be fiction anymore as the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) scientists themselves have found possible evidence of a parallel universe next to our own.

NASA's ANITA

The group of experts was working with NASA's Antarctic Impulsive Transient Antenna (ANITA). They used a giant balloon to haul the device high above Antarctica, where there is cold, dry air, which provides the excellent condition to use it as there is little to no radio noise that could distort its findings.

 

ANITA is an instrument that detects ultra-high energy cosmic-ray neutrinos.

These high-energy particles are a million times more powerful than anything we can create here on Earth, and these neutrinos have become a great interest to astrophysicists as they are the only ones that can reach Earth unattenuated.

Finding Possible Evidence of a Parallel Universe

According to the news outlet, low-energy neutrinos can pass by our planet with no problem, barely interacting with anything.

Nevertheless, high-energy particles will be stopped by our planet's solid matter, which is why these high-energy particles are detected coming "down" from space.

However, the team's ANITA detected a tau neutrino or a heavier particle coming from "up" out of the Earth in 2016, which means that these particles are traveling back in time and could be evidence of a parallel universe.

The bizarre phenomenon was reported by the NASA scientists, led by Peter Gorham, an experimental particle physicist from the University of Hawaii, as well as the principal investigator of the ANITA.

Even the discovery of the tau neutrino happened by accident, as Gorham and his team decided to investigate signals that have been dismissed as noise in the first two flights of the device, as noted by New Scientist.

The Only Explanation

In an attempt to explain the strange happening, Gorham suggests that the particle changed into a different type before it passed through the Earth and then back again, which is the only way it could happen, but "not everyone was comfortable with the hypothesis."

It's extremely rare that it might only happen once, but the team has witnessed this phenomenon happen several times.

With that, the simplest and the most scientifically elegant explanation is linked to the parallel universe, wherein when the Big Bang happened, two universes were formed and that the other world runs in reverse.

In this mirror world, time runs backward.

Nevertheless, it's still a possibility that the results came from a bizarre error the ANITA made, but if it's not, it may finally prove the existence of parallel universes.

"We're left with the most exciting or most boring possibilities," said Ibrahim Safa, who also works on the experiment. 

 

[Guest Gone Fishing...]

https://www.techtimes.com/articles/249697/20200518/nasa-scientists-might-have-found-a-parallel-universe-next-to-ours-after-an-antarctica-experiment.htm 

[Tinfoil Hat]

Thanks for that. 

[Guest Gone Fishing...]

11 minutes ago, Tinfoil Hat said:

Thanks for that. 

You're welcome
lt took a lot of messing around.
l see why you had trouble.

[KingPin]

That would be ... awesome and frightening at the same time.

[Tinfoil Hat]

While this interests me, I don't have a very scientific brain, and a lot of the logic presented by scientists doesn't sound right to me. If those powerful particles are shooting up out of the earth, I can't grasp why time running backwards in a parallel universe is the only possible explanation.

 

But then I don't get the Schrodinger's cat theory. To me, the possibility of the cat's being alive in the box is real at the same time as the possibility of its being dead. But to my brain, that doesn't mean that it's actually simultaneously dead and alive - it's one or the other, and we don't know which is true till the box is opened. It's beyond my reasoning.

 

But I'd like to be able to comprehend it all better than I do.

 

I'm quite interested to learn about things like string theory.

[Guest Gone Fishing...]

22 minutes ago, Tinfoil Hat said:

While this interests me, I don't have a very scientific brain, and a lot of the logic presented by scientists doesn't sound right to me. If those powerful particles are shooting up out of the earth, I can't grasp why time running backwards in a parallel universe is the only possible explanation.

 

But then I don't get the Schrodinger's cat theory. To me, the possibility of the cat's being alive in the box is real at the same time as the possibility of its being dead. But to my brain, that doesn't mean that it's actually simultaneously dead and alive - it's one or the other, and we don't know which is true till the box is opened. It's beyond my reasoning.

 

But I'd like to be able to comprehend it all better than I do.

 

I'm quite interested to learn about things like string theory.

"Nevertheless, high-energy particles will be stopped by our planet's solid matter, which is why these high-energy particles are detected coming "down" from space." 

l think these particles only come from outer space, outside our planet.
Once they get here and the density stops and traps them here, they've lost their energy and should be stuck here ?
lf they're leaving and returning to outer space (which they shouldn't be able to do, once trapped) then the only explanation is that time or these particles is running backwards and they're somehow going back / re-tracing their journey here ?
lt's a weird one  

Reminds me that l have ' The Curious Case of Benjamin Button' to watch.. 

Edited May 20, 2020 by Basket Case

[alexa]

As we traverse the Antarctic Circle that encompasses earth 360%, I believe there is more land for us to discover. I don't think NASA is being quite honest with us, but this is nothing new is it?

[Heavenman]

NASA aren’t to be trusted. However, I may try and make a “stepper” out of a potato just in case. 

[Tinfoil Hat]

I was thinking too, that the idea of particles heading back out is like the start of a reverse Big Bang (I might actually have seen that comment in one of the articles about this) but I watched a video a few weeks ago about CERN which claimed they are trying to create their own universe out of anti-matter - literally creating their own anti-universe (). Perhaps this finding is connected in some way to those experiments. 

 

As Steven Hawking described CERN as Pandora's Box, and urged them to drop their tampering, I find it frightening that it's in the hands of maniacs.

[AOP]

Number 01: The Earth’s axis or tilt is at 66.6 degrees.

 

Number 02: The Earth orbits the sun at 66,600 miles per hour.

 

Number 03: The circumference of the earth is 600 x 6 x 6 nautical miles.

 

Number 04: The Arctic Circle is at the 66.6^th Latitude.

 

Number 05: The Antarctic Circle is at the 66.6^th Latitude.

 

Number 06: The distance to the moon is 6 x 60 x 666 miles. This changes from 250k to 238k

 

Number 07: The diameter of the moon is 6 x 6 x 60 miles (2,160 miles).

 

Number 08: The speed of sound is 666 knots per second.

 

Number 09: The force of gravity is 666 Newtons.

 

Number 10: Time is represented by 60 seconds, 60 minutes, and 24 hours. 24? That’s 2 + 4 = 6.

 

 

I got a total of 33 times NASA uses 666 in their calculations here for anyone who's interested:

 

https://www.bitchute.com/video/HeAmDbaqnVJW/

[peter]

AOP

 

The earths axis is actually 23.5 deg, so that's the first one wrong ,I hope you have better luck with the other 9 you put up as fact

Edited August 7, 2020 by peter

[peter]

I have been watching this fellow's work for the last 30 years , some may find this interesting unfortunately I think the 3 letter agencies have got their foot in the door with him now ,I hope not

 

[Seconal]

This annoys me. Assuming there are infinite Universes with infinite possibilities then wouldn't they be infinitely different than infinitely the same. Surely over infinity diversity would be more prevalent than similarity no matter the infinite nature.

 

Still infinity is a concept not a value. It can't be quantified so....

[Truthspoon]

8 hours ago, Seconal said:

This annoys me. Assuming there are infinite Universes with infinite possibilities then wouldn't they be infinitely different than infinitely the same. Surely over infinity diversity would be more prevalent than similarity no matter the infinite nature.

 

Still infinity is a concept not a value. It can't be quantified so....

 

It annoys  me too.

 

The 'multiverse' seems to me to be a humanist concept created solely to strip the universe of meaning and reason.

 

The real universe doesn't operate on random chance and chaos like these sinister scientards try to tell us.

 

Anyone who has been paying attention ought to realise there is something else going on behind the scenes, there is definitely meaning behind life and even a way to interact with the creative force behind its creation.

 

 

 

Edited February 4, 2021 by Truthspoon

[Truthspoon]

 

Personally I believe the neutrinos travelling back in time are evidence of the endless expansion and contraction of the whole universe.

 

Once the universe fully expands, it starts to contract and collapse in on itself, effectively travelling back in time....until it reaches a 'big crunch'.

 

When scientists speak of 'the big bang' they are referring to something which happens continually and eternally, it is the start of a new cycle, therefore the universe has no end. 

 

 

 

 

Edited February 4, 2021 by Truthspoon

[Seconal]

A few years ago following MAOI's and a Cheese on Toast supper I fell asleep and dreamt of the Universe. What I saw where these tiny bubbles expanding from this clear liquid then they'd pop and their outer skin would form a ring that part collpsed back into its centre and part spread out into the liquid both to become part of the other expanding bubbles. Some would expand and shrink several times and some would over expand and pop depending on the surrounding bubbles.

 

I think the fabric of Space the Aether can expand causing a red shift as light travels through it due to the expansion of gravity.

 

Gravity is like a negative pressure that matter repels. So around matter gravity is repelled causing things to fall into that area of low pressure and not actually pulled towards the matter as thought.

[webtrekker]

I'm drawn more towards the Muliverse theory, simply because the constants in our own Universe are so finely tuned that I postulate many (an infinite number of?) other Universes exist, with entirely different parameters, causing them to expand, contract, be unable to form stars and galaxies, or to support life as we know it. That's not to say that there may not be other universes practically identical in formation to our own.

Edited June 24, 2021 by webtrekker

[Origin]

Human perception is limited for certain reasons. It is not there. Neither Multi nor the universe. It is impossible to zoom into something. Something reacts in real time. And it is infinitely superior. Everything is predetermined what humans have seen, see and will see.

[DaleP]

This preacher explains so clearly.

 

[DaleP]

I think Parallel Universe is like this.

 

                OOOOOOOOOOO

Infinite <-OOOOOUOOOOO -> infinite

                OOOOOOOOOOO

 

U are moving in one timeline (forward) but the creation is renewed like a film's frame per second (fps) every 10 to the minus 17th power. So in a way, we may perceive our physical movement as one continuous movement but it's actually like a film frames or flick through cartoon. Each frame is presented with O in the above diagram. You have a chance to move to the left or right of your current timeline and this possibilities are infinite but the further you go to the left or right, the scenario changes greatly. Each O, the scenario is inactive until you step into it. It's like a game scenario. By this, if you choose to select an end of the world scenario, I won't be affected because I am choosing a different scenario. You are responsible for your own choice. Hence you need to focus on what you want and not the fear or the worst case scenario. Brilliant...no?

 

EDIT: This is why there is no time. Just different frames. It gives you a sense of timeline but there isn't really. So when you die and to comeback, you don't actually wait 100s, 1000s of years, it could be instant and you'd go to year 2050 and so on.....because there is already scenario waiting for you to slot in.

 

 

 

 

Edited April 30, 2022 by DaleP

[Anti Facts Sir]

I'm coming to the conclusion that I/we are not experiencing a continual, single timeline now. Something got badly fucked up in the 2000s.

[DaleP]

 

 

 

[Bombadil]

On 5/20/2020 at 5:44 PM, Tinfoil Hat said:

While this interests me, I don't have a very scientific brain, and a lot of the logic presented by scientists doesn't sound right to me. If those powerful particles are shooting up out of the earth, I can't grasp why time running backwards in a parallel universe is the only possible explanation.

 

But then I don't get the Schrodinger's cat theory. To me, the possibility of the cat's being alive in the box is real at the same time as the possibility of its being dead. But to my brain, that doesn't mean that it's actually simultaneously dead and alive - it's one or the other, and we don't know which is true till the box is opened. It's beyond my reasoning.

 

But I'd like to be able to comprehend it all better than I do.

 

I'm quite interested to learn about things like string theory.

This a link to the molecular equivalent of Schrodongers cat.. Pure Quantum

 

https://www.sciencetimes.com/articles/24018/20191010/quantum-superposition-in-larger-particles.htm

 

I use quite advanced mathematics when doing astronomical observations. I can just use an app but like to challenge my brain.

As a result I feel quite comfortable with a lot of difficult concepts. As far as Quantum theory goes it next level. Headachingly hard for me

[Origin]

So I'm too stupid to understand any of it. But I know that there is no parallel universe. When I look at high-resolution images of sectors of the so-called universe, I see it spatially and that everything belongs together and it is closer than we think. There is an indescribable beauty in the fact that everything is interlocked. That earth, like everything else, is part of an overarching fabric. And if humans could actually see, it would indicate something extraordinary. That something is connected to us.