Jump to content

Q & POTUS


Recommended Posts

On 8/2/2022 at 9:21 AM, EnigmaticWorld said:

TODAY in Masonic History: Norman Vincent Peale is Born
https://www.masonrytoday.com/index.php?new_month=5&new_day=31&new_year=2020

 

York rite Scottish rite, red pill blue pill, left right, up down, forwards backwards, good bad.........etc, the next time someone is offering you a choice, you need to look at the vendor and ask how is it possible for you to offer this choice that are polar opposites, might the truth be that you are playing both sides of the choice, meaning no matter what i choose from you i am still in the play pen, no thank you, i choose truth now fuk off!!!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheConsultant said:

I saw Trump wrote 5 down 5 to go elsewhere, what is that in relation to?



 

 

Voting, not quite sure how it works out in the states but a load of voting was taking place and the Trump backed candidates are winning bigly, lol

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump

https://www.rsbnetwork.com/news/trump-candidates-dominate-tuesdays-primary-elections/

 

truthrdjt.jpg.ee496eba72b32173f24e80bb82b789a7.jpgrsbnet.jpg.639eeb80d64fa9648df439c579212354.jpg

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, TheConsultant said:

image.png.3d6485e6f8c279c11afef00fb63b9f1e.png

May have been very wrong about 11.3 being election fraud marker. Have people seen the posts on Pelosi?

 

Pelosi has to be the red marker, the visit was a huge international scare event, China threatens retaliation and now has to act which will probably be something of a missile launch over Taiwan, a capability demonstration, i pray that is all would occur and no more.

On the other hand what was buried in the snooze that this event covered/hides?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheConsultant said:

She or Pence were Red3 in regards to marker, no idea what it refers to. I agree could be look over here whilst we do something over there. Classic move.

image.png.c274e54e97be76956fbc571a96ee5637.png

 

China responds in kind, and it's a bit upset, WAY TO GO JOE, you really ought to seek out medical attention for the thing, you know the thing the thing, brainless twats.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/video/news/video-2744455/Video-Chinese-military-stats-exercises-near-Taiwan-following-Pelosi-visit.html

 

dmcm.jpg.5a53e008a1913422efc1a8232eb84c43.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Back in 2017 there appears to be a number of posts regarding a live operation, sure enough a couple of days later helicopter and plane collide just half a mile away from Rothschild residence in UK. The mission whatever it was failed.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/nov/17/aircraft-helicopter-midair-crash-buckinghamshire

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/11/17/aylesbury-mid-air-crash-fatalities-feared-afteraircraft-helicopter/

image.png.0b6c348980290113cb63e776537489f3.png

image.png.13d4949763c69c5b12e6739e993e79b1.png

image.png.d0ff5afe822506b6c4dd536303ce2abb.png

Captain Mike Green being the Helicopter pilot.

 

Edited by TheConsultant
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everything is hackable. I moved past the IDs after a period of time and went on the information and proofs derived from the posts becoming elements of global reality further down the line. "Future proves past". As time goes on more of those posts appear to be based on something tangible.

Question everything, especially Q stuff and who is interpreting it, not everyone has your best interests at heart. Quite a lot of those dotted around in truth, all of which will be highlighted further down the line.

 

Edited by TheConsultant
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, TheConsultant said:

 

I've had a look at some, i don't understand them all, but some are easy enough, like the very first one. Some need a better res photo.

Regards the first, it is pretty interesting i'll give you that. It's evidence of a connection between the two parties (although not tippy top proof). It's not proof to me that "Q"/Trump is on the side of the people, because this may have been engineered this way to fit the overall Q narrative.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, spideysensei said:

It's evidence of a connection between the two parties (although not tippy top proof).


🤣 nice!
 

2 hours ago, spideysensei said:

It's not proof to me that "Q"/Trump is on the side of the people, because this may have been engineered this way to fit the overall Q narrative.


I agree. No argument from me there, its not proof of that. Have you read the executive orders he signed? 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_executive_actions_by_Donald_Trump

The more specific ones I am referring to are human rights abuses and seizing of assets and blocking property of persons involved. A few other poignant ones but memory is failing me right now.

image.png.de34b881951197ceb1c47e01e1bd9461.png
image.png.5af3f25881560f13824c9361e99e80b7.png

Not proof of anything just some questions to ask yourself.

Edited by TheConsultant
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/hillary-clinton/hillary-clinton-flies-commercial-during-campaign-still-shielded-public-n361981

Assets seized - also, how much did clinton foundation and her campaign raise when people believed she would be president, did she have to pay it all back,,,

image.png.d3fea4ac86401271243100040a2234ba.png

She knew that was coming

 

https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/executive-order-13818-blocking-the-property-persons-involved-serious-human-rights-abuse-or

Edited by TheConsultant
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, spideysensei said:

 

I've had a look at some, i don't understand them all, but some are easy enough, like the very first one. Some need a better res photo.

Regards the first, it is pretty interesting i'll give you that. It's evidence of a connection between the two parties (although not tippy top proof). It's not proof to me that "Q"/Trump is on the side of the people, because this may have been engineered this way to fit the overall Q narrative.

 

its not meant to be easy if you are sending messages you dont want the enemy to see

some look easy but might have 2,3,4 different meanings

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TheConsultant said:


🤣 nice!
 


I agree. No argument from me there, its not proof of that. Have you read the executive orders he signed? 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_executive_actions_by_Donald_Trump

The more specific ones I am referring to are human rights abuses and seizing of assets and blocking property of persons involved. A few other poignant ones but memory is failing me right now.

image.png.de34b881951197ceb1c47e01e1bd9461.png
image.png.5af3f25881560f13824c9361e99e80b7.png

Not proof of anything just some questions to ask yourself.

Any ideas to who the 7 people in the meeting were?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...