Q & POTUS

[TheConsultant]

[TheConsultant]

[TheConsultant]

1 minute ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

What are we misunderstanding? The "lock her up" pantomime?

 

The fact of the matter is, at least for me personally, is that I supported Donald in 2016. Then he became a letdown. I didn't turn my back on Trumpers though. I started leaning towards Nick Fuentes' America First movement because I was angry that Trump wasn't putting America first. Then Nick started shilling for Eurasianists, so now I'm basically at a point where I think a lot of Trumpers often might have the right intentions, but their pied pipers are not America First.

 

Can you understand why me and other ex-Trumpers get annoyed now when Bam screams "TDS"? It's a tantrum because people are leaving the plantation.

I think you havent read a single post quite honestly

[Bombadil]

Can we all just discuss the points being made and keep it on topic please.

[Doc]

 

 

 

[bamboozooka]

i stopped caring and wasting energy to explain to hernetically sealed minds a long long time ago

[EnigmaticWorld]

3 minutes ago, TheConsultant said:

I think you havent read a single post quite honestly

 

I have, but saying "muh Muslim Brotherhood" over and over doesn't change the fact that a certain clique gloated over Obama and wanted him in power. What's the deal with that? Are they cozy with the MB? It's like pointing to Saudis without asking why they are cool with "Greatest Ally", why they attack other Muslims, and the possibility of them being Donmeh.

 

[TheConsultant]

Read the posts Enigmatic, your questions each and every single time are answered. Its really quite tiring.

[EnigmaticWorld]

7 minutes ago, bamboozooka said:

i stopped caring and wasting energy to explain to hernetically sealed minds a long long time ago

 

"TDS" and "Never Trumper" are not explanations, and you know it.

 

Can't you folks just create a thread to discuss Q drops if you don't want to discuss the validity of it all?

Edited June 10, 2022 by EnigmaticWorld

[TheConsultant]

18 minutes ago, bamboozooka said:

i stopped caring and wasting energy to explain to hernetically sealed minds a long long time ago

When it dilutes non propagandised information it gets beyond frustrating. That's "the plan" as far as I can tell, people are able to verify genuine intel that is publicly available of ongoing events themselves. No middle man, no being told what to do or think, you do it independently and can confirm this stuff yourself.  We learn about it and they do the military actions that are not happening for teh last number of years.

I may not bother replying to the remaining nonsense.

Edited June 10, 2022 by TheConsultant

[sock muppet]

16 minutes ago, TheConsultant said:

 

Most of what is being posted here relates to project Echelon, which also relates to the backdoor that was part of the architecture of every CPU based on INTEL design, aka Meltdown and Spectre

[TheConsultant]

4th line. What are media rallying around at the moment, Russia and Ukraine. What if it directly relates to posts? because it does if you bother looking, as do posts relating to Ukraine and money laundering, trafficking and their proxies etc etc. Who owns media? the same people who brought you covid pandemic the same people bribing ports in USA for trafficking. 

Do the maths people, its all there for you to ignore it seems.

As for 'mockingbird' it relates to propaganda. The same media who lied for two years straight about covid.

https://dokumen.pub/cia-operation-mockingbird-document-collection.html

 

Edited June 10, 2022 by TheConsultant

[EnigmaticWorld]

6 minutes ago, TheConsultant said:

4th line. What are media rallying around at the moment, Russia and Ukraine. What if it directly relates to posts? because it does if you bother looking. Who owns media? the same people who brought you covid pandemic the same people bribing ports in USA for trafficking. 

Do the maths people, its all there for you to ignore it seems.

 

What am I supposed to make of the "yet" in the 4th line? All that tells me is that Q will talk about some peoples links to Russia, but not others. Shouldn't that bias concern you? Why is Q only willing to talk about one side of the argument?

 

Another thing, after years of me watching dissident political debates, why do no serious political commentators talk about Q? It's almost seen as something cringe that adults in the room don't want anything to do with at this point. Why is that? Why don't people take Q seriously on 4chan these days? You see, you say I don't read, but I was on the chans in the early days when Q started going viral. Do I read every Q post now? No, you're right I don't, but maybe ask why people don't trust that shit anymore instead of assuming you have seen something that nobody else can see.

[JCP]

I keep seeing references to "The Plan". David Icke exposed many times the source where he gets much of his information about "The Plan" ......... Do a search for "Dr Richard Day Speech - 1969". A transcript of that speech called "New Order of Barbarians" can be found here:

https://thenarrative.uk/pdf/NWORichardDay.pdf

 

Some of the predictions from that speech are :

• New untreatable diseases will crop up.
• Homosexuality will be accepted
• Clothing will become increasingly seductive.
• The family unit will be separated.
• More woman will work outside the home.
• Marriages will decrease, and divorces will become common.
• Entertainment will become extremely perverted and more graphical.
• Music will become demoralised (separator between generations).
• Music will change so much that age groups will listen to different stations, ”older folks would refuse to listen” to newer ”junk”.
• ID will become more and more required [e.g. Vaccine ID].
• Food production will become more and more centralized.
• Eventually, growing your own food would be outlawed under the excuse that it spreads disease.
• Terrorism will increase, specifically in Europe.
• Money will be completely cashless [see pandemic].
• Earned money will be transferred electronically, and all payments will have an electronic trace.
• Credit cards will eventually be replaced with a skin implant.
• Euthanasia will be accepted and eventually expected, ”an arbitrary age limit could be established.”
• Religion will be reduced and removed.
• Restructuring the education system as a tool of indoctrination, children would spend more time in school, but pupils ”wouldn’t learn anything”.
• School psychiatric services would be ”increased dramatically”.
• Education will eventually be life-long.
• Change will become a constantly expected thing.
• Gun ownership will be a privilege and will become restricted.
• Conservatism will be eliminated.
• The purpose of sex would change from reproduction to activity.
• Sex will be done without reproduction, and reproduction will be done without sex.
• Contraception and sex education will become widely available and from a young age.
• Abortion will be legalised and accepted.
• Technology will become widely advanced, so much so that it becomes severely addictive and dangerous.
• Technology will be integrated with cameras and microphones and could be used as a means of surveillance. 
• People would become ”dependent” on their screens.
• Alcohol and drug abuse would increase.
• Private doctors will gradually disappear.
• The image of a doctor would gradually shift to that of a technician.
• Cancer research would be suppressed and would be geared towards comfort rather than cure.
• People would be less dependant on their own kitchen; convenience foods will become more available.
• Public eating places would rapidly increase.
• Food will become more hazardous, but most people will ignore nutritional advice.
• People would have to eat and exercise right, to live as long as before.
• Access to information will gradually become more controlled.
• Some books will disappear.
• House prices will become so high that private housing will eventually become a thing of the past.
• Young people will become renters, and gradually more and more people will be pushed into small apartments.
• Microchips will be implanted under the skin and forehead and eventually be used to replace cash.
• Globalism will increase.
• People would become used to the idea of losing sovereignty.
• We will become citizens of the world rather than our own nation.
• The United Nations would gain more control. 
• A mass surveillance state will be put in place.

http://www.surviveunagenda21depopulation.com/388778388

 

If any of this sounds familiar, you can listen to the three hours of records available at Archive.org, listed below.

https://archive.org/details/New_Order_of_Barbarians_remaster_tapes_1to3/New+Order+of+Barbarians+%5Bremaster%5D+tapes+1+to+3.mp3

 

[sock muppet]

12 minutes ago, JCP said:

I keep seeing references to "The Plan". David Icke exposed many times the source where he gets much of his information about "The Plan" ......... Do a search for "Dr Richard Day Speech - 1969". A transcript of that speech called "New Order of Barbarians" can be found here:

https://thenarrative.uk/pdf/NWORichardDay.pdf

 

Some of the predictions from that speech are :

• New untreatable diseases will crop up.
• Homosexuality will be accepted
• Clothing will become increasingly seductive.
• The family unit will be separated.
• More woman will work outside the home.
• Marriages will decrease, and divorces will become common.
• Entertainment will become extremely perverted and more graphical.
• Music will become demoralised (separator between generations).
• Music will change so much that age groups will listen to different stations, ”older folks would refuse to listen” to newer ”junk”.
• ID will become more and more required [e.g. Vaccine ID].
• Food production will become more and more centralized.
• Eventually, growing your own food would be outlawed under the excuse that it spreads disease.
• Terrorism will increase, specifically in Europe.
• Money will be completely cashless [see pandemic].
• Earned money will be transferred electronically, and all payments will have an electronic trace.
• Credit cards will eventually be replaced with a skin implant.
• Euthanasia will be accepted and eventually expected, ”an arbitrary age limit could be established.”
• Religion will be reduced and removed.
• Restructuring the education system as a tool of indoctrination, children would spend more time in school, but pupils ”wouldn’t learn anything”.
• School psychiatric services would be ”increased dramatically”.
• Education will eventually be life-long.
• Change will become a constantly expected thing.
• Gun ownership will be a privilege and will become restricted.
• Conservatism will be eliminated.
• The purpose of sex would change from reproduction to activity.
• Sex will be done without reproduction, and reproduction will be done without sex.
• Contraception and sex education will become widely available and from a young age.
• Abortion will be legalised and accepted.
• Technology will become widely advanced, so much so that it becomes severely addictive and dangerous.
• Technology will be integrated with cameras and microphones and could be used as a means of surveillance. 
• People would become ”dependent” on their screens.
• Alcohol and drug abuse would increase.
• Private doctors will gradually disappear.
• The image of a doctor would gradually shift to that of a technician.
• Cancer research would be suppressed and would be geared towards comfort rather than cure.
• People would be less dependant on their own kitchen; convenience foods will become more available.
• Public eating places would rapidly increase.
• Food will become more hazardous, but most people will ignore nutritional advice.
• People would have to eat and exercise right, to live as long as before.
• Access to information will gradually become more controlled.
• Some books will disappear.
• House prices will become so high that private housing will eventually become a thing of the past.
• Young people will become renters, and gradually more and more people will be pushed into small apartments.
• Microchips will be implanted under the skin and forehead and eventually be used to replace cash.
• Globalism will increase.
• People would become used to the idea of losing sovereignty.
• We will become citizens of the world rather than our own nation.
• The United Nations would gain more control. 
• A mass surveillance state will be put in place.

http://www.surviveunagenda21depopulation.com/388778388

 

If any of this sounds familiar, you can listen to the three hours of records available at Archive.org, listed below.

https://archive.org/details/New_Order_of_Barbarians_remaster_tapes_1to3/New+Order+of+Barbarians+%5Bremaster%5D+tapes+1+to+3.mp3

 

 

Most of which can be found in the book of Revelations

[EnigmaticWorld]

 

https://www.bitchute.com/video/HmgbOFIM5mTP/

 

[TheConsultant]

28 minutes ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

What am I supposed to make of the "yet" in the 4th line? All that tells me is that Q will talk about some peoples links to Russia, but not others. Shouldn't that bias concern you? Why is Q only willing to talk about one side of the argument?

 

Another thing, after years of me watching dissident political debates, why do no serious political commentators talk about Q? It's almost seen as something cringe that adults in the room don't want anything to do with at this point. Why is that? Why don't people take Q seriously on 4chan these days? You see, you say I don't read, but I was on the chans in the early days when Q started going viral. Do I read every Q post now? No, you're right I don't, but maybe ask why people don't trust that shit anymore instead of assuming you have seen something that nobody else can see.

Firstly, what makes you think for a second that I talk about and discuss everything I am privvy to on this forum? 

Secondly, the posts mention far more than Russia as a few posts above mention Saudi Arabia. Ukraine. Pakistan. Iran. Israel (your favourite). North Korea. China. UK. USA. etc.

Thirdly, because many promoted political commentators are not neutral, independent or on the publics side at all. Operation Mockingbird, much like many CIA programs never ended.

Fourthly, Q is taken seriously by people who understand the posts and its real world correlations. I am sorry that you don't see that, or know people who understand it.
 

19 minutes ago, JCP said:

I keep seeing references to "The Plan".

A different plan altogether.

Icke has a history of being on the money, doesn't mean he is infallible.

Edited June 10, 2022 by TheConsultant

[bamboozooka]

icke only published a Q hit piece the day after biden was inaugurated.

hedging bets me thinks.

 

then he mentions "dark to light", "the plan is written" using Q soundbites

 

Edited June 10, 2022 by bamboozooka

[TheConsultant]

8 minutes ago, bamboozooka said:

icke only published a Q hit piece the day after biden was inaugurated.

hedging bets me thinks.

 

then he mentions "dark to light", "the plan is written" using Q soundbites

 

Plus his book name Renegade directly relates to Obamas secret service name, that Obama chose for himself.

 

Edited June 10, 2022 by TheConsultant

[bamboozooka]

talking of renegade, the movie was produced by 2 nexflix companies.

sauce: imdb

[EnigmaticWorld]

47 minutes ago, TheConsultant said:

Thirdly, because many promoted political commentators are not neutral,

 

I'm not talking about milquetoast political commentators that are promoted, I said dissident, but whatever.

[TheConsultant]

I am sure Alex Jones believes himself to be dissident, the content is the important bit.

[EnigmaticWorld]

21 minutes ago, TheConsultant said:

I am sure Alex Jones believes himself to be dissident, the content is the important bit.

 

He can believe all he likes, but aligning himself with Kremlinists and Duginites is only going to make more people believe Perestroika deception theory. He's scared to debate anyone serious too, so he is hardly the kind of content creator that I'm talking about. I'm talking about internet bloodsport debates, where people don't hold back, not that fool.

Edited June 10, 2022 by EnigmaticWorld

[TheConsultant]

2 minutes ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

 

He can believe all he likes, but aligning himself with Kremlinists and Duginites is only going to make more people believe Perestroika deception theory. He's scared to debate anyone serious too, so he is hardly the kind of content creator that I'm talking about. I'm talking about internet bloodsport debates, where people don't hold back, not that fool.

Ok so who do you suggest I check out? - Jones was an example of your wording, not a suggestion. I highly recommend people avoid his nonsense.

I am far more concerned with misinformation and disinformation from my own Government than I am from Kremlin.

Edited June 10, 2022 by TheConsultant

[sock muppet]

2 hours ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

why do no serious political commentators talk about Q? It's almost seen as something cringe that adults in the room don't want anything to do with at this point. Why is that?

 

Does this make one happy

https://t.me/McafeeAfterlife/846

click the image for msnbc