Jump to content

Q & POTUS


Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, TheConsultant said:

Is that true?
4tyd7bMbTE2v.png

 

Every single one of them are related to the queen, its all kept in the family, blood is thicker than water, however DJT is making a break with the 'old guard', i think it stems from the fact that whatever they try to do, to remain 'status quo', it always ends in 'fail', the reason is Aquarius, its not for everyone.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dunno how true it is, but that kind of virtue signalling is driving more of his base away.

 

Edit: Not really sure what the alternatives are though, and I'm not really a fan of DeSantis. America just needs an actual conservative leader, not someone that sounds like a Dem.

Edited by EnigmaticWorld
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, sock muppet said:

 

Every single one of them are related to the queen, its all kept in the family, blood is thicker than water, however DJT is making a break with the 'old guard', i think it stems from the fact that whatever they try to do, to remain 'status quo', it always ends in 'fail', the reason is Aquarius, its not for everyone.


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2183858/All-presidents-bar-directly-descended-medieval-English-king.html

and people think we live in a democratic society.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, bamboozooka said:

my mum had an owl that changed colour when it was going to rain

 

You wouldn't want Pres. Putin's Owl, his is called 'Storm', Qliver had one also, Cromwell, i prefer Michael Jackson's though, Don't Stop 'Til You Get Enough, OOOWWWWWLLLLLL, whose bad, 🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been told this is a good "q proof" video. Two hours long and I cannot vouch for any of its contents just going on a few others perspective who I generally agree with. Will watch it at some stage and pull it apart if it is wrong or misunderstood.

Bare in mind this is from almost 3 years ago now so will only relate to the older posts and anyone following along probably already knows most if not all of these anyway. 

https://www.bitchute.com/video/4cQc9X9l0a5Y/
 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/15/2023 at 5:59 PM, TheConsultant said:

I have been told this is a good "q proof" video. Two hours long and I cannot vouch for any of its contents just going on a few others perspective who I generally agree with. Will watch it at some stage and pull it apart if it is wrong or misunderstood.

Bare in mind this is from almost 3 years ago now so will only relate to the older posts and anyone following along probably already knows most if not all of these anyway. 

https://www.bitchute.com/video/4cQc9X9l0a5Y/
 

Very very good! 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/15/2023 at 5:59 PM, TheConsultant said:

I have been told this is a good "q proof" video. Two hours long and I cannot vouch for any of its contents just going on a few others perspective who I generally agree with. Will watch it at some stage and pull it apart if it is wrong or misunderstood.

Bare in mind this is from almost 3 years ago now so will only relate to the older posts and anyone following along probably already knows most if not all of these anyway. 

https://www.bitchute.com/video/4cQc9X9l0a5Y/
 

Have you managed to watch it and do any ‘fact checking’ yet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, TheConsultant said:


Sadly not seen it yet. Always gotta "fact check", I cannot help it. Its an illness at this point.

Absolutely not an illness, it’s a necessity!

 

It is a very detailed, professional and informative video which, imho, absolutely proves Q and Trump are working together. Anything more than that and I’m not sure, yet.
 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

image.png.3ed127a4a587bbfc718129385f176956.png
image.png.7b3bf8a120104d4ebc6a29c13f9e2418.png

Also note that due to this Trump case going to court a phrase to bare in mind "discovery". Lawyer term.

https://www.britannica.com/topic/discovery-law

-------

Steps in a Trial

Discovery

To begin preparing for trial, both sides engage in discovery . This is the formal process of exchanging information between the parties about the witnesses and evidence they ll present at trial.

Discovery enables the parties to know before the trial begins what evidence may be presented. It s designed to prevent "trial by ambush," where one side doesn t learn of the other side s evidence or witnesses until the trial, when there s no time to obtain answering evidence.

One of the most common methods of discovery is to take depositions. A deposition is an out-of-court statement given under oath by any person involved in the case. It is to be used at trial or in preparation for trial. It may be in the form of a written transcript, a videotape, or both. In most states, either of the parties may take the deposition of the other party, or of any other witness. Both sides have the right to be present during oral depositions.

Depositions enable a party to know in advance what a witness will say at the trial. Depositions can also be taken to obtain the testimony of important witnesses who can t appear during the trial. In that case, they re read into evidence at the trial.

Often a witness's deposition will be taken by the opposing side and used to discredit the witness's testimony at trial if the trial testimony varies from the testimony taken during the deposition. (A lawyer might ask a witness at trial, Are you lying now or were you lying then? )

Usually depositions consist of an oral examination, followed by cross-examination by the opposing side. In addition to taking depositions, either party may submit written questions, called interrogatories , to the other party and require that they be answered in writing under oath. If one party chooses to use an interrogatory, written questions are sent to the lawyer representing the other side, and that party has a period of time in which to answer.

Other methods of discovery include

  • subpoenaing or requiring the other side to produce books, records or other documents for inspection (a subpoena is a written order issued by a court compelling a person to testify or produce certain physical evidence such as records);
  • having the other side submit to a physical examination; or
  • asking that a document be submitted for examination to determine if it is genuine.


Go back and read above post regarding how you get the information they have had since at least 2016 public and legally doing so. 

Edited by TheConsultant
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, TheConsultant said:

image.png.3ed127a4a587bbfc718129385f176956.png
image.png.7b3bf8a120104d4ebc6a29c13f9e2418.png

Also note that due to this Trump case going to court a phrase to bare in mind "discovery". Lawyer term.

https://www.britannica.com/topic/discovery-law

-------

Steps in a Trial

Discovery

To begin preparing for trial, both sides engage in discovery . This is the formal process of exchanging information between the parties about the witnesses and evidence they ll present at trial.

Discovery enables the parties to know before the trial begins what evidence may be presented. It s designed to prevent "trial by ambush," where one side doesn t learn of the other side s evidence or witnesses until the trial, when there s no time to obtain answering evidence.

One of the most common methods of discovery is to take depositions. A deposition is an out-of-court statement given under oath by any person involved in the case. It is to be used at trial or in preparation for trial. It may be in the form of a written transcript, a videotape, or both. In most states, either of the parties may take the deposition of the other party, or of any other witness. Both sides have the right to be present during oral depositions.

Depositions enable a party to know in advance what a witness will say at the trial. Depositions can also be taken to obtain the testimony of important witnesses who can t appear during the trial. In that case, they re read into evidence at the trial.

Often a witness's deposition will be taken by the opposing side and used to discredit the witness's testimony at trial if the trial testimony varies from the testimony taken during the deposition. (A lawyer might ask a witness at trial, Are you lying now or were you lying then? )

Usually depositions consist of an oral examination, followed by cross-examination by the opposing side. In addition to taking depositions, either party may submit written questions, called interrogatories , to the other party and require that they be answered in writing under oath. If one party chooses to use an interrogatory, written questions are sent to the lawyer representing the other side, and that party has a period of time in which to answer.

Other methods of discovery include

  • subpoenaing or requiring the other side to produce books, records or other documents for inspection (a subpoena is a written order issued by a court compelling a person to testify or produce certain physical evidence such as records);
  • having the other side submit to a physical examination; or
  • asking that a document be submitted for examination to determine if it is genuine.


Go back and read above post regarding how you get the information they have had since at least 2016 public and legally doing so. 

There are pertinent news articles everyday on Fox News. All discussing the criminality of the Bidens. Many discussing how far ahead in the polls Trump is over Ron Desantis of Florida. Trump was on 53 points and Desantis 19. Every new allegation or charge increases Trumps lead. 
 

when I have more time I will post some links, though they are easy to find.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Anti Facts Sir said:

Good grief, these MSM types (and GB News is MSM) are total dorks. Being good little puppies.


MSM has been propaganda for decades. What she is stating is factual information following Executive Orders, collected evidence (2000 mules, voting machine tampering, resizing of ballots, changing voting laws fraudulently/illegally (goes against the constitution which an EO was regarding), taking Gold back from Vatican etc etc) and legally speaking the Trump court case now opens the door to evidence to be legally released publicly to prove that (and more) to people who are not reading or have not read the Q posts. As she says its a big error on their part and the world will know how it was done from at least in part via discovery and the subpoenaing of witnesses and thus evidence of how it was done will become public information. 

It was industrial levels and multiple levels/layers of fraud, it also, in some peoples cases were acts of Treason which if I am not mistaken means you can be put to death.


 

Edited by TheConsultant
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...