The Flat Earth/Globe Earth Discussion Thread

[alexa]

1 minute ago, Chef said:

I'l be sure to wave next time I'm in Ilfracombe. 

 

 Yes we can see Illfracombe ( North Devon) on a clear day 

[bflat]

10 hours ago, zArk said:

i expected more from spherists and rather than be disappointed with them...

Now you are going to be really disappointed:

Sorry, bro

 

[zArk]

@bflat anothering thing is, weather predictions are so crap because the globe model ruins all the hard work and analysis by the meteorologists.

maybe a flat earth model with their expertise would provide solid weather reports?

[alexa]

1 hour ago, bflat said:

Now you are going to be really disappointed:

Sorry, bro

 

 

I'm out of likes 

[Messenger]

I suppose we shouldn't discuss corona "virus" then either since we are living in a hologram. 

[Guest Chica]

6 hours ago, Messenger said:

I suppose we shouldn't discuss corona "virus" then either since we are living in a hologram. 

 

LOL...maybe we should!

 

But I think DI did explain this- just like the current advanced VR games, which seem so real that one feels as if inside that reality, so our matrix is so palpably real and we are so deep into it that we are actually physically affected by it. There was an episode in the series Black Mirror along those lines. That's where they are going- now that our minds are hooked onto virtual world..

 

Having said that, there are multiple ways to address what's happening around us. Not all of us are thinking with the same perspective. There are some members who are into conspiracy, fighting the deep state, fight the system etc. way of thinking- they will first need to go through that journey to get it out of their system.

 

Others just need to intellectually and academically understand the sham being played out to recoup their power first and just conquer their fears and find equanimity. Some of these people will spend a lot of time in these intellectual discussions and may get caught up in it.  It's all good because it's all part of the process of awakening.

Others on a sprint mode to awakening or who are just blessed enough to be ready, will zip through this part without going too deep into studying this scam, just enough to align their understanding and be 'protected' along the rest of their journey but not investing too much mental energy in it. For instance people who study pedos and child abuse sometimes go so deep into it that they imbue the perpetrators with power through the investment of their energy. 

The person in sprint mode will just accept all disease and death externally for what it is and focus on silencing all conflict inside, since conflicts and emotional turmoil is feeding the beast. Remaining in that state takes years of discipline or until physical death- that is why each moment is precious.

So the virus itself is not the problem- the problem is that since we are still entangled in this matrix, we are being led like sheep to the stage of mind control through AI and as most of us will soon realize that there is little hope of being saved by anyone outside of us, we might turn inwards with even more intensity to complete our journeys.

I get a feeling I may be posting on the wrong forum, people are discussing FE here..my words may sound out of context here. Sorry about that!

 

[zArk]

so its a fraud then,  the 13miles without 100ft drop? 

 

oh well,  how about the solar eclipse fraud? 

 

the land observed sun effect travels west to east. 

bit of a mash mess for spherists shurrley? 

 

moon observed travel is east to west so for the inline sun moon effect to be true the observed sun effect must travel east to west

 

oooopsey

 

explain please spherists

 

 

 

[bflat]

7 hours ago, zArk said:

explain please spherists

[peter]

On 7/28/2020 at 3:29 PM, alexa said:

Now you are going to be really disappointed:

Sorry, bro

Alexa If you can't see problems in that video I'm sorry but I can't be bothered to explain them to you as I think I've done my fair share in this thread, however I would say try thinking in 3D as it helps.

maybe you could enlighten me with regards to god and religion since you are always quoting the bible

1 If the planets don't orbit the sun and space doesn't exist , why dose the Vatican have it's own observatory, with a particular interest in the sun , maybe they are waiting for the return of the Sumerian Sun Gods, maybe not who knows

2 Who has the controlling interests in the satellites that are orbiting the sun at the present time, the Vatican that's who,but since space doesn't exist could it be that all Catholics are closet Freemasons and as such are full of shit and are helping to perpetuate the globalist lies .

Keep posting between yourselves ,I enjoy a good chuckle

[alexa]

3 hours ago, peter said:

Alexa If you can't see problems in that video I'm sorry but I can't be bothered to explain them to you as I think I've done my fair share in this thread, however I would say try thinking in 3D as it helps.

maybe you could enlighten me with regards to god and religion since you are always quoting the bible

1 If the planets don't orbit the sun and space doesn't exist , why dose the Vatican have it's own observatory, with a particular interest in the sun , maybe they are waiting for the return of the Sumerian Sun Gods, maybe not who knows

2 Who has the controlling interests in the satellites that are orbiting the sun at the present time, the Vatican that's who,but since space doesn't exist could it be that all Catholics are closet Freemasons and as such are full of shit and are helping to perpetuate the globalist lies .

Keep posting between yourselves ,I enjoy a good chuckle

 

 It wasn't me that posted the above said vid, but as you've said........ I cant see anything wrong with the vid that bflat posted, in fact I thought it was good example how only on a flat earth would flights make such maneuvers in an emergency landing.

 

And if I can enlighten you in regards to God, I would be happy too.

 

 

 

[bflat]

Anyone still confused? Well, here you go:

 

 

Welcome to flat earth!

[screamingeagle]

2 hours ago, bflat said:

Anyone still confused? Well, here you go:

yes,it's fake...

 

how do i know,because they say the earth is flat 

[Lady Baynham]

I find it puzzling that there are a lot of very good videos of people testing the shape of the earth. Lazers and  Nikon cameras,mirrors,drones and they say look,look here ,we should not be able to see this.Then using the chart for curvature they point out that there is no hill of water .

They bring ships back into focus,not hidden by a hill of water,but still here.

Ordinary people,experimenting and filming.Working out distances,and saying Nah,its wrong,we can see it ,no hill of water .

I have yet to see the curve.

Where are the people going out and doing the research into showing a hill of water ? 

Old Greek men with sticks and shadows,Nasa. Where is the curve , sHow me the curve and maybe I can prove them wrong when they say...once you see its flat,theres no going back.

[peter]

Bloody Freemasons

[bflat]

RE: Reification (also known as concretism, hypostatization, or the fallacy of misplaced concreteness) is a fallacy of ambiguity, when an abstraction (abstract belief or hypothetical construct) is treated as if it were a concrete real event or physical entity.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reification_(fallacy)

 

Y'all who have been reading along knows how many times I have to point this out, but here we are again.

 

7 hours ago, screamingeagle said:

yes,it's fake...

 

how do i know,because they say the earth is flat 

I mean it has to be, right? We live on a globe, duh. Do you see how greatly these posts fail now?

 

Let alone, it isn't fake. They are heard communicating in real time as the laser directly strikes the camera lens, not once, but MULTIPLE TIMES.

 

We have seen this in Utah over 13.7 miles. It is linked under point one of the OP. And now we are looking over the even more ridiculous distance of nearly 17 miles!

 

I've been explaining all along that the evidence for flat earth will soon become so great, that those denying it will become a great minority. Our tech is getting way too good to avoid this eventual outcome. And that's OK. Time for a damn paradigm shift already, no? They have fooled us long enough.

 

Edited July 31, 2020 by bflat

[zArk]

2 hours ago, bflat said:

 

 

i notice once more that the posed questions go unanswered by the spherists

 

the paranoia that these things are entirely CIA/oss/MI6 COINTELPRO is absurd however i do suspect that misdirection on points has occurred and that splinter groups were created to take people off into strawman arguments

 

i fail to see how, screaming - peter -etc etc,  a 16mile laser sighting is the Carl Beech of questioning the Globe earth model

 

 

 

 

[screamingeagle]

4 hours ago, bflat said:

mean it has to be, right

yes,i saw it on the vids you say are fake,i saw the curavture 

 

4 hours ago, bflat said:

Let alone, it isn't fake. They are heard communicating in real time as the laser directly strikes the camera lens, not once, but MULTIPLE TIMES.

to easy to fake that....

for some one who went out with a intentions to prove FE and thus set up his bias before the experiment started

[peter]

1 hour ago, zArk said:

 

i notice once more that the posed questions go unanswered by the spherists

 

the paranoia that these things are entirely CIA/oss/MI6 COINTELPRO is absurd however i do suspect that misdirection on points has occurred and that splinter groups were created to take people off into strawman arguments

 

i fail to see how, screaming - peter -etc etc,  a 16mile laser sighting is the Carl Beech of questioning the Globe earth model

 

 

 

 

You certainly have a short memory ,as I have answered plenty of questions from your side of the debate and not one of you have answered any of mine, so maybe I just can't be bothered any more.

I notice you didn't comment on the parachute jump , but I actually know what you will say ,It' a fish eye lens, well you are right and it's obvious when I think of it ,  the evidence is when the picture is taken from his back and the opening is round ,in your reality it's actually square

[zArk]

1 hour ago, peter said:

You certainly have a short memory ,as I have answered plenty of questions from your side of the debate

 

heh ..sorry you're right i should re-state my statement

 

i notice, once more, that the facts that disprove the sphere model go unexplained

 

i.e

1. 13.7 miles  --- laser ---- wheres the 100ft of curvature gone?

Edited July 31, 2020 by zArk

[zArk]

1 hour ago, peter said:

I notice you didn't comment on the parachute jump , but I actually know what you will say ,It' a fish eye lens, well you are right and it's obvious when I think of it ,  the evidence is when the picture is taken from his back and the opening is round ,in your reality it's actually square

 

ermm  other than fisheye, fake background and wideangle lens i think its a cracking video but i wonder how a fella jumping out of a capsule makes 100ft+ of curvature disappear

 

 

really baffling why you introduced the felix jump when the thread was on the laser 16miles ?????

 

 

Edited July 31, 2020 by zArk

[peter]

15 minutes ago, zArk said:

really baffling why you introduced the felix jump when the thread was on the laser 16miles ?????

It only baffles some

 

 

"i wonder how a fella jumping out of a capsule makes 100ft+ of curvature disappear"

The fact that he might be looking straight down  wouldn't have anything to do with it

And the bit about the fake background after he jumps ,of course it's fake ,that's not the bit I'm talking about and you know it

 

Edited July 31, 2020 by peter

[zArk]

 

@peter all you are doing is bolstering the flat earth model and destroying the sphere model

 

if the sphere model is unable to answer "where has 100ft+ of curvature gone?"

then its sunk, its over.

 

there is a practical example of flat earth evidence

there is a methodology

there is results

there is a conclusion

 

now, if the sphere model wishes to write its own conclusion GREAT!!! lets read it...

[peter]

3 hours ago, zArk said:

now, if the sphere model wishes to write its own conclusion GREAT!!! lets read it

3 hours ago, zArk said:

i wonder how a fella jumping out of a capsule makes 100ft+ of curvature disappear

How many times do I have to do that, as I have said before not one of my questions have been answered by any of you lot , If nothing else your bloody predictable

 

i notice, once more, that the facts that disprove the sphere model go unexplained,

 

Just like the facts that prove it

Edited July 31, 2020 by peter

[peter]

On 7/28/2020 at 3:25 PM, zArk said:

@bflat anothering thing is, weather predictions are so crap because the globe model ruins all the hard work and analysis by the meteorologists.

maybe a flat earth model with their expertise would provide solid weather reports?

 Another brilliant insight .

I can hit a golf ball about 250 mts so the earth must be a sphere ( or there about's)

Edited July 31, 2020 by peter

[bflat]

7 hours ago, screamingeagle said:

to easy to fake that....

Well, I am sure it could be done, but you completely miss here is the fact that I have begged y'all to do your own experiments. I have explained multiple ways to accomplish the simple task of determining if a geometric horizon exists... yet y'all refuse in favor of trolling those who do.

 

The other problem you have with this gambit is the simple fact that these experiments are numerous. They are taking place all over the world. We see horizons that are miles past where they are REQUIRED TO BE in your little globe world and we will continue to because a physical barrier does not exist.

 

That simple.

 

 

17 hours ago, Lady Baynham said:

I find it puzzling that there are a lot of very good videos of people testing the shape of the earth. Lazers and  Nikon cameras,mirrors,drones and they say look,look here ,we should not be able to see this.Then using the chart for curvature they point out that there is no hill of water .

They bring ships back into focus,not hidden by a hill of water,but still here.

Ordinary people,experimenting and filming.Working out distances,and saying Nah,its wrong,we can see it ,no hill of water .

I have yet to see the curve.

Where are the people going out and doing the research into showing a hill of water ? 

Old Greek men with sticks and shadows,Nasa. Where is the curve , sHow me the curve and maybe I can prove them wrong when they say...once you see its flat,theres no going back.

Perfect! Thank-you!