# The Flat Earth/Globe Earth Discussion Thread

## Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, peter said:

Clearly the globe argument  is finished we just can't compete with that,I watched the video talk about impressed, it looks like utube has finally come through for you alexa

Let me just check 8" drop per mile  = 92x8 =736 inches divide by 12 and you have 61.3333333 ft repeater (looks like the masons were involved) since a projectile flies line of sight predominantly ( allowing for gravity and depending on the distance, the Coriolis effect),  you only have a drop in either direction from the horizon of 30. 66666666 ft repeater ( shit Satan as well). My only conclusion  is, according to those numbers the devil is at work here and you failed to notice it alexa.

Few,I was worried there for a sec

Not SURE what the above maths is about.

What is the 92? The amount of drop is 8" per mile squared.

So if the 92 is referring to a distance of 92 miles then the actual calculation is 8" x 92 x 92 = 67,712" and converted to feet then 67,712 / 12 = 5624 feet (that is over 1 mile which is 5280 feet).

Quite often the calculation forgets the squared term. Yes, I know that the equation for drop is not quite accurate at longer distances but it is not that too far away from figures given in this calculation. That is over 1 mile drop for curvature!

##### Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, Concerned Citizen said:

Not SURE what the above maths is about.

What is the 92? The amount of drop is 8" per mile squared.

So if the 92 is referring to a distance of 92 miles then the actual calculation is 8" x 92 x 92 = 67,712" and converted to feet then 67,712 / 12 = 5624 feet (that is over 1 mile which is 5280 feet).

Quite often the calculation forgets the squared term. Yes, I know that the equation for drop is not quite accurate at longer distances but it is not that too far away from figures given in this calculation. That is over 1 mile drop for curvature!

Its 8" per  mile,  this calculation  has been discussed many times over this thread ,I know how many ft are in a mile and this equation is never applied correctly only ever in one direction which an underhanded  flat earth slight of hand ,this has been explained before in this thread.

I'm not discussing this again for the umpthenth time ,but you are quite welcome to go back and look

Edited by peter
##### Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, peter said:

Its 8" per  mile,  this calculation  has been discussed many times over this thread ,I know how many ft are in a mile and this equation is never applied correctly only ever in one direction which an underhanded  flat earth slight of hand ,this has been explained before in this thread.

I'm not discussing this again for the umpthenth time ,but you are quite welcome to go back and look

Yes 8" per mile squared is the calculation, so at 92 miles then 8" x 92 x 92 = 67,712 inches etc, or am I incorrect with the equation? That is what I am asking. The number of miles is the squared term - Is that not correct?

##### Share on other sites

12 hours ago, peter said:

except when the earth revolves and it's night time

Then why did Joshua ask God to make the sun stand still and not the earth, so the Israelites could slaughter more Amorites?

"And the sun stood still, and the moon stayed, until the people had avenged themselves upon their enemies. Is not this written in the book of Jasher? So the sun stood still in the midst of heaven, and hasted not to go down about a whole day."

##### Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Velma said:

Then why did Joshua ask God to make the sun stand still and not the earth, so the Israelites could slaughter more Amorites?

What a lovely god,full of vengeance death and slaughter,sounds like he has all the hall marks of satan,don't tell it wasn't god it was the Israelites, god just facilitated the carnage , what an upstanding entity you worship

How do you know joshua personally asked god to do anything,  don't tell me it's in the book,who wrote the book then?

Sorry but to me Tom Cruise and the story of Zenu sounds just as plausible but at least we know who wrote that one

Edited by peter
##### Share on other sites

3 hours ago, peter said:

What a lovely god,full of vengeance death and slaughter,sounds like he has all the hall marks of satan,don't tell it wasn't god it was the Israelites, god just facilitated the carnage , what an upstanding entity you worship

How do you know joshua personally asked god to do anything,  don't tell me it's in the book,who wrote the book then?

Sorry but to me Tom Cruise and the story of Zenu sounds just as plausible but at least we know who wrote that one

First off, who said I worship the OT God of war and vengeance, that the Israelites used to justify genocide?

The Books were written by the the individuals they are attributed to, Isaiah, Amos, Jeremiah, whoever...

I merely used the literature to demonstrate the point that a stationary earth is an archaic concept.

And lastly,why the hostility?

##### Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Velma said:

Then why did Joshua ask God to make the sun stand still and not the earth, so the Israelites could slaughter more Amorites?

"And the sun stood still, and the moon stayed, until the people had avenged themselves upon their enemies. Is not this written in the book of Jasher? So the sun stood still in the midst of heaven, and hasted not to go down about a whole day."

Plus when the sun moved back ten steps for Isiah, to heal Hezekiah.

So Isaiah the prophet called out to the LORD, and He brought the shadow back the ten steps 2 Kings 20:11

##### Share on other sites

Here in this video @ 7:11 it mentions 'The Summer Gate' , I'd never heard of this before ?

##### Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

I quoted the Bible as a source, in the same way as I may refer to Greek Philosophers like Herodotus, or the Renaissance astronomers, like Copernicus and Kepler, because I thought we were having a debate on the geocentric or heliocentric model of the earth.

The spinning ball theory seems ludicrous to me, especially when the only thing to substantiate it is NASA (AKA Paramount Pictures.)  However, there is more to a ‘flat earth’ than meets the eye and then there is the ‘inner earth’ to consider. Agartha!

Admiral Richard Byrd reported a continent beyond Antarctica as large as the United States, as yet unexplored (by us.) So, either the landmass extends, or he entered another world or dimension. Nicola Tesla said that earth is a “realm” and that resonates with me.

Colonel Percy Fawcett mysteriously disappeared in the Mato Grosso claiming to know the whereabouts of a ‘lost city.’ Who am I to question these renowned men in their field? I have never been to Brazil or Antarctica and probably never will. It’s out-of-bounds.

Edited by Velma
##### Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Velma said:

The Books were written by the the individuals they are attributed to, Isaiah, Amos, Jeremiah, whoever...

This is an interesting question from the pov of historical truth. Biblical books carry names like that, but I would need better evidence than this to decide one way or another. The Gospels should be easier to attribute than the OT, but as a random example, this is from wiki about Matthew's Gospel:

"Traditionally, the gospel has been attributed to the Apostle Matthew, who is described as a tax collector within the text. Most modern scholars hold the gospel was written anonymously by a male Jew in the last quarter of the first century who was familiar with technical legal aspects of scripture.

##### Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Velma said:

First off, who said I worship the OT God of war and vengeance, that the Israelites used to justify genocide?

The Books were written by the the individuals they are attributed to, Isaiah, Amos, Jeremiah, whoever...

I merely used the literature to demonstrate the point that a stationary earth is an archaic concept.

And lastly,why the hostility?

Fair call, I would agree that a stationary earth is an archaic concept but is now outdated due to evidence, I think that a good majority that believe in a flat earth only do so to reinforce their own personal religious beliefs. With respect to the perceived hostility, it is undeniable that the belief in god or gods and therefore their associated religious practices and attitudes has been used as an excuse to commit all manner of atrocities down through the ages, case in point the passage you quoted. Lastly the bible is written in such a way that leaves a large scope for personal interpretation and therefore the meaning of a certain passage for one person may not be the same as for another.

On a more personal note I think that religion in all its forms is an archaic outdated concept,it certainly hasn't served human kind up until this point very well, it has only served certain individuals with the means to attain wealth, power and control through the indoctrination of the respective followers (sheep) into believing that they are somehow special

Edited by peter
##### Share on other sites

The sun stays in the same point in the sky for 31 days twice a year.
Once during the winter solstice, and once during the summer solstice.

Then between those times, it moves 1degree about every 4 days.

When the sun is at the equator, it stays there for about 3 days.

This fact proves the earth is not a ball.

The sun is moving above us and around us and not over and below us.

Greenwich Time Zone Transit Altitude
For 31 days the sun keeps its height in the sky, twice a year this happens.

winter solstice dec 06 - jan 05
Transit Altitude 44°S

summer solstice jun 05 - jul 07
Transit Altitude 90°S&N

# Flat Earth in the Movies

##### Share on other sites

On 3/27/2023 at 1:44 AM, alexa said:

# Flat Earth in the Movies

Just because it's in the movies doesn't make it real, just like if it's on utube or in this case rumble

I like the fact that his channel is flat earth fact or fiction which gives the impression of even handed investigation.However  in the URL is flat earth in the movies ( with that wording we see a very subtle physiological trick) so we can now see which way this joker leans

As I said before alexa just because it's in the movies doesn't make it real, just like if it's on utube or in this case rumble

##### Share on other sites

Hollywood is poison. Posting movie clips as an argument that are likely made and financed by people that hate you is silly. The subversives in Hollywood are not going to supply you with the tools to stop your enslavement.

##### Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, peter said:

Just because it's in the movies doesn't make it real, just like if it's on utube or in this case rumble

I like the fact that his channel is flat earth fact or fiction which gives the impression of even handed investigation.However  in the URL is flat earth in the movies ( with that wording we see a very subtle physiological trick) so we can now see which way this joker leans

As I said before alexa just because it's in the movies doesn't make it real, just like if it's on utube or in this case rumble

These movies never put it bang smack in yer face, they like to do the subtle approach, the slight of hands which you have to look for. Tricks of their trade if yer like.

##### Share on other sites

The wall was a pretty big plot point in the Truman Show, a movie by Scott Rudin Productions.

##### Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

Hollywood is poison.

I know, I agree, tricky people these movie directors.

##### Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

NASA has finally announced the earth is flat

Edited by alexa
##### Share on other sites

3 hours ago, alexa said:

NASA has finally announced the earth is flat

##### Share on other sites

Twinkle twinkle little star, how I wonder what you are

##### Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DaleP said:

Haven't you noticed what day it is ?  And I did post it before 12.

##### Share on other sites

That earth is a realm and also not an object is correctly observed. This can be extended to something larger. Perhaps something has not yet been discovered to replace the concept of objects with something far more sophisticated. That in between has no significance. The stars and also the obsolete firmament still need to be redefined so that earth and all other so-called three-dimensional objects can be integrated into the construct. And all processes must be accelerated by a significant factor in order to comprehend it. Since everything here is considered an almost stasis.

##### Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LastOneLeftInTheCounty said:

Tesla also said, 'Don't believe everything you read on the internet.'

## Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

Only 75 emoji are allowed.