peter Posted March 2 Share Posted March 2 (edited) 40 minutes ago, alexa said: It's these that are fake; and what are your reasons they are fake, at least I pointed mine out as to my conclusions with the circular rainbow Edited March 2 by peter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexa Posted March 2 Share Posted March 2 11 minutes ago, peter said: and what are your reasons they are fake, at least I pointed mine out as to my conclusions with the circular rainbow NASA'a Robert Simmon explains how he created the Earth image “Blue Marble”. All images of Earth are literally photoshopped. He say's, 'It is photo shopped but it has to be' https://youtu.be/R4YiOhjd9O4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter Posted March 2 Share Posted March 2 6 hours ago, alexa said: NASA'a Robert Simmon explains how he created the Earth image “Blue Marble”. All images of Earth are literally photoshopped. He say's, 'It is photo shopped but it has to be' https://youtu.be/R4YiOhjd9O4 Really alexa more time wasted watching your proof that isn't, if you want me to go in point form why I believe this video is a load of rubbish I will, but at the moment I can't be bothered ,but I will make you a bargain if you tell me why you think the those pictures are fake in your own words, and I'm not saying there not, I will tell you why I think the video is suspect and I use the term video loosely as it is mostly an audio file Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Origin Posted March 2 Share Posted March 2 8 hours ago, alexa said: WOW - A complete circle, this is amazing, thanks for sharing Dale I think you need this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexa Posted March 2 Share Posted March 2 1 hour ago, Origin said: I think you need this. This one is very impressive - Thanks origin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexa Posted March 2 Share Posted March 2 2 hours ago, peter said: Really alexa more time wasted watching your proof that isn't, if you want me to go in point form why I believe this video is a load of rubbish I will, but at the moment I can't be bothered ,but I will make you a bargain if you tell me why you think the those pictures are fake in your own words, and I'm not saying there not, I will tell you why I think the video is suspect and I use the term video loosely as it is mostly an audio file It's just a matter of perception again. You just know instinctively when something is faked. I must admit tho, not always. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Origin Posted March 2 Share Posted March 2 (edited) 53 minutes ago, alexa said: This one is very impressive - Thanks origin Always remember that everything here is coincidence. They are really just clouds. And you have learned what the atmosphere is. Try not to interpret anything strange into it! What is the probability that Humans can simply capture this on film? And what is the probability that this is of natural origin? ;) Edited March 2 by Origin 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter Posted March 2 Share Posted March 2 (edited) 6 hours ago, alexa said: It's just a matter of perception again. You just know instinctively when something is faked. I must admit tho, not always. For christ sake alexa that is an old experiment and nothing to do with why the pictures you put up are fake,so once again in your own words why are those pictures of the earth fake. You make a statement and can't back it up ,which is typical, then come back with an unrelated Utube video, you are truly a waste of time. Even in the unrelated video you put up you could replace the name fake hand with the word bible , remember your book was written by a despot english king and not god, so my only conclusion is it has to be fake , your showing me how perception works,thanks for that but I think I've got it and in return I've just shown you how logic works Edited March 2 by peter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexa Posted March 2 Share Posted March 2 (edited) 1 hour ago, peter said: and in return I've just shown you how logic works Isn't it logical to say that water always finds it's own level & that it certainly wont stick to a spinning ball ? I could go on & on about whats logical. Edited March 2 by alexa typo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaleP Posted March 2 Share Posted March 2 On 2/28/2023 at 2:20 AM, DaleP said: A question! We normally see waxing moons like this. and waning moon if you flip it vertically. But we never see a dish like moon. But it happens and Sumerians apparently drew such moon. What does it mean in terms of FE concept? WOW you won't believe this Peter.... As I said above, the moon is lit at the top half only instead of like this below. http://blogs.jccc.edu/astronomy/files/2013/11/Phasesmoon-1024x439.jpg It's either the aliens are reading my post and did this tonight to give me a wink that they do or that we are at end time. Go outside and have a looooook. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter Posted March 3 Share Posted March 3 4 hours ago, alexa said: Isn't it logical to say that water always finds it's own level & that it certainly wont stick to a spinning ball ? I could go on & on about whats logical. For the third time why do you think those pictures are fake, ignore deflect ,zark has taught you well Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter Posted March 3 Share Posted March 3 (edited) 4 hours ago, DaleP said: WOW you won't believe this Peter.... As I said above, the moon is lit at the top half only instead of like this below. http://blogs.jccc.edu/astronomy/files/2013/11/Phasesmoon-1024x439.jpg It's either the aliens are reading my post and did this tonight to give me a wink that they do or that we are at end time. Go outside and have a looooook. So where is the moon that looks like a saucer as you insinuated in your post ,or a picture of the moon that is lit on the top half,and no that is not what you said above "But it happens and Sumerians apparently drew such moon.What does it mean in terms of FE concept?" remember this dale,you don't don't even remember what you wrote or tried to infer. So now you can explain the relevance of this URL http://blogs.jccc.edu/astronomy/files/2013/11/Phasesmoon-1024x439.jpg with respect to your original question and my reply What am I supposed to be looking at when I go outside Edited March 3 by peter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexa Posted March 3 Share Posted March 3 (edited) 4 hours ago, peter said: For the third time why do you think those pictures are fake, ignore deflect ,zark has taught you well By using Forensically Photoshop Analyzer, try it, you can do it with any photo. https://fotoforensics.com/ In case the picture was altered or photoshopped, you will see color in picture analysis. In case the picture is unedited, you will see a regular white color on it. Edited March 3 by alexa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
webtrekker Posted March 3 Share Posted March 3 (edited) 2 hours ago, alexa said: By using Forensically Photoshop Analyzer, try it, you can do it with any photo. https://fotoforensics.com/ In case the picture was altered or photoshopped, you will see color in picture analysis. In case the picture is unedited, you will see a regular white color on it. That's ridiculous, because that's not the ORIGINAL photo. To obtain forensic evidence you must use the original, unedited photo, not one that has been posted and reposted millions of times on god knows how many sites, especially jpegs that are compressed files and lose information each time they are saved. Edited March 3 by webtrekker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter Posted March 3 Share Posted March 3 (edited) 3 hours ago, alexa said: By using Forensically Photoshop Analyzer, try it, you can do it with any photo. https://fotoforensics.com/ In case the picture was altered or photoshopped, you will see color in picture analysis. In case the picture is unedited, you will see a regular white color on it. Good so you have obviously done it to make the claim they're fake so explain on what points those particular pictures failed Edited March 3 by peter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter Posted March 3 Share Posted March 3 1 hour ago, webtrekker said: That's ridiculous, because that's not the ORIGINAL photo. To obtain forensic evidence you must use the original, unedited photo, not one that has been posted and reposted millions of times on god knows how many sites, especially jpegs that are compressed files and lose information each time they are saved. Shhhhh, she's already dug a hole for herself saying the earth is globular , I'm just letting her pick up another shovel with regards to the fake pictures,but you have stolen my punch line, no worries though it was going to come out sooner rather than later 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Origin Posted March 3 Share Posted March 3 23 hours ago, alexa said: This one is very impressive - Thanks origin Expectation and reality..Let's see. Why Nasa post-processes so many images and also creates them artificially. Boring.. Caution. Each frame must be studied individually. If you want to question Nasa or others like Eso you have to study their footage. And it should be clear to you that not everything is fake. Except that they lie about what the universe is supposed to be, or Earth. No one can fake everything because there are millions of amateur astronomers worldwide who are independent. Even if they don't have such sophisticated telescopes or cameras. And they can make real time recordings of what surrounds us without any problems. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
webtrekker Posted March 3 Share Posted March 3 3 hours ago, peter said: Shhhhh, she's already dug a hole for herself saying the earth is globular , I'm just letting her pick up another shovel with regards to the fake pictures,but you have stolen my punch line, no worries though it was going to come out sooner rather than later Oops! Didn't mean to leak your punch line Peter. I've been watching too many Isabel Oakeshott newsclips! Never mind though, 'Lessons have been learned,' as they say in government circles! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexa Posted March 3 Share Posted March 3 1 hour ago, Origin said: Expectation and reality..Let's see. Why Nasa post-processes so many images and also creates them artificially. This is not all they create artificially I don't know why they bother ? Why not just come straight out & give us the truth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexa Posted March 3 Share Posted March 3 Shouldn't this read ' The Day The Earth Moved' ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Origin Posted March 3 Share Posted March 3 22 minutes ago, alexa said: I don't know why they bother ? Why not just come straight out & give us the truth. Nobody can. Because it questions not only the current system. The answer is collapse. The James Webb Telescope can barely separate three layers that are wafer thin. And every time the same fabric can be seen. It never changes. That can only be perceived when something has been altered in you to be able to see it. Context Experiencer. And earth is so exotic that it can't really be described in words, they don't exist. Truth is a beautiful word, but I know that no one is ready for it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexa Posted March 3 Share Posted March 3 6 hours ago, peter said: Good so you have obviously done it to make the claim they're fake so explain on what points those particular pictures failed This device makes use of a stabilized condition, combined with isomorphic silicon overlays calling forth pixels in color within the one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter Posted March 3 Share Posted March 3 (edited) 4 hours ago, alexa said: This device makes use of a stabilized condition, combined with isomorphic silicon overlays calling forth pixels in color within the one. I don't care what it makes use of and I don't care how it works, why are the pictures fake? , you seem to have difficulty understanding a simple question as this is the fourth time it has been asked. Edited March 3 by peter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexa Posted March 3 Share Posted March 3 35 minutes ago, peter said: I don't care what it makes use of and I don't care how it works, why are the pictures fake? , you seem to have difficulty understanding a simple question as this is the fourth time it has been asked. This device makes use of a stabilized condition, combined with isomorphic silicon overlays calling forth pixels in color within the one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaleP Posted March 3 Share Posted March 3 18 hours ago, peter said: So where is the moon that looks like a saucer as you insinuated in your post ,or a picture of the moon that is lit on the top half,and no that is not what you said above There is no photo because someone like you would say it's fake so I told you to go and look outside for yourself then you can't blame me for creating the moon in the sky. duh! It is in saucer shape in the Sourthern Hemisphere I presume because in the Norther Hemisphere it was showing the opposite. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.jpg.8081a54a3b74a5d1823dfac966666137.jpg)
.jpg.594f0ef23288ec5ab04539b2f8a8dbd4.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.