Bombadil Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 23 minutes ago, RobinJ said: Well for a start I live off grid, I'm actively trying to wake people up in my local (foreign) community and beyond. I share, with all my new spiritually awake friends, our experiences so we can help people recover from the matrix programming and learn to understand our true worth and power. I'm not sitting on a computer every day whining whilst hoping it will miraculously resolve itself like most. I dont even have internet that often. You are mistaken, I'm not trying to tell people what to think, simply pointing the way to a better understanding of self whilst living the path and purpose I've been shown is mine. I'm not waiting or looking for a hero and I keep on trying to help, regardless of how much most still.like to use derision as a weapon. Unfortunately most people dont want real truth. They want to argue over a version they find palatable. One that fits their current world view. The vast majority are simply stuck in anger and fear and dont even know it or how to get out of it. New age stuff or that woman you mentioned have nothing to do with my own journey, though Ive met plenty of those, and they are just as bad as the angry types. They all live on hopium. We are walking in two worlds right now, a collapsing one and one to come and it wont be an easy road. 23 minutes ago, RobinJ said: Well for a start I live off grid, I'm actively trying to wake people up in my local (foreign) community and beyond. I share, with all my new spiritually awake friends, our experiences so we can help people recover from the matrix programming and learn to understand our true worth and power. I'm not sitting on a computer every day whining whilst hoping it will miraculously resolve itself like most. I dont even have internet that often. You are mistaken, I'm not trying to tell people what to think, simply pointing the way to a better understanding of self whilst living the path and purpose I've been shown is mine. I'm not waiting or looking for a hero and I keep on trying to help, regardless of how much most still.like to use derision as a weapon. Unfortunately most people dont want real truth. They want to argue over a version they find palatable. One that fits their current world view. The vast majority are simply stuck in anger and fear and dont even know it or how to get out of it. New age stuff or that woman you mentioned have nothing to do with my own journey, though Ive met plenty of those, and they are just as bad as the angry types. They all live on hopium. We are walking in two worlds right now, a collapsing one and one to come and it wont be an easy road. Fair enough. It seemed you were digging at me personally. My mistake. I also live off grid and try to live and enable others to live a better way. I don’t spend a lot of time on my computer either. Though sometimes it feels that way. Living off grid yourself, you know full well how time consuming it can be. It is pleasurable time consumption though Imo. I apologise for being such a pissy old git. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
webtrekker Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 (edited) 14 hours ago, alexa said: Seriously though -The Black Sun resides underground emitting the rays we see from the Aurora Borealis, the earth is like a dart board with the bulls eye representing the North. I can't understand why you cannot see all this & how logically correct all this is. Sorry to say but you've been well & truly indoctrinated by science & it's jargon math's system, but not to worry most people have. Here's proof that the so-called 'Black Sun' would have to be halfway out of the Hole for its rays to be able to intersect the lines from Polaris to the Equator of Flat Earth in the manner described in the video... 1. As depicted in the video. 2. When the Sun and Moon are on the horizon. You can clearly see that your 'Black Sun' has to move up and down according to the positions of the Sun and Moon in the sky, and that the edge of the Hole determines the maximum angle the 'Black Sun's' rays can subtend. It's not me who doesn't understand this, Alexa. Edited February 4 by webtrekker 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexa Posted February 4 Share Posted February 4 (edited) 4 hours ago, webtrekker said: Here's proof that the so-called 'Black Sun' would have to be halfway out of the Hole for its rays to be able to intersect the lines from Polaris to the Equator of Flat Earth in the manner described in the video... 1. As depicted in the video. 2. When the Sun and Moon are on the horizon. You can clearly see that your 'Black Sun' has to move up and down according to the positions of the Sun and Moon in the sky, and that the edge of the Hole determines the maximum angle the 'Black Sun's' rays can subtend. It's not me who doesn't understand this, Alexa. I'm sorry web, you maybe right, I'll have to do more research into this. https://youtu.be/dgghvbkLDKo Edited February 4 by alexa 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexa Posted February 7 Share Posted February 7 (edited) It's strange that you can't get hold of this book anymore, it is only on PDF & then it wont let you copy & paste. https://ia801701.us.archive.org/28/items/galileo-was-wrongthe-church-was-right/GalileoWasWrongtheChurchWasRight.pdf Edited February 7 by alexa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter Posted February 7 Share Posted February 7 (edited) here is a random page out of the book. don't you see something wrong with your above statement,you say it won't let you copy and past which you obviously have done and so did I xiii Notice Concerning Terminology and Physics This book is written for both layman and scientist. The main text of the book seeks to explain the scientific information in a simple and entertaining way. The footnotes contain the technical information and sources for the scientist and scholar. We employ the term “geocentrism” to represent the scientific position that the Earth is motionless in space at the center of the universe with neither diurnal rotation nor translational movement. We have adopted the term “heliocentrism” to represent the views of Copernicus, Galileo, Kepler, Newton, even though there are various differences among them, including the acentrism of Einstein. Others employ “geocentricity” or “geostatism” to represent the motionless Earth, and employ “geokineticism” or “antigeostatism” to represent a moving Earth. The term “geocentrism” will stand for any scientific theory that holds the Earth is the center of the universe and/or motionless in space. The term “heliocentrism” will stand for any scientific theory that holds that the Earth is not in the center, or that the sun is the center, or that there is no center of the universe, and that the Earth is in constant motion. In addition to the above, we have adopted the spelling “ether” rather than “aether,” since most scientific texts have employed the former. We have adopted to capitalize titles such as Special Relativity, General Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, the Big Bang, String Theory, etc., in order to emphasize that a particular but controversial theory is being discussed. The word “Earth” has been consistently capitalized in distinction to “sun,” “moon,” “stars” or “universe” which have been left in the lower case. The cosmic microwave background radiation is abbreviated with the acronym “CMB.” So as to limit the confusion often inherent in the words rotation and revolution, these volumes use word “rotation” to refer to the turning of an object upon its own axis, including the turn of the entire universe around the north-south axis of the Earth; whereas “revolution” refers to the angular movement of one object around another wherein both are separated by space, as in saying “Mercury revolves around the sun.” We make use of Newtonian, Machian, Lorentzian, Einsteinian, Quantum, LCDM (Big Bang) and other mathematical systems of physics but do not endorse any of them as having the correct physical representation of reality. We use these models to demonstrate that the geocentric universe can be substantiated by one or more of these models, but that none of them can provide the correct physical model of the universe. At times we will demonstrate how their limited view of reality has been used to obscure geocentric cosmology from the public, and at other times show how the logical conclusions of their own systems supports geocentric cosmology Edited February 7 by peter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexa Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 6 hours ago, peter said: here is a random page out of the book. don't you see something wrong with your above statement,you say it won't let you copy and past which you obviously have done and so did I Well I'm sorry but it it wouldn't let me copy and paste. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bombadil Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 10 hours ago, peter said: here is a random page out of the book. don't you see something wrong with your above statement,you say it won't let you copy and past which you obviously have done and so did I xiii Notice Concerning Terminology and Physics This book is written for both layman and scientist. The main text of the book seeks to explain the scientific information in a simple and entertaining way. The footnotes contain the technical information and sources for the scientist and scholar. We employ the term “geocentrism” to represent the scientific position that the Earth is motionless in space at the center of the universe with neither diurnal rotation nor translational movement. We have adopted the term “heliocentrism” to represent the views of Copernicus, Galileo, Kepler, Newton, even though there are various differences among them, including the acentrism of Einstein. Others employ “geocentricity” or “geostatism” to represent the motionless Earth, and employ “geokineticism” or “antigeostatism” to represent a moving Earth. The term “geocentrism” will stand for any scientific theory that holds the Earth is the center of the universe and/or motionless in space. The term “heliocentrism” will stand for any scientific theory that holds that the Earth is not in the center, or that the sun is the center, or that there is no center of the universe, and that the Earth is in constant motion. In addition to the above, we have adopted the spelling “ether” rather than “aether,” since most scientific texts have employed the former. We have adopted to capitalize titles such as Special Relativity, General Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, the Big Bang, String Theory, etc., in order to emphasize that a particular but controversial theory is being discussed. The word “Earth” has been consistently capitalized in distinction to “sun,” “moon,” “stars” or “universe” which have been left in the lower case. The cosmic microwave background radiation is abbreviated with the acronym “CMB.” So as to limit the confusion often inherent in the words rotation and revolution, these volumes use word “rotation” to refer to the turning of an object upon its own axis, including the turn of the entire universe around the north-south axis of the Earth; whereas “revolution” refers to the angular movement of one object around another wherein both are separated by space, as in saying “Mercury revolves around the sun.” We make use of Newtonian, Machian, Lorentzian, Einsteinian, Quantum, LCDM (Big Bang) and other mathematical systems of physics but do not endorse any of them as having the correct physical representation of reality. We use these models to demonstrate that the geocentric universe can be substantiated by one or more of these models, but that none of them can provide the correct physical model of the universe. At times we will demonstrate how their limited view of reality has been used to obscure geocentric cosmology from the public, and at other times show how the logical conclusions of their own systems supports geocentric cosmology MOD NOTE: SO WOULD IT NOT HAVE BEEN BETTER TO POLITELY TELL ALEXA YOU MANAGED TO COPY AND PASTE. DISCUSS THE CONTENT OF THE BOOK NOT THE ABILITY OF SOMEONE TO COPY AND PASTE PLEASE. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaleP Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 On 1/4/2023 at 2:26 PM, TheConsultant said: Magnetism is essentially what we call gravity, an acceleration towards a null. So its around you everyday, watch some Ken Wheeler for examples and far better explanations on how magnetism/dielectricity/gravity and electricity are one and the same thing in different expressions. As for the child experiment with the frisbee, rope etc. How is recreating something cheaply any different to FE using a torch to be analogous to the sun? It is merely imparting force or effect on to something in order to demonstrate something interacting We call an electron a particle when its actually a singular unit of induction, but that unit (or particle) orbits larger mass bodies at the micro scale, the small mimics the large, the large mimics the small. The same is true at the tiny level as it is at the galactic level, galactic jets are spewing extremely high energy light out at the poles, that light is called hydrogen, it becomes what we call matter at high enough frequency of oscillation. All elements are compounds of hydrogen, all hydrogen is extremely high energy light. There is a company which takes you on a 6-hour 'space' journey, about 40km above the Earth and the guy who runs the business has said that the entire space isn't anti-gravity environment. Likes of space station needs to have a high speed and keep on spinning so that it doesn't get pulled towards the Earth which you have stated 'magnetism'. If you were to hold one leg out there and use the other leg as an axis while you are off ice, it is very hard. Example (time stamped) https://youtu.be/ZFDgf4gxmjE?t=497 But if you do this on ice while you are spinning, the G-force pulls your leg and as if someone is holding your leg that you become stable and can easily sit down and come up like the above. Obviously the speed is not fast enough in relation to your body weight so you don't fly off and anchored to the ice but you get the gist of it. This is why I think gravity is something you create. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexa Posted February 9 Share Posted February 9 (edited) This is the only copy of the book I could find up for sale and the cost is $219. US $215.00 Part of a 3 volume series on geocentrism. This has quotes from popes and church fathers along with prominent scientists to give support to geocentrism. The table of contents has chapters 11 through 16, other chapters are in volumes 1 and 3. Edited February 9 by alexa 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexa Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 Mysterious blue spiral appears in the sky over Hawaii, baffling skygazers - but there's a simple explanation It may have an eerie, UFO-like appearance but this mysterious blue spiral in the sky has a far more mundane explanation. The spectacular sight - which baffled skygazers over Hawaii - is actually part of the aftermath of a SpaceX rocket launch. It was caught on camera by the Subaru Telescope, located at the summit of Maunakea, shortly after billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk 's SpaceX launched a GPS satellite into space for the U.S. Space Force last Wednesday. IMO the rocket hit the Dome, like the one in Norway a few years back but then they were nuking it from Greenland. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-11691673/Mysterious-blue-spiral-appears-sky-Hawaii.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaleP Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 On 2/9/2023 at 6:05 AM, alexa said: This is the only copy of the book I could find up for sale and the cost is $219. US $215.00 Part of a 3 volume series on geocentrism. This has quotes from popes and church fathers along with prominent scientists to give support to geocentrism. The table of contents has chapters 11 through 16, other chapters are in volumes 1 and 3. Search pdfcoffee dot com 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaleP Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 7 hours ago, alexa said: Mysterious blue spiral appears in the sky over Hawaii, baffling skygazers - but there's a simple explanation It may have an eerie, UFO-like appearance but this mysterious blue spiral in the sky has a far more mundane explanation. The spectacular sight - which baffled skygazers over Hawaii - is actually part of the aftermath of a SpaceX rocket launch. It was caught on camera by the Subaru Telescope, located at the summit of Maunakea, shortly after billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk 's SpaceX launched a GPS satellite into space for the U.S. Space Force last Wednesday. IMO the rocket hit the Dome, like the one in Norway a few years back but then they were nuking it from Greenland. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-11691673/Mysterious-blue-spiral-appears-sky-Hawaii.html Oh NO we are baffled again!!! Could this be the return of Jesus? Will he open the firmament to release all the water???! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Origin Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 Yes, I am also totally baffled. Here is a wrecked part of Mount Meru that was captured. Sometimes parts come loose. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexa Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 25 minutes ago, DaleP said: Search pdfcoffee dot com Thanks Dale, but I wanted to buy the book Volume 1 and I can't buy it anywhere. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexa Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 28 minutes ago, DaleP said: Oh NO we are baffled again!!! Could this be the return of Jesus? Will he open the firmament to release all the water???! Your not going to let me forget this now, are you ? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexa Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 Another bit from the book ' Was Galileo wrong' They managed to hide this letter for well over 200 years but fortunatly Galileo's retraction managed to escape censorship and find it's way among the rest of his letters in the twenty- volume compendium 'Le Opere di Galileo Galilei, which was published in 1909 with a reprint in 1968. Not much has changed has it ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaleP Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 14 hours ago, alexa said: Remember this clip from the Simpsons ? I have never seen this and I think the Simpsons tells us that the Earth IS Flat. The creator of Simpsons knows based on various episodes and real life events. You can forget about the Galieo's book now. lol 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaleP Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 10 hours ago, alexa said: Another bit from the book ' Was Galileo wrong' They managed to hide this letter for well over 200 years but fortunatly Galileo's retraction managed to escape censorship and find it's way among the rest of his letters in the twenty- volume compendium 'Le Opere di Galileo Galilei, which was published in 1909 with a reprint in 1968. Not much has changed has it ? So do we know why they want to hide the truth about the Earth being flat? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexa Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 9 minutes ago, DaleP said: So do we know why they want to hide the truth about the Earth being flat? One of their main reasons is to hide God & they have succeeded thanks to Copernicus, but this isn't enough for them, as they are now wanting to alter scriptures, as you know yourself in the God gender thread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexa Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 28 minutes ago, DaleP said: I have never seen this and I think the Simpsons tells us that the Earth IS Flat. The creator of Simpsons knows based on various episodes and real life events. You can forget about the Galieo's book now. lol Spot on Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaleP Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 26 minutes ago, alexa said: One of their main reasons is to hide God & they have succeeded thanks to Copernicus, but this isn't enough for them, as they are now wanting to alter scriptures, as you know yourself in the God gender thread. No, I don't know God gender thread..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexa Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 2 minutes ago, DaleP said: No, I don't know God gender thread..... Sorry I couldn't remember the title of the thread -Thread 'I do not believe there is a God but hasn't every image of him been portrayed as a man? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaleP Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 This is a comment from someone who has been observing.... He said....Normally Orion can only be seen during the winter months in the Norther hemisphere but he could see it during the summer months in 2016 so he knew that the Earth axis has moved and climate change would follow...... not necessarily like the Earth is becoming hot but simply changes occurring and as a result he observed decline of certain insects and plants due to the shift. I guess we'll have to wait till summer months to check this with our own eyes. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexa Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 (edited) Austin Majors dead at 27, his favorite Artist was Ben Sack. https://153news.net/watch_video.php?v=R1KMXU8HODUR https://www.google.com/search?q=ben+sack+artist&client=opera&hs=JzE&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiTyr_6xJT9AhUHR8AKHW3ZBusQ_AUoAXoECAEQAw&biw=1067&bih=506&dpr=1.5 My favorite has to be this one Edited February 14 by alexa 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bombadil Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 7 hours ago, DaleP said: This is a comment from someone who has been observing.... He said....Normally Orion can only be seen during the winter months in the Norther hemisphere but he could see it during the summer months in 2016 so he knew that the Earth axis has moved and climate change would follow...... not necessarily like the Earth is becoming hot but simply changes occurring and as a result he observed decline of certain insects and plants due to the shift. I guess we'll have to wait till summer months to check this with our own eyes. I could have sworn I’ve seen Orion in the Summertime. I need to check this out. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.jpg.9e99ff3727a52b51047711c51028c847.jpg)
.jpg.e0850aef2895b3e8c638a24da2b8f92e.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.