The Flat Earth/Globe Earth Discussion Thread

[Bombadil]

If no one is ever going to acknowledge anything from the other side of the fence, or consider even the remotest possibility that they might be wrong about something, I don't see the point in arguing Flat Earth. You are basically preaching to an already converted choir regardless of what you believe. Imo as a member.

[TheConsultant]

1 hour ago, alexa said:

 

I'll never except that we live on a spinning ball hurtling through space, cus we don't.

What if its possible to be on a spinning ball whilst the God angle also still holds true? Would you be more open to accept that?

[alexa]

9 minutes ago, TheConsultant said:

What if its possible to be on a spinning ball whilst the God angle also still holds true? Would you be more open to accept that?

 

Unfortunately no, that would be like living a lie which sadly so many are doing at the mo.

[screamingeagle]

25 minutes ago, alexa said:

 

Unfortunately no, that would be like living a lie which sadly so many are doing at the mo.

but you are living a lie .....

[alexa]

14 minutes ago, screamingeagle said:

but you are living a lie .....

 

I don't reckon I am & there's many who surprisingly would agree with me.

[screamingeagle]

Just now, alexa said:

 

I don't reckon I am & there's many who surprisingly would agree with me.

same goes for me,you know that

[peter]

1 hour ago, alexa said:

 

Unfortunately no, that would be like living a lie which sadly so many are doing at the mo.

this would indicate your the one actually living the lie and sadly so are many others

https://flatearthdeception.com/biblical-proofs-of-the-globe-earth/

[The All Eye]

Anyone know the name of the turtle that is holding up the flat earth in space? 

[webtrekker]

1 hour ago, The All Eye said:

Anyone know the name of the turtle that is holding up the flat earth in space? 

 

Ask Alexa!

 

 

 

[peter]

5 hours ago, The All Eye said:

Anyone know the name of the turtle that is holding up the flat earth in space? 

There was four wasn't there ,I think one was called Leonardo and they weren't very old

 

[alexa]

7 hours ago, The All Eye said:

Anyone know the name of the turtle that is holding up the flat earth in space? 

 

6 hours ago, webtrekker said:

 

Ask Alexa!

 

 

 

 

Well at a guess I would say it's either Leonardo Ninja, Donatello Ninja, Raphael Ninja or Michelangelo Ninja, the fab four, no I've got it, it's Rumpelturtleskin 

[hardtruthspitta]

any fellow truth dawgs out here in the middle of this trollfest?

 

I'll ask again if I can be directed to the post where they measured the actual curvature?

[zArk]

13 hours ago, TheConsultant said:

What if its possible to be on a spinning ball whilst the God angle also still holds true? Would you be more open to accept that?

 

measure it.

 

helios have had hundreds of years and now have modern scientific instruments.

 

devise an experiment and try to measure any motion of the earth

 

 

[zArk]

 

14 hours ago, Origin said:

You don't have to. Try to understand what you see there. 

 

 

both are pictures.

 

first is an interpretation of EM waves into pictorial form with a generous dose of creativity

 

second is a cgi from the creative mind of a space believer

[The All Eye]

23 minutes ago, hardtruthspitta said:

any fellow truth dawgs out here in the middle of this trollfest?

 

I'll ask again if I can be directed to the post where they measured the actual curvature?

Here’s the thing I’ve noticed with flat earthers, no matter how much scientific evidence you show them for a round(ish) earth they never believe it.  It’s always the system is rigged, or science is wrong because they are covering for round earth or “insert excuse here”. Same thing with pictures of earth from space…it’s all a NASA  conspiracy.  
I’ll say this again.  The whole FE is a CIA psyop.  This is well known.  Many whistleblowers have come out.  FE makes the whole conspiracy community look crazy and discredits actual conspiracies, and the evidence for RE is so easy to find.  

[zArk]

16 hours ago, legion said:

 

It completely ignores the most fundamental point that goes with the Pole Star and the Southern Cross.

Difference in Rotations.
Clockwise / Anti-Clockwise.
 

When you have a rock solid explanation for this, .
 

 

the explanation , as with most, it quite simple. Only helio dominated teachings hold us back from working it out i.e being taught the moon moves west to east , a gross lie that damages our rational and personal judgment.

 

so.....

 

the distance to the stars is only a few thousand miles, not billions of light years

 

the stars rotate around polaris above us (dome arc unknown) 

our position on earth observing the stars determins which stars we can see and their movement

 

 

under polaris ,90 degrees , views the rotation around it

 

away from polaris views one direction 

 

direction of star rotation around polaris is always east to west, same as sun, same as moon 

 

 

 

Edited December 11, 2022 by zArk

[zArk]

20 minutes ago, The All Eye said:

The whole FE is a CIA psyop.  This is well known.  Many whistleblowers have come out.  

millions of amateur scientists can perform Sir Airy experiment. 

An earth spin has not been measured. it is theorectical

 

noone has measured an earth curve

 

heliocentrism is a failure. 

 

23 minutes ago, The All Eye said:

Here’s the thing I’ve noticed with flat earthers, no matter how much scientific evidence you show them for a round(ish) earth they never believe it.

wheres the measurements?

 

chalkboard calculations amd drawings are not proof.

 

i want hard facts. 

 

 

[alexa]

14 minutes ago, The All Eye said:

Here’s the thing I’ve noticed with flat earthers, no matter how much scientific evidence you show them for a round(ish) earth they never believe it.  It’s always the system is rigged, or science is wrong because they are covering for round earth or “insert excuse here”. Same thing with pictures of earth from space…it’s all a NASA  conspiracy.  
I’ll say this again.  The whole FE is a CIA psyop.  This is well known.  Many whistleblowers have come out.  FE makes the whole conspiracy community look crazy and discredits actual conspiracies, and the evidence for RE is so easy to find.  

 

Can't you see it ? This is exactly what the PTB want you to imagine, this is one of the reasons why the establishment ridicules us flat earthers. The more they ridicule us the more people will carry on believing the lie. The establishment are out to discredit us any which way they can. But this is what makes me know that us f/ers are on the right path.

 

 

And neither do the flat earthers as we know what the flat earth society is all about.

[legion]

45 minutes ago, zArk said:

 

the explanation , as with most, it quite simple. Only helio dominated teachings hold us back from working it out i.e being taught the moon moves west to east , a gross lie that damages our rational and personal judgment.

 

so.....

 

the distance to the stars is only a few thousand miles, not billions of light years

 

the stars rotate around polaris above us (dome arc unknown) 

our position on earth observing the stars determins which stars we can see and their movement

 

 

under polaris ,90 degrees , views the rotation around it

 

away from polaris views one direction 

 

direction of star rotation around polaris is always east to west, same as sun, same as moon 

 

 

 

 

Absolute gobbledegook nonsense. 

 

Very conveniently ignoring the Southern Cross. 

 

People in South America - South Africa and Australia - all looking away from the North Pole (North Pole behind them) all see the Southern Cross and all see the WHOLE sky rotate around it. 

But according to the FE model - all looking in completely different directions. 

(and see the opposite spin direction than that seen by people looking at the Pole Star - no 'East / West' but clockwise and anticlockwise ) 

 

Totally impossible on a flat plane.. 

[Bombadil]

2 hours ago, hardtruthspitta said:

any fellow truth dawgs out here in the middle of this trollfest?

 

I'll ask again if I can be directed to the post where they measured the actual curvature?

Of the globe or of the disk edge?

[The All Eye]

If earth was flat wouldn’t I be able to see the sun all the time?

if earth is flat how come the different hemispheres see a different part of the night sky?

 

”Flat Earthers, insert unscientific excuses here”

[bamboozooka]

8 minutes ago, The All Eye said:

If earth was flat wouldn’t I be able to see the sun all the time?

have you ever heard of perspective and vanishing point.

you must have done it at school

 

[zArk]

1 hour ago, legion said:

 

Absolute gobbledegook nonsense. 

 

Very conveniently ignoring the Southern Cross. 

 

People in South America - South Africa and Australia - all looking away from the North Pole (North Pole behind them) all see the Southern Cross and all see the WHOLE sky rotate around it. 

But according to the FE model - all looking in completely different directions. 

(and see the opposite spin direction than that seen by people looking at the Pole Star - no 'East / West' but clockwise and anticlockwise ) 

 

Totally impossible on a flat plane.. 

 

the southern cross is not simulataneously viewable from everywhere in the south areas

 

polaris is viewable from everywhere in the north areas

 

explain that!

 

 

[zArk]

1 hour ago, The All Eye said:

If earth was flat wouldn’t I be able to see the sun all the time?

if earth is flat how come the different hemispheres see a different part of the night sky?

 

”Flat Earthers, insert unscientific excuses here”

no, its distance, perspective and vanishing point.

 

there is no sphere, there is no hemisphere

 

get your goggles out and explain why stars appear to move away from each other at the equator. It looks like a mangle. summit to do with perspective , viewing angle etc possibly?

 

 

 

 

this guy has an explanation. very intriguing how he integrates the dome as a reflective surface

 

 

Edited December 11, 2022 by zArk

[zArk]

orbiting at 67,000 mph, chasing the sun at 500,000mph, inside the milky way moving at 670,000 mph

 

and you think that the stars above us will remain the same, night after night, month after month, year after year

 

Honestly, that requires some serious mental gymnastics.

 

of course thats not even including those stars claimed movements.

Edited December 11, 2022 by zArk