The Flat Earth/Globe Earth Discussion Thread

[peter]

4 hours ago, zArk said:

jesus wept, big tears

 

this was done pages back. i attended to your needs with a few speculative figures and you just left that conversation dead. from what i remember i stated the dome/firmament would prevent getting high enough to see the entire earth. This is why NASA has to stitch photo strips together and CGI a globe to dazzle the believers.

 

You (jeeze, as if it was you that did it) have a theorectical diameter with calculated decimal places.

 

WE? why is it that heliocentrists when discussing the earth and space refer to all the work of past scientists as 'we'. Its like the football fan, sat home but claiming "we won the cup"

you did nowt. you just cut and paste other peoples theorectical calculations and postulations

 

i think it would be better that YOU reference your statements. I do.. I state Airy or Sagnac or FE CORE

if youre gonna say "we" ... tell us who actually calculated it.

 

  tell us who actually calculated it.

 

No worries ,right after you give me the FE working hypothesis ( one that makes sense )

[Origin]

On 12/6/2022 at 8:19 AM, alexa said:

.

 

 

 

This model does not match the reality of Experiencer. 

[Certified Green of Heart]

I have no opinion on this (whilst my mind is entertained, who cares about facts, lol), just spotted this on YT, and thought of that floating boat image on page 413... (real or not)

 

 

Edited December 9, 2022 by Certified Green of Heart

[peter]

On 12/4/2022 at 6:34 PM, zArk said:

calculations based upon assumptions

you asked your it ,you got it and you don't believe it ,how unusual

 

[zArk]

hits mac 1 around 17,000 ft.. crunch

mac 2 at 60,000ft.....ouch

 

concord cruised at 60,000ft

jumbo jets around 35,000ft

 

 

 

 

 

Edited December 9, 2022 by zArk

[peter]

1 hour ago, zArk said:

hits mac 1 around 17,000 ft.. crunch

mac 2 at 60,000ft.....ouch

 

concord cruised at 60,000ft

jumbo jets around 35,000ft

 

 

 

 

 

Is DITRH the best you can come up with,from what I've seen this idiot couldn't explain how to skip rope

 

and now for your amusement and viewing pleasure

 

 

 

[legion]

@peter

This is a response to a post that I read and watched while not signed in earlier today.
I can't find it now...and don't comprehend why.

But I'll respond still and include a link to the video you posted.

I notice that you rarely post videos and prefer to debate with words.
So I couldn't help but be a little curious. 

I  gave up wasting time watching videos on this subject a long time ago.
I thought l'd have a quick peep, but ended up watching the whole hour.

This is a superb video, thanks.

IMO...anyone new looking into this subject can save wasting days reading these 416 pages of repetitive, circular 'debates' by watching this exquisite video.
It totally sums up this whole thread and whole subject.
 

This is valid and should remain on this thread if this subject is to remain on this forum.
I hope this stays here.
 

The fact that Professor Dave who clearly debunks FE is also outspoken against anti-vaxxers does not faze me in the slightest.
No-one has a complete grasp on everything in life. In fact I'd love to see Professor Dave debate vaxxines with Dr Mike Yeadon.
I wonder if this could be arranged..
 

Anyway. Here's the video in question.
 

 

[alexa]

55 minutes ago, legion said:

The fact that Professor Dave who clearly debunks FE is also outspoken against anti-vaxxers does not faze me in the slightest.

 

Well it should...

[legion]

Just now, alexa said:

 

Well it should...

Explain to me why ?

[alexa]

1 minute ago, legion said:

Explain to me why ?

 

For anyone to talk against anti-vaxxers must work for the establishment, therefore I'd be inclined to take him with a pinch of salt.

[legion]

6 minutes ago, alexa said:

For anyone to talk against anti-vaxxers must work for the establishment

No. Some people are just very naive and mistaken.

His explanation about the shape of this place is spot on.

 

[legion]

@alexa
  
Take Jordan Peterson for example.
He has something extremely valid to say about 'Wokism / LGBT pronoun laws and feminism / getting your personal shit together.
He's helped a lot of people get their heads together and deal with a lot of modern madness.
But...
But he calls out Christians and Muslims but not the chosen few.
And hangs out with some very dodgy characters.

So......he's totally correct on some stuff and totally wrong on other stuff.
See how it works ?


No-one can be relied on for all aspects of what we want to call 'Truth'. 
Regardless of whether they do it intentionally or accidentally.


 

 

[alexa]

26 minutes ago, legion said:

His explanation about the shape of this place is spot on.

 

IMO it is Flat Earth Dave who is spot on & professor Dave is highly indoctrinated without any signs of hope. 

[legion]

6 minutes ago, alexa said:

 

IMO it is Flat Earth Dave who is spot on & professor Dave is highly indoctrinated without any signs of hope. 

I wouldn't expect anything different from you.
Your inability to comprehend any valid information presented to you is legendary  :O)
 

[legion]

@alexa 
Do you live in the Northern or Southern hemisphere ?
Have you ever travelled / visited the other ?
Have you direct experience of the different skies observable ?

[alexa]

5 minutes ago, legion said:

@alexa 
Do you live in the Northern or Southern hemisphere ?
Have you ever travelled / visited the other ?
Have you direct experience of the different skies observable ?

 

I've been to Jamaica, does this count ?

 

10 minutes ago, legion said:

I wouldn't expect anything different from you.
Your inability to comprehend any valid information presented to you is legendary  :O)
 

 

Cheeky 

[legion]

1 minute ago, alexa said:

I've been to Jamaica, does this count ?

From where to there..?

[alexa]

5 minutes ago, legion said:

From where to there..?

 

The UK

[legion]

3 minutes ago, alexa said:

 

The UK

Then the answer to my question is no...
You would observe the Pole Star from the UK and Jamaica.
You need to go further and in a different direction to observe the Southern Cross and experience the clockwise / anticlockwise action.

l have seen and experienced this myself.
Lived mainly in Europe- spent time in Australia / NZ / Fiji....
It's real.....and not explainable in any FE 'model'.
 

[alexa]

13 minutes ago, legion said:

Then the answer to my question is no...
You would observe the Pole Star from the UK and Jamaica.
You need to go further and in a different direction to observe the Southern Cross and experience the clockwise / anticlockwise action.

l have seen and experienced this myself.
Lived mainly in Europe- spent time in Australia / NZ / Fiji....
It's real.....and not explainable in any FE 'model'.
 

 

I'm sure there is a valid explanation for this.

[legion]

4 minutes ago, alexa said:

 

I'm sure there is a valid explanation for this.

I've yet to see one.
I've been looking hard....and long.
 

[screamingeagle]

2 hours ago, alexa said:

 

I'm sure there is a valid explanation for this.

there's valid explantion for everything,the problem is when people start to look the evidence to support theirs preconcived claims....

[screamingeagle]

2 hours ago, legion said:

I've yet to see one.
I've been looking hard....and long.
 

your search is not fast enough

[TheConsultant]

2 hours ago, alexa said:

 

I'm sure there is a valid explanation for this.

Coriolis effect?

[Grumpy Owl]

On 11/30/2022 at 8:34 PM, Velma said:

Antarctica, arguably the most mysterious and certainly most inaccessible place on earth which, according to the scientists who are based there, contains nothing more than penguins and ice. Nonetheless, 55 states adhere to the treaty, originally signed by 12 nations in 1959, to make it off limits. This was in the aftermath of the disastrous ‘Operation High-Jump,’ still shrouded in secrecy.

 

If the footage below, alleged to be from Captain Scott’s final and fatal 1912 expedition is genuine, it reveals the ruins of a lost civilization, including monolithic columns, statues and ziggurats, reminiscent of those found everywhere from Mesoamerica to Mesopotamia, which appear to have been reduced to rubble by a worldwide cataclysmic event, during the antediluvian period.

 

If an advanced race did exist in Antarctica in antiquity, it completely rewrites history and we have been lied to for over a century by ‘The Royal Society’ archaeologists and explorers who have ignored this ancient worldwide civilization, that created all the inexplicable megalithic structures and out-of-place artifacts which litter the earth today. It’s time to unearth the forbidden truth.

 

Antarctica is a particularly interesting topic, and while there are 'mysteries' surrounding it, I don't think it really ties in with the 'Flat Earth' stuff.

 

If the planet is a globe, then periodically in its history, the poles have shifted, the axis of rotation has 'tilted', and the continent of Antarctica has 'moved' to the equatorial regions. When the poles shift back and the Earth tilts, Antarctica finds itself where it is now, at the south pole, covered in snow and ice.

 

Whatever civilisation was living there, is buried under snow and ice now.

 

In my opinion, 'Flat Earth' completely ignores or overlooks all of this. The 'tilting' of the poles, and the resulting crustal displacement, even go some way to explaining the 'Noah event' that caused a massive flood on this planet some 6000 years ago.

 

Maybe the 'elites' are keen to get and maintain a foothold in Antarctica because they know when the next pole shift occurs, when the ice melts, its secrets will be revealed. And they'll have a new habitable land to live on. While the rest of us freeze to death.