Jump to content

The Flat Earth/Globe Earth Discussion Thread


bflat

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, zArk said:

hits mac 1 around 17,000 ft.. crunch

mac 2 at 60,000ft.....ouch

 

concord cruised at 60,000ft

jumbo jets around 35,000ft

 

 

 

 

 

Is DITRH the best you can come up with,from what I've seen this idiot couldn't explain how to skip rope

 

and now for your amusement and viewing pleasure

 

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@peter

This is a response to a post that I read and watched while not signed in earlier today.
I can't find it now...and don't comprehend why.

But I'll respond still and include a link to the video you posted.

I notice that you rarely post videos and prefer to debate with words.
So I couldn't help but be a little curious. 

I  gave up wasting time watching videos on this subject a long time ago.
I thought l'd have a quick peep, but ended up watching the whole hour.

This is a superb video, thanks.

IMO...anyone new looking into this subject can save wasting days reading these 416 pages of repetitive, circular 'debates' by watching this exquisite video.
It totally sums up this whole thread and whole subject.
 

This is valid and should remain on this thread if this subject is to remain on this forum.
I hope this stays here.
 

The fact that Professor Dave who clearly debunks FE is also outspoken against anti-vaxxers does not faze me in the slightest.
No-one has a complete grasp on everything in life. In fact I'd love to see Professor Dave debate vaxxines with Dr Mike Yeadon.
I wonder if this could be arranged..
 

Anyway. Here's the video in question.
 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@alexa
  
Take Jordan Peterson for example.
He has something extremely valid to say about 'Wokism / LGBT pronoun laws and feminism / getting your personal shit together.
He's helped a lot of people get their heads together and deal with a lot of modern madness.
But...
But he calls out Christians and Muslims but not the chosen few.
And hangs out with some very dodgy characters.

So......he's totally correct on some stuff and totally wrong on other stuff.
See how it works ?


No-one can be relied on for all aspects of what we want to call 'Truth'. 
Regardless of whether they do it intentionally or accidentally.


 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, alexa said:

 

IMO it is Flat Earth Dave who is spot on & professor Dave is highly indoctrinated without any signs of hope. 


I wouldn't expect anything different from you.
Your inability to comprehend any valid information presented to you is legendary  :O)
 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, legion said:

@alexa 
Do you live in the Northern or Southern hemisphere ?
Have you ever travelled / visited the other ?
Have you direct experience of the different skies observable ?

 

I've been to Jamaica, does this count ?

 

10 minutes ago, legion said:


I wouldn't expect anything different from you.
Your inability to comprehend any valid information presented to you is legendary  :O)
 

 

Cheeky 🤪

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, alexa said:

 

The UK


Then the answer to my question is no...
You would observe the Pole Star from the UK and Jamaica.
You need to go further and in a different direction to observe the Southern Cross and experience the clockwise / anticlockwise action.

l have seen and experienced this myself.
Lived mainly in Europe- spent time in Australia / NZ / Fiji....
It's real.....and not explainable in any FE 'model'.
 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, legion said:


Then the answer to my question is no...
You would observe the Pole Star from the UK and Jamaica.
You need to go further and in a different direction to observe the Southern Cross and experience the clockwise / anticlockwise action.

l have seen and experienced this myself.
Lived mainly in Europe- spent time in Australia / NZ / Fiji....
It's real.....and not explainable in any FE 'model'.
 

 

I'm sure there is a valid explanation for this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/30/2022 at 8:34 PM, Velma said:

Antarctica, arguably the most mysterious and certainly most inaccessible place on earth which, according to the scientists who are based there, contains nothing more than penguins and ice. Nonetheless, 55 states adhere to the treaty, originally signed by 12 nations in 1959, to make it off limits. This was in the aftermath of the disastrous ‘Operation High-Jump,’ still shrouded in secrecy.

 

If the footage below, alleged to be from Captain Scott’s final and fatal 1912 expedition is genuine, it reveals the ruins of a lost civilization, including monolithic columns, statues and ziggurats, reminiscent of those found everywhere from Mesoamerica to Mesopotamia, which appear to have been reduced to rubble by a worldwide cataclysmic event, during the antediluvian period.

 

If an advanced race did exist in Antarctica in antiquity, it completely rewrites history and we have been lied to for over a century by ‘The Royal Society’ archaeologists and explorers who have ignored this ancient worldwide civilization, that created all the inexplicable megalithic structures and out-of-place artifacts which litter the earth today. It’s time to unearth the forbidden truth.

 

Antarctica is a particularly interesting topic, and while there are 'mysteries' surrounding it, I don't think it really ties in with the 'Flat Earth' stuff.

 

If the planet is a globe, then periodically in its history, the poles have shifted, the axis of rotation has 'tilted', and the continent of Antarctica has 'moved' to the equatorial regions. When the poles shift back and the Earth tilts, Antarctica finds itself where it is now, at the south pole, covered in snow and ice.

 

Whatever civilisation was living there, is buried under snow and ice now.

 

In my opinion, 'Flat Earth' completely ignores or overlooks all of this. The 'tilting' of the poles, and the resulting crustal displacement, even go some way to explaining the 'Noah event' that caused a massive flood on this planet some 6000 years ago.

 

Maybe the 'elites' are keen to get and maintain a foothold in Antarctica because they know when the next pole shift occurs, when the ice melts, its secrets will be revealed. And they'll have a new habitable land to live on. While the rest of us freeze to death.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, legion said:

But I'll respond still and include a link to the video you posted.

I notice that you rarely post videos and prefer to debate with words.
So I couldn't help but be a little curious. 

I  gave up wasting time watching videos on this subject a long time ago.
I thought l'd have a quick peep, but ended up watching the whole hour.

This is a superb video, thanks.

The reason I don't post videos very often and watch them even less is I like to think about things for myself then form an opinion, if that opinion is right or wrong is another mater all together . I find that people these days are inherently lazy ,it's a lot easier to use utube videos to do their debating and with this brings some very inherent problems.  First off they form an opinion then confirmation bias sets in and they cherry pick, disregarding anything inconvenient and then the debate degenerates into ,look at this ,well what about this then or have you seen that and all the while the sad fact of the matter is their not thinking for themselves,they have just become unwitting parrots or a mouth piece for someone else that has a vested interest in how many times their particular video is played.

 

 As far as the video I posted goes I can't take credit for it as it was recommended to me quite a while back and for the life of me I can't remember who it was 

Edited by peter
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, peter said:

I find that people these days are inherently lazy ,it's a lot easier to use utube videos to do their debating and with this brings some very inherent problems. 


A hundred times - yes - especially on this topic

 

1 hour ago, peter said:

As far as the video I posted goes I can't take credit for it as it was recommended to me quite a while back and for the life of me I can't remember who it was 


Where ever it popped up from - it's valid here. 

Not just for laying waste to a few key points of the debate -but actually displaying the dynamics of the debate. (like this very thread)

Regardless of facts and truths - both sides didn't come out looking too good.
Both Daves were very rude in their own particular ways.

And FE  Dave was keen to hop over to different points to avoid the conclusion of the previous point.
Also extremely evasive and miss-using words and language to muddy the waters.

It was just like a little snippet of this thread played out by actors in a scripted scene...
It could have been titled - "The 2 Daves Play out a Dark Corner of the DI Forum"  :O)


 

Edited by legion
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...