Jump to content

The Flat Earth/Globe Earth Discussion Thread


bflat

Recommended Posts

 

4 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

 I see my ontopic posts deleted by new mod.. whilst tons of posts offtopic..

 

Im calling someone out for spreading obvious 💩 once again.

 

Well it wasn't me who got your post deleted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

speed of light

what speed? 

light speed is not a constant.

you assume too many things.

i have written a number of reasons previously why 'moon bounce' is a myth.

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, zArk said:

what speed? 

light speed is not a constant.

you assume too many things.

i have written a number of reasons previously why 'moon bounce' is a myth.

 

Youve never offered any explanation, accept your usual ignorance when it comes to the ionosphere & radio frequency, which you demonstrated you know nothing about, but refuse to actually read from those that do.. as always you know better than millions of others.

 

Speed of light is near enough a constant, depending on atmosphere. You are clutching straws as always to try & explain your 3400 mile high flake moon.

SOL can be accurately measured using a lazer pointer & Oscilloscope..again they must all be lying, as you are the expert.

 

If you were a truth seeker, you could easily determine this. But we know you are a propagator of excrement, as this thread is a testament too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, oddsnsods said:

 

Youve never offered any explanation, accept your usual ignorance when it comes to the ionosphere & radio frequency, which you demonstrated you know nothing about, but refuse to actually read from those that do.. as always you know better than millions of others.

 

Speed of light is near enough a constant, depending on atmosphere. You are clutching straws as always to try & explain your 3400 mile high flake moon.

SOL can be accurately measured using a lazer pointer & Oscilloscope..again they must all be lying, as you are the expert.

 

If you were a truth seeker, you could easily determine this. But we know you are a propagator of excrement, as this thread is a testament too.

i had 2 separate arguments

1. was within the helio model

2nd was discounting the helio model due to its failures and unproven basis, there is no space. The moon is 3400~ miles up. There is a firmament etc etc

 

so continuing////...

you assume a vacuum to the moon. i say that is folly

 

there is a thick air/liquid up in the sky

 

i present this video as evidence of a 'thick' liquid/air in the sky. Its very odd as the rocket seems to be undamaged by the sudden spin stop.  Additionally the release of the bottom section is not what we expect from a free falling heavy object. It just seems to drift. I recommend watching Felix Baumgartner drop from on high. He plummets like a stone. Alternative thought would be that the bottom section is very very light but the rockets sudden spin halt deserves attention.

 

 

n.b at 1.25min the moon is seen which has been pointed out 'should' in the helio model be on the otherside of the globe.. but we know there is no globe and we are seeing the moon from a high observer position as it ttravels over the flat earth

 

Edited by zArk
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, alexa said:

 

No such thing as planets, they are stars. 

But you don't know what so-called stars are and in which context they have to be placed. Have you forgotten that humans can see a tiny spectrum? Your creator is not based on three dimensions. And so also not your perceptible so-called world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, alexa said:

 

What we would call Wondering stars or fallen.

 

PLANEts is a deceptive sounding term, right up your street. _____________CONFIRMED.😆

 

Saturn & Jupiter are brown dwarfs, we are told. You call them stars because your sand people book of spells tells you. They are not the same as the sun, they do not radiate our planet. So you are making another stupid argument based on bible nonsense as ever.

 

I pointed out Venus having a crescent like the moon radiated by our sun.

 

 

Pelicula nosferatu movies GIF - Find on GIFER

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, oddsnsods said:

You call them stars because your sand people book of spells tells you.

 

And you call them planets because your Seance books of lies tells you they are. These stars must be so important to the elite that they have given them all names after their gods.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, alexa said:

 

And you call them planets because your Seance books of lies tells you they are. These stars must be so important to the elite that they have given them all names after their gods.

 

2 hours ago, alexa said:

 

No such thing as planets, they are stars. 

 

You are arguing Semantics, because of etymology or SPELLings.. What the actual F*** is your point here??

They are something different to what "seance"👻🤦‍♂️claims?

Spit it out FFS.🥱

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, oddsnsods said:

 

 

You are arguing Semantics, because of etymology or SPELLings.. What the actual F*** is your point here??

They are something different to what "seance"👻🤦‍♂️claims?

Spit it out FFS.🥱

 

 

 

 

Getting away from the subject in question as per.

 

You called the ancient ones the sand people & the Bible a book of spells, so I returned the truth and called your books seance/science stuff which are books of pure lies.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, alexa said:

 

What we would call Wondering stars or fallen.

 

The Greeks we are told gave them the name Planet meaning wanderer amongst those that are fixed, the other difference is that they have no light like that of the fixed stars, which means that the light we see is reflected from Sol, or our star the Sun.

If there is any Planet in the sky that speaks of the beauty of the cosmos it is Saturn, but here's a thing, the telescope was not in use until 1608, but the Greeks knew it as Chronos due to the fact of the rings being at different angles through time, how is it possible for the Greeks to know about the rings of Saturn before the invention of the telescope.

And the Earth is HOLLOW

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, peter said:

No ,what you call wandering stars or fallen, did you work that out yourself or are you just repeating someone else's crap

 

No not at all - it is a fact that the wandering stars, which are seven never rise or set in the same place as they did on the previous day, which would be rendered useless not only to a seaman but to us in general.

These are the stars which did not keep their first estate.

 

And now for a bit of light entertainment 😂✴️

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, sock muppet said:

If there is any Planet in the sky that speaks of the beauty of the cosmos it is Saturn

 

I call Saturn a wondering star, Saturn is another name for Satan/Lucifer

 

Ezekiel 16:10

About Lucifer- I clothed you in embroidered cloth and gave you sandals of fine leather. I wrapped you in fine linen and covered you with silk. adorned you with jewelry, and I put bracelets on your wrists and a chain around your neck, put a ring in your nose, earrings on your ears, and a beautiful crown upon your head.…

 

2 hours ago, sock muppet said:

The Greeks we are told gave them the name Planet meaning wanderer amongst those that are fixed

 

Yes- And I find it very sus that the elites should name these wondering stars after their false gods & why did they name their space ships after some of the star signs ?

 

2 hours ago, sock muppet said:

Greeks knew it as Chronos due to the fact of the rings being at different angles through time, how is it possible for the Greeks to know about the rings of Saturn before the invention of the telescope.

 

Maybe they were far more advanced than we first thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was Hermes Trismegistus who could read & uncovered the Egyptian hieroglyphics of the 7 secret sciences that had been carved onto stone & preserved in a vault by the Nephilim  before the deluge, it was during the reign of Nimrod in conjunction with Hermes that these 7 sciences came to be known. It is these same 7 secret sciences that are still used today via the 33 degree Masons, in their so called mystery schools.

They know the earth is flat & they are laughing at us all for believing all of NASA's, the Vatican & all these scientists lies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...