Jump to content

The Flat Earth/Globe Earth Discussion Thread


bflat

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Mr. Nice said:

 

Nope. Speaking of trying harder.....how about every single thing you type in this thread. Your denial of the ISS involves a cast of thousands, plus every person who can actually see and measure it across the sky ....every day of the year....all over the planet when its orbital path allows.

 

 

It ain't in the bible thus it's not true. 🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, DarianF said:

 

I think you're the one being deceived. 😉

It's like trying to argue with a four year old, ask them why something happens and the answer is simply because, now substitute the word because with the words god said and there you have the mentality your dealing with

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, alexa said:

 

Lol'z & still they can't go any higher than lower earth orbit.

 

Saying one of the dumbest things possible twice actually doesn't help your case. Tell me about "low Earth orbit" on a flat Earth!

 

Then tell me the source for your quote and the full interview with honest context.  I shall watch some paint drying to assist with my patience.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, peter said:

It's like trying to argue with a four year old, ask them why something happens and the answer is simply because, now substitute the word because with the words god said and there you have the mentality your dealing with

 

When even Answers in Genesis thinks you're crazy, you've got a serious fkn problem. 🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, alexa said:

 

Don't be silly, think how many men they'd need to change them.🤔

 

Of course I was being silly, but less silly than your unexplainable claim of the moon being its own light source (and less silly than your insinuation that only 'men' can change lightbulbs, I know that women are as equally capable you know)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

image_2022-03-24_195434.png.990eda69cd84982705165b09cf41a7b0.png


Did you know that NASA’s space programmes are busy proving that was has been called ‘myth’ in the Bible is true? Mr. Harold Hill, President of the Curtis engine Company in Baltimore, and a consultant in the space programmes, relates the following incident: “One of the most amazing things that God has for us today happened recently to our astronauts and space scientists at Green Belt, Maryland.

 

https://esnoticia.co/noticia-11700-nasa-found-that-everything-the-bible-says-is-true

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, alexa said:

Did you know that NASA’s space programmes are busy proving that was has been called ‘myth’ in the Bible is true? Mr. Harold Hill, President of the Curtis engine Company in Baltimore, and a consultant in the space programmes, relates the following incident: “One of the most amazing things that God has for us today happened recently to our astronauts and space scientists at Green Belt, Maryland.

 

https://esnoticia.co/noticia-11700-nasa-found-that-everything-the-bible-says-is-true

 

I genuinely don't know whether you are being serious or knowingly making a joke. All I know is that you just pointed towards dipshit.com and made a statement. It would be staggering if you thought that dipshit.com was telling you the truth. Please tell me you didn't make that claim in earnest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Grumpy Owl said:

 

Of course I was being silly, but less silly than your unexplainable claim of the moon being its own light source (and less silly than your insinuation that only 'men' can change lightbulbs, I know that women are as equally capable you know)

 

I was joking!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, alexa said:

 

 

 

How old do you claim the Earth is? Your source says that he believes man will one day land on Mars or Venus, that ice ages occur every 200 million years because the axis of the Earth changes. He explains tides are caused by cosmic effects within the Solar System.

 

He basically confirms the Earth is a spheremuttley-for-imbeciles.gif

Edited by Mr. Nice
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Mr. Nice said:

How old do you claim the Earth is? Your source says that he believes man will one day land on Mars or Venus, that ice ages occur every 200 million years because the axis of the Earth changes. He explains tides are caused by cosmic effects within the Solar System.

 

There is truth in one thing he say's (oops sorry says) that the moon is not a piece of rock & it will never be landed upon. I didn't hear him mention anything about the earth being a sphere.

 

Edited by alexa
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, alexa said:

There is truth in one thing he say's (oops sorry says) that the moon is not a piece of rock & it will never be landed upon.

 

So your scientist, plucks some theory out of his bottom and that is correct, but where he talks about his other ice age theory and his thoughts that we would one day land on Mars and Venus and he is wrong? Do you understand how much of a mad cherry picked source this is? 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, alexa said:

 

 

 

1965 - yes, before that hypothesis was proven incorrect by the Apollo missions. Did he stick by his plasma claim after 1969? I doubt it. If he changed his mind, based on the new evidence, then he was indeed a real scientist. If he stuck by his plasma hypothesis, then he was just a loon all along.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Mr. Nice said:

 

How old do you claim the Earth is? Your source says that he believes man will one day land on Mars or Venus, that ice ages occur every 200 million years because the axis of the Earth changes. He explains tides are caused by cosmic effects within the Solar System.

 

He basically confirms the Earth is a spheremuttley-for-imbeciles.gif

 

From the video description:

 

"The ABC has been unable to confirm Mr Foster’s identity beyond the entry in the production notebook from 1965: “People – Int Tasmanian Professor (FOSTER)”. We have also been unable to find any documentation of his work.

 

Wow. Sounds credible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DarianF said:

 

1965 - yes, before that hypothesis was proven incorrect by the Apollo missions. Did he stick by his plasma claim after 1969? I doubt it. If he changed his mind, based on the new evidence, then he was indeed a real scientist. If he stuck by his plasma hypothesis, then he was just a loon all along.

 

He's probably been dun away with just like Admiral Byrd was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Guest changed the title to The Flat Earth/Globe Earth Discussion Thread
  • screamingeagle locked this topic
  • screamingeagle unlocked this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...