Jump to content

The Flat Earth/Globe Earth Discussion Thread


bflat

Recommended Posts

Its my observation that if you discuss this FE subject with someone thats 100% globe rotating planet there is one thing guaranteed

 

They will never accept any evidence or proof you offer them.

Not even once

 

Repeat, They will never accept any evidence or proof you offer them.

 

 

Edited by Jikwan
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Longest line of sight photographed

 

325 MILES

 

 

This is a sensation!

I will try and post the photo

This one is much farther than the current guiness world record

 

 

HIDDEN World Record Low Altitude FLAT EARTH Puig Sallfort (Pyrénées-Orientales) - Île et Phare de Giraglia (Corsica) Observer = 2 227 feet / 979 mètres Distance = 325 miles / 523,79 km HO = 69,40 miles / 111,69 km HI = 43 680 feet / 13,31 km 8,27 miles 

Edited by Jikwan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Jikwan said:

British Physicist Julian Barbour: "It is remarkably difficult to say categorically whether the Earth moves, and if so, in what precise sense...

I just had a thought. If the earth rotates, if i get a helicopter and stay in one position for 2 hours will i end up in a different country? 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Fluke said:

I just had a thought. If the earth rotates, if i get a helicopter and stay in one position for 2 hours will i end up in a different country? 

Hey that a great idea.

Maybe no one has ever thought about this possability

Hire a helicopter as soon as possible

Ask the pilot to just hover in one position for 2hrs

If this works you could make a name for yourself

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jikwan said:

Hey that a great idea.

Maybe no one has ever thought about this possability

Hire a helicopter as soon as possible

Ask the pilot to just hover in one position for 2hrs

If this works you could make a name for yourself

I thought it was einstein level genius myself.  I sense some sarcasm in your post. I would if i owned a helicopter. 

 

If the earth rotates why would this not work? For instance if i fire a pellet in the air it usually does not fall in the same position which i fired it from. Why is that?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Fluke said:

I thought it was einstein level genius myself.  I sense some sarcasm in your post. I would if i owned a helicopter. 

 

If the earth rotates why would this not work? For instance if i fire a pellet in the air it usually does not fall in the same position which i fired it from. Why is that?

If you lined the barrel exactly vertical using some sophisticated rifle clamps it would return to same spot give or take 3 feet

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Fluke said:

I just had a thought. If the earth rotates, if i get a helicopter and stay in one position for 2 hours will i end up in a different country? 

 

well for the sphere heads thats correct as its all relative. If the planet is spinning 1400mph to travel opposite direction 1400 miles one would need to be stationary for 1 hr. The air resistance, build of the vehicle, power of vehicle would affect the stationary requirement relative to the spin.

 

So i really do not see this argument as showing a flat earth and the sphereheads will eat it up with calculations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A quote from avoiceinthecrowd.....

 

NASA has the means, the motives, and the opportunities to create all manner of false facade aimed at discrediting those revealing evidence of grand larceny on a scale never seen before. They have a vested interest in conserving the globe model. The flat earth would land them in jail if it was allowed to go mainstream. Lots of faces with cream pie.

Edited by Jikwan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Jikwan said:

Snip-it_1591906909602.jpg

Why don't you put up the explanation for that so people can see both sides of the argument without bias, I thought this thread was about new information all that is happening now is a re run of the first thread. I'm still waiting for a counter argument concerning lasers across lakes and their validity as evidence of a flat earth, I guess it won't belong before we see the obligatory bubbles rising in water for the umpteenth time.

If you are interested in an explanation on what you perceive as a large problem,  I'll give you a hint, vacuums don't suck.

Try thinking instead of repeating  for a change

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, peter said:

Why don't you put up the explanation for that so people can see both sides of the argument without bias, I thought this thread was about new information all that is happening now is a re run of the first thread. I'm still waiting for a counter argument concerning lasers across lakes and their validity as evidence of a flat earth, I guess it won't belong before we see the obligatory bubbles rising in water for the umpteenth time.

If you are interested in an explanation on what you perceive as a large problem,  I'll give you a hint, vacuums don't suck.

Try thinking instead of repeating  for a change

Its my observation that if you discuss this FE subject with someone thats 100% globe rotating planet there is one thing guaranteed

 

They will never accept any evidence or proof you offer them.

Not even once

 

Repeat, They will never accept any evidence or proof you offer them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why has the gay, fetish porn not been removed?

 

Besides the fact that it's gross and that no one wants to come on a thread and see that, this is a technique that has been used since the internet to stop discussions of uncomfortable information.

 

14 minutes ago, screamingeagle said:

space is not vaccum,far from it...

10^-17 torr?

1.33322368 × 10-15 pascals?

 

How far, really?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, screamingeagle said:

space is not vaccum,far from 

What i think it means is this

If you say that the space that we can see or imagine is in a state of vaccuum......

Then the FE position is if it is a vaccuum how is it possible for a vast amount of gasses/air can exist side by side with it? It cant....it needs a barrier

Just like if you had a sealed container having a very strong vaccuum pressure. If the container would be peirced the air would rush in.

Thats my understanding of the message

Maybe its the wrong understanding i dont care too much to spend time defending it.

 

This is my own view of it:

Show me a person that has actually gone to this "outer space" and has brought back credible test results, measurements, weights visual proof of it

No one has done that yet

Dont tell me all this NASA CGI moonlanding/spacestation trips collecting evidence is the truth

Nobody knows what space is...or if there atually is any space up there

No one and no thing has been there

Outside the dome it could be water

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Jikwan said:

Its my observation that if you discuss this FE subject with someone thats 100% globe rotating planet there is one thing guaranteed

 

They will never accept any evidence or proof you offer them.

Not even once

 

Repeat, They will never accept any evidence or proof you offer them.

sounds familiar,look in the mirror, lets have those air bubbles in water then,can't wait

Edited by peter
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...