Jump to content

The Flat Earth Thread: The reality of our physical plane (v2)


bflat
 Share

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, Avoiceinthecrowd said:

2020-06-03_064507.jpg.806d7ea797dfb3408e6270efcd3f13dc.jpg

 

Without Hollywood the globe earth would deflate.

 

2020-06-03_060443.jpg.8aacf4160b4b6e036c9fee5a83b195ea.jpg

 

Trillions spent exploring space over 60 years by several countries and still no picture of a ball earth besides these CG fakes. Not even good fakes:

 

2020-06-02_031948.jpg.68828d5e5b5bf0e90f1021611b7272b0.jpg

 

2020-06-03_065116.jpg.3ffe07de04289f8a029716467f63ead1.jpg

 

 

What's all this load of Ball S**t :classic_biggrin:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, MrA said:

 

Whatever 

 

You are doing a MASSIVE dis service to any truth movement 

 

You.might as well be sat in here trying to tell us you can carry God around in a Box 

 

 

What the fuck happened to you Mr A?

 

Why does this upset you so much?

 

And how is asking people to look into it for themselves a disservice? Actually it's the other way round by telling them not to bother you encourage sheephood.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, alexa said:

 Either that or her mission has been accomplished :classic_wink:

I suppose after they'd scared a lot of people off they thought that no-one would bother with this.

 

I'm glad we're able to discuss it here as, as I understand it DI has not realised FE yet.

 

"Reserve your right to think, for even to think wrongly is better than not to think at all."

Hypatia

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Nobby Noboddy said:

I suppose after they'd scared a lot of people off they thought that no-one would bother with this.

 The truth will never stay hidden for long, I think Jesus said this ?? Yes he did here;

 

Luke 12-2

For there is nothing covered, that shall not be revealed; neither hid, that shall not be known.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Avoiceinthecrowd said:

2020-06-02_082018.jpg.69656871b975429bf843b464202c0f68.jpg

 

Not a soul has ever travelled those red lines. If they could it would drastically shorten certain air routes. Like Brazil to Australia for example.

 

They darn't, they know it would be game over and the truth would be out........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the record, and speaking for myself, I believe the reports that Byrd,s aircrafts slamming into a dome or that Byrd discovered where our flat plane meets a dome are contradictory because he spoke of a landmass the size of the USA that he discovered after trekking the ice flats for thousands of miles. 

 

2020-06-02_073106.jpg.774ac2266e10c6066b0a36c339e3fb07.jpg

 

If such a dome exists, and I suspect it does, it covers far more area than normally estimated in dome illustrations.

Edited by Avoiceinthecrowd
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2020-06-02_031541.jpg.5704e47747e8be8d5dee43ce3bed2c17.jpg

 

The stories of the last Byrd expedition to Antarctica ending badly and prematurely with saucers coming out of the water and inflicting casualties are not credible. Byrd did not appear rattled or scared when he spoke on Chilean radio or appeared on the Longines tv show.

 

2020-06-03_035633.jpg.b5793b00925acde4b05ccbb513983628.jpg

 

Byrd and his superior both passed away soon after. Staged deaths to conceal their permanent departure to this newly discovered world? Who knows?

Edited by Avoiceinthecrowd
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2020-06-02_073106.jpg.319403ca48b539f1a81e792171fca524.jpg

 

In passing there are 33 land masses beyond the ice wall in this supposed 1000 year old Buddhist map alledgedly found by the brother of a well known Hawaiian physician and surgeon of the early 1900s called Dr. Kobayashi.

 

Where do I keep hearing this 33 number all the time? Is it not a sacred number for Masons?

Edited by Avoiceinthecrowd
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Avoiceinthecrowd said:

If such a dome exists, and I suspect it does, it covers far more area than normally estimated in dome illustrations.

 

You should watch this vid, it's Martin Kenny,  with his model of the flat earths extension's (fascinating stuff).

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, chocomel said:

If this is true.... UK was a part of North America long time ago.

It seems like all the continents were bunched up in one side so probably earth span in a funny lopsided way? :classic_blink:

 

Paleogeographic history of plate tectonics

https://apl.esri.com/jg/PaleoMap/index.html

don't know but there alledgedly used to be a land bridge between the UK and Europe, doggerland I think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, MrA said:

 

Whatever 

 

You are doing a MASSIVE dis service to any truth movement 

 

You.might as well be sat in here trying to tell us you can carry God around in a Box 

 

 

 

11 hours ago, Nobby Noboddy said:

What the fuck happened to you Mr A?

 

Why does this upset you so much?

I was hoping he would respond as his comment was directed at me... like I have ever made this discussion a matter of religious belief... sure. I was asking him simply to go experiment for himself and to post his results here. I explained that him simply proving that a geometric horizon exists would end this whole thing. But I also warned him that researchers all over our world have already proved the exact opposite. That we have proved that the horizon is a vanishing point based on perspective and atmospheric conditions and that the horizons we are seeing all over the world are several miles past where they would need to be if we lived on one of the freemason's balls.

 

Now, not to put words in his mouth, but I know what happens here. It is known as cognitive dissonance. It is basically a defense mechanism for people who simply cannot handle the implications of the information they are presented with. In their minds, it is so shattering to their world view, that they simply shut off and lose all ability to think rationally.

 

12 hours ago, Nobby Noboddy said:

And how is asking people to look into it for themselves a disservice? Actually it's the other way round by telling them not to bother you encourage sheephood.

Exactly! I have been explaining as well that:

Flat earthers encourage everyone to do their own research (as I just did again above). The freemason morons pushing their fully debunked heliocentric idiocy are the ones that tell you to just trust them. They never encourage you to go measure the earth for yourself. Never!

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, chocomel said:

If this is true.... UK was a part of North America long time ago.

It seems like all the continents were bunched up in one side so probably earth span in a funny lopsided way? :classic_blink:

  

No, they don't fit unless you put them on a smaller globe.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hopefully some of you are out there conducting your experiments measuring our Earth.

 

For those still simply believing in the freemason's heliocentric, fairy tales, please consider:

DTAIkxuVoAAtdLY.jpg

and:

synchronized-moon-shot.gif?resize=480,30

 

For anyone who doesn't understand the implications of the above, I suggest downloading Celestia and trying to figure it out on your own.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bflat said:

For those still simply believing in the freemason's heliocentric, fairy tales, please consider:

 

This test isn't useful, the moon will appear upside down from the opposite hemisphere regardless of whether the earth is flat or spherical. A useful test would be to compare the angular size of the moon on the horizon and and compare it to it's angular size when it is overhead.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, theo102 said:

This test isn't useful, the moon will appear upside down from the opposite hemisphere regardless of whether the earth is flat or spherical. A useful test would be to compare the angular size of the moon on the horizon and and compare it to it's angular size when it is overhead.

 

Read the post you quoted. This has nothing to do at all whatsoever with the moon appearing "upside down."

 

LOL, man

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Grumpy Owl changed the title to The Flat Earth Thread: The reality of our physical plane (v2)
  • Grumpy Owl locked, unlocked and locked this topic
  • Grumpy Owl unlocked this topic
  • Grumpy Owl locked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...