Jump to content

The Flat Earth Thread: The reality of our physical plane (v2)


bflat
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, MrA said:

Well done bflat 

 

Excellent fucking research 

Thank-you! But I encourage you to do your own research. For under 500 dollars you can actually test this yourself. You can actually do it for even less with decent binoculars. If you can prove to yourself that the geometric horizon is actually a physical barrier, then hats off to you. Post your evidence. End this. And stop being distracted by your religious beliefs.

 

Flat earthers encourage everyone to do their own research. The freemason morons pushing their fully debunked heliocentric idiocy are the one that tell you to just trust them. They never encourage you to go measure the earth for yourself. Never!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, bflat said:

Thank-you! But I encourage you to do your own research. For under 500 dollars you can actually test this yourself. You can actually do it for even less with decent binoculars. If you can prove to yourself that the geometric horizon is actually a physical barrier, then hats off to you. Post your evidence. End this. And stop being distracted by your religious beliefs.

 

Flat earthers encourage everyone to do their own research. The freemason morons pushing their fully debunked heliocentric idiocy are the one that tell you to just trust them. They never encourage you to go measure the earth for yourself. Never!

 

Whatever 

 

You are doing a MASSIVE dis service to any truth movement 

 

You.might as well be sat in here trying to tell us you can carry God around in a Box 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

614904230_biblicalcosmo.png.4e6bac831f6200e0a3e8ff50a007beac.png.c8ac96d84df9835f1c8eaa4e6edda980.png

 

 

That is your model of flat Earth 

 

Now think about this 

 

Which civilizations have been most determined to find the nature of the surface of this Earth ? 

 

Land locked civilizations or sea faring civilizations ? 

 

The answer is sea faring civilizations 

 

And the Hebrews were never a sea faring civilization until they started hitching a ride with others ! 

 

oh but Noahs Ark !!!! 

 

FANTASY LAND BECAUSE THATS ANOTHER.STORY THE PARASITIC BASTARDS LIFTED FROM.EARLIER ACCOUNTS 

 

 

Edited by MrA
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MrA said:

614904230_biblicalcosmo.png.4e6bac831f6200e0a3e8ff50a007beac.png.c8ac96d84df9835f1c8eaa4e6edda980.png

 

 

That is your model of flat Earth 

 

Now think about this 

 

Which civilizations have been most determined to find the nature of the surface of this Earth ? 

 

Land locked civilizations or sea faring civilizations ? 

 

The answer is sea faring civilizations 

 

And the Hebrews were never a sea faring civilization until they started hitching a ride with others ! 

 

oh but Noahs Ark !!!! 

 

FANTASY LAND BECAUSE THATS ANOTHER.STORY THE PARASITIC BASTARDS LIFTED FROM.EARLIER ACCOUNTS 

 

 

I don't understand why your religious beliefs take precedence over actually experimenting and producing empirical evidence.

 

And ftr, it was not only the ancient Hebrews who knew the earth was stationary. If you take the time to look at actual history from the point of view of the actual cultures around our world, you would realize that they all knew!

 

5dc6141bced33a1252df7a2f88ac5285.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MrA said:

And the Hebrews were never a sea faring civilization

No the Hebrews were more than a sea faring civilization, thousands managed to cross the Red Sea on flat land.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Peter has done most of the work on this but  still...

Back to Polaris.

bflat: you made me do some maths.

So, the orbit of the earth around the sun has a diameter of 186 million miles or so.

Polaris is about 447 light years away.

Now, think of Polaris is directly above the sun, it isn't but some astronomical ephemeris will tell you exactly where you need to look.

What our simplified model gives us is a cone.

A cone with a base diameter of 186 million miles and a height of 447 light years.

When you do the geometry you get a very very pointy cone with an angle between its' sides of 0.0406 degrees.

 

No matter which side of the sun the earth is , at night time I look up and North to find Polaris.

It is never 'in the opposite direction'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, gregory-peccary said:

Peter has done most of the work on this but  still...

Back to Polaris.

bflat: you made me do some maths.

So, the orbit of the earth around the sun has a diameter of 186 million miles or so.

Polaris is about 447 light years away.

Now, think of Polaris is directly above the sun, it isn't but some astronomical ephemeris will tell you exactly where you need to look.

What our simplified model gives us is a cone.

A cone with a base diameter of 186 million miles and a height of 447 light years.

When you do the geometry you get a very very pointy cone with an angle between its' sides of 0.0406 degrees.

 

No matter which side of the sun the earth is , at night time I look up and North to find Polaris.

It is never 'in the opposite direction'.

 

None of that matters 

 

Its all freemasonic wizardry 

 

This is the only truth 

 

614904230_biblicalcosmo.png.4e6bac831f6200e0a3e8ff50a007beac.png.b642bcf9a2c9b7b3769301a26b56c0a8.png

 

See ? 

 

Two.pillars holding up the sky mate 

 

End of discussion 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, gregory-peccary said:

Ah well, wrong again. I suppose the flat earth is why we don't get the problems measuring longitude that you would get if we lived on a sphere.

 

Dont give them headaches 

 

Just admit that God can live inside a box and be a good goy

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, gregory-peccary said:

Peter has done most of the work on this but  still...

Back to Polaris.

bflat: you made me do some maths.

So, the orbit of the earth around the sun has a diameter of 186 million miles or so.

Polaris is about 447 light years away.

Now, think of Polaris is directly above the sun, it isn't but some astronomical ephemeris will tell you exactly where you need to look.

What our simplified model gives us is a cone.

A cone with a base diameter of 186 million miles and a height of 447 light years.

When you do the geometry you get a very very pointy cone with an angle between its' sides of 0.0406 degrees.

 

No matter which side of the sun the earth is , at night time I look up and North to find Polaris.

It is never 'in the opposite direction'.

Sorry, gp, but there are WAY to many assumptions to even begin here. If you honestly think that any of your numbers are correct you will need proof. Proving distances in light years is impossible and to make it really as simple as possible for you, please prove that the earth has moved an inch since creation. You could end this all.

 

But again, if you care I encourage you to do your own research. For under 500 dollars you can actually test for yourself whether or not the horizon is a physical barrier. You can do it for even less with decent binoculars. If you can prove to yourself that the geometric horizon exists and is actually a physical barrier, then hats off to you. Post your evidence. End this. And stop being distracted by objects you are told to believe are light years away, lol, man.

 

Flat earthers encourage everyone to do their own research. The freemason morons pushing their fully debunked heliocentric idiocy are the one that tell you to just trust them. They never encourage you to go measure the earth for yourself. Never!

 

They do encourage you to come up with every red herring possible to keep you distracted, but never do they encourage you to do your own experiments like I have and so many others across our world.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, bflat said:

Thanks for taking the time to respond, but you clearly do not understand the problem.

 

 

Well Mr flat , I do understand the problem ,however  the main  problem as I see it is all in the interpretation and differing beliefs  , if I am correct (and I think I am) that makes your interpretation incorrect and visa versa, therefore no amount of logical or illogical ( depending on which side of the fence your from) debate is going to change either of our positions on the subject, going round and round eventually makes you dizzy and you fall over

So I would like to say it has been fun but we will just have to agree to disagree and leave it at that.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, peter said:

Well Mr flat , I do understand the problem ,however  the main  problem as I see it is all in the interpretation and differing beliefs  , if I am correct (and I think I am) that makes your interpretation incorrect and visa versa, therefore no amount of logical or illogical ( depending on which side of the fence your from) debate is going to change either of our positions on the subject, going round and round eventually makes you dizzy and you fall over

So I would like to say it has been fun but we will just have to agree to disagree and leave it at that.

 

I would say that's your best post yet.

 

And as I told the others, go experiment for yourself. We have the technology. If you can prove there to be a geometric horizon, post that evidence here and we can end this.

 

But don't forget there are videos now all over the internet that prove just the opposite.

 

Real truthers do real research.

 

25 minutes ago, alexa said:

 

6833-globe-earth-splash-water-artistic-hd-wallpaper-free-photo.jpg.32f2bd61e63615411b1a2502558d675d.jpg

 

Here's another pic to get your head A-ROUND Mr A :classic_laugh:

 

LOL at water sticking to a spinning ball. The things people believe... just weird.

 

0802a54ddf258174cdcc0158b1a579eb--true-n

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clever people here have collated the world's  weather data for a full year (2018) and projected it like an unrolled biblical scroll to fit the flat screen.

 

Alert !   The commentary includes  trigger words such as globe and hemisphere.

 

 

 

 

Edited by serpentine
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every country in the world has flag which represents in one way or the other the values and traditions of those nations. They are symbolic.

 

Only one of these flags has the outline of the landmass it represents drawn on it's face. Antarctica.

 

2020-06-02_073517.jpg.46c59c12677b62d547a140ea098a5b04.jpg

 

Besides its physical outline seems this place has no ideology or symbolism besides a need to anchor the shape into our minds.

 

If I was asked to redesign this flag to be more symbolic of its attributes I would propose this design:

 

2020-06-03_063300.jpg.e137e0390491fe80d487ad4a6e635094.jpg

Edited by Avoiceinthecrowd
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In order to travel to Antarctica you must submit the details of your expedition for approval. 

 

The US Dept of State's Advance Notification Form DS-4131 has to be a world record of convoluted regulations and bureaucratic scrutiny. 

 

It has been estimated that the cost of litigation just to comply with regulations is nearly 2 million dollars. Then, after spending this small fortune your application can be denied by any one of an army of bureacrats not to mention the veto rights of those signatories to the Antarctic Treaty that hold territorial claims.

 

In other words:

 

2020-06-02_072241.jpg.98ce3b9fcbedc61586af2aca657ce78a.jpg

 

Section 39 of the application requires you explain the purpose of your expedition:

 

2020-06-02_074913.jpg.d67ba1d74586f4836587650a56b7ca42.jpg

 

2020-06-02_075023.jpg.e1a11813082fdf28d663229537d1dd96.jpg

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Grumpy Owl changed the title to The Flat Earth Thread: The reality of our physical plane (v2)
  • Grumpy Owl locked, unlocked and locked this topic
  • Grumpy Owl unlocked this topic
  • Grumpy Owl locked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...