Jump to content

The Flat Earth Thread: The reality of our physical plane (v2)


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

The “Nature of Reality” forum was recently hosting a thread where heated discussion was taking place regarding our plane, “a flat, nonrotating Earth” as nasa themselves reference multiple times in mul

I dont think that flat earth is a thing. But either way - why does the shape of the world matter? If its a flat sphere or a globe - there is no difference for us in our daily lifes, is it?

Posted Images

53 minutes ago, Forsaken Bankzy said:


Hard to say but from my own observation i would say half and half. though, I've seen a lot of flat earthers speak of a creator but not of the 3 main monolithic faiths. 

Many paths to the center of the circle as the gnostics said

Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
19 minutes ago, screamingeagle said:

it is a quote from a russian(i think) scientist

 

from the book "who built the moon"

 

One of the authors also wrote The Hiram Key 

 

Masons apparently 

 

*edit* should say Freemasons **

Edited by MrA
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok so this is where my own conjecture that gravity is real will trip me up

 

Because the Moon is apparently far too big to get caught in Earths gravitational pull 

 

Its also.difficult to explain why it is all ways facing the same way as it orbits Earth 

 

So yes theres my honest experience with cognitive dissonence and gravity 

 

I still believe in it because of other evidence even when I find out the Moon has disqualified itself from the proof , yet its still there 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Forsaken Bankzy said:

NASA fakery would debunk the heliocentric model in itself though?

 

there was a fella yonks back who, investigating 9/11 , (i think it was Simon 'september clues' shack) phoned up an intelligence big whig and stated to the big whig "the video footage was fake therefore there were no planes"

the big whig replied "well if the footage was fake, you aint got evidence of anything"

 

same with Nasa fakery, doesnt negate the moon landing, just leaves a void between personal experiences.

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, oddsnsods said:

 

Babylonian Ishtar moon goddess sex magic! :classic_tongue:

 

Flat Earthers believe they have sex with the moon ? 

 

This is just too much for one day I will have to try again tomorrow

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Avoiceinthecrowd said:

 

No closeups or still shots. Just CG. 

 

 

They are mostly small objects travelling at high speed  when entering the Earth's atmosphere. 

 

Any system currently capable of a getting a close up wouldn't be able to track such a thing.

 

There is this however....

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

In the 16th and 17th centuries shooting stars (meteorites) were a religious issue.

Protestants didn't believe in meteorites. They thought they were just made up stores by farmers and peasants.

Catholics did believe in meteorites (and alexa will like this!) because the only place rocks could fall from was the Heavenly City in the sky.

And that is the exact same reason why Protestants didn't believe in them!

 

Then one day sometime in the middle of the 17th century (or maybe the18th) two respectable gentleman were out walking and saw a meteorite land with their own eyes.

From then on meteorites falling to earth was accepted as true by the establishment.

 

They still fall to the earth, and they are still from 'up there', but from the solar system or the Heavenly City?

Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, gregory-peccary said:

They still fall to the earth, and they are still from 'up there', but from the solar system or the Heavenly City?

 

So Gods throwing rocks down on us? Hmmm :classic_biggrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/16/2020 at 3:35 PM, rideforever said:

When I stand at the beach the horizon looks slightly curved to me, also the heavenly bodies look round, and boats seem to descend below the horizon.

Another thing is that on some days I can see the waves on the horizon, meaning I can see the crest and troughs on the horizon.

My eyesight is pretty good for long distance.

 

Those boats are not descending below the horizon.  They're falling off the edge of the flat earth and floating out into space.  I thought everyone knew this already.

 

I myself travelled "around" the world on a 600' ship.  I guess I must be part of the disinformation campaign spreading lies and such.  Or maybe I was so confused I didn't realize I was going around in circles on a giant flat lake.

 

Here's a simple truth that the flat-earthers can't seem to understand.  When you climb higher, you can actually see farther.  That's not because the world is flat, it's because that's how basic 9th grade Geometry works.

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
42 minutes ago, motleyhoo said:

 

Those boats are not descending below the horizon.  They're falling off the edge of the flat earth and floating out into space.  I thought everyone knew this already.

 

I myself travelled "around" the world on a 600' ship.  I guess I must be part of the disinformation campaign spreading lies and such.  Or maybe I was so confused I didn't realize I was going around in circles on a giant flat lake.

 

Here's a simple truth that the flat-earthers can't seem to understand.  When you climb higher, you can actually see farther.  That's not because the world is flat, it's because that's how basic 9th grade Geometry works.

 

 

At Mecca there used to be 360 stone idols in a circle before they were destroyed one by one 

 

Which might mean nothing at first glance but theres also 360 degrees in a circle 

 

My point is even 1500 years ago ignorance won the day and knowledge went to shit as a result 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by MrA
Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, gregory-peccary said:

Heavens no!

Some pope is staggering back home after drinking far too much wine with St Paul and knocks a rock over the edge.

 You know, this pope has a lot to answer for ?:classic_biggrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

@Avoiceinthecrowdand @alexa

Thanks so much for keeping truth alive. Both of you deserve much credit... especially for your patience. I know it can be frustrating answering the same questions again and again... especially when you are forced into discussing pro wrestling like it is real.

 

@All y'all who have been reading along, but not posting (there are many of you).

 

Are any of you the least bit concerned that this thread is now 12 pages long, has been read thousands of times, and not once has anyone even attempted to dispute even one of my five points I listed in the OP?

 

In my mind, this alone should have bells going off.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, MrA said:

Flat bells or round bells ? 

You have been on here having all your questions handled for pages now and still have not come close to responding to the OP.

 

Here are the five simple points:

1) Impossible horizons

2) Natural physics of water

3) Natural gas law

main-qimg-ee1fb0a6f4e101d514714cb518daab

4) Emergency landings prove pilots use a flat earth map and they have never used a globe

5) Not only pilot manuals, but nasa's own technical documents repeatedly reference a stationary flat earth!

Link to post
Share on other sites

why can Polaris not be seen by anybody living in the southern hemisphere ? 

 

Apparently the Earth is so flat and level you can see Canada from Mexico if you are in a plane on a clear day ? ( according to the OP )

 

So why cant people all.over the world see Polaris ( the North star ) 

 

Surely on a flat and level plane , everyone on Earth should see Polaris no problem 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have as many questions as you do bflat

 

Except I want to know the vanishing point of light on a flat level.disc 60,000 miles in circumference 

Link to post
Share on other sites

@bflat why dont we try and crowdfund enough money to send a balloon with a go pro in to the sky so we can see for ourselves whats going on ? 

 

I mean if I was rich enough I would fund a trip to the ice wall itself 

 

It doesnt seem that hard to find considering its surrounding us completely 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

@MrA

A red herring is something that misleads or distracts from a relevant or important question....

... the red herring falls into a broad class of relevance fallacies....

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_herring

 

All your "concerns" can be easily understood with some very basic research, but again all this is simply distracting you from the five simple points.

 

Hit my points first and then anything you can't google for yourself I will help you with.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Grumpy Owl changed the title to The Flat Earth Thread: The reality of our physical plane (v2)
  • Grumpy Owl locked, unlocked and locked this topic
  • Grumpy Owl unlocked this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...