Jump to content

The Flat Earth Thread: The reality of our physical plane (v2)


bflat
 Share

Recommended Posts

Now, look at what happens with all your math when input it into a computer. Pay special attention at 1 mile, 5 miles, 10 miles and 20 miles.

1 mile is at 2:09

5 miles is at 2:11

10 miles is at 2:12

20 miles is at 2:15

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ig9YOyei_hc

 

Why do many of my links not post correctly?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, amy G said:

Ok, that is just pure denial. You have been provided with more academic links then anyone should require.

 

The angle at sea level and pretty much every angle up to the top of large buildings is not discernible to the human eye. As stated on the original bloody post! It looks level with the horizon on a globe and on a flat earth.

 

And dude, don't you dare quote your "appeal to authority" when 

 

a) you ignore a million things from authority way better qualified than you

b) your "authority" was a drawing website.

 

I don't require ANY academic links to know that the horizon MUST always be below eye level. Put the bong down.

 

1 minute ago, amy G said:

Cool, perspective  plays no role and you learned how to use an online calculator.

 

That is correct and it is irrelevant whether I save time with something you don't understand. You ignore its use every time it is quoted, with nothing but bloviating and arm waving.

 

1 minute ago, amy G said:

Now, is this angle discernible?

 

Are you frickin' blind????

  

2 hours ago, Comedy Time said:

Angle theta is 0.217 degree. THAT is how far down the eye needs to look to see the horizon. Nobody has the capacity to discern a difference between that angle and level.

 

Angle theta is 0.28 degrees. Again THAT is how far down the eye needs to look to see the horizon. Nobody has the capacity to discern a difference between that angle and level.

 

 

Angle theta is 2.8 degrees. THAT is how far down the eye needs to look to see the horizon. Is it possible for somebody to know they are looking down at just under 3 degrees of arc? Doubtful but totally irrelevant anyway - that is exactly what should and does occur on both models!!

 

1 minute ago, amy G said:

Sorry for the bold, enlarged text, but for some reason it seems to get through to you better.

 

Nothing gets through to you. I have never come across such wilful ignorance on this forum or the other.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, amy G said:

Now, look at what happens with all your math when input it into a computer. Pay special attention at 1 mile, 5 miles, 10 miles and 20 miles.

1 mile is at 2:09

5 miles is at 2:11

10 miles is at 2:12

20 miles is at 2:15

 

All perfectly fine by me. I paid attention:classic_rolleyes:

 

10 minutes ago, amy G said:

 

Spam-o-vid. I am actually wondering whether you think that because the camera tilts down or the image is moved up you think this somehow means something? Or maybe it confuses you that the camera looks straight at the horizon, therefore it cannot be a downward angle to do so???

 

There was this thing on JREF many years ago for really dumb statements - it was called a Stundie - if you genuinely think what I just surmised, then your claim would be a worthy candidaterabugento1.gif

 

10 minutes ago, amy G said:

Why do many of my links not post correctly?

 

Even the forum software is trying to stop you posting horseshit. Cut and paste it into a browser - then recopy it.

Edited by Comedy Time
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For anyone whos new to how Amy G operates...this is a typical post.

 

Infinite troll Amy G is a typical narcissist spiralling out every day on here.

 

Posts videos like this as irrefutable proof & of course denies gravity actually exists...its all density.😉

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, oddsnsods said:

Posts videos like this as irrefutable proof & of course denies gravity actually exists...its all density.😉

 

 

@amy G 

 

Brilliant spot - didn't occur to me. The density is still the same but they're floating.

 

Cue bloviating and arm flailing response from him?

Edited by Comedy Time
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nobby Noboddy said:

 

Corresponding altitudes would have been helpful at the pauses but maybe that was just an oversight.

 

Err no. It is continuous footage and the plane is at cruising altitude pretty much the whole time. It is a piffling side issue that puts that "horizon always comes up" bullshit in its place. It's irrelevant in the extreme.

 

Are you a fence sitter or something? The Sun - above eye level drops below it and disappears full size. Just that - flat earth kicked in the gonads with a size 20 Doc Marten.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Comedy Time said:

 

Err no. It is continuous footage and the plane is at cruising altitude pretty much the whole time. It is a piffling side issue that puts that "horizon always comes up" bullshit in its place. It's irrelevant in the extreme.

 

Are you a fence sitter or something? The Sun - above eye level drops below it and disappears full size. Just that - flat earth kicked in the gonads with a size 20 Doc Marten.

 

Err yes, it would have verified the footage better. I have seen plenty of other continuous flight vids.

 

It isn't piffling or irrelevant to want more data.

 

I understand (and experience) it as 'the horizon is always at eye level'.

 

I'm not a fence sitter, that's cowardice. I believe for simple reasons that we're not on a crazy spinning ball hurtling at great speed... etc. etc..

 

You're not particularly articulate are you, why do you constantly use insulting language? It's like dealing with a teenager.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Nobby Noboddy said:

Err yes, it would have verified the footage better. I have seen plenty of other continuous flight vids.

 

How would it? It is at the same altitude the whole flight. 

 

2 minutes ago, Nobby Noboddy said:

It isn't piffling or irrelevant to want more data.

 

No, you misunderstand, the "issue" raised by the flat earthers is piffling and irrelevant. If you had been following this full line of exchange you would have seen why. How much more data do you want? 

 

2 minutes ago, Nobby Noboddy said:

I understand (and experience) it as 'the horizon is always at eye level'.

 

Yes it is pretty much, but as I have shown it is expected and only a gentle look down to the horizon at altitude. It was a claim made as some colossal ahaaaa, when it is nothing of the sort.

2 minutes ago, Nobby Noboddy said:

I'm not a fence sitter, that's cowardice. I believe for simple reasons that we're not on a crazy spinning ball hurtling at great speed... etc. etc..

 

No it isn't, it's called considering options and nothing wrong with it.

 

What simple reasons do you have for doubting spinning and "hurtling"?

 

2 minutes ago, Nobby Noboddy said:

You're not particularly articulate are you, why do you constantly use insulting language? 

 

Yes I am, I am very articulate, way more than most on this forum. Perhaps you should go and review the meaning of the word.

 

2 minutes ago, Nobby Noboddy said:

why do you constantly use insulting language?

 

Huh? You find that insulting, you poor little thing. I'm so sorry, didn't want to hurt your feelings. 

 

2 minutes ago, Nobby Noboddy said:

It's like dealing with a teenager.

 

Try it from this side, it's like dealing with a large number of people who seem to have a very low collective intelligence, who are skilled at evasion and find ways to suck up nonsense in ways that amaze. Poetry.

 

On 9/27/2020 at 6:36 PM, Nobby Noboddy said:

Are you a complete idiot?

 

Dude, you started it.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Nobby Noboddy said:

Maaan I love space.....

 

https://youtu.be/mfHXRSGRbLQ

 

 

Nylon wires. You know why it looks so different to weightless footage? Because he has control of his movements the whole time. 

 

Now imagine how the hell they are going to rig those wires up for that 6 minutes of ISS footage I showed you. Your chief observation was her frickin' hair! She went here there and everywhere, round corners, through hatches, including enclosed spaces and the camera above her old position.

 

Edited by Comedy Time
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Comedy Time said:

 

How would it? It is at the same altitude the whole flight. 

 

 

No, you misunderstand, the "issue" raised by the flat earthers is piffling and irrelevant. If you had been following this full line of exchange you would have seen why. How much more data do you want? 

 

 

Yes it is pretty much, but as I have shown it is expected and only a gentle look down to the horizon at altitude. It was a claim made as some colossal ahaaaa, when it is nothing of the sort.

 

No it isn't, it's called considering options and nothing wrong with it.

 

What simple reasons do you have for doubting spinning and "hurtling"?

 

 

Yes I am, I am very articulate, way more than most on this forum. Perhaps you should go and review the meaning of the word.

 

 

Huh? You find that insulting, you poor little thing. I'm so sorry, didn't want to hurt your feelings. 

 

 

Try it from this side, it's like dealing with a large number of people who seem to have a very low collective intelligence, who are skilled at evasion and find ways to suck up nonsense in ways that amaze. Poetry.

 

 

Dude, you started it.

 

 

 

 

 

Now I know your measure. Don't do that again, you inserted a line that was not in the post.

 

How do you know it's at the same altitude?

mmmm... next line, you're misrepresenting what I alluded to. YOU said further evidence was irrelevant, not the 'issue'.

Fence sitting is the situation where you have all the information to consider but can't decide which side to land on.

I don't feel any movement whatsoever. There are no signs you might consider conclusive to show it and it has never been conclusively proven. I suspect you'll say it has of course been proved so please cite.

Ha ha ha, yes very. Quite modest too it seems.

I do find your language unnecessarily insulting. Personally I am no longer insulted (see above) you can call me anything you like, just don't call me late for dinner. You are the poor little thing here.

Actually you started it (although I'm not sure what 'it' is) and have proven me correct with your penultimate statement.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Nobby Noboddy said:

How do you know it's at the same altitude?

 

 

Because that's what planes do! They don't dive and climb all the time. You mentioned you hadn't been in a plane or something like that.

 

2 minutes ago, Nobby Noboddy said:

next line, you're misrepresenting what I alluded to. YOU said further evidence was irrelevant, not the 'issue'.

 

Oh FFS!! I am trying to clarify what you had a bloody problem with!

 

2 minutes ago, Nobby Noboddy said:

Fence sitting is the situation where you have all the information to consider but can't decide which side to land on.

 

No it isn't! 

  1. a person who remains neutral or uncommitted on an issue.
2 minutes ago, Nobby Noboddy said:

I don't feel any movement whatsoever. There are no signs you might consider conclusive to show it and it has never been conclusively proven. I suspect you'll say it has of course been proved so please cite.

 

You only notice acceleration. If you are in a plane on a train/ you notice changes in direction caused by turbulence/bumps and changes in speed. You do not notice steady motion.

 

The setting sun proves we a re spinning.

 

2 minutes ago, Nobby Noboddy said:

Ha ha ha, yes very. Quite modest too it seems.

 

 

Well you accused me of something that I am not. Defence often needs immodesty. Normally I wouldn't make much noise about how good or bad I am at anything.

 

2 minutes ago, Nobby Noboddy said:

I do find your language unnecessarily insulting.

 

The moderators do not. If you get insulted from the mildest of forum banter then you should catch me when the shackles are off. I would have called you a jolly old rotter by now.

 

2 minutes ago, Nobby Noboddy said:

You are the poor little thing here.

 

Ridiculous. You are turning a simple exchange into something it didn't need to be.

 

2 minutes ago, Nobby Noboddy said:

Actually you started it (although I'm not sure what 'it' is) and have proven me correct with your penultimate statement.

 

In response to......"It's like dealing with a teenager."   Dude, try to just belt up and debate. You are deliberately trying to wind me up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Nobby Noboddy said:

 

Remember this post?It was only 15 minutes ago.  I think you need a doctor what do you think mods?

clip.jpeg

 

 

Oh man, you don't know how to track where that "inserted line" came from do you.

YOU SAID THAT TO ME!!

Click the arrow in the top right corner to see where. 

 

I quoted you and I have every right to do so. You accused me of being insulting when I am not being insulting, whilst I showed an example of you using a direct insult at me.

Edited by Comedy Time
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, oddsnsods said:

Nob can dish it but cant take it.🤣🍿

 

 

Thanks snods, that's very helpful and constructive. I've noticed your insightful and intelligent input before.

 

I'm not going to engage much with CT any more, no point.

 

And if you can't see that what he did (inserting a previous comment of mine into a more recent post) was disingenuous then you are as small as they are

 

25 minutes ago, Comedy Time said:

 

 

Oh man, you don't know how to track where that "inserted line" came from do you.

YOU SAID THAT TO ME!!

Click the arrow in the top right corner to see where. 

 

I quoted you and I have every right to do so. You accused me of being insulting when I am not being insulting, whilst I showed an example of you using a direct insult at me.

 

You are insulting. Name calling is being insulting. Trying to belittle me for not being as tech-savvy as you is insulting. You really need help for your multitudinous problems. If you like I can recommend some self-help books although you'd probably prefer self-abuse books.

 

Or

 

You get paid to do this.

Edited by Nobby Noboddy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Nobby Noboddy said:

Thanks snods, that's very helpful and constructive. I've noticed your insightful and intelligent input before.

 

I'm not going to engage much with CT any more, no point.

 

And if you can't see that what he did (inserting a previous comment of mine into a more recent post) was disingenuous then you are as small as they are

 

Come on, he was just pointing out when you insulted him & you walked straight into it.

 

Yes, ive made a lot of input on this topic above, that gets ignored & the topic just gets filled with lame videos that dont really prove anything. Maybe you could answer some of my questions, like Satellites or GPS & onboard WIFI with credible explanations.

 

If you are going to keep changing the topic to space is fake or NASA, go Alexa's thread..

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Grumpy Owl changed the title to The Flat Earth Thread: The reality of our physical plane (v2)
  • Grumpy Owl locked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...